DOĞRUDAN YABANCI YATIRIMLAR VE KARBONDİOKSİT EMİSYONU İLİŞKİSİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

Bu çalışmada Türkiye’deki doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar (DYY’ler) ve karbondioksit (CO2) salımı arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi, 1974-2012 dönemine ait yıllık veriler kullanılarak, incelenmektedir. İlgili nedensellik ilişkisini tespit edebilmek için birim kök testleri, eş-bütünleşme analizi ve vektör hata düzeltme modeli temelli nedensellik testleri kullanılmıştır. Varyans ayrıştırması ve etki-tepki analizleriyle de bu nedensellik ilişkisinin anlamlılığı, modelde kullanılan diğer iktisadi değişkenler arasındaki nedenselliklerle birlikte, belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular DYY’den CO2 salımına doğru uzun dönem bir nedensellik göstermiş fakat bu nedenselliğin, çok güçlü olmamakla birlikte, CO2 emisyonunu azalttığı tespit edilmiştir. Türkiye’ye gelen DYY’ler çevreyi olumsuz etkilememekte, aksine kirlilik azaltıcı bir etki yaratmaktadırlar. Çalışmada elde edilmiş olan diğer anlamlı nedensellikler çerçevesinde çeşitli politika önerileri de sunulmuştur.

The Relationship Between Foreign Direct Investments and Carbon Dioxide Emissions: The Case of Turkey

In this study, the causality relationship between FDIs and CO2 emissions in Turkey is investigated by using annual data which spans from 1974 to 2012. To find whether there is a causal relationship, unit root tests, co-integration analysis and VEC based causality tests are employed. The significance of this causality, along with the significance of other causal relationships that are found among other economic variables in the model, is determined by using variance decomposition and impulse-response analyses. Results indicate that there is a long-run uni-directional causality running from FDI to CO2 emissions. However, besides the fact that this causality is not that strong, it has a decreasing effect on emissions. FDI inflows to Turkey do not deteriorate the environment, and on the contrary, they create an emission decreasing effect. Additionally, by taking other significant causalities into consideration, various policy recommendations are proposed.

