İbrahim DEMİRKAN, Musa KORKMAZ, Aytekin HİTİT, Kamuran PAMUK, Aysun DEMİRKAN ÇEVİK, Z. Kadir SARITAŞ

Symphysis mandibula ayrılmalarında kemik yapıştırıcısı, kemik çimentosu ve cam iyonomerin tutucu etkilerinin karşılaştırılması: ex vivo taze koyun kemiğinde biyomekanik bir çalışma

Özet: Üç farklı kemik yapıştırıcısının tutucu etki güçlerinin karşılaştırması mezbahadan temin edilen koyun çene kemikleri (n=30) üzerinde gerçekleştirildi. Taze çene kemikleri symphysis mandibula hizasından üniversal mekanik test cihazıyla ayrıldı ve uygulanan güç dijital olarak kaydedildi. Yapıştırıcılar yardımıyla ayrılma yerleri hemen yapıştırıldı ve bir gece nemli (% 60) bir ortamda bekletildi. Yapıştırıcı uygulanan mandibulalara ertesi gün sağlam mandibulaya uygulanan aynı işlem uygulandı. Farklı yapıştırıcı uygulanan mandibulaların mekanik olarak ayrılmasıyla elde edilen sonuçlar, yapıştırıcıların tutma güçleri arasında istatiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmadığını gösterdi.

Comparison of the binding effects of bone adhesive, bone cement and glass Ionomer in separated symphysis mandible: an ex vivo biochemical study on fresh ovine mandible

Abstract: Effects of binding strength of three bone adhesives on ovine mandibles (n=30) obtained from a slaughterhouse were compared. Fresh mandibles were separated via symphysis mandible by a universal mechanical test device. Applied force was recorded digitally. Separated mandibles were fixed with different bone glues and incubated in a humidified (60%) chamber at room temperature. Next day, the separation procedure that applied to intact mandible was repeated on the glued mandibles. The results indicated that there was no statistical difference between different artificial bone adhesives used for the fixation of symphysis mandible separation.

PDF

___

Amarante MT., Constantinescu MA., O’Connor D., Yaremchuk J., 1995. Cyanoacyralte fixation of the craniofacial skeleton: en experimental study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 95, 639-646.
Belkoff SM., Mathis JM., Jasper LE., 2002. Ex vivo biomechanical comparison of hydroxyapatite and polymethylmetacrylate cements for use with vertebroplasty. Am. J. Neuroradiol., 23, 1647-1651.
Bloch B., 1958. Bonding of fractures by plastic adhesives. J. Bone Joint Surg., 40A, 804-812.
Brook IM., Hatton PV., 1998. Glass-ionomers: bioactive implant materilas. Biomaterials., 19, 565.
Garruba Jr CN., Robertson RD., 1979. Lag-screw repair of feline mandibular symphseal fracture. Vet. Med. Small. Anim. Clin., 74, 1752.
Giebel G., Rimpler M., 1981. Klebungen am skelettsystem: klebstoffe, 50 jahre hilfsstoffe für den chirurgen (teil 1). Biomed. Technik., 26, 35-40.
Gosain AK., 2002. The plastic surgery Educational Foundation DATA Committee: the current status of tissue glues: 1. For bone fixation. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 109, 2581-2583.
Gosain AK., Lyon VB., 2001. Use of tissue glue: current status. Perspect. Plast. Surg., 15, 129-145.
Heiss C., Schnettler R., 2003. Bioabsorbable adhesives in trauma and orthopaedic surgery. Biomaterialien., 4, 298-304.
Heiss C., Schnettler R., 2005. Bioabsorbable bone adhesives. Historical perspective and current status. Unfallchirurg., 108, 345-348.
Heiss C., Kraus R., Schluckebier D., Stiller AC., Wenisch S., Schnettler R., 2006. Bone adhesives in trauma and orthopedic surgery. European J. Trauma., 2, 141-148.
Kennady MC., Tucker MR., Lester GE., Buckley MJ., 1989. Stress shielding effect of rigid fixation plates on mandibularbone grafts: a photon absorbtion densitometry and quantitative computerized tomographic evaluation. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 18, 307-310.
Kühn KD., 2005. Properties of Bone Cement: What is Bone Cement. In: Breusch S., Malchau H (eds): The well-cemented total hip arthroplasty. Heidelberg: Springer Medizin Verlag: 52-59.
Le Nihouannen D., Saffarzadeh A., Aguado E., Goyenvalle E., Gauthier O., Moreau F., Pilet P., Spaethe R., Daculsi G., Layrolle P., 2007. Osteogenic properties of calcium phosphate ceramics and fibrin glue based composites. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 18, 225-35.
Lye KW., Tideman H., Merkx MAW., Jansen JA., 2009. Bone cements and their use in a mandibular endoprothesis. Tissue Engineering: Part B., 15, 485-496.
Maurer P., Bekes K., Gernhardt CR., Schaller HG., Schubert J., 2004. Comparison of the bond strength of selected adhesive dental systems to cortical bone under in vitro conditions. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surgy., 33, 377–81.
McGraw JK., Lippert JA., Minkus KD., 2002. Prospective evaluation of pain relief in 100 patients undergoing percutaneous vertebroplasty: results and follow up. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol., 13, 883-886.
Meechan JG., McCabe JF., Beynon AD., 1994. Adhesion of composite resin to bone-a pilot study. British J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 32, 91–93.
Meechan JG., McCabe JF., 1995. A comparison of the bond strengths of two different dentine-bonding agents to bone. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 53, 284–287.
Ortiz Ruiz AJ., Vicente A., Camacho Alonso F., López Jornet P., 2010. A new use for self-etching resin adhesives: cementing bone fragments., J. Dent. 38, 750-756.
Papay FA., Hardy S., Morales L., Walker M., Enlow D., 1995. “False” migration of rigid fixation appliances in pediatric craniofacial surgery. J. Craniofac. Surg., 7, 309-313.
Sarkar MR., Wachter N., Patka P., Kinzl L., 2001. First histological observations on the incorporation of a novel calcium bone substitute material in human cancellous bone. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 58, 329-334.
Schliephake H., Reiss G., Urban R., Neukam FW., Guckel S., 1993. Metal release from titanium fixtures during placement in the mandible: an experimental study. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants., 8, 502-511.
Umphlet RC., Johson AL., 1988. Mandibular fractures in the cat: A retrospective study. Vet. Surg., 17, 333.