Violence-induced segregated urban environments (VISUE) are quite unique urban centres for their characteristic of neighbourhood sharing among residents before the resultant parting triggered by violence. Yet, not much is known about the neighbourhood satisfaction of inhabitants in this type of urban setting. Such knowledge can provide hints on the factors to be prioritized in planning for improvement of neighbourhood satisfaction of residents in these cities. This paper thus examines the key predictors of neighbourhood satisfaction in a VISUE. Household heads (n = 289), cutting across the three identifiable types of neighbourhoods in Jos, Nigeria, expressed their level of satisfaction on a 71-item self-administered structured survey instrument. The principal component analysis with varimax rotation option explored 10 factors to represent the examined attributes of the neighbourhood environment. The third (final) in the sequence of hierarchical regression models estimated, indicates that none of the socio-economic and demographic attributes and dwelling attributes is significant in predicting neighbourhood satisfaction in VISUE. Three factors: neighbourhood safety and stability, social relationships, and neighbourhood facilities and services, emerge as the key predictors of neighbourhood satisfaction. On the basis of these findings, these three attributes are required to be given precedence in any policy action aiming to improve residents’ satisfaction with their neighbourhoods in VISUE "> [PDF] Hierarchical multiple regression modelling on predictors of neighbourhood satisfaction in violence-induced segregated urban environments | [PDF] Hierarchical multiple regression modelling on predictors of neighbourhood satisfaction in violence-induced segregated urban environments Violence-induced segregated urban environments (VISUE) are quite unique urban centres for their characteristic of neighbourhood sharing among residents before the resultant parting triggered by violence. Yet, not much is known about the neighbourhood satisfaction of inhabitants in this type of urban setting. Such knowledge can provide hints on the factors to be prioritized in planning for improvement of neighbourhood satisfaction of residents in these cities. This paper thus examines the key predictors of neighbourhood satisfaction in a VISUE. Household heads (n = 289), cutting across the three identifiable types of neighbourhoods in Jos, Nigeria, expressed their level of satisfaction on a 71-item self-administered structured survey instrument. The principal component analysis with varimax rotation option explored 10 factors to represent the examined attributes of the neighbourhood environment. The third (final) in the sequence of hierarchical regression models estimated, indicates that none of the socio-economic and demographic attributes and dwelling attributes is significant in predicting neighbourhood satisfaction in VISUE. Three factors: neighbourhood safety and stability, social relationships, and neighbourhood facilities and services, emerge as the key predictors of neighbourhood satisfaction. On the basis of these findings, these three attributes are required to be given precedence in any policy action aiming to improve residents’ satisfaction with their neighbourhoods in VISUE ">

Hierarchical multiple regression modelling on predictors of neighbourhood satisfaction in violence-induced segregated urban environments

Hierarchical multiple regression modelling on predictors of neighbourhood satisfaction in violence-induced segregated urban environments

Violence-induced segregated urban environments (VISUE) are quite unique urban centres for their characteristic of neighbourhood sharing among residents before the resultant parting triggered by violence. Yet, not much is known about the neighbourhood satisfaction of inhabitants in this type of urban setting. Such knowledge can provide hints on the factors to be prioritized in planning for improvement of neighbourhood satisfaction of residents in these cities. This paper thus examines the key predictors of neighbourhood satisfaction in a VISUE. Household heads (n = 289), cutting across the three identifiable types of neighbourhoods in Jos, Nigeria, expressed their level of satisfaction on a 71-item self-administered structured survey instrument. The principal component analysis with varimax rotation option explored 10 factors to represent the examined attributes of the neighbourhood environment. The third (final) in the sequence of hierarchical regression models estimated, indicates that none of the socio-economic and demographic attributes and dwelling attributes is significant in predicting neighbourhood satisfaction in VISUE. Three factors: neighbourhood safety and stability, social relationships, and neighbourhood facilities and services, emerge as the key predictors of neighbourhood satisfaction. On the basis of these findings, these three attributes are required to be given precedence in any policy action aiming to improve residents’ satisfaction with their neighbourhoods in VISUE

