Süleyman Utku UZUN, Ali Çağdaş YÖRÜKOĞLU

Youtube Videolarının Osteoporoz için Bilgi Kaynağı Olarak Doğruluğu ve Güvenilirliği

Amaç: Literatürde internet ortamındaki osteoporoz ile ilgili videoları araştıran çok az veri bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışma, YouTube web sitesine yüklenen ve yayınlanan osteoporoz ile ilgili videoların özelliklerini ve bilimsel doğruluğunu araştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Gereç ve Yöntem: “Osteoporoz” anahtar kelimesi Şubat 2016’da herhangi bir filtre kullanılmadan YouTube tarayıcısında aranmıştır. Değerlendirmeye alınan videolar, genel bilgi veren, hastalığı önleyici ve tedavi bilgilendirmesi olmak üzere üç kategoriye ayrılmış; kaliteleri ise yararlı, orta derecede yararlı ve yararlı değil olarak sınıflandırılmıştır. Bulgular: İki yüz otuz yedi video (%47,4) çalışma grubuna dahil edilmiştir. Bu videoların %64’ü hastalık için tanımlayıcı ve tanısal bilgiler içermekteydi ve %87 oranında video ise koruyucu öneriler içermekte idi. Videoların %56,9’unun tedaviyle ilgili içerik barındırdığı saptanmıştır. Yükleyicilerden bağımsız olarak, osteoporoz ile ilgili videoların genel olarak düşük kaliteli olduğu görülmüştür; ancak videolar, yükleyicilere göre gruplandırıldığında; devlet ve resmi kurumlar veya dernekler tarafından yüklenen videoların en yüksek tanı, önleme ve tedavi bilgilendirme puanlarına sahip olduğu görülmüştür. Sonuç: Youtubedaki osteoporoz ile ilgili videoların, kullanıcıları doğru bir şekilde bilgilendirdiği söylenemez. YouTube gibi web sitelerinde sağlık hakkında bilgi veren videoların içeriklerinin kontrol edilmesi veya devlet kuruluşları ve resmi kurumlar tarafından yüklenen videoların daha fazla kişi tarafından izlenmesinin sağlanması gerekli gözükmektedir. Bu tür internet kaynaklarından büyük miktarda bilgi edinildiği düşünüldüğünde, gerekli düzenlemelerin yapılması, video paylaşım web sitelerini halk eğitiminde daha faydalı hale getirebilir.

Accuracy and Reliability of YouTube Videos as an Information Source for Osteoporosis

Objectives: There is a little data available in the literature investigating videos related to osteoporosis in the internet media. The present studyinvestigates the characteristics and scientific accuracy of the videos related to osteoporosis, which have been uploaded and broadcast on theYouTube website.Materials and Methods: The key word “osteoporosis” was searched in February 2016 on the YouTube browser without any filters. The contents ofthe recruited videos were assigned to three groups, including general information, preventing the disease, and treatment; while their usefulness wasclassified as useful, moderately useful and not useful.Results: Two hundred and thirty-seven (47.4%) videos formed the study group. Sixty-four point one percent of these videos contained definitiveand diagnostic information about the disease, and 87% included preventative suggestions. It was noted that 56.9% of the videos had contentrelated to treatment. Regardless of uploaders, the videos about osteoporosis were found to be low scores but when the videos were groupedaccording to uploaders; the videos, which were uploaded by the governmental and official institutions or associations had the highest diagnostic,preventing and treatment scores.Conclusion: It cannot be proclaimed that the videos, which are related to osteoporosis, inform people accurately enough. It seems crucial thatvideos giving information about health on such websites as YouTube, should be controlled beforehand or that more public viewing of videosuploaded by the governmental and official institutions should be ensured. Considering the large volume of information gathering from this type ofinternet source, by arranging the necessary regulations, video sharing websites may become more useful in public education.

PDF

___

1. Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergard M, et al. Osteoporosis in the European Union: Medical management, epidemiology and economic burden: A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos. 2013;8:136.
2. World Health Organization. Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health care level. Technical report of a WHO Scientific Group 2007. http:// www.sheffield.ac.uk/FRAX/pdfs/WHO_Technical_Report.pdf (Access Date: 15.03.2016).
3. Cotten SR, Gupta SS. Characteristics of online and offline health information seekers and factors that discriminate between them. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59:1795-1806.
4. World Health Organization. WHO scientific group on the assessment of osteoporosis at primary health care level. Summary Meeting Report. https:// www.who.int/chp/topics/Osteoporosis.pdf (Access Date: 15.03.2016).
5. Diaz JA, Griffith RA, Ng JJ, et al. Patients’ use of the internet for medical information. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:180-185.
6. Fox S, Rainie L, Horrigan J, et al. The online health care revolution: how the web helps Americans take better care of themselves. Pew Internet & American Life Project. 2000. http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc. asp?Report=26. (Access Date: 15.03.2016).
7. Silberg, WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the internet: caveant lector et viewor-let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA. 1997;277:1244-1245.
8. Cosman F, De Beur SJ, LeBoff MS, et al. Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25:2359-2381.
9. MacLeod MG, Hoppe DJ, Simunovic N, et al. YouTube as an information source for femoroacetabular impingement: A systematic review of video content. Arthroscopy. 2015;31:136-142.
10. Brooks FM, Lawrence H, Jones A, et al. YouTubeTM as a source of patient information for lumbar discectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014;96:144-146.
11. Staunton PF, Baker JF, Green J, et al. Online curves: a quality analysis of scoliosis videos on YouTube. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40:1857-1861.
12. Loos A. Cyberchondria: too much information for the health anxious patient? J. Consum Health Internet. 2013;17:439-445.
13. Kunst H, Groot D, Latthe PM. Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: survey of five common health topics. BMJ. 2002;324:581-582.
14. Eysenbach G, Diepgen TL. Towards quality management of medical information on the internet: evaluation,labelling, and filtering of information. BMJ. 1998;317:1496-1500.
15. Morahan-Martin JM. How internet users find, evaluate, and use online health information: a cross-cultural review. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004;7:497-510.
16. Murray E, Lo B, Pollack L, et al. The impact of health information on the internet on health care and the physician-patient relationship: National U.S. survey among 1.050 U.S. physicians. J Med Internet Res. 2003;5:17.
17. Purcell GP, Wilson P, Delamothe T. The quality of health information on the internet. BMJ. 2002;324:557-558.