___

• Admiraal, W., Vugt, F. V., Kranenburg, F., Koster, B., Smit, B., Weijers, S., & Lockhorst, D. (2017). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology into K-12 instruction: Evaluation of a technology-infused approach. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26, 105-120.
• Akçay, N. O., Akçay, A., & Kurt, M. (2016). Ortaokul öğretmenlerinin öğretim yöntem ve tekniklerine yönelik görüş ve yeterliklerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of the secondary school teachers’ view and competency to teaching methods and techniques]. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 5(1), 333-342.
• Akgün, M., & Atıcı, B. (2017). The effect of flipped classroom on learners’ academic achievements and views. Kastamonu Education Journal, 25(1), 329-344.
• Alsancak-Sırakaya, D. (2015). Tersyüz sınıf modelinin akademik başarı, öz-yönetimli öğrenme hazırbulunuşluğu ve motivasyon üzerine etkisi [The effect of flipped classroom model on academic achievement, self - directed learning readiness and motivation]. Unpublished Doctorate Dissertation, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
• Alsancak-Sırakaya, D. A. (2017). Oyunlaştırılmış tersyüz sınıf modeline yönelik öğrenci görüşleri. Ondokuz Mayis University Education of Journal, 36(1), 114-132.
• Andujar, A., Salaberri-Ramiro, M. S., & Martínez, M. S. C. (2020). Integrating Flipped Foreign Language Learning through Mobile Devices: Technology Acceptance and Flipped Learning Experience. Sustainability, 12(3), 1110. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031110
• Aykaç, N. (2011). Hayat bilgisi dersi öğretim programında kullanılan yöntem ve tekniklerin öğretmen görüşlerine göre değerlendirilmesi (Sinop ili örneği) [Evaluation of the methods and techniques used in knowledge of life course teaching pro (Sinop case study) gram according to teacher opinions]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 19(1), 113-126.
• Awidi, I. T., & Paynter, M. (2019). The impact of a flipped classroom approach on student learning experience. Computers & Education, 128, 269-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.013
• Aziz, Z., & Hossain, A. (2010). A comparison of cooperative learning and conventional teaching on students’ achievement in secondary mathematics. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 53-62.
• Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist,37(2), 122-47.
• Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71- 81). New York: Academic Press.
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman and Company.
• Başaran, S. (2019). Investigating university students' views on flipped classroom approach. Proceedings of INTED2019, 13th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, 8050-8059. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2019.1998
• Beins, B. C., & McCarthy, M. A. (2012). Research Methods and Statistics. New Jersey: Pearson Education.
• Benzer, F. (2011). İlköğretim ve ortaöğretim kurumlarında görevyapan öğretmenlerin öz yeterlik algılarının analizi[An analysis on the sense of self efficacy of the teachers working in primary and high schools]. Unpublished Master Dissertation, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey.
• Bergmann J., &Sams A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
• Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: a survey of the research. In 120th ASEE National Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA (Paper ID 6219). Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
• Brown, A. L. (2014). Implementing active learning in an online teacher education course. American Journal of Distance Education, 28(3), 170-182.
• Buldu, M. (2014). Öğretmen yeterlik düzeyi değerlendirmesi ve mesleki gelişim eğitimleri planlanması üzerine bir öneri [A system level proposal on teacher competency assessment and teacher professional development]. Millî Eğitim, 204, 114-134.
• Butt, A. (2014). Student views on the use of a flipped classroom approach: Evidence from Australia. Business Education & Accreditation, 6(1), 33-43.
• Büyüköztürk, S. (2013). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Data analysis handbook for social sciences]. (18. Edition). Ankara: Pegem AkademiYayıncılık.
