Uluslararası İlişkilerde Arap Ayaklanmaları Bağlamında İletişimsel Dönüşüm: Sosyal Medya ve Vatandaş 2.0'ın Yükselişi

Bu makale, Uluslararası İlişkiler disiplininin hızla değişen dünyaya uyum sağlayamamasının en önemli nedenlerinden birisinin iletişim kavramının disiplinde marjinal kalması olduğunu savunuyor. Makale, sıradan bireylerin veya sosyal medya aracılığıyla etkisini artıran vatandaş 2.0'ın rolüne daha fazla dikkat edilirse sınırların aşılabileceğini öne sürüyor. Bu bağlamda, iletişim teknolojisindeki bir değişikliğin sadece iletişim yöntemlerinin kolaylaştırılmasını değil, aynı zamanda siyasi ve sosyal yapılarda da hayati değişiklikleri ifade ettiğini anlamak önemlidir. Sıradan bireylerin, toplumları bilgilendirme, etkileme ve harekete geçirme gücüne sahip olduğu; yerel, (trans-) ulusal ve uluslararası düzeylerde akışkan bir toplumun ortaya çıktığı gözlemlenmektedir. Devletler arasındaki "ilişkileri" anlamayı amaçlayan bir disiplin, bu tür değişikliklere kayıtsız kalmamalıdır. Makalede, ilk kez bir toplumsal hareketin kullanıcı tabanlı iletişim araçlarını verimli bir şekilde uyguladığı iddia edilen Arap Baharı vakası bir dönüm noktası olarak kullanılıyor. Şimdiye kadar ihmal edilen iletişim teorilerinin ve güçlenmiş yeni vatandaş 2.0’ın bu çerçevede analizi, disiplinin de güçlenmesine ve biraz daha “güncel” olmasına katkı sağlayacaktır.

A COMMUNICATIVE TURN OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE ARAB UPRISINGS: SOCIAL MEDIA AND THE RISE OF THE CITIZEN 2.0*

This article argues that one of the most important reasons of the pronounced inability of the International Relations discipline to adapt to the rapidly changing world is that the concept of communication remains marginal in the discipline. The article suggests that the limits can be overcome if more attention is given to the role of ordinary individuals, or citizen 2.0, who by means of social media increase their influence. In this context, it is important to understand that a change in communication technology implies not only the facilitation of communication methods but also vital changes in political and social structures. Notably, a fluid society emerges at local, (trans-)national and international levels, a society in which ordinary individuals gain the power of informing, influencing and activating societies. A discipline that aims at understanding "relations" among states should not remain indifferent to such changes. The article uses the case of the Arab Spring as a turning point, which is claimed to be the first time a social movement efficiently applied user-based communication tools. Analyzing the so far neglected communication theories and the empowered new citizen 2.0 within this perspective, will contribute to the empowerment of the discipline and make it more “up to date”.

