Clinical quality studies in orthopedic oncology and centers of excellence

Clinical quality studies in orthopedic oncology and centers of excellence

Clinical quality studies basically aim to improve the quality of health care and therefore to provide health care services ofthe same quality throughout the country. These studies of great importance in terms of obtaining the correct data from thesystem, performing the analyzes correctly, and identifying the areas open to improvement correctly.Criteria for clinical quality care standards and indicators. Clinical indicators are used to measure and quantify the safety andquality of patient care. Identifying clinical indicators in orthopedic oncology provides accurate analysis of data and improvesthe quality of health care in sarcoma patients.

___

  • 1. Torun P, Kutlar A. Economic Costs of The Cancer: A Computable General Equilibrium Model Approach. Hacettepe J Health Administration, 2018;21:87-101.
  • 2. Makary MA, Daniel M. Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ 2016;3:2139.
  • 3. Fehrenbach MJ. Dental hygiene education [Internet]. [Place unknown]: Fehrenbach and Associates; 2000 [updated 2009 May 2; cited 2009 Jun 15]. Available from : http://www.dhed.net/Main.html
  • 4. High - Expenditure Part B Drugs [Internet]. [Place unknown] 2009[ updated 2009 Jan 18; cited 2020 jan 18] Available from: https://www.gao.gov/ assets/650/649459.pdf.
  • 5. Avcı K. Kalite ve Akreditasyona Teorik Bir Bakış. In Beylik U, Avcı K, eds. Sağlıkta Kalite Yönetimi ve Akreditasyon. Ankara: Gazi Kitapevi 2019;1-6.
  • 6. Centers for medicare and medicaid services[Internet]. [Place unknown] [cited 2020 jan 18] Available from: https://www.cms.gov
  • 7. Koç EM, Aksoy H. Klinik Kalite. In Beylik U, Avcı K, Eds. Sağlıkta Kalite Yönetimi ve Akreditasyon. Ankara: Gazi Kitapevi 2019;1-16.
  • 8. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O) 3rd Edition, 1st Revision. © World Health Organization 2013.
  • 9. Avcı K, Şenel ÇF. Sağlık Hizmetleri Akreditasyonu: Faydası, Önemi ve Etkisi Nedir? Online Türk Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2019;4;221-34.
  • 10. T.C. Ministry of Health, Clinical Quality Implementation and Data Quality Improvement Guide. [Internet]. [Place unknown] [updated 2017, cited 2020 Jan 18] Available from: https://kalite.saglik.gov.tr/TR,25083/ klinik-kalite-olcme-ve-degerlendirme-rehberleri. HTML.
  • 11. Avcı K. Sağlık hizmet kalitesinin iyileştirilmesi için klinik kalite ölçümü, Health Care Acad J 2017;4:181- 5.
  • 12. Bampoe S, Cook T, Fleisher L, et al. Clinical indicators for reporting the effectiveness of patient quality and safety-related interventions: a protocol of a systematic review and Delphi consensus process as part of the international Standardised Endpoints for Perioperative Medicine initiative (StEP). BMJ 2018;2;8:023427.
  • 13. National Director of Quality and Patient Safety. [Internet]. [Place unknown]: 2013 A Practical Guide to Clinical Audit [updated 2017 Sep 16; cited 2020 Jan 18]. Available from: Who/QID/MeasurementQuality/ Clinical-Audit/ practicalguideclaudit 2013.pdf
  • 14. Amare G. Reviewing the Values of a Standard Operating Procedure. Ethiop J Health Sci 2012;22: 205-8.
  • 15. Ozturk R, Arikan SM, Bulut EK, et al. Distribution and evaluation of bone and soft tissue tumors operated in a tertiary care center. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2019;53:189-94.
  • 16. Atalay IB, Simsek MA, Irak O, et al. Biological Reconstruction in Malignant Bone Tumors. Acta Oncol Turc 2018;51:283-93.
  • 17. Sevimli R, Korkmaz MF. Analysis of orthopedic surgery of patients with metastatic bone tumors and pathological fractures. J Int Med Res 2018;46:3262- 67.
  • 18. Atalay IB, Yapar A, Ozturk R, et al. Surgical Outcomes of Synovial Osteochondromatosis: An Evaluation of 15 Cases Acta Oncol Tur 2019;52:379-82.
  • 19. Sevimli R. Distribution and evaluation of primary bone and soft tissue tumors admitted from Malatya province and surrounding provinces. Med Science 2017;6:546-50.
  • 20. Sarcoma NICE quality standard QS78. [Internet]. [Place unknown]: 2016. [updated 2016 jan 25; cited 2020 Jan 18]. Available from: https://www.nice.org. uk/guidance/qs78.
  • 21. European Reference Networks. [Internet]. [Place unknown]: 2020 . [updated 2020; cited 2020 Jan 18]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/health/ern/ networks_en.
  • 22. Jørgensen PH, Lausten GS, Pedersen AB. The Danish Sarcoma Database. Clin Epidemiol 2016;25:685-90.