DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN ORTODONTİK TEDAVİ BİLGİLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı diş hekimliği fakültesinde okuyan öğrencilerin ortodonti hakkında bilgisinin değerlendirilmesidir. Yöntem: Çalışma üniversitemizin Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi 1. sınıfında okuyan 18-21 yaş arası (ortalama yaş 20±1,54) 120 öğrenci üzerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Ortodonti ile ilgili 6 sorudan oluşan bir anket 120 öğrenci tarafından cevaplanmıştır. Bulgular: Çalışmaya katılan bireylerin %69’u diş ve çene bozukluklarının kişinin görüntüsünü etkileyeceğini bildirmişler, %78’i diş veya çene bozukluklarının kişinin kendine olan güvenini etkileyeceğini bildirmişler, %89’u diş veya çene bozukluklarında kişinin yaşam kalitesinin etkilenip etkilenmeyeceğine bireylerin çoğunluğu “fikrim yok” yanıtını vermişlerdir. Katılımcıların %56’sı diş telini estetik bulmadıklarını belirtmişler, %68’i lingual ortodonti kavramını bildiklerini belirtmişler, ayrıca %45’i dişlerin 18 yaşından sonra ortodonti tedavisi ile düzelebileceğini düşündüklerini belirtmişlerdir.Sonuç: Bireylerin çoğunluğu; ortodontik problemlerin kişilerin görünümü ve kendine olan güvenlerini etkilediğini doğru değerlendirmiş ancak yaşam kalitesi ile ilgili bağı kuramamışlardır. Ortodonti hakkında toplumumuzda daha fazla bilgilendirme yapılması gereklidir.

KNOWLEDGE OF ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT AMONG DENTAL STUDENTS

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the knowledge of orthodontic treatment among the dental students in a university. Methods: The 120 students were asked to complete a questionnaire that contains 6 questions about orthodontics. The participants were between the ages of 18 and 21 (mean age 20±1.54), and all of them were in their first year of education. Results: 69% of respondents stated that the presence of teeth or jaw anomalies may influence the appearance of a person, 78% reported that teeth or jaw anomalies may effect the self-confidence of a person, 89% told that they have no idea about the impact of teeth or jaw anomalies on quality of life, 56% respondents noted they do not like the appearance of brackets, 68% told that they have known the presence of lingual orthodontics, and 45% of the respondents noted that they think it is possible to perform orthodontic treatment after the age of 18. Conclusion: Most of the participants have rightly evaluated the impact of orthodontic problems on facial appearance and self-confidence but they could not make a relationship between quality of life. Informing about orthodontics should perform in our population.

___

  • 1-Richards MR et al. Contribution of malocclusion and female facial attractiveness to smile esthetics evaluated by eye tracking. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015; 147(4): 472-482.
  • 2-Diklić D, Sever EK, Galić N, Spajić J, Prskalo K. Attitudes of Students of Differenet Schools of University of Zagreb on Tooth Bleaching. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2016 Dec;50(4):301-309. doi: 10.15644/asc50/4/3.
  • 3- KO Adegbite, BO Ogunbanjo, OA Ajisafe, and AA Adeniyi1 Knowledge of Orthodontics as a Dental Specialty: A Preliminary Survey among LASUCOM Students Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2012 Jan-Jun; 2(1): 14–18.
  • 4-Chen M, Wang DW, Wu LP. Fixed orthodontic appliance therapy and its impact on oral health-related quality of life in Chinese patients. Angle Orthod. 2010;80(1):49-55.
  • 5-Klages U, Bruckner A, Guld Y, Zentner A. Dental esthetics, orthodontic treatment,and oral-health attitudes in young adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.2005;128(4):442-449.
  • 6-Liu Z, McGrath C, Hägg U. The impact of malocclusion/orthodontic treatment need on the quality of life: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2009;79(3):585-591.
  • 7- Pandey M, Singh J, Mangal G, Yadav P. Evaluation of awareness regarding orthodontic procedures among a group of preadolescents in a cross-sectional study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2014 Jan-Apr; 4(1): 44–47.
  • 8-Prabhakar RR, Saravanan R, Karthikeyan MK, Vishnuchandran C, Sudeepthi. Prevalence of malocclusion and need for early orthodontic treatment in children. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 May;8(5):ZC60-1.
  • 9-Baykul, Y. (2000). Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme: Klasik test Teorisi ve Uygulaması. ÖSYM Yayınları, Ankara.
  • 10- Ertürk, S. (2013) Eğitimde “Program” Geliştirme. Edge Akademi.
  • 11-Salzman JD. Patient cooperation and assessment. Br Dent J. 1973;134:91–4.
  • 12-Albino JE, Lawrence SD, Tedesco LA. Psychological and social effects of orthodontic treatment. J Behav Med. 1994;17(1):81-98
  • 13- Heydecke G, Gobetti JP. Oral Health Related Quality of Life. Chicago, Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, 2002.
  • 14- Naito M, Yuasa H, Nomura Y. Oral health status and health-related quality of Life: a systematic review. Journal of Oral Science. 2006;48:1-7.
  • 15-de Oliveira CM, Sheiham A. The relationship between normative orthodontic treatment need and oral health-related quality of life. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003;31(6):426-36.
  • 16- de Oliveira CM, Sheiham A. Orthodontic treatment and its impact on oral health related quality of life in Brazilian adolescents. J Orthod. 2004;31(1):20-27.
  • 17- Gherunpong S, Tsakos G, Sheiham A. A socio-dental approach to assessing children's orthodontic needs. Eur J Orthod. 2006;28(4):393-399.
  • 18-Marques LS, Ramos-Jorge ML, Paiva SM, Pordeus IA. Malocclusion: esthetic impact and quality of life among Brazilian schoolchildren. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129(3):424-427.
  • 19-Feu D, de Oliveira BH, Almeida MAO, Kiyak HA, Miguel JAM. Oral health-related quality of life and orthodontic treatment seeking. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;138(2):152-159.
  • 20-Liu Z, McGrath C, Hägg U. The impact of malocclusion/orthodontic treatment need on the quality of life: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2009;79(3):585-591.
  • 21-Feldmann I, List T, John MT, Bondemark L. Reliability of a questionnaire assessing experiences of adolescents in orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2007;77:311–317.
  • 22-Fonseca LM, Araújo TM, Santos AR, Faber J. Impact of metal and ceramic fixed orthodontic appliances on judgments of beauty and other face-related attributes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Feb;145(2):203-6.
  • 23-Papageorgiou SN, Gölz L, Jäger A, Eliades T, Bourauel C. Lingual vs. labial fixed orthodontic appliances: systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment effects. Eur J Oral Sci. 2016 Apr;124(2):105-18.
  • 24-Kim Y. Study on the perception of orthodontic treatment according to age: A questionnaire survey. Korean J Orthod. 2017 Jul;47(4):215-221.