GÜNEY KORE’NİN İNOVASYON AKTÖRLERİ: ÜNİVERSİTE, SANAYİ VE KAMU ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZLERİNİN ANALİZİ

Teknolojik bir rekabet gücü elde etmek için hükümetin, endüstrinin ve üniversitelerin inovasyon gayretleri Kore’nin küresel rekabet gücüne sahip olmasının önünün açtı. Bu makale üniversiteler, kamu araştırma kurumları ve özel sektör gibi inovasyon aktörlerinin durumlarını ve birbirleriyle olan ilişkilerini araştırmaktadır. Üniversiteler Kore deki araştırmacıların % 27’sini, doktoralı mühendis ve bilim insanlarının ise %66’sını bünyesinde barındırmalarına rağmen, kalkınmanın ilk yıllarından bu yana patent başvurularında özel sektör her zaman önde oldu. Üniversiteler daha çok bilimsel yayınlarda öne çıkarak, SCI endeksli yayın sayısına göre Kore’nin dünyada 15. ülke olmasını sağladılar. Kamu araştırma merkezleri yerli sanayinin yabancı teknolojiyi içselleştirerek geliştirmelerine yardımcı oldular. Ayrıca tecrübeli araştırmacıları yetiştirip üniversitelere ve yeni kurulan endüstriyel araştırma merkezlerine gönderen bir okul vazifesi yaptılar. Üçüncü önemli inovasyon aktörü özel kuruluşlarıdır. Rekabet gücünü elde etmede büyük aile holdingleri olan ‘chaebollerin’ katkısı büyüktür. Kuruluşlarının ilk yıllarında seri üretimle bir kaç kalem üreten chaeboller zamanla kalite artırımı, teknolojik üstünlüğü elde etme gibi amaçlarla araştırma ve geliştirme faaliyetlerine önem verdiler. Daha çok büyük holdinglerin teminatçısı olan ve emeğe dayalı üretim yapan küçük ve orta ölçekli işletmeler ise özellikle 1997 Asya finansal krizi sonrasında uygulanan hükümet politikalarıyla araştırma ve geliştirme merkezli üretime odaklandılar.

INNOVATION ACTORS IN SOUTH KOREA: AN ANAYLYSIS OF UNIVERSTY, INDUSTRY AND GOVERNMENT RESEARCH CENTERS

Keywords:

-,

___

  • Chai, Sung Sung, (2007). Korean national system of innovation and FDIs. In Maximilian Von Zedwitz, D. K. Bok, Sahngo Chung (Edts), R&D Interplay in Northeast Asia, Seoul: Samsung Economic Research Institiute.
  • Chung, H. H. (2007), Lessons from the Korean venture industry development, World Bank Working Paper, 39379.
  • Chung, Sungchul, (2010). Innovation, competitiveness, and growth: Korean experiences, Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 2010, Global, 334.
  • Chung, Sunyang (2011). Academia- industry- government interaction in the Republic of Korea. In Martin Michaela (Edt), In search of triple helix academia-industry- government interaction China, Poland and Republic of Korea, Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning. pp:163-202
  • Eoma, Boo Young, Lee, Keun (2010). Determinants of industry-academy linkages and, their impact on firm performance: The case of Korea as a latecomer in knowledge industrialization, Research Policy, 39, 625-639.
  • Etzkowitz, Henry and Loet Leydesdorff (1997). Introduction: Universities in the lobal knowledge economy. In Henry Etzkowitz & Loet Leydesdorff (Edts), Universities and the global knowledge economy: A triple helix of university-industry-government relations, London: Pinter. pp 1-8, p-2-3.
  • Etzkowitz, Henry (2003). Innovation in innovation. The triple helix of universityindustry-govemment relations’, Social Science Information Sur les Sciences Sociales, 42(3), 293-337.
  • Etzkowitz, Henry and Leydesdorff, Loet (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘‘Mode 2’’ to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations, Research Policy, 29, 109-123.
  • Keenan, Michael (2012). Moving to the innovation frontier: lessons from the OECD review of Korean innovation policy. In Mahlich, J. and Pascha, W. (eds.), Korean Science and Technology in an International Perspective, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp: 15-40.
  • Kim, L. (1997), Imitation to innovation: The dynamics of Korea’s technological learning, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Koita, (Korea Industrial Technology Association), (2012), http://www.koita.or.kr/eng/indicators/koita industrial.asp (accessed at 1 August, 2012).
  • Koo, Min Chul, (2010), State-Funded Research Institutes Need Reform, http://www.koreaherald.com/specialreport/Detail.jsp?newsMLId=20100630000634 (accessed at August 3, 2012).
  • Korea Institute of S&T Planning and Evaluation, (2010), Survey of Research and Development in Korea 2010. Seoul: National Science and Technology Commission.
  • Lee, Brian H. (2007), Enhancing the Competitiveness of SMEs: Subnational Innovation Systems and, Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific Technological Capacity-Building Policies, Bangkok: United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific.
  • Lee, J. and S. J. Koh (2007). Study on the Policy Measurement for Promoting the Industry and University Cooperation, Seoul: Korean Institiute of Technology Foundation (KITF).
  • Lee, K. and Kim, S. S. (2000). Characteristics and Economic Efficiency of the Venture Companies in Korea: Comparison with the Chaebols and Other Traditional Firms, Seoul Journal of Economisc, 13(3): 335-360.
  • Niosi, J. Saviotti, P.P. and Bellon, B. Crow, M. (1993). National systems of innovations: in search of a workable concept, Technology in Society,( 15), 207-227.
  • OECD, (2009). Reviews of innovation policy: Korea, Paris, OECD.
  • Park, Han Woo, Leydesdorff, Loet (2010), Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives, Research Policy 39 (2010) 640-649.
  • Sohn, D. W. and Kenney, M. (2007), Universities, clusters, and innovation systems: The case of Seoul, Korea, World Development Vol. 35 (6), pp. 991-1004, p:994.
  • Suh, Joonghae; Aubert, Jean Eric; Ahn, Do-Geol, and Chen, Derek, H. C. (2006). Overview. In Suh, Joonghae and Aubert, Jean Eric (edts), Korea as a Knowledge Economy Evolutionary Process and Lessons Learned, Washington, D.C: The World Bank Institute.
  • Suh, J. H. (2009). Development srategy and evolution of Korea’s innovation system. In Lim, Won Hyuk (edt), Models for national technology and innovation capacity development in Turkey, Seoul: Ministry of Strategy and Finance & Korea Development Institute.
  • Tidd, J. (2006), A review of innovation models, Imperial College, London: Tanaka Business School, , http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/portal/pls/portallive/docs/ 1/7290726.PDF (accessed at April 1, 2012).
  • Ungson, G. R. , Steers, R. M. and Park, S. H. (1997). Korean enterprise: The quest for globalization, Boston: Harward Business School Press.
Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2006
  • Yayıncı: İbrahim Güran YUMUŞAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

