Urban design and morphology are one of the most important factors affecting outdoor thermal comfort that should be given special attention. Optimal orientation would improve the quality of the building’s thermal comfort as well as its urban area, considering the geography and climate of the area. Conversely, orientation and physical form of the buildings (particularly high-rise buildings) which are incompatible with climate could create a phenomenon called “urban heat island” and disrupt their thermal comfort. Moreover, vegetation as one of the outdoor affecting factors, through creating air movement and shading can help in enhancing the thermal comfort sensation. This paper, through a descriptive-analytical method, firstly explored the theoretical foundations around thermal comfort and the effects of morphology and vegetation on that. Secondly, a high-rise building complex located in Maslak district of Istanbul, a modern and developing region with the Mediterranean climate, was chosen as a case study. Three design alternatives, including the current design and two hypothetical design alternatives for building orientation and vegetation parameters, have been analyzed and the thermal comfort indicators, PMV and PPD have been calculated by Envi-met software. By evaluating and comparing the outputs, it can be concluded that controlling these two parameters (building orientation and vegetation) could have a positive impact on outdoor thermal comfort. "> [PDF] Measuring effects of building orientation and vegetation on thermal comfort by ENVI-met (Case study: Maslak area, Istanbul) | [PDF] Measuring effects of building orientation and vegetation on thermal comfort by ENVI-met (Case study: Maslak area, Istanbul) Urban design and morphology are one of the most important factors affecting outdoor thermal comfort that should be given special attention. Optimal orientation would improve the quality of the building’s thermal comfort as well as its urban area, considering the geography and climate of the area. Conversely, orientation and physical form of the buildings (particularly high-rise buildings) which are incompatible with climate could create a phenomenon called “urban heat island” and disrupt their thermal comfort. Moreover, vegetation as one of the outdoor affecting factors, through creating air movement and shading can help in enhancing the thermal comfort sensation. This paper, through a descriptive-analytical method, firstly explored the theoretical foundations around thermal comfort and the effects of morphology and vegetation on that. Secondly, a high-rise building complex located in Maslak district of Istanbul, a modern and developing region with the Mediterranean climate, was chosen as a case study. Three design alternatives, including the current design and two hypothetical design alternatives for building orientation and vegetation parameters, have been analyzed and the thermal comfort indicators, PMV and PPD have been calculated by Envi-met software. By evaluating and comparing the outputs, it can be concluded that controlling these two parameters (building orientation and vegetation) could have a positive impact on outdoor thermal comfort. ">

Measuring effects of building orientation and vegetation on thermal comfort by ENVI-met (Case study: Maslak area, Istanbul)

Measuring effects of building orientation and vegetation on thermal comfort by ENVI-met (Case study: Maslak area, Istanbul)

Urban design and morphology are one of the most important factors affecting outdoor thermal comfort that should be given special attention. Optimal orientation would improve the quality of the building’s thermal comfort as well as its urban area, considering the geography and climate of the area. Conversely, orientation and physical form of the buildings (particularly high-rise buildings) which are incompatible with climate could create a phenomenon called “urban heat island” and disrupt their thermal comfort. Moreover, vegetation as one of the outdoor affecting factors, through creating air movement and shading can help in enhancing the thermal comfort sensation. This paper, through a descriptive-analytical method, firstly explored the theoretical foundations around thermal comfort and the effects of morphology and vegetation on that. Secondly, a high-rise building complex located in Maslak district of Istanbul, a modern and developing region with the Mediterranean climate, was chosen as a case study. Three design alternatives, including the current design and two hypothetical design alternatives for building orientation and vegetation parameters, have been analyzed and the thermal comfort indicators, PMV and PPD have been calculated by Envi-met software. By evaluating and comparing the outputs, it can be concluded that controlling these two parameters (building orientation and vegetation) could have a positive impact on outdoor thermal comfort.

