The Tower of Justice (Adalet Kulesi) in the Topkapı Palace is the most striking and visible feature of the imperial complex, defining the renowned silhouette of the Seraglio. This imperial tower, known as Kasr-ı Adl or Kasr-ı Padişahi, was a reflection of the Ottoman visual ideologies and believed to represent the power and glory of the ruler, as an embodiment of his omniscient eye, watching over his subjects to distribute justice. This paper is an attempt to document the architectural and symbolic evolution of this significant monument and scrutinize the changing meanings attributed to it from the 15th century until the 19th century. The date of construction and the patron of the latest Tower of Justice –as we see it today– is not yet documented. Under the light of visual sources and morphological analysis, this research sheds light on the period, in which the latest neo-classical pavilion surmounting the tower was built. Archival documents from the Ottoman State Archives and Topkapı Palace Museum Archives, together with inscriptions, engravings, paintings, and photographs are used in this research to demonstrate the transformation and continuous renovation of the Tower of Justice throughout the Ottoman era. "> [PDF] Biography of a monument: Historical and morphological survey of the Tower of Justice (Adalet Kulesi)Biography of a monument: Historical and morphological survey of the Tower of Justice (Adalet Kulesi) | [PDF] Biography of a monument: Historical and morphological survey of the Tower of Justice (Adalet Kulesi)Biography of a monument: Historical and morphological survey of the Tower of Justice (Adalet Kulesi) The Tower of Justice (Adalet Kulesi) in the Topkapı Palace is the most striking and visible feature of the imperial complex, defining the renowned silhouette of the Seraglio. This imperial tower, known as Kasr-ı Adl or Kasr-ı Padişahi, was a reflection of the Ottoman visual ideologies and believed to represent the power and glory of the ruler, as an embodiment of his omniscient eye, watching over his subjects to distribute justice. This paper is an attempt to document the architectural and symbolic evolution of this significant monument and scrutinize the changing meanings attributed to it from the 15th century until the 19th century. The date of construction and the patron of the latest Tower of Justice –as we see it today– is not yet documented. Under the light of visual sources and morphological analysis, this research sheds light on the period, in which the latest neo-classical pavilion surmounting the tower was built. Archival documents from the Ottoman State Archives and Topkapı Palace Museum Archives, together with inscriptions, engravings, paintings, and photographs are used in this research to demonstrate the transformation and continuous renovation of the Tower of Justice throughout the Ottoman era. ">

Biography of a monument: Historical and morphological survey of the Tower of Justice (Adalet Kulesi)Biography of a monument: Historical and morphological survey of the Tower of Justice (Adalet Kulesi)

Biography of a monument: Historical and morphological survey of the Tower of Justice (Adalet Kulesi)Biography of a monument: Historical and morphological survey of the Tower of Justice (Adalet Kulesi)

The Tower of Justice (Adalet Kulesi) in the Topkapı Palace is the most striking and visible feature of the imperial complex, defining the renowned silhouette of the Seraglio. This imperial tower, known as Kasr-ı Adl or Kasr-ı Padişahi, was a reflection of the Ottoman visual ideologies and believed to represent the power and glory of the ruler, as an embodiment of his omniscient eye, watching over his subjects to distribute justice. This paper is an attempt to document the architectural and symbolic evolution of this significant monument and scrutinize the changing meanings attributed to it from the 15th century until the 19th century. The date of construction and the patron of the latest Tower of Justice –as we see it today– is not yet documented. Under the light of visual sources and morphological analysis, this research sheds light on the period, in which the latest neo-classical pavilion surmounting the tower was built. Archival documents from the Ottoman State Archives and Topkapı Palace Museum Archives, together with inscriptions, engravings, paintings, and photographs are used in this research to demonstrate the transformation and continuous renovation of the Tower of Justice throughout the Ottoman era.

