Yönetişim ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma: Oecd ülkeleri üzerine bir panel veri analizi

Sürdürülebilir kalkınma, bugünkü kaynak kullanımının gelecektekikaynak kullanımına en az zarar verir düzeyde olmasını savunur. Yönetişim isesürdürülebilir kalkınma için gerekli olan ortak akıl ve çok yönlü planlamayıyapabilecek güçtedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı OECD üyesi ülkelerde, yönetişiminsürdürülebilir kalkınma üzerindeki etkisini analiz etmektir. 1996 -2012dönemini kapsayan veriler kullanılarak GEKK (Genelleştirilmiş En KüçükKareler) yöntemi ile elde edilen tahmin sonuçlarına göre, yönetişimsürdürülebilir kalkınma üzerinde pozitif yönlü ve oldukça önemli bir etkiyesahiptir. Diğer bir deyişle ülkelerin yönetişim düzeyi yükseldikçe sürdürülebilirkalkınma düzeyi yükselmektedir. Dolayısıyla OECD üyesi ülkelerinsürdürülebilir kalkınmayı temel alan bir yönetişim düzeyine ulaşması,kalkınmanın sürdürülebilirliği açısından önem arz etmektedir.

Governance and sustainable development: A panel data sample on oecd countries

Sustainable development advocates that the use of currentresources ought to harm at least level to the use of future resources. Governancehas power to make the necessary common sense and versatile planning forsustainable development. The aim of this study is to analyze the impact ofgovernance on sustainable development in OECD countries. According to theestimation results which obtained with GLS (Generalized Least Squares)method and used data covering the 1996 -2012 periods, governance has apositive and significant effect on sustainable development. The highergovernance level of countries has the higher sustainable development level theyhave. Therefore, it is important to reach sustainable development basedgovernance level in OECD countries for the sustainability of the development.

