Mehmet Murat SEVAL, Acar KOÇ, Müge KESKİN, Tuncay YÜCE

Sakrokosigeal Teratomun Prenatal Tan s ; Olgu Sunumu

Sakrokoksigeal teratom yenidoğanlarda sık görülen bir tümördür. insidansı 1/35 000 ile 1/40 000arasındadır. Fetal sonucu belirleyen faktörler tümörün damarlanmasına ek olarak mevcut plasentomegali, polihidroamniyoz ve fetal hidropsdur. Bizim sunduğumuz olgu 22 hafta günlük gebeliği tespit edilen büyük bir sakrokoksigeal teratoma eşlik eden fetal kalp yetmezliği olgusudur. SCT 80x78x72 mm (kraniokaudal transvers anteroposterior) boyutlarında ölçülmüştür. Daha sonra durum hasta ile paylaşılarak gebelik sonlandırılmıstır.

Prenatal Diagnosis of Sacrococcygeal Teratomas; Case Report

Sacrococcygeal teratomas are the most common tumors among newborns. Incidence of SCT ranges between 1/35 000 and 1/40 000. Not only the tumor's vascularity but also the accompanying placentomegaly, polyhidramnios and fetal hidrops are the main predictors of fetal outcome. Here we describe our experience of a 22 weeks and 3 days pregnancy complicated with a fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma accompanied with cardiac sequale. In our case SCT was measured 80x78x72 mm (cranio caudal x transverse x antero posterior) in size. After appropriate counselling pregnancy was terminated.

PDF

___

1. R. Swamy, N. Embleton, J. Hale. Sacrococcygeal teratoma over two decades: birth prevalence, prenatal diagnosis and clinical outcomes. Prenat Diagn. 2008;28:1048-1051
2. E. Danzer, A.M. Hubbard, H.L. Hedrick. Diagnosis and characterization of fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma with prenatal MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:356
3. Akinkuotu A C, Coleman A, Shue E, et al. Predictors of poor prognosis in prenatally diagnosed sacrococcygeal teratoma: A multiinstitutional review. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2015; 50:771-774.
4. Winderl LM, Silverman RK. Prenatal identification of a completely cystic internal sacrococcygeal teratoma (type IV). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;9:425-428.
5. Gucciardo L, Uyttebroek A, De Wever I, et al. Prenatal assessment and management of sacrococcygeal teratoma. Prenat Diagn 2011;31:678-688.
6. Benachia A, Durinb L, Maurerc S V, et al. Prenatally diagnosed sacrococcygeal teratoma: a prognostic classification. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2006; 41:1517-1521
7. Grigore M, Iliev G. Diagnosis of sacrococcygeal teratoma using two and three-dimensional ultrasonography: two cases reported. Med Ultrason 2014;16: 274-277
8. Shue E, Bolouri M, Jelin E B, et al. Tumor metrics and morphology predict poor prognosis in prenatally diagnosed sacrococcygeal teratoma: A 25-year experience at a single institution. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2013:48:1225-1231. 9. Yoneda A, Usui N, Taguchi T, et al. Impact of the histological type on the prognosis of patients with prenatally diagnosed sacrococcygeal teratomas: the results of a nationwide Japanese survey. Pediatr Surg Int. 2013:29:1119-1125.
10. Kafali H, Arkan Onaran Y, Keskin E, Sar U, Krbas ù. Ovarian vein thrombosis and mirror syndrome in association with sacroccygeal teratome. Clinics. 2010;65:452-455