___

  • Akçıl, Ç. (2009). Saray-ı Cedid. In TDV İslam Ansiklopedisi 36 (pp. 126–128). Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı.
  • Arel, A. (1996). Cihannüma Kasrı ve Erken Osmanlı Saraylarında Kule Yapıları Hakkında. In Z. Ahunbay, D. Mazlum, K. Eyüpgüller (Eds.), Prof. Doğan Kuban’a Armağan (pp. 99– 116). Eren.
  • Atasoy, N. (2005). 15. yüzyıldan 20. yüzyıla Osmanlı Bahçeleri ve Hasbahçeler. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı.
  • Avcıoğlu, N. (2008). Istanbul: The Palimpsest City in Search of Its Architext. RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics, 53/54,190–210.
  • Ayık, M. S. (2012). Topkapı Sarayı I. II. III. Avlu ve binalarında bulunan kitabelerin bir coğrafi bilgi sistemine işlenmesi, harita üzerinde gösterimi ve internet ortamında paylaşımı. T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanliği İstanbul Rölöve ve Anıtlar Müdürlüğü.
  • Aynur, H., Hayashi, K., Karateke, H. (2020). Database for Ottoman Inscriptions. http://www.ottomaninscriptions. com/
  • Ayverdi, E. H. (1953). Fâtih Devri Mimarisi. İstanbul Fethi Derneği.
  • Ayverdi, E. H. (1973). Osmanlı Mimarisinde Fatih Devri III. Baha Matbaası.
  • Ayverdi, E. H. (1973b). Osmanlı Mimarisinde Fatih Devri IV. Baha Matbaası.
  • Ayverdi, E. H. (1976). İlk 250 senenin Osmanlı Mimârîsi. İstanbul Fetih Cemiyeti. Choiseul-Gouffier, M.G.A.F. (1842).
  • Voyage pittoresque dans l’empire Ottoman, en Grèce, dans la Troade, les îles de l’archipel et sur les cotes de l’Asie-Mineure. J.-P. Aillaud.
  • Çağaptay, S. (2011). Prousa/Bursa, a city within the city: chorography, conversion and choreography. Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies, 35(1), 45–69.
  • Çağaptay, S. (2020). The First Capital of the Ottoman Empire: The Religious, Architectural and Social History of Bursa. I.B. Tauris.
  • Eldem, S. H. (1969). Köşkler ve Kasırlar. Devlet Güzel Sanatlar Akademisi Yüksek Mimarlık Bölümü Rölöve Kürsüsü.
  • Eldem, S. H. (1979). İstanbul Anıları - Reminiscences of Istanbul. Aletaş Alarko Eğitim Tesisleri.
  • Eldem, S. H. & Akozan, F. (1982). Topkapı Sarayı: Bir mimari araştırma. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı, Eski Eserler ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlüğü.
  • Eren, E. (1995). Mimari Açıdan Geçmişten Günümüze Osmanlı Sarayları. In I. Edirne Sarayı Sempozyumu Bildirileri. Trakya Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Ersoy, A. (2015). Architecture and the late Ottoman historical imaginary: reconfiguring the architectural past in a modernizing empire. Ashgate.
  • Evliya Çelebi (1998). Evliya Çelebi Seyahatnamesi. Haz. A.S. Kahraman, Y. Dağlı, R. Dankoff, Z. Kurşun. Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  • Gabriel, A. (2010). Bir Türk Başkenti, Bursa. Haz. N. Er, H. Er, A. Kazancıgil. Osmangazı Belediyesi Yayınları.
  • Gülsün, H., Öner, S., Yılmaz, Y. (1995). Osmanlı Mimarlığında “Devlet” Kavramını Vurgulayan Mimarlık Ögeleri. In I. Edirne Sarayı Sempozyumu Bildirileri. Trakya Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Hamadeh, S. (2008). The city’s pleasures in Istanbul in the eighteenth century. University of Washington Press.
  • Kafescioglu, Ç. (2009). Constantinopolis / Istanbul : Cultural Encounter, Imperial Vision, and the Construction of the Ottoman Capital. Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Keskin, M. Ç. (2014). Çağdaş Kaynaklarda Ankara Savaşı Sonrası Bursa Sarayı’nın Yağmalanması. Belleten LXXVIII, 283. 891–906. Türk Tarih Kurumu.
  • Kocaaslan, M. (2010). Topkapı Sarayı Haremi: IV. Mehmed Dönemi (1648-1687) [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi. Kontolaimos, P. (2016). A Landscape for the Sultan, an architecture for the eye: Edirne and its fifteenth-century royal tower. Landscape History 37(2), 19–33.