• Can, E. (2019). Öğretmenlerin meslekî gelişimleri: Engeller ve öneriler [Professional development of teachers: obstacles and suggestions]. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 7(4), 1618-1650. https://doi.org/10.14689/Issn.2148-2624.1.7c.4s.14m
• Chan, S. C. H., Wan, C. L. J., & Ko, S. (2019). Interactivity, active collaborative learning, and learning performance: The moderating role of perceived fun by using personal response systems. The International Journal of Management Education, 17(1), 94-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2018.12.004
• Cheng, L., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Antonenko, P. (2018). Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students’ learning outcomes: a meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 4, 793- 824. doi:10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7
• Cheng, Y., & Weng, C. (2017). Factors influence the digital media teaching of primary school teachers in a flipped class: A Taiwan case study. South African Journal of Education, 37(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v37n1a1293.
• Chou, L.-Y. (2017). The Effect of Flipped Classroom on Self-efficacy and Satisfaction of Computer Auditing. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 841–845. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61542-4_86
• Chuang, H., Weng, C., & Chen, C. (2018). Which students benefit most from a flipped classroom approach to language learning?. Br J Educ Technol, 49, 56-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12530
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
• Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M.E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo, Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
• Demir, S., & Özden, S. (2013). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin öğretimsel stratejilere yöntemlere ve tekniklere ilişkin görüşleri: hayat bilgisi dersine yönelik tanılayıcı bir çalışma [Primary school teachers’ opinions of instructıonal strategies, methods and techniques: a descriptıve study for scince of life class]. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute,14, 59-75.
• Dunn, T. J., & Kennedy, M. (2019). Technology enhanced learning in higher education; motivations, engagement and academic achievement. Computers & Education, 137, 104-113.
• Effield, J. (2013). Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN. TechTrends, 57(6), 14-27.
• Elmaadaway, M. A. N. (2018). The effects of aflipped classroom approach on class engagement and skill performance in a blackboard course. British Journal ofEducational Technology, 49(3), 479-491.
• Findlay-Thompson, S. and Mombourquette, P. (2014). Evaluation of a flipped classroom in an undergraduate business course. Business Education & Accreditation, 6, 63-71.
• Fook, C. Y., Dalim, S. F., Narasuman, S., Sidhu, G. K., Fong, L. L., & Keang, K. M. (2015). Relationship between active learning and self-efficacy among students in higher education. International Academic Research Journal of Social Science, 1 (2), 139-149.
• Friedman, L. W., & Friedman, H. H. (2013). Using social media technologies to enhance online learning. Journal of Educators, 10(1), 1-22.
• Frydenberg, M. (2012). Flipping Excel. Proceedings of the Information Systems, Proceedings of the Information Systems Educators Conference, New Orleans Louisiana, USA.
• Fulton, K. (2012). 10 reasons to flip. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 20-24.
• Gillois P., Bosson J. L., Genty C., Vuillez J. P., & Romanet J. P. (2015). The impacts of blended learning design in first year medical studies. Stud Health Technol Inform, 210, 607-611.
• Greene, C. M. (2016). Exploring the flipped classroom: Possibilities and limitations. Unpublished Master Dissertation. Lisbon University, Institute of Education, Portugal.
• Goedhart, N. S., Blignaut-van Westrhenen, N., Moser, C., & Zweekhorst, M. B. M. (2019). The flipped classroom: supporting a diverse group of students in their learning. Learning Environments Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09281-2
• Görü-Doğan, T. (2015). Sosyal medyanın öğrenme süreçlerinde kullanımı: Ters-yüz edilmiş öğrenme yaklaşımına ilişkin öğrenen görüşleri[The use of social media in learning processes: Learner views on the inverted learning approach]. Journal of Open Education Practices and Research,1(2), 24-48.
• Gür-Erdoğan. D. (2011). Öğretim ilke ve yöntemleri dersi tutum ölçeği’nin geliştirilmesi [Development of teaching principles and methods course attitude scale]. International Educational Technology Conference Proceedings Book (ss.1858-1862). İstanbul University, İstanbul.
• Güven, B. (2008). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin öğrenme stilleri, tutumları ve akademik başarıları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [An investigation of the relationships among the learning styles of the primary school students, their attitudes and their academic success]. Turkish Journal of Social Research, 12(1), 35- 54.
