Çin Halk Cumhuriyeti'nde toprak yönetimi

Makale, Çin Halk Cumhuriyeti’nde sosyalizmden kapitalizme doğru radikal yön değişikliğinintoprak rejimine yansımalarını incelemektedir. Toprağın günümüzdeki mülkiyet ve yönetim rejiminin anahatlarının verilmesinin ardından, sosyalist dönemdeki kırsal üretim biçimi ile toprak rejimi üzerindedurulmaktadır. İzleyen bölümde, sosyalist ekonomik sistemden kopuşun kırsal ve kentsel topraklar üzerindekietkileri incelenmektedir. Son olarak, toprak rejimindeki değişimin yarattığı toplumsal sorunlartartışılmaktadır.Çin Halk Cumhuriyeti’nde kamu mülkiyeti biçimsel olarak korunmakla birlikte toprakmetalaştırılmıştır. Süreç, 1970’lerin sonunda, kırda üretimden sorumlu birim olarak komünün yerine aileninikame edilmesiyle başlamıştır. Günümüzde, ikili piyasa ilişkileri çerçevesinde kiralama veya devirsözleşmeleriyle kullanım hakkı özelleştirilmekte, toprak ve üzerindeki taşınmazlar piyasada alım-satıma konuolmaktadır. Çin Komünist Partisi halen biçimsel kamu mülkiyeti yoluyla kapitalist mülkiyet ilişkilerinidenetlemektedir. Ancak makalede varılan sonuç, günümüzdeki uygulamaların uzun erimde özel toprakmülkiyetine geçişin deneme süreçleri olduğudur.

Land administration in the People's Republic of China

The People’s Republic of China (PRC) has been in a transition process from socialism to capitalismfor roughly three decades. This article examines the impact of this transition on its land regime. It explores,first, main characteristics of present land ownership and management regime. Thereafter, it explains the ruralproduction system and land regime in the socialist era. The effects of the dissolution of socialist economicsystem on rural and urban land are examined in the following section. Finally, social problems and challengesderiving from the change in land regime are discussed.Although public ownership of land is formally maintained in PRC, land is now a commodity and hasa price in the market. This process was launched at the end of 1970s via the substitution of the household forthe commune as the responsible rural production unit. Today land use right is privatized either by lease ortransfer agreements in a dual market structure and, both land and properties built on it are sold and purchasedin these markets. It is asserted that China Communist Party is still controlling all private ownershiptransactions in this field via abandonment of de jure public ownership. However, it seems that currentpractices could be considered as preliminaries to a possible de jure public ownership in the long term.