___

  • Aikman, David (2012), “Welcome to the Young Global Leaders Class of 2012”, World Economic Forum Archive, 12 October, https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2012/03/welcome-to-the- young-global-leaders-class-of-2012/ (22.06.2019).
  • Albert, Mathias, Oliver Kessler and Stephan Stetter (2008), “On order and conflict: International Relations and the ‘Communicative Turn”, Review of International Studies, 34(1): 43-67.
  • Alikılıç, Özlem (2008), “When People are the Message...Public Participation in New Media: User Generated Content”, Journal of Yaşar University, 3(10): 1345-1365.
  • Alterman, Jon B. (2011), “The Revolution will not be Tweeted”, The Washington Quarterly, 34(4): 103- 116.
  • Ataman, Muhittin (2003), “The Impact of Non-State Actors on World Politics: A Challenge to Nation- States”, Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, 2(1): 42-66.
  • Baç, Meltem Müftüler (2007), “Information Societies, New Terrorism: Its Impact on International Politics”, Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika, (09): 130-138.
  • Bailey, Alison (2017), “The End of Spring: Democratic Transitions in the Arab World”, British Council Insight Articles, https://www.britishcouncil.org/research-policy-insight/insight-articles/end- spring-democratic (21.09.2020).
  • Bellin, Eva (2012), “Reconsidering the Robustness of Authoritarianism in the Middle East: Lessons from the Arab Spring”, Comparative Politics, 44(2): 127-149.
  • Ben-Dor, Gabriel (1977), “Political Culture Approach to Middle East Politics”, International Journal of Middle East Studies, 8(1): 43-63.
  • Berlo, David K. (1966), The Process of Communication: An Introduction to Theory and Practice (New York, Holt: Rinehart and Winston).
  • Bernstein, Jay M. (2001), The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture, Bernstein, Jay M. (ed.) (New York: Taylor & Francis).
  • Bertot, John C., Paul T Jaeger and Justin M. Grimes (2010), “Using ICTs to Create a Culture of Transparency: E-Government and Social Media as Openness and Anti-Corruption Tools for Societies”, Government Information Quarterly, 27(3): 264-271.
  • Blumer, Herbert (1969), Principles of Sociology (No. 26) (New York: Barnes & Noble).
  • Bradbury, J. W. and Vehrencamp, Sandra L. (2001 [1998]), Principles of Animal Communication, Second Edition (Sunderland: Sinauer Associates).
  • Brody, Lee (2012), “Is Arab Spring Turning Into Arab Winter?”, CNBC, https://www.cnbc.com/id/ 48992646 (18.03.2018).
  • Brooking, Emerson T. and Peter W. Singer (2016), “War Goes Viral: How Social Media is being Weaponized across the World”, The Atlantic (11), https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/ archive/2016/11/war-goes-viral/501125/ (27.11.2019).
  • Brown, Seyom (1988), New Forces, Old forces, and the Future of World Politics (Illinois: Scott, Foresman, Addison-Wesley Longman).
  • Burton, John W. (1972), World Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Canella, Gino (2017), “Social Movement Documentary Practices: Digital Storytelling, Social Media and Organizing”, Digital Creativity, 28(1): 24-37.
  • Carpenter, Charli and Daniel W. Drezner (2010), “International Relations 2.0: The Implications of New Media for an Old Profession”, International Studies Perspectives, 11(3): 255-272.
  • Carr, Madeline (2016), US Power and the Internet in International Relations: The Irony of the Information Age (London: Palgrave MacMillan, Springer).
  • Carty, Victoria, and Francisco G. Reynoso Barron (2019), “Social Movements and New Technology: The Dynamics of Cyber Activism in the Digital Age”, Berberoglu, Berch (ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Social Movements, Revolution, and Social Transformation (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham).
  • Chaves, Elisabeth (2010), The Internet as Global Platform? Grounding the Magically Levitating Public Sphere, New Political Science, 32(1): 23-41.
  • Collins, Stephen D., Jeff R. DeWitt, and Rebecca K. LeFebvre (2019), “Hashtag Diplomacy: Twitter as a Tool for Engaging in Public Diplomacy and Promoting US Foreign Policy”, Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 15(2): 78-96.
  • Constantinou, Costas M., Oliver P. Richmond, and Alison MS Watson (2008), “International Relations and the Challenges of Global Communication”, Review of International Studies, 34(1): 5- 19.
  • Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms Rome, European Court of Human Rights, 4.XI.1950 Protocol # 14 (CETS no. 194), https://www.echr.coe.int/ documents/convention_eng.pdf (28.02.2021).
  • Couldry, Nick (2011). “Media and Democracy: Some Missing Links”, Jansen, Sue Curry, Jefferson Pooley and Lora Taub-Pervizpour (eds.), Media and Social Justice (New York: Palgrave MacMillan): 45–55.
  • Craig, Robert T. (1999), “Communication Theory as a Field”, Communication Theory, 9(2): 119-161.
  • Dalacoura, Katerina (2012), “The 2011 Uprisings in the Arab Middle East: Political Change and Geopolitical Implications”, International Affairs, 88(1): 63-79.
  • De Jong, Wilma, Martin Shaw, and Neil Stammers (2005), Global Activism, Global Media (London: Pluto Press).
  • Deutsch, Karl W. (1969), The Nerves of Government: Models of Communication and Control, 3rd ed. (New York: The Free Press).
  • Dobson, Charles (2001), "Social Movements: A Summary of What Works," The Citizen's Handbook: A Guide to building community in Vancouver (Vancouver Citizen’s Committee): 0-9.
  • Dubai School of Government (2011), “Civil Movements: The Impact of Facebook and Twitter”, Arab Social Media Report, 1 (2): 1-29.