• Güven, E. (2011). Kaynaştırma uygulamasının yapıldığı sınıflarda işbirlikli öğrenmenin müzik öğretimi üzerindeki etkileri [The Effects of Cooperative Learning on Music Teaching in the Classrooms where Inclusive Practice is Performed]. Unpublished Doctorate Dissertation, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
• Ha, A. S., O’Reilly, J., Ng, J. Y. Y., & Zhang, J. H. (2019). Evaluating the flipped classroom approach in Asian higher education: Perspectives from students and teachers. Cogent Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2019.1638147
• Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62-66.
• İnceoğlu, M. (2004). Tutum, algı, iletişim [Attitude, perception, communication]. Ankara: Kesit Tanıtım Ltd. Şti. Kara, A. (2010). Öğrenmeye ilişkin tutum ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi [The development of the scale of attitudes toward learning]. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 9(32), 49-62.
• Kardaş, M. N., & Öztürk, Y. (2015). Aktif öğrenme tekniklerinin Türkçe öğretiminde başarı, tutum ve uygulamalara yönelik öğrenci görüşleriyle ilişkisi: Bir meta-analiz çalışması [Relationship between active learning techniques and students' views on success, attitude and practices in Turkish teaching: a meta-analysis study]. International Journal of Languages' Education and Teaching UDES Özel Sayısı, 1682-1692.
• Kardaş, M. N., & Uca, N. (2016). Aktif öğrenme yönteminin kullanildiği çalışmaların öğrenci başarısı, tutumu ve görüşleri açısından incelenmesi: Bir meta-analiz çalışması [The relationship between active learning method and theviews of students on achievement; attitudeand applications: astudy of meta-analysis]. International Journal of Turkish Education Sciences, 4(7), 118-130.
• Kavas, A. B., & Bugay, A. (2009). Öğretmen adaylarının hizmet öncesi eğitimlerinde gördükleri eksiklikler ve çözüm önerileri [Perceptions of Prospective Teachers about Deficiencies of Pre-ServiceTeacher Education and Suggestions]. PAU Journal of Education, 1 (25), 13-21.
• Kaya, A., & Büyükkasap, E. (2005). Fizik öğretmenliği programi öğrencilerinin profilleri, öğretmenlik mesleğine yönelik tutum ve endişeleri: Erzurum Örneği [Hysisc student teachers’ profiles, attitudes and anxiety toward teaching profession: case for Erzurum]. Kastamonu Education Journal,13(2), 367-380.
• Koballa, T. R., & Crawley, F. E. (1985). The influence of attitude on science teaching and learning. School Science and Mathematics, 85, 222-232.
• Kocabatmaz, H. (2016). Ters yüz sınıf modeline ilişkin öğretmen adayı görüşleri [The ideas of pre-service teachers regarding the “flipped classroom model”]. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 5(4), 14-24.
• Kong, S. C. (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers & Education, 78, 160-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.009
• Kumral, O., & Saracaloğlu S. (2011). Eğitsel eleştiri modeli ile sınıf öğretmenliği meslek bilgisi dersleri programının değerlendirilmesi [Teaching profession courses evaluation with educational criticism: a case study]. E-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 6(1), 106-118.
• Kuzu, S., & Demir, S. (2015). Öğretmen adayları için öğretim ilke ve yöntemleri dersi öz yeterlilik ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi [Developing “teaching principles and methods cors self-efficacy scale” for pre-service teachers]. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 12(32), 401-415.
• Küçükahmet, L. (2003). Bir meslek olarak öğretmenlik [Teaching as a profession]. L. Küçükahmet, Ş.Ö. Külahoğlu, T. Çalık, G. Topses, A. F. Öksüzoğlu, & A. Korkmaz (Eds.), Öğretmenlik mesleğine giriş [Introduction to teaching profession] (ss.1–25) Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
• Küçükahmet, L. (2008). Öğretimde planlama ve değerlendirme [Planning and evaluation in instruction]. (17. Edition). Ankara: Nobel yayın dağıtım.
• LaFee, S. (2013). Flipped learning. Education Digest, 79(3), 13-18.