___

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. ve Robinson, J. (2001) “The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation”, American Economic Review, 91 , ss.1369–1401.
  • Aidt, T., Dutta, J. ve Sena, V. (2008) “Governance regimes, corruption and growth: Theory and evidence” Journal of Comparative Economics, 36, ss.195 -220.
  • Aidt, T. S. (2009) “Corruption, institutions, and economic development”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(2), ss.271 –291.
  • Aidt, T. S. (2010). Corruption and sustainable development , CWPE 1061. Bentzen, J. S. (2012) “How bad is corruption? Cross -country evidence of the ımpact of corruption on economic prosperity”, Review of Development Economics , 16(1), ss.167 -184.
  • Carbonnier, G., Wagner, N. ve Brugger, F. (2011). Oil, gas and minerals: The impact of resource- dependence and governance on sustainable development, CCDP Working Paper, Geneva.
  • Çelik, S., Deniz, P. ve Eken, S. (2008). Eşbütünleşme Analiziyle Altı Gelişmekte Olan Ülke İçin İkiz Açıklar Hipotezi. 2. Ulusal İktisat Kongresi, 20 -22 Şubat 2008, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İİBF İktisat Bölümü, İzmir.
  • Dietz, S. ve Neumayer, E. (2007) “Corruption, the resource curse and genuine saving”, Environment and Development Economics, 12, ss.33- 53.
  • Ehrlich, I. ve Lui, F.T. (1999) “Bureaucratic corruption and endogenous growth”, Journal of Political Economy, 107 (6), ss.270 –S293.
  • Graeff, P. ve Mehlkop, G. (2003) “The Impact of Economic Freedom on Corruption: Different Patterns for Rich and Poor Conutries”, European Journal of Political Economy, 19, ss. 605- 620.
  • Gupta, S., H. R. Davoodi ve Alonso - Terme, R. (2002) “Does corruption affect income inequality and poverty?”, Economics of Governance, 3(1), ss.23- 45.
  • Güney, T. (2014), “Environmental Sustainability and pressure groups”, Quality & Quantity, 1 -14, DOI 10.1007/s11135 -014- 0116- 6.
  • Gyimah- Brempong, K. ve Camacho, S. M. (2006) “Corruption, Growth, and Income Distribution: Are There Regional Differences?”, Economics of Governance, 7, ss. 245- 269.
  • Hsiao, C. (2003), Analysis of Panel Data, İkinci Baskı, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Im, K. S., Pesaran, M.H. ve Shin, Y. (2003). “Testing For Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels”, Journal of Econometrics, 115, ss.53- 74.
  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. ve Mastruzzi, M. (2010), The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical iss ues, Global Economy and Development: Brookings Institution.
  • Keefer, P. (2004). A review of the political economy of governance: From property rights to voice, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 3315.
  • Kemp, R., Parto, S. ve Gibson, R. (2005). “Governance for sustainable development: moving from theory to practice”, International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8, ss.12- 30.
  • Kooiman, J. (1993). Societal -Political Governance: Introduction, Kooiman, J. (ed.), Modern Governance: New Government- Society Interactions , Sage, London.
  • Lambsdorff, J.G. (1999). Corruption in empirical research- a review. 9th International Anti- Corruption Conference, , 10- 15 December Durban, South Africa.
  • Lennan, A., M. ve Ngoma, W., Y. (2004) “Quality governance for sustainable development”, Progress in Development Studies, 4(4), ss.279 -293.
  • Levin, A., Lin, C. ve Chu, C.J. (2002). “Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite- Sample Properties”, Journal of Econometrics, 108, ss.1 – 24.
  • Mauro, P. (1995) “Corruption and growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics , 110, ss.681 – 712.
  • Meadowcroft, J. (2007) “Who is in charge here? Governance for sustainable development in a complex world” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 9(3- 4), ss.299- 314.
  • Mendez, F. ve Sepulveda, F. (2006) “Corruption, growth and political regimes: cross country evidence”, European Journal of Political Economy, 22, ss.82– 98.
  • Méon, P. -G. ve Sekkat, K. (2005) “Does corruption grease or sand the wheels of growth?” Public Choice, 122, ss.69 –97.
  • Mo, P., H. (2001) “Corruption and economic growth”, Journal of Comparative Economics , 29, ss. 66- 79.
  • OECD (2002a). Governance for sustainable development: Five oecd case studies, Paris: OECD.
  • OECD (2002b). Improving policy coherence and integration for sustainable development: A checklist, Paris: OECD.
  • Olson, M., Naveen, S. ve Swamy, A.,V. (2000) “Governance and growth: A simple hypothesis explainingcross - country differences in productivity growth”, Public Choice, 102 , ss.341 –364.
  • PECORINO, P. (1992) “Rent seeking and growth: The case of growth through human capital accumulation”, Canadian Journal of Economics , 25 (4), ss.944–956.
  • Plumptre, T. ve Graham, J. (1999) Governance and good governance: International and abor iginal perspectives. Institute On Governance. http://dspace.africaportal.org/jspui/bitstream/123456789/11075/1/ Governance%20and%20Good%20Governance.pdf?1 (Erişim: 19 January 2014).
  • Reiter, S.L. ve Steensma, K., H. (2010) “Human development and foreign direct investment in developing countries: The influence of fdi policy and corruption” World Development, 38(12), ss.1678 –1691.
  • Saldanha, C. (2004) “Strategies for Good Governance in the Pacific”, Asian- P acific Economic Literature, 18(2), ss.30 – 43.
  • Svensson, J. (2005) “Eight Questions about Corruption”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(3), ss.19- 42.
  • Tatoğlu, F. Y. (2012a), Panel Veri Ekonometrisi: Stata Uygulamalı, Beta Basım Yayın, İstanbul
  • Tatoğlu, F. Y. (2012b), İleri Panel Veri Ekonometrisi: Stata Uygulamalı , Beta Basım Yayın, İstanbul
  • WCED (1987). Our Common Future. The World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Welsch, H. (2004) “Corruption, Growth, and The Environment: A Cross - Country Analysis”, Environment and Development Economics , 9, ss.663 -693.