  • Earl, Jennifer and R. Kelly Garrett (2017), “The New Information Frontier: Toward a More Nuanced View of Social Movement Communication”, Social Movement Studies, 16(4): 479-493.
  • ElBaradei, Mohamed (2011), “Wael Ghonim: Spokesman for a Revolution”, Time Magazine, 21 April.
  • Evgeny, Morozov (2011), The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom (New York: Public Affairs).
  • England, Andrew and Hebah Saleh (2011), “Google Worker is Egypt's Facebook Hero”, Financial Times (11 February).
  • Foust, Christina R., and Kate Drazner Hoyt (2018), “Social Movement 2.0: Integrating and Assessing Scholarship on Social Media and Movement”, Review of Communication, 18(1): 37-55.
  • Foweraker, Joe (1995), Theorizing Social Movements, Volume 1 (London: Pluto Press).
  • Gabon, Alain (2019), “From Lebanon to Iraq, the Arab Spring Never Ended, It Just Gets Bigger”, Middle East Eye, 21 October.
  • Ghonim, Wael (2012), Revolution 2.0: The Power of the People is Greater than the People in Power: A Memoir (Boston, New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt).
  • Gladwell, Malcolm (2010), “Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted”, The New Yorker, 4 October.
  • Gümüş, Pınar (2016), “Emergency in Protest: Young People’s Politics in the Gezi Protests”, On Culture: The Open Journal for the Study of Culture, (1).
  • Habermas, Jürgen (1986), Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Vol. 1. (Cambridge: Polity).
  • Habermas, Jürgen (1991), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  • Harvey, David (1996), The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change (New York: John Wiley and Sons).
  • Heywood, Andrew (2011), Global Politics (New York: Palgrave MacMillan).
  • Hobden, Stephen and John M. Hobson (eds.) (2002), Historical Sociology of International Relations (New York: Cambridge University Press).
  • Holford, John (1995), “Why Social Movements Matter: Adult Education Theory, Cognitive Praxis, and the Creation of Knowledge”, Adult Education Quarterly, 45 (2): 95-111.
  • Howard, Philip N. (2010), The Digital Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Information Technology and Political Islam (New York: Oxford University Press).
  • Huang, Carol (2011), “Facebook and Twitter Key to Arab Spring Uprisings: Report”, The National, 6 (2): 3.
  • Hussain, Muzammil M. and Philip N. Howard (2012), “Democracy’s Fourth Wave? Information Technologies and the Fuzzy Causes of the Arab Spring”, Information Technologies and the Fuzzy Causes of the Arab Spring, Paper Prepared for Presentation at the International Studies Association, April 1-4 2012, San Diego.
  • Innis, Harold A. (1999), The Bias of Communication (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).
  • İpek, Özlem (2018), “Dış Politikada Medyanın Rolü”, Lectio Socialis, 2(2): 153-161.
  • Jones, Steven G. (1997), “The Internet and its Social Landscape”, Jones, Steven G. (ed.), Virtual Culture: Identity and Communication in Cyber Society (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage) 7-35.
  • Kan, Hideki (2004), “Actors in World Politics”, Government and Politics, Vol 2., UNESCO- Encyclopedia Life Support Systems.
  • Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye Jr. (1973), Power and Interdependence, Survival, 15(4): 158-165.
  • Kirilenko, Viktor and Georgy Alekseev (2018), “Freedom of Speech under the International Law”, Nauchni Trudove (2): 225-236.
  • Kranzberg, Melvin (1985), “The Information Age: Evolution or Revolution”, Guile, Bruce R. (ed.), Information Technologies and Social Transformation (Washington: National Academy Press): 35-54.
  • Lewis, Bernard (1978), The Political Language of Islam (New York: Pantheon Books).
  • Little, William, Sally Vyain, Gail Scaramuzzo, Susan Cody-Rydzewski, Heather Griffiths, Eric Strayer, Nathan Keirns and Ron McGivern (2014), Introduction to Sociology, 1st Canadian edition (BC Campus: Victoria, BC).
  • Lynch, Marc (2011), “After Egypt: The Limits and Promise of Online Challenges to the Authoritarian Arab State”, Perspectives on Politics, 9(2): 301-310.
  • Magro, Michael J. (2012), “A Review of Social Media Use in E-Government”, Administrative Sciences, 2(2): 148-161.
  • McAdam, Doug, John D. McCarthy and Mayer N. Zald (1988), “Social Movements”, Neil J. Smelser (ed.), Handbook of Sociology (Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications): 695-737.
  • McGee, Michael Calvin (1980), “Social Movement: Phenomenon or meaning?”, Central States Speech Journal, 31 (4): 233–244.
  • McLuhan, Marshall (1951), The Mechanical Bride: Folklore of Industrial Man (New York: Vanguard Press).
  • McLuhan, Marshall (1964), Understanding Media (New York: Signet).
  • McQuail, Denis (1987), Mass Communication Theory: An introduction (London: Sage Publications, Inc).
  • McQuail, Denis (2007), “New Horizons for Communication Theory in the New Media Age”, Valdivia, Angharad N. (ed.), A Companion to Media Studies (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing): 40-49.
  • Miller, Lynn H. (1994), Global Order: Values and Power in International Politics (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).
  • Miller, Vincent (2011), Understanding Digital Culture (London: Sage Publications).
  • Mills, Alex (2017), “Choice of Law in Defamation and the Regulation of Free Speech on Social Media: Nineteenth-Century Law Meets Twenty-First-Century Problems”, Mangan, David and Lorna E. Gillies (eds.), The Legal Challenges of Social Media, (Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing): 270-292.