___

  • Akbari, H. (2002). Shade trees reduce building energy usage use and CO2 emissions from power plants. Environmental Pollution, 116, 119-226.
  • Ali-Toudert, F., Mayer, H. (2006). Numerical study on the effects of aspect ratio and orientation of an urban street canyon on outdoor thermal comfort in hot and dry climate, Building and Environment, 41, 94–108.
  • Aljawabral, F., Nikolopoulou M. (2009). Outdoor Thermal Comfort in the Hot Arid Climate. 26th Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Quebec.
  • ASHRAE (2004). ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55R - Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. Barakat, A., Ayad, H., El-Sayed, Z.
  • (2017). Urban design in favor of human thermal comfort for hot arid climate using advanced simulation methods. Alexandria Engineering, 56, 533–543.
  • Beizaee, A., Steven, K. Firth, Vadodaria, K., Loveday, D. (2012). Assessing the ability of PMV model in predicting thermal sensation in naturally ventilated buildings in UK. Proceedings of 7th Windsor conference: The changing context of comfort in an unpredictable world, London.
  • Bourbia, F., Boucheriba, F. (2010). Impact of street design on urban microclimate for semi-arid climate (Constantine). Renewable Energy, 35, 343–347.
  • Bruse, M. Fleer, H. (1998). Simulating surface-plant-air interactions inside urban environments with a three dimensional numerical model. Environmental Modeling & Software, 13, 373–384.
  • Chia, S. L, Hamdan, A., Ossen, D. R. (2007). The effect of geometric shape and building orientation on minimizing solar insolation on high-rise built form in tropical climate. National Seminar on Energy in Buildings (NSEB). UITM, Shah Alam.
  • Çobanoglu, G. (2007). Lichens from the Maslak Campus of Istanbul Technical University. Turk J Bot, 31, 71-74.
  • Djongyang, N., Tchinda, R. Njomo, D., (2010) Thermal comfort: A review paper. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 14, 2626-2640.
  • Eliasson I., Knez, I. Westerberg, U., Thorsson, S., Lindberg, F. (2007). Climate and behavior in a Nordic city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 82, 72–84.
  • Emmanuel R., Rosenlund, H., Johansson, E. (2007). Urban shading (A design option for the tropics) a study in Colombo, Sri Lanka. International journal of climatology Int. J. Climtol, 27, 1995–2004.
  • Fabbri, K. (2015). Indoor Thermal Comfort Perception. A Questionnaire Approach Focusing on Children, XI, 302 p. 19-20.
  • Fanger, P.O. (1972). Thermal comfort. New York: McGraw- Hill. Gupta R, Ralegaonkar. RV. (2004).
  • Estimation of beam radiation for optimal orientation and shape decision of buildings in India. Architectural Journal of Institution of Engineers India, 85, 27–32.
  • Hensen, J. (1991). On the thermal interaction of building structure and heating and ventilation system. Doctoral Dissertation, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
  • Iyendo, T. O., Akingbaso, Y. A., Alibaba, H. Z., Özdeniz, M. B. ( 2016 ). A relative study of microclimate responsive design approaches to buildings in Cypriot settlements. ITU A|Z , 13(1).
  • Rodrigues, M. J., & Landin, A. (2011). Influence of Building Orientation on the indoor climate of Buildings. The second international conference on advances in engineering and technology, Entebbe, Uganda (pp. 78-84).
  • Kocagil I. E. and Oral G. K. (2016). The effect of solar heat gain on climate responsive courtyard buildings. ITU A|Z , 13(2) , 39-46.
  • Koerniawan, M. D., Gao, W. (2015). Thermal Comfort Investigation in Three Hot-Humid Climate Theme Parks in Jakarta. American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 11 (3), 133.144.
  • Krüger, E., Drach, P., Emmanuel, R., Corbella, O. (2013). Urban heat island and differences in outdoor comfort levels in Glasgow. UK. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 112(1-2), 127–141.
  • Lai, D., Guo, D., Hou, Y., Lin, C., Chen, Q. (2014). Studies of Outdoor Thermal Comfort in Northern China, Thermal Comfort in Northern China. Building and Environment, 77, 110-118.
  • Lin, K. Y. (2013). Investigating Reducing Building Energy Use at Urban Scale in Taipei. PhD thesis, Cardiff University.
  • Lin. T.P. (2009). Thermal perception, adaption and attendance in a public square in hot and humid regions. Building and Environment, 44, 2017–2026.
  • Lowe, S.A. (2016). An energy and mortality impact assessment of the urban heat island in the US. Environ. Impact Assess. 56, 139–144.
  • Makvandi, M. Li, B. (2016). The Relation between Urban Morphology and Local Climate Towards the Urban Form to Reach a Reasonable and Sustainable Urban Design. International conference on research and science, Georgia.
  • Matzarakis A., Mayer H. (1997). Heat stress in Greece. Int. Biometeorol, 41, 34–39.
  • Moreno M. M., Labaki, L., Noguchi. E. (2008). Thermal Comfort Zone for Outdoor Areas in Subtropical Climate. 25th Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Dublin.
  • Nikolopoulo M., Baker, N., Steemers, K. (2001). Thermal comfort in outdoor urban spaces: understanding the human parameters. Solar Energy, 70(3), 227–235.
  • Nouri, A. S., (2015). A framework of thermal sensitive urban design benchmarks: potentiating the longevity of Auckland’s Public Realm. Buildings, 5, 252–281.
  • Ogbonna, A. C., Harris, D. J. (2008). Thermal comfort in sub-Sahara Africa: field study report in Jos-Nigeria. Applied Energy, 85.
  • Omrany, H., Marsono, A. K. (2016). Optimization of building energy performance through passive design strategies. British journal of applied science & technology, 13(6), 1-16.
  • Runming, Y., Li, B., Liu, J. (2009). A theoretical adaptive model of thermal comfort - adaptive predicted mean vote PMV). Building and Environment, 44, 2089-2096.
  • Suau, C., Bugariž, B., Fikfak, A. (2015). Urban History, Morphology and environmental urban design of maritime spaces in the old town of Koper , ANNALES, 25.
  • Susie, K. (2011). Using bioclimatic design to build passive sustainable building. Retrieved from http// green building elements. com.
  • Taib, N., Aldrin, A., Fadzil, S. F. S., Foong, S. Y. (2010). An Assessment of thermal comfort and users’ perceptions of landscape gardens in a high-Rise Office building. Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(4), 153-154.
  • Thorsson S., Honjo, T., Lindberg, F. ( 2007). Thermal comfort and outdoor activity in Japanese urban public places. Environment and Behavior, 39(5), 660- 684.
  • Tumini I. (2014). The urban microclimate in open space: case studied in Madrid. Cuadernos de Investigación Urbanística, 96, 1–73.
  • Ward, K., Lauf, S., Kleinschmit, B., Endlicher, W. (2016). Heat waves and urban heat islands in Europe: A review of relevant drivers. Sci. Total Environ, 569, 527–539.
  • Yahia M.W., Johansson, E., Thorsson, S., Lindberg, F., Rasmussen, M. I. (2017). Effect of urban design on microclimate and thermal comfort outdoor in warm-humid Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Int J Biometeorol., 62(3), 373-385.