  • Kuban, D. (1996). Istanbul, an urban history : Byzantion, Constantinopolis, Istanbul. Türkiye Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfı.
  • Kuran, A. (1996). A Spatial Study of Three Ottoman Capitals: Bursa, Edirne, and Istanbul. Muqarnas, 13, 114–131. Léopold, Basch, S., & Ferrier, C.-M. (1997). Voyage à Constantinople: 1860. Éd. Complexe.
  • Melling, A. I. (1819). Voyage pittoresque de Constantinople et des rives du Bosphore. Treuttel & Wuertz.
  • Necipoğlu, G. (1986). Framing the Gaze in Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal Palaces. Ars Orientalis, 23, 303–42.
  • Necipoğlu, G. (1991). Architecture, ceremonial, and power : the Topkapı Palace in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. Architectural History Foundation; MIT Press.
  • Oğuzoğlu, Y. (2006). Bursa’nın payitaht Olması. In Payitaht Bursa’da Kültür ve Sanat. Osmangazi Belediyesi.
  • Osman, R. (1989). Edirne Sarayı. Haz. S. Ünver. Türk Tarih Kurumu.
  • Özer, M. (2014). Edrine Sarayı (Saray-ı Cedid-i Amire) : Kısa bir değerlendirme. Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Özgüven, Y. (2009). II. Mahmud Dönemi İstanbulu’nda Kentsel-Fiziksel Kavrayışın Değişimi [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi.
  • Özlü, N. (2018). From Imperial Palace to Museum: The Topkapı palace durıng the Long-Nineteenth Century [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi.
  • Özlü, N. (2020). II. Mahmud’dan II. Meşrutiyet’e Topkapı Sarayı Onarımları. Ege Mimarlık, 108 (4), 70–77.
  • Öztuncay, B. (2006). Dersaadet’in fotoğrafçıları: 19 yüzyıl İstanbulunda fotoğraf: Öncüler, stüdyolar, sanatçılar. Aygaz.
  • Öztuncay, B. (2013). Robertson: Osmanlı başkentinde fotoğrafçı hakkak = photographer and engraver in the Ottoman Capital. Vehbi Koç Vakfı.
  • Pancaroğlu, O. (1995). Architecture, Landscape, And Patronage In Bursa: The Making of an Ottoman Capital City. Turkish Studies Association Bulletin, 19(2), 40–55.
  • Sakaoğlu, N. (2002). Tarihi, mekanları, kitabeleri ve anıları ile Saray-ı Hümayun: Topkapı Sarayı. Denizbank. Sözen, M. (1990). Devletin Evi Saray. Sandoz.
  • Stephanov, D. (2014). Sultan Mahmud II (1808-1839) and the first shift in modern ruler visibility in the Ottoman Empire. Journal of the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association, 1(1–2), 129–148.
  • Stephanov, D. (2018). Ruler Visibility and Popular Belonging in the Ottoman Empire, 1808-1908. Edinburgh University Press.
  • Şenocak, L. (2008, June 13–15). Hadice Turhan Sultan and the Yeni Valide Mosque Complex [Conference presentation]. Tarihi Yarımada Sempozyumu, İstanbul Ticaret Odası.
  • Şimşirgil, A. (2005). Taşa yazılan tarih Topkapı Sarayı. Tarih Düşünce Kitapları.
  • Tanyeli, U. (1988). Anadolu-Türk Saray Mimarlığının Evrimi Üzerine Gözlemler (12.-16. Yüzyıl). Topkapı
  • Müzesi Yıllığı 3. Topkapı sarayı Müzesi. Tayyarzade Ata Bey, & Arslan, M. (2010). Osmanlı Saray Tarihi Tarih-i Enderun (Târih-i Atâ) (Vol. I). Kitabevi.
  • Tuğlacı, P. (1990). The role of the Balian family in Ottoman architecture. YÇK Yayınları.
  • Uğurlu, H. (2012). III. Selim’in İstanbul’u: Siyasi ve Askeri Dönüşümler Işığında İmar Faaliyetleri [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi.
  • Uzunçarşılı, İ. H. (1945). Osmanlı devletinin saray teşkilâtı. Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi.
  • Ünver, S. (1953). Edirne’de Fatih’in Cihannüma Kasrı. İsmail Akgün Matbaası.
  • Ünver, R. (2019). Ottoman Baroque: The architectural refashioning of eighteenth- century Istanbul. Princeton University Press.
  • Westbrook, N., Rainsbury Dark, K., van Meeuwen, R. (2010). Constructing
  • Melchior Lorichs’s Panorama of Constantinople. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 69(1), 62–87.
  • Yenal, E. (1996). Bir Masaldı Bursa. YKY.
  • Yılmaz, C. (2010). II. Mahmud: Yeniden yapılanma sürecinde İstanbul = Istanbul in the process of being rebuilt. İstanbul Avrupa Kültür Başkenti.