THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE SHARING AND NEGATIVE ATTITUDE AGAINST EMPLOYEE MONITORING

 Knowledge sharing in an organization is an important part of knowledge management and its success or failure will be directly related to how much knowledge could be used by employees. Unfortunately there are some de-motivators in work environment that prevent employees to share knowledge with each others. This paper intends to interrogate employee monitoring as one of the de-motivators of knowledge sharing in organizations. In an insecure work environment where employee behaviors are monitored employees may not intend to share their knowledge with others because of confidentiality, job insecurity, mistrust. Therefore, the aim of this research is to examine the relationship between organizational knowledge sharing and employee monitoring. Employees who have negative attitude against employee monitoring complained that the implementation of electronic monitoring in their workplace caused paced work, lack of involvement, reduced task variety and clarity, reduced peer social support, reduced supervisory support, fear of job loss, routinized work activity, and lack of control over tasks. It is assumed that there is a relationship between negative attitudes against employee monitoring and knowledge sharing in organizations. This empirical research is realized by surveying 122 employees in banking sector. In this study, with inspiration taken from the related studies in literature, the relationship between two variables was tried to be identified by conducting required statistical analysis of questionnaires applied to employees.

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE SHARING AND NEGATIVE ATTITUDE AGAINST EMPLOYEE MONITORING

 Knowledge sharing in an organization is an important part of knowledge management and its success or failure will be directly related to how much knowledge could be used by employees. Unfortunately there are some de-motivators in work environment that prevent employees to share knowledge with each others. This paper intends to interrogate employee monitoring as one of the de-motivators of knowledge sharing in organizations. In an insecure work environment where employee behaviors are monitored employees may not intend to share their knowledge with others because of confidentiality, job insecurity, mistrust. Therefore, the aim of this research is to examine the relationship between organizational knowledge sharing and employee monitoring. Employees who have negative attitude against employee monitoring complained that the implementation of electronic monitoring in their workplace caused paced work, lack of involvement, reduced task variety and clarity, reduced peer social support, reduced supervisory support, fear of job loss, routinized work activity, and lack of control over tasks. It is assumed that there is a relationship between negative attitudes against employee monitoring and knowledge sharing in organizations. This empirical research is realized by surveying 122 employees in banking sector. In this study, with inspiration taken from the related studies in literature, the relationship between two variables was tried to be identified by conducting required statistical analysis of questionnaires applied to employees.