___

  • Adams, R. E. (1992). Is happiness a home in the suburbs? The influence of urban versus suburban neighbourhoods on psychological health. Journal of Community Psychology, 20(4), 353-372.
  • Adewale, B.A., Taiwo, A.A., Izobo- Martins, O.O. & Ekhaeze, E.N. (2015). Age of residents and satisfaction with the neighbourhoods in Ibadan core area: A Case study of Oke Foko. Global Journal of Art Humanities and Social Science, 3(2), 52-61.
  • Afacan, Y. (2015). Residents satisfaction for sustainable urban regeneration. Municipal Engineer: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 1-15.
  • Aliyu, A.A., Abdu, A.A., Kasim, R., & Martin, D. (2015). Residential segregation and existing neighbourhood patterns in Jos metropolis, Nigeria. Journal of Natural Science Research, 5(16), 12-21.
  • Baruch, Y. & Holtom, B.C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations 61(8), 1139–1160.
  • Basolo, V., & Strong, D. (2002). Understanding the neighbourhood: From residents’ perceptions and needs to action. Housing Policy Debate 13, 83-105.
  • Batson, C. D., & Monnat, S. M. (2015). Distress in the desert: neighbourhood disorder, resident satisfaction, and quality of life during the Las Vegas foreclosure crisis. Urban Affairs Review 51, 205-238.
  • Baum, S., Arthurson, K. & Rickson, K. (2010). Happy people in mixed-up places: The association between the degree and type of local socioeconomic mix and expressions of neighbourhood satisfaction. Urban Studies, 47(3), 467–485.
  • Bhavanani, R., Donney, K., Miodownik, D., Mayan Mor, M., & Helbing, D. (2014). Group segregation and urban violence. American Journal of Political Science, 58(1), 226-245.
  • Boeckermann, L.M., Kaczynski, A.T. & Child, S.T. (2017). Association of perceived physical and social attributes with neighbourhood satisfaction among men and women in disadvantaged communities. Public Health 146, 148-151.
  • Braubach, M. (2007). Residential conditions and their impact on residential environment satisfaction and health: results of the WHO large analysis and review of European housing and health status (LARES) study. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 30(3/4), 384–403.
  • Cao, X., & Wang, D. (2016). Environmental correlates of residential satisfaction: An exploration of mismatched neighbourhood characteristics in the Twin Cities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 150, 26–35.
  • Cheng, Z. & Smyth, R. (2015). Crime victimization, neighbourhood safety and happiness in China. Economic Modelling 51, 424–435.
  • Cooke, C. (2015). Careful with the Panic: Violent crime and gun crime are both dropping. National Review.
  • Dassopoulos, A., & Monnat, S. (2011). Do perceptions of social cohesion, social support, and social control mediate the effects of local community participation on neighbourhood satisfaction? Environment and Behaviour 43, 546-565.
  • Davoudi, S.M.M. & Allahyari, M. (2013). Effect of job organization on job performance among operating staffs in manufacturing companies. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management 3, 136-139.
  • Du, P., Wood, A. Ditchman, N. & Stephens, B. (2017). Life satisfaction of downtown high-rise vs suburban lowrise living: Chicago case study. Sustainability 9, 1052, 1-14.
  • Dung-Gwom, J. Y. and Rikko, L. S. (2009). Urban violence and emerging land and housing markets in Jos, Nigeria. Paper presented at the ISA Housing Conference, Glasgow.
  • Field, A.P. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. (4th Ed.). London, UK: SAGE Publications.
  • Fleming, C.M., Manning, M. & Ambrey, C.L. (2016). Crime, green space and life satisfaction: an evaluation of the New Zealand experience. Landscape and Urban Planning 149, 1–10.
  • Francescato, G. (2002). Residential satisfaction research: the case for and against. In Aragones, J.I., Francescato, G. and Garling, T. (Eds.), Residential Environment: Choice, Satisfaction and Behaviour, Westport, CT, US: Bergin & Garney.
  • Gravetter, F., & Wallnau, L. (2014). Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences (8th edition). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Hadavi S. & Kaplan, R. (2016).
  • Neighbourhood satisfaction and use patterns in urban public outdoor spaces: multidimensionality and twoway relationships. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 19, 110–122.
  • Higazi, A. (2011). The Jos Crisis: A Recurrent Nigerian Tragedy. A Discussion Paper. Abuja: Ebert Stifftung.
  • Hipp, J. R. (2010). What is the ‘neighbourhood’ in neighbourhood satisfaction? Comparing the effects of structural characteristics measured at the micro-neighbourhood and tract level. Urban Studies 47(12), 2517– 2536.
  • Hipp, J.R. & Perin, A.J. (2009). The simultaneous effect of social distance and physical distance on the formation of neighbourhood ties. City and Community 8, 5-25.
  • Howley, P., Scott, M. & Redmond, D. (2009). Sustainability versus liveability: An investigation of neighbourhood satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 52(6), 847–864.
  • Hur, M. and Morrow-Jones, H. (2008). Factors that influence residents’ satisfaction with neighbourhoods. Environment and Behaviour, 40(5), 619–635.
  • Hur, M. & Nasar, J. L. (2014). Physical upkeep, perceived upkeep, fear of crime and neighbourhood satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 186-194.
  • Ibem, E.O. & Aduwo, E.B. (2013). Assessment of residential satisfaction in public housing in Ogun state, Nigeria. Habitat International 40, 163-175.
