Effect of electromagnetic wave emitted from mobile phone on some reproductive parameters in adult male guinea pigs

Bu çalışmada, rutin kullanımdaki mobil telefondan yayılan 900 MHz’lik elektromanyetik alana (EMA) 60 gün süreyle maruz kalan erkek Gine domuzlarında testis ağırlığı ve epididimal sperm kalitesi araştırıldı. Oniki adet sağlıklı erkek kobay rastgele uygulama, EMA (n=6) ve kontrol, K (n=6) grubu olarak iki gruba ayrıldı. Uygulama grubu (Grup EMA), 60 gün süre ile her gün mobil bir telefonla yayılan (telefonu 20 dk çaldırma/konuşma modu, 23 saat 40 dk uyku/standby modu) 900 MHz’lik EMA’a (217 Hz pulse rate, 2 W maximum peak power, SAR 0.95 w/kg) maruz bırakıldı. Kontrol grubu (Grup K) benzer şartlar altında tutuldu, ancak radyasyona maruz bırakılmadı. Grup EMA ve K arasında, sırasıyla, testis ağırlığı (3.6 g ve 4.4 g), epididimal sperm motilitesi (%61.7 ve %70.0) ve anormal sperm oranı (%5.8 ve %3.7) bakımından anlamlı farklılıklar gözlenmedi (P>0.05). Bununla birlikte, Grup EMA’deki sperm sayısı (549.6 x 106 sperm/ml) Grup K’dekilerden (799.17 x 106 sperm/ml) önemli düzeyde (P

Cep telefonundan yayılan elektromanyetik dalganın erişkin erkek kobaylarda bazı üreme parametreleri üzerine etkisi

The effects electromagnetic wave (EMW) (900 MHz) emitted by mobile phones, for 60 days, upon the testis weight and epididymal sperm quality in male guinea pigs were investigated. Twelve healthy male guinea pigs were assigned randomly as the treatment (n=6) and control (n=6) groups. Treatment group (group EMW) was exposed to electromagnetic field of 900 MHz (217 Hz pulse rate, 2 W maximum peak power, SAR 0.95 w/kg) emitted by a mobile phone (used daily as; 20 min calling, then kept in ‘standby’ position for 23 h 40 min/day) for 20 min per day for 60 days. Control group (Group C) was maintained under similar conditions, with no radiation. Unlike the males in Group C kept in a separate room, those in exposed-group were subjected to electromagnetic radiation being operated at 900 MHz EMW field. There were not significant (P>0.05) differences between the groups based on the testicle weight (3.6 g vs. 4.4 g), sperm motility (61.7% vs. 70.0%), and abnormal sperm rate (5.8% vs. 3.7%) in treated and control males, respectively. However, there was a significantly (P