• Lai, C.-L., & Hwang, G.-J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006
• Lalima, & Dangwal, K. L. (2017). Blended learning: an innovative approach. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5, 129-136. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050116.
• Li, Q. (1999). Teachers’ beliefs and gender differences in mathematics: A review. Educational Research, 41(1), 63-76.
• Milman, N. (2012). The flipped classroom strategy: What is it and how can it be used? Distance Learning, 9(3), 85-87.
• Mitroka, J. G., Harrington, C., & DellaVecchia, M. J. (2020). A multiyear comparison of flipped- vs. lecture-based teaching on student success in a pharmaceutical science class. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 12 (1), 84-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2019.10.014
• Murillo-Zamorano, L. R., López Sánchez, J. Á., & Godoy-Caballero, A. L. (2019). How the flipped classroom affects knowledge, skills, and engagement in higher education: Effects on students’ satisfaction. Computers & Education, 103608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103608
• Niemi, H., & Nevgi, A. (2014). Research studies and active learning promoting professional competences in Finnish teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 131-142.
• Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and ıts ımplications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079.
• Pierce, R., & Fox, J. (2012). Vodcasts and activelearning exercises in a “flipped classroom” model of a renal pharmacotherapy module. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76(10)
• Priporas, C., Stylos, N., & Fotiadis, A. K. (2017). Generation Z consumers' expectations of interactions in smart retailing: A future agenda. Computers in Human Behavior,77, 374-381
• Rawas, H., Bano, N., & Alaidarous, S. (2019). Comparing the effects of individual versus group face-to-face class activities in flipped classroom onstudent's test performances. Health Professions Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2019.06.002
• Richardson, J. T. (2011). Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 135-147.
• Rivera, E. (2015). Using the flipped classroom model in your library instruction course. The Reference Librarian, 56(1), 34-41.
• Sams, A., & Bergmann, J. (2013). Flip your students' learning. Educational Leadership, 70(6), 16-20. Sandholtz, J. H. & Ringstaff, C. (2013). Assessing the impact of teacher professional development on science instruction in the early elementary grades in rural US schools. Professional Development in Education, 39(5), 678-697.
• Sever, G. (2014). Bireysel çalgı keman derslerinde çevrilmiş öğrenme modelinin uygulanması [The application of flipped learning model on ındividual violin lessons]. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 2(2), 27- 42.
• Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207-231. Sharp, C. (2002). Study support and the development of self-regulated learner. Educational Research, 44(1), 29- 42.
• Soylu Y. (2009). Sınıf öğretmen adaylarının matematik derslerinde öğretim yöntem ve teknikleri kullanabilme konusundaki yeterlilikleri üzerine bir çalışma [A study on primary school teacher candidates’ ability of using teaching methods and techniques in mathematics courses]. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 5(1), 1-16.
• Stone, B. B. (2012). Flip your classroom to increase active learning and student engagement. 28th annual conference on distance teaching & learning. Wisconsin: The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System.
• Şallı-Çopur, D. (2008). Teacher effectiveness in initial years of service: a case study on the graduates of METU Foreign Language Education Program. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
• Şen, A. İ., & Özgün-Koca, S. A. (2005). Orta öğretim öğrencilerinin matematik ve fen derslerine yönelik olan olumlu tutumları ve nedenleri [Causes of negative attitudes of secondary school students towards mathematics and science classes]. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research (EJER), 18, 186-201.
• Tan, E., Brainard, A., & Larkin, G. L. (2015). Acceptability of the flipped classroom approach for in-house teaching in emergency medicine. Emerg Med Australas, 27, 453-459.
• Taşkın, Ç. Ş., & Hacıömeroğlu, G. (2010). Meslek bilgisi derslerinin öğretmen adaylarının profesyonel gelişimindeki önemi [Importance of pedagogy courses on preservice teachers’ professional development]. PAU Journal of Education, 28, 165-174.