  • Ibem E.O., Opoko A.O. & Aduwo E.B. (2017). Satisfaction with neighbourhood environments in public housing: evidence from Ogun State, Nigeria. Soc Indic Res 130, 733–757.
  • Kasarda, J., & Janowitz, M. (1974). Community attachment in mass society. American Sociological Review 39, 328-39.
  • Krause, J. (2011). A deadly cycle: ethno-religious conflict in Jos, Plateau state, Nigeria. Geneva Declaration Working Paper. Lee S.M., Conway T.L., Frank L.D., Saelens B.E., Cain K.L. & Sallis J.F. (2016). The relation of perceived and objective environment attributes to neighbourhood satisfaction. Environment and Behaviour, 1-25.
  • Leslie E. & Cerin, E. (2008). Are perceptions of the local environment related to neighbourhood satisfaction and mental health in adults? Preventive Medicine 47, 273-278.
  • Li, Z. & Wu, F. (2013). Residential satisfaction in China’s informal settlements: a case study of Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou. Urban Geography 34 (7), 923-949.
  • Loo, C. (1986). Neighbourhood satisfaction and safety: a study of a low-income ethnic area. Environment and Behaviour, 18(1), 109-131.
  • McCulloch, A. (2012). Housing density as a predictor of neighbourhood satisfaction among families with young children in urban England. Population, Space and Place, 18(1), 85-99.
  • Mohan, J. & Twigg, L. (2007). Sense of place, quality of life and local socioeconomic context: evidences from the survey of English housing, 2002/03. Urban Studies, 44(10), 2029-2045.
  • Mouratidis, K. (2017). Is compact city livable? The impact of compact versus sprawled neighbourhoods on neighbourhood satisfaction. Urban Studies, 1- 23.
  • Oktay, D., & Marans, R. W. (2011, July). Neighbourhood satisfaction among diverse groups of inhabitants: findings from Famagusta Area Study. Paper presented at ENHR Conference 2011, Toulouse. Osborne K., Ziersch A.M., Baum
  • F.E. & Gallaher G. (2012). Australian aboriginal urban Residents’ satisfaction with living in their neighbourhood: perceptions of the neighbourhood socio- cultural environment and individual socio-demographic factors. Urban Studies, 49(11) 2459–2477.
  • Oshio, T & Urakawa, K. (2012). Neighbourhood satisfaction, self-rated health, and psychological attributes: a multilevel analysis in Japan. Journal of Environmental Psychology 32, 410-417.
  • Ostien, P. (2009). Jonah Jang and the Jasawa: Ethno-Religious Conflict in Jos, Nigeria. Muslim–Christian Relations in Africa. August.
  • Pallant, J. (2011). A step-by-step guide to data analysis using SPSS programme: SPSS survival manual. (4th Ed). Australia: Allen & Unwin.
  • Parkes, A., Kearns, A., & Atkinson, R. (2002). What makes people dissatisfied with their neighbourhoods? Urban Studies, 39(13), 2413–2438.
  • Permentier, M., Bolt, G., & van Ham, M. (2011). Determinants of neighbourhood satisfaction and perception of neighbourhood reputation. Urban Studies, 48(5), 977–996.
  • Potter, J. & Cantarero, R. (2006). How does increasing population and diversity affect resident satisfaction? A small community case study, Environment and Behaviour, 38(5), 605–625.
  • Sampson, R. J. (1991). Linking the micro- and macro level dimensions of community social organization. Social Forces 70, 43–64.
  • Savasdisara, T. (1988). Residents’ satisfaction and neighbourhood characteristics in Japanese urban communities. Landscape and Urban Planning 15, 201- 210.
  • Sirgy, M.J. and Cornwell, T. (2002). How neighbourhood features affect quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 59(1) 79-114.
  • Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. (6th Ed.) Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Tajfel, H. (1981). The attributes of intergroup behaviour. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Human groups and social categories (pp. 228-253). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tan, T.H. (2016b). Neighbourhood satisfaction: responses from residents of green townships in Malaysia. Inter national Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 9 (1), 137-155.
  • Tapsuwana, S., Mathota, C., Walkera, I. & Barnett, G. (2018). Preferences for sustainable, liveable and resilient neighbourhoods and homes: A case of C a n b e r r a , Australia. Sustainable Cities and Society 37, 133–145.
  • Temelova J. & Slezavoka A. (2014). The changing environment and neighbourhood satisfaction in socialist high-rise panel housing estates: The time- comparative p e r - ceptions of elderly residents in Prague. Cities 37, 82-91.
  • Tetaz, M. (2014). Life satisfaction, neighbourhood quality of life and crime. Working Paper Series - Centre for Business Research and Studies). Palemo Business Review, 7-15.
  • Weidmann, N. & Salehyan, I. (2013). Violence and ethnic segregation: A computational model applied to Baghdad. International Studies Quarterly 57, 52-64.
  • Wu, R., Huang, X., Li, Z, Liu, Y., and Liu, Y. (2018). Deciphering the meaning and me chani sm of migrants’ and locals’ neighbourhood attachment in Chinese cities: evidence from Guangzhou. Cities 85, 187-195.
  • Yong, A. G. and Pearce, P. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis, Tutorials in quantitative methods for Psychology, 9(2): 79-94.
  • Youssoufi, S. and Foltête, J. (2013). Determining appropriate neighbourhood shapes and sizes for modelling landscape satisfaction. Landscape and Urban Planning, 110, 12–24.
A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2564-7474
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2005
  • Yayıncı: İTÜ Rektörlüğü