Manyetik rezonans görüntüleme yöntemi ile lumbal intervertebral disklerin morfometrik değerlendirilmesi

Bu çalışma ile, sağlıklı Türk bireylerde, manyetik rezonans görüntüleme yöntemi kullanılarak, lumbal intervertebral disk yüksekliklerinde yaşa, cinsiyete ve kiloya bağlı değişikliklerin ortaya konulması amaçlandı. Toplam 305 semptomsuz kişi (131’i erkek (yaş aralığı 10-72 yaş; ortalama 36 ± 15,79 yaş) ve 174’ü kadın (yaş aralığı 10-80 yaş; ortalama 38 ± 13,37)) çalışma periyodu esnasında seçildi. Hepsi lumbal intervertebral disklerin anterior ve posterior yüksekliklerini ve disk derinliklerini ölçmek için midsagital manyetik rezonans görüntülemeye maruz bırakıldı. Disk anterior yüksekliğinde ve disk derinliğinde; genel olarak; her iki cinste ve her dekadda L1'den L5'e doğru sefalokaudal (yukarıdan aşağı) bir yükseklik artışı görülmesine rağmen disk posterior yüksekliğinde; değişken bir durum görüldüğünden herhangi bir genelleme yapılamadı. Elde edilen bilgilerin semptomatik hastalarda lumbal disklerin değerlendirilmesinde referans olarak kullanılabileceği, bu verilerin hem intervertebral disklerin geometrik modellemesine hem de biyomekanik ve ergonomik analizlere önemli katkılar sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.

Morphometric evaluation of lumbar intervertebral discs by using magnetic resonance imaging

The aim of the present study was to reveal the changes in lumbar intervertebral disc heights in asymptomatic Turkish individuals relative to the age, gender and weight by using magnetic resonance imaging. A total of 305 asymptomatic individuals (131 males, age range 10-72 years; mean 36 ± 15.79 and 174 females, range 10-80 years; mean 38 ± 13.37) were selected during the study period. All the individuals underwent midsagittal magnetic resonance imaging for measuring the anterior and posterior heights and disc depths of all lumbar intervertebral discs. In anterior heights and disc depths of intervertebral discs, as a whole, from L1 to L5, cepalocaudal, the increases were seen in both genders and in all decades. However, it was not possible to make any generalizations for judging the variables in the posterior heights of intervertebral discs. Therefore, it was considered that the database established would eventually serve as a reference for evaluation of lumbar discs in symptomatic patients and making important contributions to both geometric modelling and biomechanical and ergonomic analyses.

___

  • Amonoo-Kuofi HS. 1991. Morphometric changes in the heights and anteroposterior diameters of the lumbar intervertebral discs with age. J. Anat., 175, 159-168.
  • Buckwalter JA. 1995. Spine Update: Aging and Degeneration of the Human Intervertebral Disc. Spine., 20, 1307-1314.
  • Dorwart RH., Genant HK. 1983. Anatomy of the lumbosacral spine: Symposium on C.T. of the lumbar spine. Radiol. Clin. North. Am. 21, 201-220.
  • Dunlop RB., Adams MA., Hutton WC. 1984. Disc space narrowing and the lumbar facet joints. J. Bone. Joint. Surg., 66, 706-710.
  • Eriksen MF. 1976. Some aspects of aging in the lumbar spine. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 45, 575-580.
  • Fahrni WH., Trueman GE. 1965. Comparative radiological studies of the spines of a primitive population with North Americans and North Europeans. J. Bone. Joint. Surg. , 47, 552-555.
  • Frobin W., Brinckmann P., Biggemann H. 1997. Objektive messung der höhe lumbaler bandscheiben aus seitlichen röntgen- übersichtsaufnahmen. Z. Orthop., 135, 394-402.
  • Humzah MD., Soames RW. 1988. Human ıntervertebral disc: Structure and function. Anat. Rec., 220, 337-356.
  • Hupli M., Heinonen R., Vanharanta H. 1997. Height changes among chronic lowback pain patients during intense physical exercise. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports., 7, 32-37.
  • Hutton WC., Elmer WA., Boden SD., Hyon S., Toribatake Y., Tomita K., Hair GA. 1999. The effect of hydrostatic pressure on intervertebral disc metabolism. Spine., 24, 1507-15.
  • Luoma K., Vehmas T., Riihimäki H., Raininko R. 2001. Disc height and signal ıntensity of the nucleus pulposus on magnetic resonance ımaging as indicators of lumbar disc degeneration. Spine., 26, 680-686.
  • Morris JM. 1973. Biomechanics of the spine. Arch. Surg., 107, 418-423.
  • Nachemson AL., Schultz AB., Berkson MH. 1979. Mechanical properties of human lumbar spinal segments. Spine., 4, 1-8.
  • Neufeld JH. 1992. Induced narrowing and back adaptation of lumbar intervertebral discs in biomechanically stressed rats. Spine., 17, 811-816.
  • Oda J., Tanaka H., Tsuzuki N. 1988. Intervertebral disc changes with aging of human cervical vertebra from the neonate to the eighties. Spine., 13, 1205-1211.
  • Putz RL., Muller-Gerbl M. 1996. The vertebral column-A phylogenic failure? A theory explaining the function and vulnerability of the human spine. Clin. Anat., 9, 205-212.
  • Ratcliffe JF. 1986. Arteryel changes in the human vertebral body associated with aging. The ratios of peripheral to central arteries. Spine., 11, 235-240.
  • Tanner JM., Whitehouse RH., Takaishi M. 1966. Standards from birth to maturity for height, weight, height velocity and weight velocity; British children. Arch. Dis Child., 41, 613-635.
  • Taylor JR. 1975. Growth of the human IVD and vertebral bodies. J. Anat., 120, 149-161.
  • Taylor TKF., Ghosh P., Bushell GR. 1981. The contribution of the intervertebral disc to the scoliotic deformity. Clin. Orthop., 156, 79-90.
  • Tibrewal SB., Pearcy MJ. 1985. Lumbar ıntervertebral disc heights in normal subjects and patients with disc herniation. Spine 10, 452-454.
  • Twomey L., Taylor J. 1985. Age changes in lumbar intervertebral discs. Acta. Orthop. Scan., 56, 496-499.
  • Vernon-Roberts B., Pirie CJ. 1977. Degenerative changes in the intervertebral discs of the lumbar spine and their sequelae. Rheum. Rehabil., 16, 13-21.