Investigation of Anatomical, Ecological and Trichome Morphological Features of Two Endemic Symphytum Species
Investigation of Anatomical, Ecological and Trichome Morphological Features of Two Endemic Symphytum Species
In this study, anatomical, ecological and trichome morphology features of Symphytum bornmuelleri andSymphytum aintabicum were compared and identified their valuable features taxonomically. S. bornmuelleri andS. aintabicum are endemic Euxine and East Mediterranean element of Turkey respectively, and have limiteddistribution. Anatomical investigations of species were made using light and stereo-microscopes. In anatomicalinvestigaions, the cross-sections were taken from root, stem and leaves of species, and the surface-sections weretaken from upper and lower surfaces of leaves. S. bornmuelleri and S. aintabicum have bifacial leaves in terms ofmesophyll structure. Stomata were observed on both upper and lower surfaces of the leaves. Stomata areanomocytic type in S. bornmuelleri, while stomata were anomocytic and anisocytic types in S. aintabicum. Straightand hooked eglandular trichomes in different sizes and capitate glandular trichomes with different number of stalkcells and head part were seen on vegetative and generative organs. The number of layers of collenchyma andparenchyma in the stem cortex, the number of layer of sclerenchyma between the vascular bundles, the status ofthe vascular bundles, the arrangement of collenchyma and paranchyma layers in stem cortex, the density ofmicropapilla in the cuticle, the density of papillae in the epiderma, stoma index, stoma types, the margin structureof epiderma cells and number of stalk cell and head structure of capitate trichomes were detected very valuable asdistinguishing anatomical characters. Soil samples were taken during flowering periods of these species and thephysical and chemical properties of soil samples were determined. The species depict a distribution on the soilcontaining clayey-loamy, loamy, saltless, slightly alkaline, medium degree calcareous, rich in organic matter,nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium.
___
- [1] Langsrom E., Chase M.W. 2002. Tribes of Boraginoideae (Boraginaceae) and placement of Antiphytum, Echiochilon, Orgastemma and Sericostoma: a phylogenetic analysis based on atpB plastid DNA sequence data. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 234: 137-153.
- [2] Hilger H.H., Selvi F., Papini A., Bigazzi M. 2004. Molecular systematics of Boraginaceae tribe Boragineae based on ITS1 and trnL sequences, with special reference to Anchusa s.l. Annales of Botany, 94: 201-212.
- [3] Retief E., Van Wyk A. 2008. The genus Wellstedia (Boraginaceae: Wellstedioideae) in Southern Africa. Bothalia, 38: 57-63.
- [4] Hacıoğlu T. B., Erik S. 2011. Phylogeny of Symphytum L. (Boraginaceae) with special emphasis on Turkish species. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10 (69): 15483-15493.
- [5] Tarıkahya B., Erik S. 2010.Taxonomy of Symphytum asperum Lepechin and S. sylvaticum Boiss. (Boraginaceae) based on Macro-and Micro-morphology. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry, 38 (1): 47-61.
- [6] Hacıoğlu B.T., Erik S. 2013. Revision of Symphytum (Boraginaceae) species growing in Turkey. The Herb Journal of Systematic Botany, 20 (1): 23-74.
- [7] Gürbüz A. 1980. The Medicinal Plants. Istanbul, 1-98.
- [8] Baytop T. 1984. Treatments with plants in Turkey. Istanbul University Publication, Istanbul, 1- 321.
- [9] Hiermann A., Writzel M. 1998. Antiphlogistic glycopeptide from the roots of Symphytum officinale.Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Letters, 8: 154-157.
- [10] Kurucu S., Kartal M., Choudary I.M., Topçu G. 2002. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids from Symphytum sylvaticum Boiss. subsp. sepulcrale (Boiss.& Bal.) Greuter & Burdet var. sepulcrale and Symphytum aintabicum Hub.-Mor. & Wickens. Turk Journal of Chemistry, 26: 195-199.
- [11] Rode D. 2002. Comfrey toxicity revisited. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 23 (11): 497-499.
