Tamamlayıcı Beslenme Uygulamalarında Bebeğin Tercihleri ve Bebek Liderliğinde Beslenme Modeli

Bebek Liderliğinde Beslenme (BLW) 2001-2002 yılında Gill Rapley tarafından normal gelişim gösteren bebekler için geleneksel tamamlayıcı beslenme modeline alternatif olarak geliştirilmiştir. BLW modelinde bebeğe sunulan yiyecekler bebeğin beslenmesiyle ilgilenen kişilere göre değişmektedir. Hangi bakıcılara kimler tarafından nasıl eğitim verileceği ve uygulamaların nasıl gerçekleşeceği konusunda standart bir eğitim ve uygulama kılavuzu bulunmamaktadır. BLW modeli bebeğin aktif katılımı ve tercihleri doğrultusunda ilerlediği için makro ve mikro besin ögesi yetersizlikleri, boğulma riski, besin tercihleri ve kalitesi, açlık tokluk mekanizması üzerindeki etkisi, ailenin tutumlarının bebek üzerine etkisi gibi birçok yönden tartışmaya konu olmuştur. Dünya Sağlık Örgütü tarafından BLW modelini öneren bir açıklama yapılmamıştır. Avrupa Pediatrik Gastroenteroloji, Hepatoloji ve Beslenme Derneği (ESPGHAN) de 2017 yılında yayınlandığı raporda BLW modeli konusunda çıkarımda bulunmak için yeterli kanıtın bulunmadığını belirtmiştir. Bu nedenle bu alanda geniş çaplı kontrollü çalışmalara gereksinim bulunmaktadır. Bu derlemede, son günlerde popüler olan BLW modeli güncel literatür ışığında incelenmiştir.

Baby Led Weaning Model and Baby’s Preferences in Complementary Feeding Practices

Baby led weaning (BLW) was developed as an alternative feeding method to the traditional complementary feeding model for term babies in 2001-2002 by Gill Rapley. The food offered to the baby varies according to the person interested in feeding the baby in the BLW method. There is no standard training and practice guide on how caregivers will be trained and how to implement them. The BLW approach has been discussed in many respects such as macro- and micronutrient deficiencies, choking risk, nutritional preferences and quality, effect on hunger satiety mechanism, the effects of family attitudes on the baby, as the baby progresses in accordance with the active participation and preferences of the baby. There is no explanation for recommending the BLW method by the World Health Organization. The European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) also reported that there was insufficient evidence to draw conclusions about the BLW approach in 2017. Therefore, extensive controlled studies are needed in this area. BLW model, which is popular in recent days, is examined in the current literature in this review.