___

  • August, Andrew (2007), The British Working Class, 1832-1940 (Great Britain: Pearson-Longman).
  • Barkan, Ömer Lütfi (1940), Türk Toprak Hukuku Tarihinde Tanzimat ve 1274 (1858) Tarihli Arazi Kanunnamesi (İstanbul: Maarif Matbaası), (Tanzimatın yüzüncü yıldönümü münasebetiyle neşredilen kitaptan alınmış ayrı baskı). Beijing Review (2007), June 14.
  • Buss, Claude A. (1962), The People’s Republic of China (New York: D. Van Nostrand Company Inc.).
  • Chen, Fu, John Davis (1998), “Land reform in rural China since the mid-1980s”, Land Reform, 2: 123-137, ftp://ftp.fao.org/sd/sda/sdaa/LR98_2/art-9.pdf, (16.03.2010).
  • China Human Development Report 2005 (China Development Research Foundation and UNDP),
  • http://www.undp.org.cn/downloads/nhdr2005/NHDR2005_complete.pdf (25.20.2008).
  • Dudwick, Nora, Karin Fock, David Sedik (2007), Land Reform and Farm Restructuring in Transition Countries: The Experience of Bulgaria, Moldova, Azerbaijan, and Kazakhstan (Washington DC: The World Bank Working Paper No. 104).
  • Düren, Akın (1972), Toprak Hukuku Dersleri (Ankara: AÜ Hukuk Fakültesi Yayını).
  • Engels, Friedrich (1987), The Condition of Working Class in England (London: Penguin Books).
  • Fishman, Ted C. (2005), China Inc. (Great Britain: Simon and Schuster UK Ltd.).
  • Han, Dongping (2009), “Farmers, Mao, and Discontent in China: From the Great Leap Forward to the Present”, Monthly Review, 61 (7): 20-36.
  • Hartford, Kathleen (1986), “Socialist Agriculture is Dead; Long Live Socialist Agriculture! Organizational Transformation in Rural China”, Perry, E., J. C. Wong (eds.) The Political Economy of Reform in Post-Mao China, 2nd printing (USA: The Council on East Asian Studies/Harvard University): 31-61.
  • Hinton, William (1998), “The Importance of Land Reform in the Reconstruction of China”, Monthly Review, 50 (3): 147-160.
  • Hopkins, Eric (1979), A Social History of the English Working Classes: 1815-1945 (Kent: Hoddger&Stoughton).
  • Hsü, Immanuel C. Y. (1990), The Rise of Modern China, 4th Edition (New York: Oxford University Press).
  • Hu, Xiangming, Q. Dong (2003), “Rural Land Policy of China: Investigation and Speculation”, Chinese Public Administration Review, 2 (1-2): 37-44.
  • Huang, Yasheng (2008), Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics: Entrepreneurship and the State (New York: Cambridge University Press).
  • Kirby, E. Stuart (Ed.) (1960), Contemporary China, III, 1958-1959 (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press).
  • Lei, Xiaoyan, Wanchuan Lin (2009), “The New Cooperative Medical Scheme in Rural China: Does More Coverage Mean More Service and Better Health?”, Health Economics, 18 (1): 25-46.
  • Li, Ling-Hin (2003), “Economic Reform in the Urban Land System in China”, Journal of Contemporary China, 12 (34): 207-224.
  • Li, Minqi (2008), The Rise of China and The Demise of the Capitalist World Economy (New York: Monthly Review Press).
  • Lin, Wanchuan, Gordon G. Liu, Gang Chen (2009), “The Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance: A Landmark Reform towards Universal Coverage in China”, Health Economics, 18 (1): 83-96.
  • Liu, Yuanli, Keqin Rao (2006), “Providing Health Insurance in Rural China: From Research to Policy”, Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 31 (1): 71-92.
  • Logan, John R. (2002), “Three Challenges for the Chinese City: Globalizaton, Migration, and Market Reform”, Logan, John R. (ed.), The New Chinese City: Globalization and Market Reform (Oxford, Massachusetts: Blackwell): 3-21.
  • Maddison, Angus (2007), Chinese Economic Performance in the Long Run, 2nd edition (Paris: OECD).
  • Marcuse, Peter (1996), “Privatization and its Discontents: Property Rights in Land and Housing in the Transition in Eastern Europe”, Andruz, G., M. Harloe, I. Szelenyi (eds.), Cities After Socialism: Urban and Regional Change and Conflict in Post-Socialist Socities, (Oxford-Massachusetts: Blackwell): 119-191.
  • Meisner, Maurice (1986), Mao’s China and After (New York: The Free Press).
  • OECD (2009), Rural Policy Review: China (Paris: OECD).
  • OECD (2010), China in the 2010s: Rebalancing Growth and Strengthening Social Safety Nets (Beijing: OECD).
  • Oi, Jean C. (1999), Rural China Takes Off, Institutional Foundations of Economic Reform (California, London: University of California Press).
  • Pollard, Sidney (1999), Labour History and the Labour Movement in Britain (Hampshire: Ashgate).
  • Reddy, Sanjay (2007), “Death in China”, New Left Review, 45 (May-June): 49-65.
  • Redford, Arthur (1968), Labour Migration in England: 1800-1850, 2nd edition (edited and revised by W. H. Chaloner) (New York: A. M. Kelly).
  • Sezen, Seriye (2009), Çin’in İkinci Uzun Yürüyüşü (Ankara: TODAİE).
  • Sezen, Seriye (2010), “Çin’in Kamu İşletmeciliği Politikası: Özelleştirme Yerine Küreselleştirme”, Cumhuriyet Bilim ve Teknoloji, 1206 (30 Nisan 2010): 18-19.
  • Thompson, Edward P. (2004), İngiliz İşçi Sınıfının Oluşumu (İstanbul: Birikim Yayınları) (Çev.: U. Kocabaşoğlu).
  • Wagstaff, Adam, W. Yip, M. Lindelow, W. C. Hsiao (2009), “China’s Health System and its Reform: A Review of Recent Studies”, Health Economics, 18 (1): 7-23.
  • Walker, Richard, Daniel Buck (2007), “The Chinese Road: Cities in the Capitalism”, New Left Review, 46 (July-August): 39-66.
  • WHO (2005), China: Health, Poverty and Economic Development (Beijing: Office of the World Health Organization Representative in China and Social Development Department of China State Council Development Research Center), http://www.who.int/macrohealth/action/CMH_China.pdf (19 Nisan 2010).
  • Wu, Jinglian (2005), Understanding and Interpreting Chinese Economic Reform (Singapore: Thomson South-Western).
  • Xie, Qingshu, A. R. Ghanbari Parsa, Barry Redding (2002), “The Emergence of the Urban Land Market in China: Evolution, Structure, Constraints and Perspectives”, Urban Studies, 39 (8): 1375-1398.
  • Xiwen, Chen (2000), “Background of the Rural Economic Reform”, Mengkui, W. (ed.) China’s Economic Transformation over 20 Years (Beijing: Foreign Languages Press): 198-264.
  • Yep, Ray, C. Fong (2009), “Land Conflicts, Rural Finance and Capacity of the Chinese State”, Public Administration and Development, 29 (1): 69-78.
  • Yip, Winnie, William C. Hsiao (2008), “The Chinese Health System at a Crossroads”, Health Affairs, 27 (2): 460-468.
  • Yuan, Zhu (2010), “The looming threat of high home prices”, http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2010-03/03/content_9528433.htm (21.04.2010).
  • Zhou, Min, John R. Logan (2002), “Market Transition and Commodification of Housing in Urban
  • China, Logan, J. R. (ed.), The New Chinese City: Globalization and Market Reform (Oxford, Massachusetts: Blackwell): 137-152.
  • Zhou, Shulian (2000), “Reform of Ownership System and State-Owned Enterprises in China”, Mengkui, W. (ed.) China’s Economic Transformation over 25 Years (Beijing: Foreign Languages Press): 65-145.
  • Zhu, Jieming (2004), “From Land Use Right to Land Development Right: Institutional Change in China’s Urban Development”, Urban Studies, 41 (7): 1249-1267.
  • Elektronik Kaynaklar
  • China Daily (2009), http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bizchina/2009-11/14/content_8972341.htm (18.11.2009).
  • China Daily (2010a), http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bizchina/2010-04/15/content_9736124.htm (21.04.2010).
  • China Daily (2010b), http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2010-04/21/content_9755404.htm (21.04.2010).
  • http://english.cri.cn/6909/2010/02/24/2001s552069.htm (19.04.2010).
  • MLR (2009) (Ministry of Land and Resources of the People’s Republic of China), http://www.mlr.gov.cn/mlrenglish/news/200806/t20080603_105045.html (19.11.2009).