- [12] Roman G.P., Neagu E., Moroeanu V., Radu G.L. 2008. Concentration of Symphytum officinale extracts with cytostatic activity by tangential flow ultrafiltration. Roumanian Biotechnological Letters, 13: 4008-4013.
- [13] Vogl S., Picker P., Mihaly-Bison J., Fakhrudin N., Atanasov A.G., Heiss E.H., Wawrosch C., Reznicek G., Dirsch V.M., Saukel J., Kopp B. 2013. Ethnopharmacological in vitro studies on Austria’s folk medicine-An unexplored lore in vitro anti-inflammatory activities of 71 Austrian traditional herbal drugs. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 149 (3): 750-771
- [14] Gomes M.F., Massoco O.C., Xavier J.G., Bonamin V.L. 2010. Comfrey (Symphytum officinale L.) and experimental hepatic carcinogenesis: A short carcinogenesis mosel study. Evidance Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 72 (2): 197-202.
- [15] Weiss R.F. 1991. Herbal Medicine. Beacons field Publishers Ltd., Beacons field-England, 334- 335.
- [16] Betz C.L, Hunsberger M., Wright S. 1994. Family Centered Nursing Care of Children. Second edition, WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, 703-724.
- [17] Frost R., Macpherson H., O'meara S. 2013. A critical scoping review of external uses of comfrey (Symphytum spp.). Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 21 (6): 724-745.
- [18] Alkan F.U., Anlas C., Üstüner O., Bakırel T., Sarı A.B. 2014. Antioxidant and proliferative effects of aqueous and ethanolic extracts of Symphytum officinale on 3T3 Swiss albino Mouse fibroblast cell line. Asian Journal of Plant Science and Research, 4 (4):62-68.
- [19] Kartal M., Kurucu S., Choudary I.M. 2001. Antifungal activities of different extracts and Echimidine-N-oxide from Symphytum sylvaticum Boiss. subsp. sepulcrale (Boiss.& Bal.) Greuter & Burdet var. sepulcrale. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 31: 487-492.
- [20] Talhouk R.S., Karam C., Fostok S., El-Jouni W., Barbour E.K. 2007. Antiinflammatory Bioactivities in Plant Extracts. Journal of Medicinal Food., 10: 1-10.
- [21] Neagu E., Paun G., Radu L.G. 2011. Phytochemical study of some Symphytum officinalis extracts concentrated by membranous procedures. UPB Scientetic Bulletin, Series B, 73 (3): 65-74.
- [22] Vostinaru O., Conea S., Mogosani C., Toma C.C., Borza C.C., Vlase L. 2018. Anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive effect of Symphytum officinale root. Romanian Biotechnological Letters, 23 (6): 14160-14167.
- [23] Bucknall C. 1913. A revision of the genus Symphytum. Journal of the Linnean Society of Botany, 41: 491-556.
- [24] Sandbrink J.M., Van Brederode J., Gadella T.W.J. 1990. Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Symphytum L. (Boraginaceae). Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetensc happen, 93 (3): 295-334.
- [25] Wickens G. 1978. Symphytum L. in Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Edited by Davis PH, Vol. 6, Edinburgh: Edinburg Univ Press, 378-386.
- [26] Çelebioğlu S., Baytop T. 1949. A new reagent for microscopical investigation of plant. Publication of the Institute of Pharmacognosy, İstanbul, 1-301.
- [27] Meidner H., Mansfield T.A. 1968. Physiology of Stomata. McGraw-Hill, London, 1-179.
- [28] Werker E., Putievsky E., Ravid U. 1985. The essential oils and glandular hairs in different chemotypes of Origanum vulgare L. Annals of Botany, 55: 793-801.
- [29] Tarıkahya B. 2010. The Revision of Turkish Symphytum L. (Boraginaceae) Genus. PhD thesis, Hacettepe University, Institute for the Graduate Studies in Science and Engineering, Ankara.
- [30] Kaçar B. 1996. Chemical analysis of plant and soil. Foundation of Education Research and Development Publication, 96-170.
- [31] Akçin A.T., Ulu Ş. 2007. A Morphological and Anatomical Study on Anchusa leptophylla Roemer & Schultes (Boraginaceae) Distributed in the Black Sea Region of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany, 31: 317-325.