___

  • 1. World Health Organization (WHO). The world health report 2002: reducing risks, promoting healthy life. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. 248 p.
  • 2. World Health Organization (WHO). Infant and young child feeding: model chapter for textbooks for medical students and allied health professionals. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009. 99 p.
  • 3. Fewtrell M, Bronsky J, Campoy C, Domellöf M, Embleton N, Mis NF, et al. Complementary feeding: a position paper by the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) Committee on Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017;64(1):119- 32.
  • 4. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Panel on Dietetic Products N, Allergies. Scientific Opinion on the appropriate age for introduction of complementary feeding of infants. EFSA Journal. 2009;7(12):1423.
  • 5. Rapley G. Baby-led weaning: Where are we now? Nutr Bull. 2018;43(3):262-8.
  • 6. Rapley G, Murkett T. Baby-led weaning: Helping your baby to love good food: UK: Random House; 2008.
  • 7. D’Auria E, Bergamini M, Staiano A, Banderali G, Pendezza E, Penagini F, et al. Baby-led weaning: what a systematic review of the literature adds on. Ital J Pediatr. 2018;44(1):49.
  • 8. Cameron SL, Taylor RW, Heath A-LM. Development and pilot testing of baby-led ıntroduction to solidS-a version of Baby-Led Weaning modified to address concerns about iron deficiency, growth faltering and choking. BMC Pediatrics. 2015;15(1):99.
  • 9. Townsend E, Pitchford NJ. Baby knows best? The impact of weaning style on food preferences and body mass index in early childhood in a case–controlled sample. BMJ Open. 2012;2(1):e000298.
  • 10. Brown A, Lee M. A descriptive study investigating the use and nature of baby-led weaning in a UK sample of mothers. Matern Child Nutr. 2011;7(1):34-47.
  • 11. Morison BJ, Taylor RW, Haszard JJ, Schramm CJ, Erickson LW, Fangupo LJ, et al. How different are babyled weaning and conventional complementary feeding? A cross-sectional study of infants aged 6–8 months. BMJ Open. 2016;6(5):e010665.
  • 12. Taylor RW, Williams SM, Fangupo LJ, Wheeler BJ, Taylor BJ, Daniels L, et al. Effect of a baby-led approach to complementary feeding on infant growth and overweight: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatrics. 2017;171(9):838-46.
  • 13. Kumar G. Baby-led weaning did not significantly impact body mass index when compared with traditional spoonfeeding. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2018;103(4):222-.
  • 14. Brown A, Lee M. Maternal control of child feeding during the weaning period: differences between mothers following a baby-led or standard weaning approach. Matern Child Nutr. 2011;15(8):1265-71.
  • 15. Dogan E, Yilmaz G, Caylan N, Turgut M, Gokcay G, Oguz MM. Baby-led complementary feeding: Randomized controlled study. Pediatr Int. 2018;60(12):1073-80.
  • 16. Brown A. No difference in self-reported frequency of choking between infants introduced to solid foods using a baby-led weaning or traditional spoon-feeding approach. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2018;31(4):496-504.
  • 17. Poniedziałek B, Paszkowiak N, Rzymski P. Baby-ledweaning (BLW) from maternal perspective: Polish experience. Journal of Medical Science. 2018;87(2):75- 81.
  • 18. Fangupo LJ, Heath A-LM, Williams SM, Williams LWE, Morison BJ, Fleming EA, et al. A baby-led approach to eating solids and risk of choking. Pediatrics. 2016;138(4):e20160772.
  • 19. Cameron SL, Taylor RW, Heath A-LM. Parent-led or baby-led? Associations between complementary feeding practices and health-related behaviours in a survey of New Zealand families. BMJ Open. 2013;3(12):e003946.
  • 20. Arantes ALA, Neves FS, Campos AAL, Pereira Netto M. The baby-led weaning meThod (blw) in The conTexT of complemenTary feeding: a review. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2018; 36(3): 353–63.
  • 21. Cichero J. Introducing solid foods using baby-led weaning vs. spoon-feeding: A focus on oral development, nutrient intake and quality of research to bring balance to the debate. Nutr Bull. 2016;41(1):72-7.
  • 22. Cameron S, Heath A-L, Taylor R. How feasible is babyled weaning as an approach to infant feeding? A review of the evidence. Nutrients. 2012;4(11):1575-609.
  • 23. Daniels L, Taylor RW, Williams SM, Gibson RS, Fleming EA, Wheeler BJ, et al. Impact of a modified version of babyled weaning on iron intake and status: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2018;8(6):e019036.
  • 24. Fu X, Conlon CA, Haszard JJ, Beck KL, von Hurst PR, Taylor RW, et al. Food fussiness and early feeding characteristics of infants following Baby-Led Weaning and traditional spoon-feeding in New Zealand: An internet survey. Appetite. 2018;130:110-6.
  • 25. Williams Erickson L, Taylor R, Haszard J, Fleming E, Daniels L, Morison B, et al. Impact of a modified version of baby-led weaning on infant food and nutrient intakes: the BLISS Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutrients. 2018;10(6):740.
  • 26. Daniels L, Taylor RW, Williams SM, Gibson RS, Samman S, Wheeler BJ, et al. Modified version of baby-led weaning does not result in lower zinc intake or status in infants: A randomized controlled trial. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018;118(6):1006-16.
  • 27. Rowan H, Harris C. Baby-led weaning and the family diet. A pilot study. Appetite. 2012;58(3):1046-9.
  • 28. Morison B, Heath A-L, Haszard J, Hein K, Fleming E, Daniels L, et al. Impact of a modified version of babyled weaning on dietary variety and food preferences in infants. Nutrients. 2018;10(8):1092.
  • 29. Rossi A, Moreira EAM, Rauen MS. Determinants of eating behavior: a review focusing on the family. Rev. Nutr. 2008;21(6):739-48.
  • 30. D’Andrea E, Jenkins K, Mathews M, Roebothan B. Babyled weaning: a preliminary investigation. Can J Diet Pract Res 2016;77(2):72-7.
  • 31. Brown A, Lee M. An exploration of experiences of mothers following a baby-led weaning style: developmental readiness for complementary foods. Matern Child Nutr. 2013;9(2):233-43.
  • 32. Brown A. Differences in eating behaviour, well-being and personality between mothers following babyled vs. traditional weaning styles. Matern Child Nutr. 2016;12(4):826-37.
  • 33. Carnell S, Wardle J. Measuring behavioural susceptibility to obesity: validation of the child eating behaviour questionnaire. Appetite. 2007;48(1):104-13.
  • 34. Brown A, Lee M. Early influences on child satietyresponsiveness: the role of weaning style. Pediatric Obesity. 2015;10(1):57-66.
  • 35. Arden MA, Abbott RL. Experiences of baby-led weaning: trust, control and renegotiation. Matern Child Nutr. 2015;11(4):829-44.
  • 36. Cameron SL, Heath A-LM, Taylor RW. Healthcare professionals’ and mothers’ knowledge of, attitudes to and experiences with, baby-led weaning: a content analysis study. BMJ Open. 2012;2(6):e001542.
  • 37. Locke, A. Agency, ‘good motherhood’ and ‘a load of mush’: Constructions of baby-led weaning in the press. In Women’s Studies International Forum 2015;53:139- 46.
  • 38. Jones S. A history of baby-led weaning: the evolution of complementary feeding trends. Journal of Health Visiting. 2016;4(10):524-30.