KENTSEL PROJE KAVRAMI VE GELİŞİM SÜRECİ

Değişim dinamikleri olarak tanımlanan farklı ekonomik ve siyasal gelişmelerin, mekânsal ölçekte yansıma biçimine bağlı olarak, kent planlama ve tasarım anlayışı dönemsel olarak farklı biçimlerde anlam kazanmıştır. Kentsel değişim sürecinde gelişen yeni yapılanmalar ile birlikte, Küreselleşme, kentlerin uluslararası düzlemde artan rekabet ortamında yer alabilmesi için Mekânsal Stratejik Planlama yaklaşımını gündeme getirmiştir. Kentsel projeler ise ekonomik güç kazanma, gelişmeyi yönlendirme, kamu-özel işbirlikleri ile yeni bir yönetim modeli oluşturma, karma kullanımlar ile sosyal dengeyi kurma ve yaşanabilir çevreler yaratma hedefi ile bu yaklaşımın en temel eylem alanları olarak yapılanmaya başlamıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, kentsel gelişmede proje temelli yaklaşımları ve kentsel proje kavramını ele almak kentsel mekâna yönelik bu yeni müdahale biçiminin kavramsal gelişim sürecini irdelemektir.

THE CONCEPT OF URBAN PROJECTS AND DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

Depending on the spatial reflections of different social and political developments, which are defined as transformation dynamics, the concepts of urban planning and urban design differ through the time. After the new developments of the urban transformation, globalization brought forward the concept of Spatial Strategic Planning in order for the cities to take part in the international competitive environment. Urban Projects on the other hand, emerged as fundamental means of this approach by fostering economical growth, conducting the development, creating a new administrative model by republic-private co-operations, establishing social equilibrium and livable environments by mixed usages The aim of this paper is to evaluate the development process of the project base approaches to urban development and concept of urban project and to examine the development process of this new form of intervention for urban space.

