Mehmet ERSOY, Adile Aşkım KURT, Selim GÜNÜÇ

The current state of digitalization: Digital native, digital immigrant and digital settler

21. yüzyılda eğitim, gerek öğrenci gerekse öğretmen boyutunda dijital bir bölünmeyi yaşamaktadır. Endüstriyel çağın öğrencileri olan “dijital göçmenler” den birçok anlamda farklılıklar gösteren ve dijital kültür içinde doğan “dijital yerliler” ile daha çok karşı karşıyayız. Öte yandan, son yıllarda teknolojiyi bir anlamda çağın gerisinde kalmamak amacıyla geçici ya da zorunlu olarak kullanan yeni bir grup olan “dijital göçebeler” dijital çağdaki varlıklarını sürdürmeye çalışmaktadır. Dijital bölünmenin yoğun olarak yaşandığı günümüzde sözü edilen grupların sağlıklı biçimde tanımlanarak özelikle eğitim ortamlarında gerekli önlemlerin alınması önem taşımaktadır. Böylelikle, dijital göçebelerin ve göçmenlerin dijital yerli özelliklerini belli ölçüde taşımalarının sağlanması eğitim ortamlarındaki öğrenci-öğretmen arasındaki anlaşmazlığı ve iletişim eksikliğini en az düzeye indirebilecektir. Bu bağlamda çalışmada, dijital yerli ve dijital göçmen özelliklerinin öğretme-öğrenme yaşantılarına yansımaları dijital göçebelik kavramı eşliğinde ele alınmıştır.

Dijitalleşmede son durum: Dijital yerli, dijital göçmen ve dijital göçebe

21th century education lives a digital divide from many aspects in the view of learner and teacher characteristics. We face with digital natives who born to a digital culture and differ from digital immigrants of industrial age. On the other hand, a new group, digital settlers rise with different behaviour and attitude characteristics by the use of technology to keep up with the times. It is quite important to determine the aformentioned groups in this digital divide world and promoting digital immigrants to acquire characteristics of digital natives in order to reduce the conreoversy between them. In this direction this study purposes to draw attention to digital native and digital immigrant characteristics, reflections to learning and teaching experiences and also the concept “digital settler”.