• Thai, N. T. T., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2017). The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers & Education, 107, 113-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.003
• Tomas, L., Evans, N., Doyle, T., & Skamp, K. (2019). Are first year students ready for a flipped classroom? A case for a flipped learning continuum. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0135-4
• Turan, Z. (2015). Tersyüz sınıf yönteminin değerlendirilmesi ve akademik başarı, bilişsel yük ve motivasyona etkisinin incelenmesi[The evaluation of flipped classroom method and examination of its effects on academic achievement, cognitive load and motivation]. Unpublished Doctorate Dissertation, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
• Tütüncü, N., & Aksu, M. (2018). A systematic review of flipped classroom studies in Turkish education. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 4(2), 207-229. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.405647
• Uşun, S. (2007). Öğretim ilke ve yöntemleri, Saraçoğlu, A. S. & Bahar, H. H. (Ed.), Öğretim yöntem ve teknikleri, (ss.137-183), İstanbul: Lisans Yayınları.
• Van Alten, D. C. D., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2019). Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28(2019), 100281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.05.003
• Varış, F. (1996). Eğitimde program geliştirme: teori ve teknikler [Program development in education: theory and techniques]. (6th edition). Ankara: Alkım Yayınları.
• Wilson, J. A., Waghel, R. C., & Dinkins, M. M. (2019). Flipped classroom versus a didactic method with active learning in a modified team-based learning self-care pharmacotherapy course. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 11(12), 1287-1295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2019.09.017
• Yazlık, D. Ö., & Erdoğan, A. (2016). İşbirlikli öğrenme ile birlikte kullanılan problem çözme stratejilerinin öğrenci başarısı üzerine etkisi [The effects of problem solving strategies used in combinations with cooperative learning on learner achivement]. Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty (KEFAD),17, 1-16.
• Yeşilyurt, E. (2013). Öğretmenlerin öğretim yöntemlerini kullanma amaçları ve karşılaştıkları sorunlar [Teachers' aim in using teaching methods and problems they encounter]. Atatürk University Journal of Social Sciences Institute., 17(1), 163-188.
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences]. (8. Edition). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Yıldırım E. G., Köklükaya, A., & Aydoğdu, M. (2016). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının öğretim yöntem-teknik tercihleri ve bu tercihlerinin nedenleri [Teaching methods-technical preferences of science teacher candidates and the reasons for these preferences]. e-Kafkas Journal of Educatıonal Research, 3(1), 15-25.
• Yıldız, D., Kıyıcı, G., & Altıntaş, G. (2016). Ters-yüz edilmiş sınıf modelinin öğretmen adaylarının erişileri ve görüşleri açısından incelenmesi. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 6(3), 195-210.
• HEI (Higher Education Institution). (2007). Öğretmen Yetiştirme ve Eğitim Fakülteleri [Teacher Training and Education Faculties] (1982–2007). Ankara: Yükseköğretim Kurulu.
• Yünkül, E. (2014). Çoklu ortam tasarım ilkelerine göre hazırlanan öğretim yazılımının başarı ve tutuma etkisi [The effect of instructional software prepared according to multimedia design principles on success and attitude]. Unpublished Doctorate Dissertation, Balıkesir University, Balıkesir.
• Yüksel, S. (2011). Türk üniversitelerinde eğitim fakülteleri ve öğretmen yetiştirme [Education faculties and teacher training at Turkish universities]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Zainuddin, Z. (2018). Students’ learning performance and perceived motivation in gamified flipped-class instruction. Computers & Education, 126, 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.003
• Zainuddin, Z., & Halili, S. H. (2016). Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 313-340. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2274.
• Zheng, M., Chu, C.-C., Wu, Y., & Gou, W. (2018). The mapping of online learning to flipped classroom: Small private online course. Sustainability, 10(3), 748. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030748
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Cleary, T. J. (2006). Adolescents’ Development of Personal Agency. In F. Pajares, & T. Urdan (Eds.), Adolescence and Education (Vol. 5): Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents (pp. 45-69). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing
• Zhu, L., Lian, Z., & Engström, M. (2019). Use of a flipped classroom in ophthalmology courses for nursing, dental and medical students: A quasi-experimental study using a mixed-methods approach. Nurse Education Today, 104262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104262