- [32] Akçin A.T., Ulu Ş., Akçin A. 2010. Morphological, anatomical and numerical studies on some Anchusa L. (Boraginaceae) taxa from Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42 (4): 2231-2247.
- [33] Yousefi M. 2010. Morphological and Anatomical study of threatened endemic Heliocarya monandra Bge. (Boraginaceae) in Iran. Iranian Journal of Botany, 16 (2): 273-281.
- [34] Yeşil Y. 2017. Anatomical investigations of Nonea dumanii (Boraginaceae). Marmara Pharmaceutical Journal, 21 (4): 804-809.
- [35] Kandemir N., Çelik A., Shah N.S., Razzaq A. 2020. Comparative micro-anatomical and morphometric investigation of genus Heliotropium L. (Boraginaceae) found in Turkey. Flora, 262: 151495.
- [36] Hoyam O.A., Maha A.K. 2012. Leaf and stem anatomy of five species from the genus Heliotropium L. (Boraginaceae) in Sudan. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 4 (10): 4575-4581.
- [37] Kasem W.T. 2015. Anatomical and micromorphological studies on seven species of Heliotropium L. (Boraginaceae Juss.) in South West of Saudi Arabia. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 6: 1370-137.
- [38] Joubert A.M., Verhoeven R.L., Venter H.J.T. 1984. An anatomical investigation of the stem and leaf of the South African species of Lycium (Solanaceae). South African Journal of Botany, 3: 219-230.
- [39] Güven S., Beyazoğlu O., Makbul S., Türkmen Z., Kandemir A. 2013. Anatomical features of six Onosma L. (Boraginaceae) species from Turkey. Iranian Journal of Botany, 19 (1): 94-103.
- [40] Metcalfe C.R., Chalk L. 1979. Anatomy of Dicotyledones I. Oxford Sciences Publications, London, 1-288.
- [41] Özörgücü B., Gemici Y., Türkan I.1991. Comparative Plant Anatomy. Ege University Faculty of Science publication, İzmir, 1-127.
- [42] Dasti A.A., Bokhari T.Z., Malik S.A., Robina A. 2003. Epidermal morphology in some members of family Boraginaceae in Baluchestan. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 2 (1): 42-47.
- [43] Selvi F., Bigazzi M. 2001. Leaf surface and anatomy in Boraginaceae tribe Boragineae with respect to ecology and taxonomy. Flora, 196: 269-285.
- [44] Bigazzi M., Selvi F. 1998. Pollen morphology in the Boragineae Bercht. & J. Presl (Boraginaceae) in relation to the taxonomy of tribe. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 213: 121-151.
- [45] Akçin Ö.E., Kandemir N., Akçin Y. 2004. A morphological and anatomical study on a medicinal and edible Plant Trachystemon orientalis (L.) G. Don (Boraginaceae) in the Black Sea Region. Turkish Journal of Botany, 28: 435-442.
- [46] Metcalfe C.R., Chalk L. 1950. Anatomy of the Dicotyledons II, Oxford Clarendon Press, 806 pp. Oxford.
- [47] Navarro T., El Qualidi J. 2000. Trichome morphology in Teucrium L. (Labiatae), a taxonomic review, Anales del Jardin Botanica de Madrid, 57: 277-297.
- [48] Diane N., Jacob C., Hilger H.H. 2003. Leaf anatomy and foliar trichomes in Heliotropiaceae and their systematic relevance, Flora, 198: 468-485.
- [49] Xiang C-Lei., Dong Z-Hui., Peng H., Liu Z-Wen. 2010. Trichome micromorphology of the East Asiatic genus Chelonopsis (Lamiaceae) and its systematic implications, Flora, 205: 434-441. [50] Kandemir N., 2011. Trichomes on Salvia pomifera (Lamiaceae) in Turkey, Botanica Lithuanica 17 (1): 3-11.
- [51] Alwahibi M., Bukhary N. 2013. Anatomical study of four species of Heliotropium L. (Boraginaceae) from Saudi Arabia, African Journal of Plant Sciences, 7 (1): 35-42.