___

  • Aiello, J. (1993). Computer-based work monitoring: Electronic surveillance and its effects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(7), 499-507.
  • Alder, S. (1998). Ethical issues in electronic performance monitoring: A consideration of deontological and teleological perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(7), 729-743.
  • Alge, B. J., Greenberg, J. & Brinsfield, C. T. (2006). An identity based model of organizational monitoring: Integrating information privacy and organizational justice. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 25, 71-135.
  • Barutçugil, İ. (2002). Bilgi Yönetimi, Kariyer Yayınları, İstanbul. Bennet, C. S. & S. D. Locke. (1998). Privacy in the Workplace, Labor Law Journal, 49(1), 781-787.
  • Bradley J. A. G. Ballinger & S. G. Green. (2004). Remote Control: predictors Of Electronic Monitoring Intensity and Secrecy, Personnel Psychology, 57(2), 377-410.
  • Chalykoff, J., & Kochan, T. A. (1989). Computer-aided Monitoring: Its Influence on Employee Job Satisfaction And Turnover, Personnel Psychology, 42(4), 807-834
  • Chowdhury, N. (2006). Building Knowledge Management in Malaysia. Inside Knowledge, 9(7). [online]: http://www.km4dev.org/index.php/articles/news/744.
  • D’Urso, S. C. (2006). Who’s Watching Us at Work? Toward A Structural Model of Electronic Monitoring and Surveillance in Organizations. Communication Theory, 16(3), 281-303.
  • Davenport, T., H., Long, D.W. & Beers, M.C. (1998). Successful Knowledge Management Projects, Sloan Management Review, (39)2, 43-57.
  • Demirel, Y. & Seçkin, Z. (2011). Örgütsel Adaletin Bilgi Paylaşımı Üzerine Etkisi: İlaç Sektörü Çalışanlarına Yönelik Bir Araştırma. Bilig, 56, 99- 119.
  • Erdemir, E. (2008). Bilgi Toplumunda Çalışma İlişkilerinin Yeni Boyutu: İşyeri ve Çalışanlara Yönelik İzleme Faaliyetleri ve Türkiye’deki Durum, 1. Ulusal Çalışma İlişkileri Kongresi: Sakarya Üniversitesi Bildiriler Kitabı, 39-52.
  • Erdemir, E., Çeliktaş, I., (2006). Örgütsel ve Hukuki Açıdan İşyeri İzleme: Karşılaştırmalı bir inceleme Kazanç Hakemli Hukuk Dergisi, (19-20), 87-102.
  • Erdemir, E. ve U. Koç (2006). Büyük Patron Sizi İzliyor! Farklı Sektörlerde İşyeri İzleme Aracı Olarak Yeni Teknolojilerin Kullanımı: Eskişehir Örneği, 5. Orta Anadolu İşletmecilik Kongresi, Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Bildiriler Kitabı, 141-148.
  • Findlay, P., A. McKinlay, A. Marks & P. Thompson (2000). In Search of Perfect People: Teamwork and Team Players in the Scottish Spirits Industry, Human Relations, 53(12), 1549–1571.
  • George, J. F. (1996). Computer-based Monitoring: Common Perceptions and Empirical Results, MIS Quarterly, 20(4), 459-480.
  • Guffey C. J. & J. F. West. (1996). Employee Privacy: Legal Implications for Managers, Labor Law Journal, 21(2), 735-745.
  • Hoffman, W. M., Hartman, L. P., Rowe, M. (2003). You’ve Got Mail . . . And the Boss Knows: A Survey by the Center for Business Ethics of Companies’ Email and Internet Monitoring. Business and Society Review, 108(3), 285-307.
  • Hovorka-Mead., A., Ross, W.H., Whipple, T. & Renchin, M.B. (2002). Watching The Detectives: Seasonal Student Employee Reactions to Electronic Monitoring with and without Advance Notification. Personnel Psychology, 55(2), 329-362.
  • Huber, P. (1991). Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures, London, Organizations Science, 2(1), 88-115
  • Ibragimova, B. (2006). Propensity for Knowledge Sharing: An Organizational Justice Perspective. Ph.D. Thesis. USA: University of North Texas.
  • Martin, K. & Freeman, R.E. (2003). Some Problems with Employee Monitoring, Journal of Business Ethics, 43(4), 353-361.
  • Marx, G., T. & Sherizen S. (1987). Corporations that spy on their employees. Business and Society Review, No. 60 (Winter), 32-37.
  • McNall, L.A. & Roch,S.G. (2007). Effects of Electronic Monitoring Types on Perceptions of Procedural Justice, Interpersonal Justice, and Privacy, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(3), 658-682.
  • Nolan, D.R. (2003). Privacy and Profitability in the Technological Workplace, Journal of Labor Research, 24, Part 2, 207-232.
  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1994).A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
  • Nussbaum K, (1989). Computer monitoring: A threat to the right to privacy? CPSR Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
  • Nussbaum, K. & du Rivage, V. (1986). Computer monitoring: Mismanagement by remote control. Business and Society Review, 56, 16–20
  • Oye, N.D.; Mazleena S. & Noorminshah, A. (2011). Knowledge Sharing in Workplace: Motivators and Demotivators. International Journal of Managing Information Technology, 3(4), 71-84.
  • Oz E., Glass, R. & R. Behling. (1999). Electronic Workplace Monitoring: What Employees Think? Omega, 27(2), 167-177.
  • Rogers, K.S., Smith, M.J., & Sainfort, P.C. (1990). Electronic performance monitoring, job design, and psychological stress. In Proceedings of the human factors society 34th annual meeting, 845-858.
  • Smith, M.; Carayon, P.; Sanders, K.; Lim, S.-Y., & Le Grande, D. (1992). Employee stress and health complaints in jobs with and without electronic performance monitoring. Applied Ergonomics, 23(1), 17-27.
  • Stanton, J. M. & E. M. Weiss. (2000). Electronic monitoring in their own words: an exploratory study of employees' experiences with new types of surveillance, Computers in Human Behavior, 16(4), 423-440.
  • Tabak, F. & Smith, W.P. (2005). Privacy and electronic monitoring in the workplace: A model of managerial cognition and relational trust development. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 17(3), 173-189.
  • Townsend A. M. & J. T. Bennett. (2003). Privacy, Technology, and Conflict: Emerging Issues and Action in Workplace Privacy. Journal of Labor Research, 24(2), 195-205.
  • Vaught, B., C,, Taylor, R., E. & Vaught, S., E. (2000). The attitudes of managers regarding the electronic monitoring of employee behavior: Procedural and ethical considerations. American Business Review, 18(1), 107- 114.
Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2006
  • Yayıncı: İbrahim Güran YUMUŞAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