___

  • Zarsky, Lyuba (1999). “Havens, Halos and Spaghetti: Untangling the Evidence about Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment”. Conference on Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment, OECD: Paris, 1-25.
  • Yılmazer, Mine ve Bernur Açıkgöz Ersoy (2009). “Kirlilik Sığınağı Hipotezi, Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar ve Kamu Politikaları”. Ege Akademik Bakış, 9(4): 1441-1462.
  • Xing, Yuquing ve Charles D. Kolstad (2002). “Do Lax Environmental Regulations Attract Foreign Investment?”. Environmental and Resource Economics, 21(1): 1-22.
  • TÜİK (2014). Sera Gazı Emisyon Envanteri, 2012. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do? id=16174 (01.07.2016).
  • The Climate Change Performance Index (2012). http://germanwatch.org/klima/ccpi.pdf (30.06.2016).
  • Talukdar, Debabrata ve Craig M. Meisner (2001). “Does the Private Sector Help or Hurt the Environment? Evidence from Carbon Dioxide Pollution in Developing Countries”. World Development, 29(5): 827-840.
  • Şahinöz, Ahmet ve Zahra Fotourehchi (2014). “Kirlilik Emisyonu ve Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımları: Türkiyeiçin "Kirlilik Sığınağı Hipotezi" Testi”. Sosyoekonomi, 21(21): 187-210.
  • Soytaş, Ugur ve Ramazan Sarı (2009). “Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, and Carbon Emissions: Challenges Faced by an EU Candidate Member”. Ecological Economics, 68(6): 1667-1675.
  • Smarzynska, Beata K. ve Shang-Jin Wei (2001). “Pollution Havens and Foreign Direct Investment: Dirty Secret or Popular Myth?”. NBER Working Paper Series No: 8465.
  • Shahbaz, Muhammad, Samia Nasreen, Faisal Abbas ve Omri Anis (2015). “Does Foreign Direct Investment Impede Environmental Quality in High-, Middle-, and Low-income Countries?”. Energy Economics, 51: 275-287.
  • Shahbaz, Muhammad, Gazi Salah Uddin, Ijaz Ur RehmanveKashif Imran (2014). “Industrialization, Electricity Consumption and CO2 Emissions in Bangladesh”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 31: 575-586.
  • Shahbaz, Muhammad, Sakiru Adebola Solarin, Haider Mahmood ve Mohamed Arouri (2013). “Does Financial Development Reduce CO2 Emissions in Malaysian Economy? A Time Series Analysis”. Economic Modelling, 35: 145-152.
  • Seker, Fahri, Hasan Murat Ertuğrul ve Murat Cetin (2015). “The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Environmental Quality: A Bounds Testing and Causality Analysis for Turkey”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52: 347-356.
  • Ridzuan, Abdul Rahim, Abdul Halim Mohd Noor ve Elsasig Musa Ahmed (2014). “The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment towards Carbon Dioxide Level: Pollution Havens Model for ASEAN5 Countries”. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, 3(5): 392-404.
  • Rezza, Alief A. (2013). “FDI and Pollution Havens: Evidence from the Norwegian Manufacturing Sector”. Ecological Economics, 90: 140-149.
  • Ren, Shenggang, Baolong Yuan, Xie Mave Xiaohong Chen (2014). “International Trade, FDI (foreign direct investment) and Embodied CO2 Emissions: A Case Study of China’s Industrial Sectors”. China Economic Review, 28: 123-134.
  • Phillips, Peter C.B. ve Pierre Perron (1988). “Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression”. Biométrika, 75 (2): 336-346.
  • Pao, Hsiao ve Chung-Ming Tsai (2011). “Multivariate Granger Causality between CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (gross domestic product): Evidence from a Panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China) Countries”. Energy, 36(1): 685-693.
  • Özturk, İlhan ve Ali Acaravcı (2013). “The Long-run and Causal Analysis of Energy, Growth, Openness and Financial Development on Carbon Emissions in Turkey”. Energy Economics, 36: 262-267.
  • Naughton, Helen T. (2014). “To Shut Down or to Shift: Multinationals and Environmental Regulation”. Ecological Economics, 102: 113-117.
  • Mutafoglu, Takvor H. (2012). “Foreign Direct Investment, Pollution and Economic Growth: Evidence from Turkey”. Journal of Developing Societies, 28(3): 281-297.
  • Merican, Yasmine, Zulkornain Yusop, Zaleha Mohd. Noor ve Law Siong Hook (2007). “Foreign Direct Investment and the Pollution in Five ASEAN Nations”. International Journal of Economics and Management, 1(2): 245-261.
  • Kim, Myeogn Hwan veNodir Adilov (2012). “The Lesser of Two Evils: An Empirical Investigation of Foreign Direct Investment-Pollution Tradeoff”. Applied Economics, 44(20): 2597-2606.
  • Karaca, Coşkun (2012). “Ülkeler Tarafından Uygulanan Çevre Politikalarının Uluslararası Doğrudan Yatırımlar Üzerindeki Etkileri: Kirlilik Sığınağı Hipotezinin Test Edilmesi”. İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 47: 181–200.
  • Johansen, Soren (1995). Likelihood-based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Johansen, Soren (1991). “Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models”. Econometrica, 59(6): 1551–1580.
  • Jalil, Abdul ve Mete Feridun (2011). “The Impact of Growth, Energy and Financial Development on the Environment in China: A Cointegration Analysis”. Energy Economics, 33(2): 284-291.
  • Hoffmann, Robert, Chew-Ging Lee, Bala Ramasamy ve MatthewYeung (2005). “FDI and Pollution: A Granger Causality Test Using Panel Data”. Journal of International Development, 17(3): 311–317.
  • He, Jie (2006). “Pollution Haven Hypothesis and Environmental Impacts of Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of Industrial Emission of Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) in Chinese Provinces”. Ecological Economics, 60(1): 228-245.
  • Gökmenoğlu, Korhan ve Nigar Taşpınar (2016). “The Relationship Between CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, Economic Growth and FDI: The Case of Turkey”. The Journal of International Trade&Economic Development: An International and Comparative Review, 25(5): 706-723.
  • Fereidouni, Hassan Gholipour (2013). “Foreign Direct Investments in Real Estate Sector and CO2 Emission: Evidence from Emerging Economies”. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 24(4): 463-476.
  • Erdoğan, Engin ve Rüya Ataklı (2012). “Investment Incentives and FDI in Turkey: The Incentives Package after the 2008 Global Crisis”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58: 1183-1192.
  • Dickey, David A. ve Wayne A. Fuller (1979). “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”. Journal of American Statistical Association, 74(366): 427-431.
  • Danladi, Johnathan D. ve Kehinde John Akomolafe (2013). “Foreign Direct Investment, Economic Growth, and Environmental Concern: Evidence from Nigeria”. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 5(7): 460-468.
  • Cole, Matthew A., Robert J.R. Elliott ve Per G. Fredriksson (2006). “Endogenous Pollution Havens: Does FDI Influence Environmental Regulations?”. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 108(1): 157-178.
  • Chandran, V.G.R. ve Chor Foon Tang (2013). “The Impacts of Transport Energy Consumption, Foreign Direct Investment and Income on CO2 Emissions in ASEAN-5 Economies”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24: 445-453.
  • Brown, Robert Leslie, J. Durbin ve J.M. Evans (1975). “Techniques for Testing the Constancy of Regression Relationship over Time”. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series (B), 37: 149–163.
  • Akbostancı, Elif, İpek Tunç ve Serap Türüt-Aşık (2005). “İmalat Sanayi ve Kirlilik: Bir Kirli Endüstri Sığınağı Olarak Türkiye?”. Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 60(1): 3-28.
  • Acharyya, Joysri (2009). “FDI, Growth and the Environment: Evidence from India on CO2 Emission during the Last Two Decades”. Journal of Economic Development, 34(1): 43-58.
  • A.T. Kearney (2012). 2012 FDI Confidence Index. https://www.atkearney.com/researchstudies/foreign-direct-investment confidence-index/2012 (01.07.2016).