The current study aims to identify the controversy dimensions between the instrumental and the aesthetic mind in Theodore Adorno’s philosophy and its representations in contemporary composition. The problem of the study is based on Theodore Adorno’s readings of the contemporary and cultural scene nature related to the conflict principle between the two concepts of conflict: the instrumental mind that makes technology, machinery; and the aesthetic mind that makes art and beauty. The importance of the study lies in presenting the ideas and thesis of the Frankfurt Critical School, as Adorno was one of its pioneers. The study includes five artworks achieved by artists from the European and American West, as the researcher’s selection criteria were based on observing the most famous and influencing artists in the contemporary art and on choosing artworks achieved between 1958 and 2004. The study found that most important of which is celebration of the productions of contemporary fine art in all its marginal, which elevates it to the place of artistic and aesthetic work to cut contemporary human ties with everything that is perfect and Semitic, and elevate human mind, spirit, and general human culture. Furthermore, the study found that the most important of which is the emergence of hybrid artistic genres combining different creative styles and turning a large number of artists to the practice technical specialties away from their original areas in search of innovation and fame. "> [PDF] The dialectic of the instrumental and the aesthetic mind in the philosophy of Theodore Adorno and its representations in contemporary art | [PDF] The dialectic of the instrumental and the aesthetic mind in the philosophy of Theodore Adorno and its representations in contemporary art The current study aims to identify the controversy dimensions between the instrumental and the aesthetic mind in Theodore Adorno’s philosophy and its representations in contemporary composition. The problem of the study is based on Theodore Adorno’s readings of the contemporary and cultural scene nature related to the conflict principle between the two concepts of conflict: the instrumental mind that makes technology, machinery; and the aesthetic mind that makes art and beauty. The importance of the study lies in presenting the ideas and thesis of the Frankfurt Critical School, as Adorno was one of its pioneers. The study includes five artworks achieved by artists from the European and American West, as the researcher’s selection criteria were based on observing the most famous and influencing artists in the contemporary art and on choosing artworks achieved between 1958 and 2004. The study found that most important of which is celebration of the productions of contemporary fine art in all its marginal, which elevates it to the place of artistic and aesthetic work to cut contemporary human ties with everything that is perfect and Semitic, and elevate human mind, spirit, and general human culture. Furthermore, the study found that the most important of which is the emergence of hybrid artistic genres combining different creative styles and turning a large number of artists to the practice technical specialties away from their original areas in search of innovation and fame. ">

The dialectic of the instrumental and the aesthetic mind in the philosophy of Theodore Adorno and its representations in contemporary art

The dialectic of the instrumental and the aesthetic mind in the philosophy of Theodore Adorno and its representations in contemporary art

The current study aims to identify the controversy dimensions between the instrumental and the aesthetic mind in Theodore Adorno’s philosophy and its representations in contemporary composition. The problem of the study is based on Theodore Adorno’s readings of the contemporary and cultural scene nature related to the conflict principle between the two concepts of conflict: the instrumental mind that makes technology, machinery; and the aesthetic mind that makes art and beauty. The importance of the study lies in presenting the ideas and thesis of the Frankfurt Critical School, as Adorno was one of its pioneers. The study includes five artworks achieved by artists from the European and American West, as the researcher’s selection criteria were based on observing the most famous and influencing artists in the contemporary art and on choosing artworks achieved between 1958 and 2004. The study found that most important of which is celebration of the productions of contemporary fine art in all its marginal, which elevates it to the place of artistic and aesthetic work to cut contemporary human ties with everything that is perfect and Semitic, and elevate human mind, spirit, and general human culture. Furthermore, the study found that the most important of which is the emergence of hybrid artistic genres combining different creative styles and turning a large number of artists to the practice technical specialties away from their original areas in search of innovation and fame.

___

  • ReferencesAbd Al-Jabbar, K. (2016). Culture and beauty by Theodor Adorno. Algeria: University of Oran.
  • Abul-Enein, F. (1995). Social interpretation of the literary phenomenon: heritage and problematic approach.
  • Alam Alfeker. 23 (4). Pp. 165-2010 Adorno, T. (1991). Culture industry reconsidered. Londen: Routledge.
  • Banai, N. (2014). Yves Klein, Reaktion Books - Critical Lives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. .
  • Biro, A. (2011). Critical Ecologies: The Frankfurt School and Contemporary Environmental Crises. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Buchholz, R. (2017). Restructuring Capitalism: Materialism and Spiritualism in Business. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.
  • Buchsteiner, T., & Letze, O. (2007).
  • Duane Hanson: Sculptures of the American Dream. Distributed Art Pub Incorporated. Cobb, M., & Abromeit, J. (2014).
  • Herbert Marcuse: A Critical Reader. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. Dickens, L. (2019, 4 23). BBC Report. Retrieved from How did Banksy become the world’s most famous vandal?: https://www.bbc.com/timelines/ zytpn39
  • Fawsi, K. (2014). Paradigm of Frankfurt School at stake. Journal of Research and Humanities, 5(9), 102-122.
  • Hao, E. (2010). Critical Theory, Frankfurt School. (T. Deeb, Trans.) Cairo: National Centre for Translatio.
  • Jones, P. (1993). Sociological Theories and Research Practices. Indiana University: CollinsEducational.
  • Lechte, J. (2008). Fifty Key Contemporary Thinkers from Structuralism to Postmodernity. (F. Al Sestani, Trans.) Beirut: Arab Unity Studies Centr.
  • Leppert, T., & Adorno, T. (2002). Essays on Music. California: University of California Press.
  • Maazouz, A. (2011). The aesthetics of modernity: Adorno and Frankfurt School. Beirut: Muntada Almaaref.
  • Mahdi, A. (2018). Frankfurt School of Cash: Foundations and Intellectual premises. Journal of Political Sciences( 9), 127-156.
  • Markham, T. (2017). Media and Everyday Life. Macmillan International Higher Education.
  • Mohamad, R. (1998). The aesthetics of the Frankfurt school, Adorno as a model. Beirut: The University Foundation for Studies, Publishing and Distribution. Moneer, K. (2010). Critical Theory for Frankfurt School from Max Horkheimer to Axel Honneth. Beirut: Arab Sceintific Publishers.
  • Mustafa. A; Ghareeb, M. (2016). Analysis of the book “The Controversy of Enlightenment” by Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno. Journal of Human Sciences, University of Umm Al - Bawaki, 3(2), Pages 75- 87.
  • Noeri, G., Adorno, T., & Horkheimer, M. (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Rauschenberg, R., & Joseph, B. (2003). Random Order: Robert Rauschenberg and the Neo-avant-garde. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Rees, G. (2011, 7 4). Theo Jansen’s Strandbeest. Retrieved from Theo Jansen’s Strandbees: garethrees. org/2011/07/04/strandbeest/