Borç Servisi İle Kamu Gelir ve Harcamaları Arasındaki İlişkinin Ampirik Bir Analizi: Türkiye Örneği

Borçlanma, kamu harcamalarının finansmanı ve içinde bulunulan sosyo-ekonomik şartların gerektirdiği önlemleri almak için verginin bir alternatifi olarak sıkça başvurulan bir araçtır. Bununla birlikte, borcun geri ödeme zamanında ekonomi üzerinde önemli etkilere sahiptir. Türkiye'de de borçlanma sıkça başvurulan bir araç olup, bu çalışmada borç anapara ve faizlerinin ödenmesini ifade eden borç servisinin kamu gelir ve harcama kanadı açısından olası etkileri ampirik olarak irdelenmektedir. 1980-2003 yıllarını kapsayan bu çalışma ile elde edilen bulgularla borç servisi ile kamu gelirleri arasında aynı yönde ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki tespit edilmiştir. Kamu harcamaları açısından ise istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmayan ters yönlü bir ilişki tespit söz konusudur.

An Empirical Analysis of Relation Between Debts Service and Public Reveue and Public Expenditures: the Turkish Case

As an alternative to tax, borrowing is more often applied as a fiscal tool to finance public expenditures and take precautions against socio-economics conditions of economy. However, in the case of borrowing it has necessary effects on economy during the period of debt servicing. Since, borrowing is frequently applied tool in Turkey, this study analyzes its effects on public expenditures and revenues. The findings based on the period of 1980-2003 show that there is statistically significant and same way relation between debt servicing and public revenues. Considering public expenditures, it is, however, found statistically insignificant but reverse relation between debt servicing and public expenditures.

___

  • ABEL, Andrew B./BERNANKE, Ben S. (1995), Macroeconomics (New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing, 2ndEdition).
  • BARRO, Robert J. (1974), "Are Government Bonds New Wealth?," Journal of Political Economy, 81:1095-1117.
  • BARRO, Robert J. (1979), "On the Determination of the Public Debt," Journal of Political Economy, 87: 940-71.
  • BARRO, Robert J. (1989), The Ricardian Approach to Budget Deficits, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3/2: 37-54.
  • BERNHEIM, B. Douglas (1987), "Ricardian Equivalence: An Evaluation of Theory and Evidence," Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, No 2330.
  • BRENNAN, Geoffrey/BUCHANAN, James M. (1980), The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres).
  • BUCHANAN, James M. (1958), Public Principles of Public Debt (Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin).
  • BUCHANAN, James M./ROB ACK, Jennifer (1987), "The Incidence and Effects of Public Debt in the Absence of Fiscal Illusion," Public Finance Quarterly, 15: 5-25.
  • CUKIERMAN, Alex/MELTZER, Allan H. (1989), "A Political Theory of Government Debt and Deficits in a Neo-Ricardian Framework," American Economic Review, 79: 13-32.
  • DAVIDSON, Russell/MacKINNON, James G. (1993), Estimation and Inference in Econometrics (New York: Oxford University Press).
  • DICKEY, David A./FULLER, Wayne A. (1979), "Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root," Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74/366:427-431.
  • DPT (2004),. "Ekonomik ve Sosyal Göstergeler," İnternet Sayfası, http://ekutup.dpt.gov.tr/ekonomi/gosterge/tr/, (04.11.2004).
  • ENGLE, Robert F./GRANGER, Clive W. (1987), "Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing," Econometrica, 55/2: 251-276.
  • ERTEK, Tümay (1996), Ekonometriye Giriş (İstanbul: Beta Yayınlan).
  • FERGUSON, James M. (1964), Public Debt and Future Generations (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Pres).
  • GUJARATI, Damodar N. (1995), Basic Econometrics (Singapore: McGraw-Hill International Edition).
  • HM (2004), "Ekonomik Göstergeler," internet Sitesi, http://www.hazine.gov.tr/stat/e-gosterge.htm, (04.11.2004).
  • İNCE, Macit (1996), Devlet Borçlanması (Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi, 5. Baskı).
  • LERNER, Abba P. (1948), "The Burden of the National Debt," METZLER, Lloyd A. vd. (eds.) Income, Employment, and Public Policy (New York: W. W. Norton): 255-75.
  • MYLES, Gareth D. (1995), Public Economics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres).
  • RICARDO, David (1963), "Principles of Political Economy and Taxation," (Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin).
  • SCHUMPETER, Joseph A. (1954), History of Economic Analysis (London: George Allen 8t Unwin).
  • SMITH, Adam (1937), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (New York: Modern Library).
  • TCMB (2004), "Elektronik Veri Dağıtım Sistemi," İnternet Sayfası, http://tcmbf40.tcmb.gov.tr/cbt.htmU (04.11.2004)
  • THOMPSON, Earl A. (1967), "Debt Instruments in Both Macroeconomic and Capital Theory," American Economic Review, 57: 1196-1210.
  • ULUSOY, Ahmet/KÜÇÜKKALE, Yakup (1996), "Türkiye'de Dış Borçların İktisadi Büyüme ve Enflasyon Üzerine Etkisi,"G.Ü. İ.I.B.F. Ekonomik Yaklaşım Dergisi, 7(21), İnternet Sitesi, http://www.vakupkucukkale.com/studies/ulusov.pdf, (04.11.2004).
  • ULUSOY, Ahmet (2001), Devlet Borçlanması (Trabzon: Derya Kitabevi).