Olena SHCHERBYNA, Liudmyla Oleksiivna SHASHKOVA

Sosyal Grupların Akıl Yürütmesinde Bir Argüman Olarak Sessizlik

Tartışma yazarların sosyal antropoloji, sosyal bilgi kuramı, disiplinler arasıbağlantıları dayalı, ve teori araştırmacılar, bireylerin ve sosyal grupların eylemleri mantık ve strateji anlama odaklanmak için hangi etmenlerin birbirleri ile güvenilir ve muhtemel bilgi almak için etkileşimli karmaşık bağlamlar için pratiksenaryoları teşvik eden ve açıklayan modern bir eğilim son olarak düşünün. Birargüman olarak sessizliğin kararsızlığına dayanarak, kullanımının özgüllüğü, çeşitli geleneklerin düğün ritüellerinin örneklerinde gösterilmiştir ve bu da grupların sosyal birimler olarak akıl yürütmesinin tartışmacı planlarındaki rolünü belirlemeyi mümkün kılmıştır. Yazarlar, sessizliğe karşı bir argüman ile sessizlikten bir argüman arasında ayrım yapmayı önerdiler; bu, tartışmacı bir işlevin uy gulanması sürecinde sessizliğin rolünü belirlemek için temel teşkil edebilir.

Silence as an Argument in the Reasoning of SocialGroups

Basing on the interdisciplinary connections between social anthropology, social epistemology, and theory of argumentation authors consider the latter as a modern trend that induces researchers to focus on the comprehension of the logic and strategy of actions of individuals and social groups and describes practical scenarios for the complex contexts in which agents interact with each other to obtain reliable and probable knowledge. Leaning on the ambivalence of silence as an argument, the specificity of its use is demonstrated in the examples of wedding rituals of various traditions, which made it possible to determine its role in the argumentative schemes of reasonings of groups as social units. Authors proposed to distinguish between an argument to silence and an argument from silence that may serve as the basis for determining the role of silence in the process of implementing an argumentative function.

PDF

___

Bodlović, P. (2019). Presumptions, and How They Relate to Arguments from Ignorance. Argumentation, 33, 579–604.
Canale, D. & Tuzet, G. (2008). On the Contrary: Inferential Analysis and Ontological Assumptions of the A Contrario Argument. Informal Logic, 28 (1), 31- 43.
Duncan, M. (2012). The Curious Silence of the Dog and Paul of Tarsus: Revisiting the Argument from Silence. Informal Logic, 32 (1), 83-97.
Ephratt, M. (2008). The Functions of Silence. Journal of Pragmatics. V. 40 (11), 1909-1938.
Goldman, A. I. (2004). Group Knowledge versus Group Rationality: Two Approaches to Social Epistemology. Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology, 1 (1), 11-22.
Goldman, A. I. & O'Connor, C. (2019). Social Epistemology. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology-social.
Johnson, R. H. & Blair, J. A. (1994). Logical Self-Defense. Toronto: McGraw HillRyerson.
Kasavin, I. (2016). Social Philosophy of Science and Collective Epistemology. Moscow: Knorus, 264. (in Russian)
Khatchadourian, H. (2015). How to Do Things with Silence. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Kostyuk, L. (2016). The Ceremony of Matchmaking in Eastern Galicia in the Second Half of XX: Beginning of XXI Century. Scientific Notes Ternopil National Pedagogical University Named Gnatyuk, 2 (3), 104-107. (in Ukrainian)
Lackey, J. (2014). (Ed.) Essays in Collective Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lange, J. (1966). The Argument from Silence. History and Theory, 5 (3), 288-301.
List, C. & Pettit, P. (2011). Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
List, C. (2011). Group Knowledge and Group Rationality: A Judgment Aggregation Perspective. Social Epistemology: Essential Readings. (Eds. A. Goldman and D. Whitcomb). New York: Oxford University Press, 221-241.
McGrew, T. (2011). Evidence. The Routledge Companion to Epistemology. (Eds. S. Bernecker and D. Pritchard). New York: Routledge, 58-67.
McGrew, T. (2014). The Argument from Silence. Acta Analytica, 29 (2), 215-228.
Milstead, Z. (2018). Religion and Arguments from Silence. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 10 (3), 155-169.
Nesen, I. (2008). The Wedding Ritual of Middle Polissia: Traditional Structure and Relictic Forms (in the Middle of xix – of xx Century). Visnyk Lviv Univ. Ser. Histor. 43, 261–319. (in Ukrainian)
Pocheptsov, G. (1986). Silence as a Sign. Analysis of the Sign Systems: History of Logic and Methodology of Science. Kiev, 90-98. (in Russian)
Shcherbyna, O. & Shashkova, L. (2019). Silence in Argumentative Practices as a Manifestation of Tolerance. Future Human Image, 12, 76-84.
Stephens, C. (2011). A Bayesian Approach to Absent Evidence Reasoning. Informal Logic, 31 (1), 56-65.
The Book of Common Prayer. (1549). Retrieved from http://justus.anglican.org/resources/bcp/1549/Marriage_1549.htm.
The (Online) Book of Common Prayer. https://www.bcponline.org.
Walton, D. (1999). The Appeal to Ignorance, or Argumentum ad Ignorantiam. Argumentation, 13, 367-377.