  • Moss, Dana M. (2018), “The Ties That Bind: Internet Communication Technologies, Networked Authoritarianism, and ‘Voice’ in the Syrian Diaspora”, Globalizations, 15 (2): 265-282.
  • Nye Jr., Joseph S. (2002), ”The Information Revolution and the American Soft Power”, Asia-Pacific Review, 9 (1): 60-76.
  • Obar, Jonathan A. (2014), “Canadian Advocacy 2.0: An Analysis of Social Media Adoption and Perceived Affordances by Advocacy Groups Looking to Advance Activism in Canada”, Canadian Journal of Communication, 39 (2): 211-233.
  • O’Boyle, Jane (2019), “Twitter Diplomacy between India and the United States: Agenda-Building Analysis of Tweets during Presidential State Visits”, Global Media and Communication, 15(1): 121-134.
  • Ovalı, Ali Şevket (2020), “Türkiye-ABD İlişkilerinde Twitter Diplomasisi”, Uluslararası İlişkiler/International Relations, 17(65): 23-45.
  • Papacharissi, Zizi (2002), “The Virtual Sphere: The Internet as a Public Sphere”, New Media & Society, 4(1): 9-27.
  • Phongpaichit, Pasuk, and C. Baker (1999), “Theories of Social Movements and Their Relevance for Thailand”, Position Paper for Social Movements in Thailand, Thailand Research Fund Program.
  • Poell, Thomas, R. Abdulla, B. Rieder, R. Woltering and L. Zack (2016), “Protest Leadership in the Age of Social Media”, Information, Communication & Society, 19(7): 994-1014.
  • Poster, Mark (1995), The Second Media Age (Cambridge: Polity).
  • Realtime Visualization of Turkey’s Gezi Park Protest in Twitter (2013), Insight Radar, http://insightradar.com/tr/realtime-visualization-of-gezi-protests-in-twitter/ (20.10.2020).
  • Risse, Thomas (2007), “Transnational Actors and World Politics”, Zimmerli, W.C., M. Holzinger, K. Richter (eds), Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer): 251-286.
  • Risse-Kappen, Thomas (1995), “Introduction”, Risse-Kappen, Thomas (ed), Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures, and International Institutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 3-36.
  • Rogers, Everett M. (1986), Communication Technology: The New Media in Society (New York: The Free Press, Simon and Schuster).
  • Sandre, Andreas (2015), Digital Diplomacy: Conversations on Innovation in Foreign Policy (London: Rowman & Littlefield).
  • Sen, Anindya and Ö. Avci (2016), “Why Social Movements Occur: Theories of Social Movements”, Journal of Knowledge Economy and Knowledge Management, 11(1): 125-130.
  • Shannon, Claude E. and Warren Weaver (1949), The Mathematical Theory of Communication (Urbana, Illinois: The University of Illinois Press).
  • Shearlaw, Maeve (2016), “Egypt Five Years On: Was It Ever a ‘Social Media Revolution?”, The Guardian, 25 January, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jan/25/egypt-5-years-on- was-it-ever-a-social-media-revolution (12.07.2018).
  • Shirky, Clay (2008), Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations (New York: Penguin).
  • Shirky, Clay (2011), “The Political Power of Social Media: Technology, the Public Sphere, and Political Change”, Foreign Affairs, 90 (1): 28-41.
  • Simmons, Beth A. (2011), “International Studies in the Global Information Age”, International Studies Quarterly, 55(3): 589-599.
  • Smelser, Neil J. (1965), Theory of Collective Behavior (New York: Free Press).
  • Sobel, Meghan, Daniel Riffe, and Joe Bob Hester (2016), “Twitter Diplomacy? A Content Analysis of Eight US Embassies’ Twitter Feeds”, The Journal of Social Media in Society, 5(2): 75-107.
  • Stammers, Neil (2015), “Human Rights and Social Movements: Theoretical Perspectives”, Revue Interdisciplinaire D'etudes Juridiques, 75(2): 67-89.
  • Starr, Amory (2000), Naming the Enemy: Anti-Corporate Movements Confront Globalization (London: Zed).
  • Strange, Susan (1996), The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • The Guardian (2019), “Thousands Block Roads in Extinction Rebellion Protests across London”, 15 April, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/apr/15/thousands-expected-in- londonforextinction-rebellion-protest (19.04.2019).
  • Tilly, Charles (1978), From Mobilization to Revolution (New York: McGraw-Hill College).
  • Tilly, Charles (2004), Social Movements: 1768-2004 (Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers).
  • Totten, Michael J., David Schenker, and Hussain Abdul-Hussain (2012), “Arab Spring or Islamist Winter? Three Views”, World Affairs, 175 (5): 23-42.
  • Tüfekçi, Zeynep and Christopher Wilson (2013), “Debate Flares on 'Twitter Revolutions,' Arab Spring”, Agence France-Presse, NewsBank Web, 10 March.
  • Van de Donk, Wim, B. D. Loader, P. G. Nixon and D. Rucht (2004), Cyberprotest: New Media, Citizens and Social Movements (New York: Routledge).
  • “Wael Ghonim and Egypt’s New Age of Revolution”, CBC Interview, 14 February, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxJK6SxGCAw (02.03.2020).
  • “Wael Ghonim Dream TV 2 Interview”, Dream TV Interview, 10 February, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjU7yAYig3U (02.03.2020).
  • Walker, Rob B. J. (1993), Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory, Vol. 24 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Westcott, Nicholas (2008), “Digital Diplomacy: The Impact of the Internet on International Relations”, Oxford Internet Institute, Research Report 16, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract_id=1326476 (09.09.2019).
Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 0378-2921
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1943
  • Yayıncı: AÜ Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

