THE EFFECT OF SELF-DIRECTION ACTION ON IDENTIFICATION WITH SUPERVISOR AND AFFIRMATIVE COMMITMENT

Identification with supervisor and affirmative commitment are some of the emotional behaviors of employees. Self-direction action value is one of the ten basic values of Schwartz value classification. Self-direction action is related to autonomy of thought and represents the cognitive behaviors of employees. This research aims to demystify the effect of self-direction action on identification with supervisor and affirmative commitment. The importance of this study is to reveal the mechanism behind the relationship between cognitive and emotional behaviors. The research hypotheses put forward a negative relation between self-direction action and identification with supervisor and affirmative commitment. The hypotheses have been supported based on the results of the analyses. Self-Direction Action (SDA) has a negative effect on Identification with Supervisor (IDS) and on Affirmative Commitment (AFC).

KENDİNİ YÖNETME DAVRANIŞININ YÖNETİCİNİN DEĞERLERİNİN ÖZDEŞLEŞTİRİLMESİ VE DUYGUSAL BAĞLILIK ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Çalışanların yöneticinin değerlerini kabullenerek kendisi ile özdeşleştirmesi ve duygusal bağlılık, çalışanların duygusal davranışlarından bazılarıdır. Kendini yönetme davranışı, Schwartz tarafından oluşturulan sınıflamada yer alan on değerden birini oluşturmaktadır. Kendini yönetme davranışı, bağımsız düşünce biçimi ile ilgilidir ve çalışanların bilişsel davranışlarını temsil eder. Bu çalışmanın amacı, kendini yönetme davranışının yöneticiye bağlılığın bir boyutu olan yöneticinin değerlerinin özdeşleştirilmesi ve duygusal bağlılık üzerine etkisini açıklamaya yardımcı olmaktır. Bu çalışmanın önemi, bilişsel ve duygusal davranışlar arasındaki ilişkinin mekanizmasını açıklığa kavuşturmaktır. Araştırmada kendini yönetme davranışı ile yöneticinin değerlerinin özdeşleştirilmesi ve duygusal bağlılık arasında negatif yönlü bir ilişki olacağı düşünülmüş ve hipotezler bu şekilde ileri sürülmüştür. Analiz sonuçlarına göre, oluşturulan hipotezler desteklenmiştir. Kendini yönetme davranışı ile yöneticinin değerlerinin özdeşleştirilmesi ve duygusal bağlılık arasında negatif yönlü bir ilişki ortaya çıkmıştır.

PDF

___

Akgün, A. e., Ince, H., Imamoğlu, S., Keskin, H., & Kocoğlu, I. (2014). The mediator role of learning capability and business innovativeness between total quality management and financial performance. International Journal of Production Research, 52(3), 888-901.

Allen, Natalie J. and John P. Meyer. (1990). “The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment To The Organization”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18

Allen, Natalie J. and John P. Meyer. (1996). “Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization: An Examination of Construct Validity”, Journal Of Vocational Behavior 49, 252-276

Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural Equation Modelling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin.

Ashkanasy, N. M., Wilderom, C. P. & Peterson, M. F. (2010). The handbook of organizational culture and climate Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781483307961

Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1990). Assessing Method Variance in Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices: The Case of Self-Reported Affect and Perceptions at Work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 547-560.

Becker, Thomas E. Robert S. Billings; Daniel M. Eveleth; Nicole L. Gilbert (1996). “Foci and Bases of Employee Commitment: Implications for Job Performance” The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 2., pp. 464-482.

Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Chen, Zhen Xiong, Anne S. Tsui and Jiing-Lih Farh. (2002).“Loyalty to Supervisor vs. Organizational Commitment: Relationships to Employee Performance in China”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 339-354

Civelek, M. (2018). Comparison of Covariance-Based and Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modeling Methods under Non-Normal Distribution and Small Sample Size Limitations. Eurasian Econometrics, Statistics & Empirical Economics Journal, 10, 39-50.

Civelek, M. (2018). Essentials of Structural Equation Modeling. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Lincoln-Zea Books.

De Castro, Marcela Lage Monteiro, Mário Teixeira Reis Neto, Cláudia Aparecida Avelar Ferreira, Jorge Filipe da Silva Gomes.(2016), " Values, motivation, commitment, performance and rewards: analysis model", Business Process Management Journal Vol. 22 No. 6, pp. 1139-1169

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

Gürsoy, Doğan, Thomas A. Maier and Christina G. Chi. (2008).“Generational Differences: An Examination Of Work Values And Generational Gaps İn The Hospitality Workforce”, International Journal of Hospitality Management 27, 2008, 448-458

Meyer, John P., Lynne Herscowitch. (2001). “Commitment in the Workplace Towards a General Model”, Human Resource Management Review 11, 299-326

Morrow, P.C. ve McElroy, J.C. (1986) “Research Notes on Assessing Measures of Work Commitment”, Journal of Vocational Behaviors,Vol.7,139-145

Petroulas, Emma, David Brown & Heidi Sundin. (2010). “Generational Characteristics and Their Impact on Preference for Management Control Systems", Australian Accounting Review No. 54 Vol. 20 Issue 3, 221-240

O'Reilly, Charles III and Jennifer Chatman. (1986). “Organizational Commitment and Psychological Attachment: The Effects of Compliance, Identification, and Internalization on Prosocial Behavior”, Journal of Applied Psychology Vol. 71, No. 3, 492-499

Schwartz, Shalom H.W. B. (1987). Toward A Universal Psychological Structure of Human Values. Journal of ftnonality and Social Psychology, Viol. 53, No. 3, 550-562.

Schwartz, S.H., (!992). “Universals In The Content And Structure Of Values: Theoritical Advances And Emperical Tests In 20 Countries”, In Advances In Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, London, Volume 25, 1-65

Schwartz, Shalom & Cieciuch, Jan & Vecchione, Michele & Davidov, Eldad & Fischer, Ronald & Beierlein, Constanze & Ramos, Alice & Verkasalo, Markku & Lönnqvist, Jan-Erik & Demirutku, Kursad & dirilen-gumus, Ozlem & Konty, Mark. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 103. 663-88