___

  • Agarwal A., 2007. Cell phones and male infertility: dissecting the relationship. Reprod. Biomed., 15, 266-270.
  • Agarwal A., Deepinder F., Sharma RK., Ranga G., Li J., 2008. Effect of cell phone usage on semen analysis in men attending infertility clinic: an observational study. Fertil. Steril., 89, 124-128.
  • Aitken R., Bennetts L., Sawyer D., Wiklendt A., King B., 2005. Impact of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation on DNA integrity in the male germline. Int. J. Androl., 28, 171-179.
  • Atessahin A., Karahan I., Turk G., Gur S., Yilmaz S., Ceribasi AO., 2006. Protective role of lycopene on cisplatininduced changes in sperm characteristics, testicular damage and lipid peroxidation in rats. Reprod. Toxicol.,21, 42-47.
  • Dasdag S., Ketani MA., Akdag Z., Ersay AR., Sari I., Demirtas OC., Celik MS., 1999. Whole body microwave exposure emitted by cellular phones and testicular function of rats. Urol. Res., 27, 219-223.
  • Dasdag S., Akdag MZ., Aksen F., Yilmaz F., Bashan M., Dasdag M., Celik MS., 2003a. Whole body exposure of rats to microwaves emitted from a cell phone does not affect the testes. Bioelectromagnetics, 24,182-188.
  • Dasdag S., Akdag MZ., Ulukaya E., Uzunlar AK., Yegin D., 2003b. Mobile phone exposure does not induce apoptosis on spermatogenesis in rats. Arch. Med.Res., 39, 40-44.
  • Davoudi M., Brossner C., Kuber W., 2002. The influence of electromagnetic waves on sperm motility. J. Urol., 19, 18-22.
  • Ergün G., Aktaş S., 2009. ANOVA modellerinde kareler toplamı yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması. Kafkas Üniv. Vet. Fak. Derg., 15, 481-484.
  • Erogul O., Oztas E., Yildirim I., Kir T., Aydur E., Komesli G., Irkilata HC., Irmak MK., Peker AF., 2006. Effects of electromagnetic radiation from a cellular phone on human sperm motility: An in vitro study. Arch. Med. Res., 37, 840-843.
  • Fejes I., Zaivaczki Z., Szallosi J., Koloszair S., Daru J., Kovaics L., Pail A., 2005. Is there a relationship between cell phone use and semen quality? Arch. Androl.,51, 385-393.
  • Fitzsimmons RJ., Strong DD., Mohan S., Baylink DJ., 1992. Low-amplitude, low-frequency electricity fieldstimulated bone cell proliferation may in part be mediated by increased IGF-II release. J. Cell. Physiol.,150, 84-89.
  • Goodman R., Henderson AS., 1988. Exposure of salivary gland cells to low-frequency electromagnetic fields alters polypeptide synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.USA., 85, 3928-3932.
  • Jones R., Mann T., Sherins R., 1979. Peroxidative breakdown of phospholipids in human spermatozoa:spermicidal effects of fatty acid peroxides and protective action of seminal plasma. Fertil. Steril.,31, 531-537.
  • Kilgallon SJ., Simmons LW., 2005. Image content influences men’s semen quality. Biol. Lett., 1, 253-255.
  • Koppers AJ., De Iuliis GN., Finnie JM., McLaughlin EA., Aitken RJ., 2008. Significance of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species in the generation of oxidative stress in spermatozoa. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,93, 3199-3207.
  • Kundi M., Mild K., Hardell L., Mattsson MO., 2004. Mobile telephones and cancer- a review of epidemiological evidence. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health. B. Crit. Rev., 7, 351-384.
  • Lahkola A., Salminen T., Raitanen J., Heinavaara S.,Schoemaker MJ., Christensen HC., Feychting M.,Johansen C., Klaeboe L., Lonn S., Swerdlow AJ.,Tynes T., Auvinen A., 2008. Meningioma and mobile phone use- a collaborative case-control study in five North European countries. Int. J. Epidemiol., 37,1304-1313.
  • Mashevich M., Folkman D., Kesar A., Barbul A., Korenstein R., Jerby E., Avivi L., 2003. Exposure of human peripheral blood lymphocytes to electromagnetic fields associated with cellular phones leads to chromosomal instability. Bioelectromagnetics, 24, 82-90.
  • Minitab, 1996. Version 11.2. MINITAB Inc., Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Odeigah PGC., 1997. Sperm-head abnormalities and dominant lethal effects of formaldehyde in albino rats. Mutat. Res., 389, 141-148.
  • Otitoloju AA., Obe IA., Adewale OA., Otubanjo OA., Osunkalu VO., 2010. Preliminary study on the induction of sperm head abnormalities in mice, mus musculus, exposed to radiofrequency radiations from global system for mobile communication base stations. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 84, 51-54.
  • Otubanjo OA., Mosuro AA., 2001. An in vivo evaluation of induction of abnormal sperm morphology by some anthelminthic drugs in mice. Mutat. Res., 497, 131-138.
  • Ozguner M., Koyu A., Cesur G., Ural M., Ozguner F.,Gokcimen A., Delibas N., 2005. Biological and morphological effects on the reproductive organ of rats after exposure to electromagnetic field. Saudi. Med. J., 26, 405-410.
  • Ozguner F., Bardak Y., Comlekci S., 2006. Protective effects of melatonin and caffeic acid phenethyl ester against retinal oxidative stress in long-term use of mobile phone: a comparative study. Mol. Cell. Biochem., 282, 83-88.
  • Pacini S., Ruggiero M., Sardi I., Aterini S., Gulisano F., Gulisano M., 2002. Exposure to global system for mobile communication (GSM) cellular phone radiofrequency alters gene expression, proliferation, and morphology of human skin fibroblasts. Oncol. Res., 13, 19-24.
  • Ribeiro EP., Rhoden EL., Horn MM., Rhoden C., Lima LP., Toniolo L., 2007. Effects of subchronic exposure to radio frequency from a conventional cellular telephone on testicular function in adult rats. J. Urol., 177, 395-399.
  • Saunders RD., Kowalczuk CI., 1981. Effects of 2.45 GHz microwave radiation and heat on mouse spermatogenic epithelium. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. Relat. Stud. Phys. Chem. Med., 40, 623-632.
  • Sharlip ID., Jarow JP., Belker AM., Lipshultz LI., Sigman M., Thomas AJ., Schlegel PN., Howards SS., Nehra A., Damewood MD., Overstreet JW., Sadovsky R., 2002. Best practice policies for male infertility. Fertil. Steril., 77, 873-882.
  • Shen H., Ong C., 2000. Detection of oxidative DNA damage in human sperm and its association with sperm function and male infertility. Free. Radic. Biol. Med., 15, 529-536.
  • Sonmez M., Turk G., Yuce A., 2005. The effect of ascorbic acid supplementation on sperm quality, lipid peroxidation and testosterone levels of male Wistar rats. Theriogenology, 63, 2063-2072.
  • Sykes PJ., McCallum BD., Bangay MJ., Hooker AM., Morley AA., 2001. Effect of exposure to 900 MHz radiofrequency radiation on intrachromosomal recombination in pKZ1 mice. Radiat. Res., 156, 495-502.
  • Thonneau P., Bujan L., Multigner L., Mieusset R., 1998. Occupational heat exposure and male fertility: a review. Human. Reprod., 13, 2122-2125.
  • Tice RR., Hook GG., Donner M., McRee DI., Guy AW., 2002. Genotoxicity of radiofrequency signals. I. Investigation of DNA damage and micronuclei induction in cultured human blood cells. Bioelectromagnetics, 23, 113-126.
  • Yan JG., Agresti M., Bruce T., Yan YH., Granlund A., Matloub HS., 2007. Effects of cellular phone emissions on sperm motility in rats. Fertil. Steril., 88,957-964.
  • Yokoi K., Uthus EO., Nielsen FH., 2003. Nickel deficiency diminishes sperm quantity and movement in rats. Biol. Trace. Elem. Res., 93, 141-153.