TÜKETİCİLERİN ONLİNE ALIŞVERİŞLERİNDE YAŞAM TARZI DEĞİŞKENLERİ, MEMNUNİYET DÜZEYLERİ, BENLİK SAYGILARI VE ALGILADIKLARI KULLANIM KOLAYLIKLARI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLER *

İbrahim DURMUŞ

Özelleştirme, Sendikal Hareket ve Çalışma İlişkileri: Yatağan Örneği

Çisel EKİZ, Süleyman GİRGİN

Uluslararası İlişkilerde Arap Ayaklanmaları Bağlamında İletişimsel Dönüş: Sosyal Medya ve Vatandaş 2.0'ın Yükselişi

Feride Aslı ERGÜL JORGENSEN

Kant ve Fransız Devrimi

Özkan AGTAŞ, Selbin YILMAZ

Göçün Güvenlileştirilmesi ve İltica Arasındaki Etkileşim: Türkiye – AB Göç Mutabakatı Örneği Üzerinden Sığınmacı Hakları Konusunda Düşünceler

Ahmet APAN

Örgütsel Destek Algısı ve İşe Tutkunluk İlişkisi: Bankacılık Sektörü ile ilgili Bir Araştırma Örneği

Edip ÖRÜCÜ, Itır HASIRCI

Tüketicilerin Online Alışverişlerinde Yaşam Tarzı Değişkenleri, Memnuniyet Düzeyleri, Benlik Saygıları ve Algıladıkları Kullanım Kolaylıkları Arasındaki İlişkiler

İbrahim DURMUŞ

Yön Dergisi Ekseninde Türk Düşüncesinde İslamiyet ve Sosyalizm Tartışmalarının Bir Değerlendirmesi

Elif TÜRKİSLAMOĞLU

Uluslararası İlişkilerde Arap Ayaklanmaları Bağlamında İletişimsel Dönüşüm: Sosyal Medya ve Vatandaş 2.0'ın Yükselişi

Feride Aslı Ergül JORGENSEN

Örgütsel Adalet ile Bağlılık Kavramlarının Doğası ve İlişkisi: Sağlık Sektörü Bağlamında Bir Araştırma

Serap ŞAHİN, Nazlı AYYILDIZ