A RESEARCH ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE SHARING AND EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE PROCESS OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT

Derya Ergün Özler – Nuray Mercan – Yaşar ALTINAY, Derya Ergün Özler, Nuray Mercan, Yaşar Aksanyar, Ayşenur Altınay

THE MEASUREMENT MODEL OF SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY CONSTRUCT FROM AN ISLAMIC PERSPECTIVE: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF MALAYSIAN BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS

Naail Mohammed KAMİL, Mohamed SULAİMAN, Aahad M. OSMAN, - GANİ, Khaliq AHMAD

THE SELF-DIRECTED CAREER IN AN ERA OF ECONOMIC INSTABILITY: OPPORTUNITIES AND LIMITATIONS IN CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON

Peter KUCHİNKE, - UN, Yeong PARK

THE INFLUENCE OF MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCE ON CAREER ORIENTATION: THE VALIDATION OF HAMBA MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCE SCALE

A. Kadir Bin Othman – M. Khirzan Badzli RAHMAN, Abdul Kadir bin Othman, Ariff Md Abdul MALİK, Mohd Khirzan Badzli Abdul Rahman, Samsudin WAHAB

THE COMPARISON OF TWO STRATEGIC ALLIANCES IN TERMS OF ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER

Nurullah Genç – N. Öykü İYİGÜN, Nurullah Genç

MEASURING THE IMPACT OF PERSON-ENVIRONMENT FIT ON AFFECTIVE OUTCOMES FOR INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT FUND IN TAIWAN

- CHENG, Ping SHİH, - LİNG, - I, - HSU

HERZBERG’İN ÇİFT FAKTÖR KURAMI KAMU OKULLARINDA ÇALIŞAN ÖĞRETMENLERİN MOTİVASYON ALGILARINI AÇIKLAYABİLİR Mİ? AMPİRİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Hamza Ateş– Bora Yıldız– Harun YILDIZ, Hamza Ateş, Bora Yıldız, Harun Yıldız

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE SHARING AND NEGATIVE ATTITUDE AGAINST EMPLOYEE MONITORING

Cihan Tınaztepe – Funda Özer– Mehmet Kız YOZGAT, Cihan Tinaztepe, Funda Özer, Mehmet Kiziloğlu, Uğur Yozgat

TRAINING AND COMPANIES’ PERFORMANCE THROUGH THE LENS OF THE HIGH-PERFORMANCE PARADIGM: A CROSS-NATIONAL STUDY OF EUROPEAN COUNTRIES

Pedro FERREİRA, Elizabeth Real De OLİVEİRA

ENHANCING KNOWLEDGE ON DEALER-SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS: AN ANALYSIS OF DEALER’S ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RELATIONSHIP SATISFACTION

Nor Azila Mohd NOOR, Selvan PERUMAL, Zolkafli HUSSİN