MEASURING THE IMPACT OF PERSON-ENVIRONMENT FIT ON AFFECTIVE OUTCOMES FOR INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT FUND IN TAIWAN

- CHENG, Ping SHİH, - LİNG, - I, - HSU

ENHANCING KNOWLEDGE ON DEALER-SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS: AN ANALYSIS OF DEALER’S ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RELATIONSHIP SATISFACTION

Nor Azila Mohd NOOR, Selvan PERUMAL, Zolkafli HUSSİN

STRATECIC MANAGEMENT OF SECURITY FORCES DURING THE OG OG 2004 (ATHENS). CRISIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND THE ROLE OF THE HELLENIC COAST GUARD

Tryfon KORONTZİS

BİLGİYE DAYALI ORGANİZASYONA İLİŞKİN ÖZELLİKLERİN STRATEJİK İNSAN KAYNAKLARI YÖNETİMİNE ETKİLERİ: BANKACILIK SEKTÖRÜNDE AMPİRİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Hüseyin YILMAZ

HERZBERG’İN ÇİFT FAKTÖR KURAMI KAMU OKULLARINDA ÇALIŞAN ÖĞRETMENLERİN MOTİVASYON ALGILARINI AÇIKLAYABİLİR Mİ? AMPİRİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Hamza Ateş– Bora Yıldız– Harun YILDIZ, Hamza Ateş, Bora Yıldız, Harun Yıldız

THE COMPARISON OF TWO STRATEGIC ALLIANCES IN TERMS OF ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER

Nurullah Genç – N. Öykü İYİGÜN, Nurullah Genç

A RESEARCH ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE SHARING AND EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE PROCESS OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT

Derya Ergün Özler – Nuray Mercan – Yaşar ALTINAY, Derya Ergün Özler, Nuray Mercan, Yaşar Aksanyar, Ayşenur Altınay

THE INFLUENCE OF MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCE ON CAREER ORIENTATION: THE VALIDATION OF HAMBA MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCE SCALE

A. Kadir Bin Othman – M. Khirzan Badzli RAHMAN, Abdul Kadir bin Othman, Ariff Md Abdul MALİK, Mohd Khirzan Badzli Abdul Rahman, Samsudin WAHAB

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE SHARING AND NEGATIVE ATTITUDE AGAINST EMPLOYEE MONITORING

Cihan Tınaztepe – Funda Özer– Mehmet Kız YOZGAT, Cihan Tinaztepe, Funda Özer, Mehmet Kiziloğlu, Uğur Yozgat

THE ROLE OF ACCULTURIZATION FOR CROSS-CULTURAL HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

Vilmante Kumpikaite – Kestutis DUOBA, Kestutis Duoba