PDF

___

Albrechts, L., 2006. Bridge the Gap: From Spatial Planning to Strategic Projects, European Planning Studies, 14/10, 1487-1500.
Altshuler, Alan A. and David E. Luberoff 2004. MegaProjects: The Changing Asia. Urban Studies, 37 (12), pp. 315-335.
Bianchini, F. and Parkinson, M. 1993. Cultural Policy and Urban Regeneration: the West European Experience, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Brenner, N., Jamie P., and Theodore N., 2010a. After neoliberalization?, Globalizations, 7: 3, pp. 327 345.
Brenner, N., Peck, J. And Theodore, N. 2010b. Variegated Neoliberalization: Geographies, Modalities, Pathways. Global Networks 9, In Press.
Çubuk, M., 1993. Kentsel Gelişmenin önlenmesinde Kentsel Tasarım ve Yeni Denge Araçları: Büyük Kentsel Projeler, 4. Kentsel Tasarım ve Uygulamalar Sempozyumu, 26-27 Mayıs,1993.
Douglass, M. 1999. Mega-Urban Regions and World City Formation: Politics of Urban Public Investment (Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution and Lincoln Institute of Land Policy).
Erden Erbey, D., 2004. Kentsel Koruma ve Yenileşmede Dönüşüm Projeleri Eyüp Rehabilitasyon Projeleri. Planlama Dergisi, Sayı,4. Faludi, A., 1996. European planning doctrine: A bridge too far? Journal of Planning Education and Research 16, 41-50.
Gospodini, A., 2002. European Cities İn Competition And The New Uses Of urban Design, Journal Of Urban Design, 7/1, 5973.
Gospodini, A., 2005. Landscape Transformations İn The Postmodern Inner City: Clustering Flourishing Economic Activities And Glocalising Morphologies. Sustainable Development and Planning II,, 2.
Graham, S. and Marvin, S., 2001. Urban Futures? Integrating Telecommunications into Urban Planning. Madanipor, A., Hull, A. and Healey, P., eds. The Governance of Place: Space and Planning Processes. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Hajer M. and Reijndrop A.. 2001. In Search of New Public Domain. NAI Publishers, Rotterdam, 2003.
Hall, P. 1993. Cities and Regions in a Global Economy. In: Hall, P., Guzman, R. de, Madduma Bandara, C.M., Kato, A. (ed.) Multilateral Cooperation for Development in the Twenty-First Century: Training and Research for Regional Development, 6-26. Nagoya: United Nations Centre for Regional Development.
Harvey, D. 1989. The Condition of Postmodernity, Oxford, Blackwell, Türkçe Çevirisi: Postmodernliğin Durumu, 1997, Metis Yayınları, çev: S. Savran.
Konuk, G., 2007. Planlamada Değişim ve Yeni Arayışlar. İstanbul Buluşmaları Sempozyumu, İstanbulda Büyük Projeler89 Ekim 2007.
Lecroart and Palisse, J-P. 2007. Large-Scale Urban Development Projects in Europe: What lessons Can be learnt for the Ile-de-France Region? in Large-Scale Urban Development Projects İn Europe, Cahiers de lIAURIF, Vol. 146, June, pp. 525, www.iau-idf.fr.
Legeby,A., 2010.Urban Segregatıon and Urban Form From residential Segregation to segregation in public space, Licentiate Thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Architecture and the Built Environment School of Architecture, Stockholm, Sweden.
Loftman, P. and Nevin, B., 1995. Prestige Projects and Urban Regeneration in the 1980s and 1990s: a review of benefits and limitations, Planning Practice and Research, 10/3-4, 299-315.
Majoor, S., 2007. Amsterdam Zuidas: The Dream Of New Urbanity. In: W.G.M. Framing Strategic Urban Projects Eds. Salet And E. Gualini, Routledge, London, pp. 53-83.
Majoor, S., 2009. The Disconnected Innovation of New Urbanity in Zuidas Amsterdam, Ørestad Copenhagen and Forum Barcelona, European Planning Studies, 17/9, 1379-1402.
Monclus, F., J., 2003. The Barcelona Model: An Original Formula? From Reconstruction to Strategic Urban Projects, 1979-2004, Planning Perspectives, 18, 399-421.
Moulaert,F., Rodrıguez, A., Swyngedouw, E., 2003. The Globalized City; Economic Restructuring and Social Polarization in European Cities. New York: Oxford University Press.
Newman P. and A. Thornley, 1995. Euralille: Boosterism At The Centre Of Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2, nr. 3: 237-246.
Newman, P. and Thornley, A., 2002. Urban Planning in Euope, Routledge.
Özaydın, G., 2006. Role Of Urban Projects As A Tool In Urban Integratıon and Dısıntegratıon, 42nd ISOCARP Congress 2006.
Özsavaşçı, A., 2005. II Nolu Park, Habitat Vadisi, Kongre vadisiKentsel Değişim ve Dönüşüm Sürecinde Taksim-Maçka Yeşil Alanı. Mimar. İst, Sayı: 16, s. 16-23.
Savitch, H.V., Kantor, P., 2004. Cities in the International Marketplace: The political economy of urban development in North America and Western Europe. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Sorkin M. 1992. Variations On a Theme Park: the New American City and the End of Public Space. New York; Hill and Wong.
Swygenedouw, E., Moulert, F. and Rodriguez, A., 2002. Neoliberal Urbanization in Europe Large Scale Urban Developmen Projects And New Urban Policy. Black Well Publising, Oxford, USA.
Tavsanoglu, S. and Healey, P. .1992. Rebuilding the City: property-led urban regeneration, pp. 117-124. Editorial, in: P. Healey et al. (Eds) London, E. & F. N. Spon. Tekeli, İ. 1992. Dünya Kenti İstanbul. Görüş, Kasım, sf: 55-61.
Ünsal, F., 2007. The Evaluatıon Of Project Typologıes In Istanbul: From Conspırıng Dıalogues To Inspırıng Trıalogues, 43rd ISOCARP Congress 2007.
Zukin, S., 1991. Landscapes of Power: From Detroit to Disney World. Berkeley: University of California Press.

ISSN: 2147-7507
Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
Başlangıç: 2013
Yayıncı: Orhan Sevgi

Arşiv