PDF

___

Bayne S., ve Ross J. (2007). The ‘digital native’ and ‘digital ımmigrant’: A dangerous opposition. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Research into Higher Education (SRHE) December 2007.
Beloit Koleji. (2009). Anlayış listesi 2009. Aralık 09, 2010 tarihinde http://www. beloit.edu/~pubaff/mindset/2009.php adresinden alınmıştır.
Ben-David, A. (2011). Digital natives and the return of the local cause. In N. Shah & F. Jansen (Eds.) Digital alternatives with a cause? book two: To think (pp. 10-23). The Hague: Centre for Internet and Society and Hivos.
Bennett, S., Maton, K. ve Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: a critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775- 786.
Brown, J. (2000). Growing up digital: How the web changes work, education, and the way people learn. Journal of the United States Distance Learning Association, 16(2), 31-36.
Büyüktanır, D., Duke, C., Karasar, N., Tileylioğlu, A. ve Toth, J.(2006). Türkiye’nin Başarısı Đçin Đtici Güç: Hayat Boyu Öğrenme Politika Belgesi. Mesleki Eğitim ve Öğretim Sisteminin Güçlendirilmesi Projesi (MEGEP), 88.
Carrier, L.M., Cheever, N.A., Rosen, L.D., Benitez, S., ve Chang, J. (2009). Multitasking across generations: Multitasking choices and difficulty ratings in three generations of Americans. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 483- 489.
Coyle, K. (2007). Managing technology: Digital divide. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(6), 708–709.
Çakır, H. ve Topçu, H. (2005). Bir iletişim dili olarak Đnternet. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19, 71-96.
De Rosa, C., Cantrell, J., Hawk, J. ve Wilson, A. (2006). The 2003 OCLC environmental scan: Pattern recognition. Ohio Çevrimiçi Bilgisayar Kütüphanesi Merkezi. 8 Aralık 2010 tarihinde http://www.oclc.org/reports/ escan/default.htm adresinden alınmıştır.
Dede, C. (2005). Planning for neomillennial learning styles. Educause Quarterly, 28(1), 7-12.
Dosaj, A. ve Jukes, I. (2006). Understanding digital children: In teaching & learning in the new digital landscape. 20 Ekim 2008 tarihinde http://edorigami.wikispaces.com/file/view/Jukes+Understanding+ Digital+Kids.pdf adresinden edinilmiştir.
Frand, J. L. (2000). The information-age mindset: Changes in students and implications for higher education. Educause Review, 35(5), 14-24.
Gibson, T.L., Koontz, D.A. ve Van Den Hende, M. (2008). The digital generation: Teaching to a population that speaks an entirely new language. 8 Aralık 2010 tarihinde http://david.koontz.name/digital/Presentation_files/THE_DIGITAL_ GENERATION.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.
Goldfarb, A. ve Prince, J. (2008). Internet adoption and usage patterns are different: Implications for the digital divide. Information Economics and Policy, 20,2-15.
Günther, J. (2007). Digital natives and digital immigrants. Hamburg: Studienverlag
Hassani, S. N. (2006). Locating digital divides at home, work, and everywhere else. Poetics, 34, 250-272.
Helsper, E. ve Livingstone, S. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671-696.
Huang, H., Keser, C., Leland, J. ve Shachat, J.(2003). Trust, the Internet, and the digital divide. IBM Systems Journal, 42(3), 507-518.
Kennedy, G. E., Judd, T. S., Churchward, A., Gray, K. ve Krause K-L. (2008). First year students' experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives?. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 108-122.
Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Gray, K., Judd, T., Waycott, J., Bennett, S., Maton, K., Krause, K-L., Bishop, A., Chang, R., ve Churchward, A. (2007). The net generation are not big users of web 2.0 technologies: Preliminary findings. Proceedings Ascilite Singapore, 517-25.
Kvavik, R. B. (2005). Convenience, communications, and control: How students use technology. In D. Oblinger ve J. Oblinger (Eds.) Educating the net generation (pp. 7.1-7.20). Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE.
Lane, C. ve Yamashiro, G. (2008). Assessing learning and scholarly technologies: Lessons from an institutional survey. Educause Quarterly, 31(3), 1-8.
Lee, A. M., ve Delli Carpini, M. X. (2010, April). News consumption revisited: Examining the power of habits in the 21st century. Paper presented at the 11th International Symposium on Online Journalism, Austin, TX.
Lei, J. (2009). Digital natives as preservice teachers: What technology preparation is needed?. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(3), 87-97.
McCrindle, M. (2006). New generations at work: Attracting, recruiting, retraining & training generation Y. McCrindle Research, 2 Ocak 2011 tarihinde http://www.mav.asn.au/CA256C320013CB4B/Lookup/NewGenerationsAtWork/$file/NewGenerat ionsAtWork.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.
McMahon, M., ve Pospisil, R. (2005). Laptops for a digital lifestyle: Millennial students and wireless mobile technologies. Proceedings of ASCILITE 2005.
McWhorter, J. (2003). Doing our own thing: The degradation of language and music and why we should, like, care. New York: Gotham Books.
Monereo, C. (2004). The virtual construction of the mind: The role of educational psychology. Interactive Educational Multimedia, 9, 32-47.
Naish, R. (2008). The digital ages of man. E-learning Age, ABI/FORM Global, 10- 11.
Oblinger, D. ve Oblinger, J. (2005). Is it age or it: First steps toward understanding the net generation. 2 Ocak 2011 tarihinde http://www.educause.edu/ educatingthenetgen adresinden alınmıştır.
Odabaşı, F. H. (2009). 21. yüzyıl öğreneni (Davetli konuşmacı), 25. Yıl Etkinlikleri: AR-GE Konferansı, 14 Mart 2009, Ankara: Özel Arı Okulları.
Palfrey, J. ve Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. NY: Basic Books.
Pedró, F. (2006). The new millennium learners: Challenging our views on ICT and learning OECD-CERI http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/1/1/38358359.pdf, internet adresinden 02.01.2011 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
Peters, J. D. (1999). Exile, nomadism, and diaspora: The stakes of mobility in the western canon. New York: Routledge. http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=YmcdoGx YsrYC&pg=RA1-PA17&lpg=RA1-PA17&dq adresinden 29 Aralık 2011 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
Prensky, M. (2009). Homosapiens digital: From digital immigrants and digital natives to digital wisdom. Innovate, 5(3).
Prensky, M. (2005). Listen to the natives. Learning in the Digital Age, 63(4), 8-13.
Prensky, M. (2004). The emerging online life of the digital native: What they do differently because of technology, and how they do it. 3 Aralık 2010 tarihinde http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky- The_Emerging_Online_Life_of_the_Digital_ Native-03.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-5.
Prieger, J.E. ve Hu, W. (2008). The broadband digital divide and the nexus of race, competition and quality. Information Economics and Policy, 20(2), 150-167.
Rikhye, R., Cook, S. ve Berge, Z. L. (2009). Digital natives vs. digital immigrants: Myth or reality?. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 6(2), 3-11.
Roberts, G. (2005). Technology and learning expectations of the net generation. 2 Ocak 2011 tarihinde http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen adresinden alınmıştır.
Shah, N. ve Jansen, F. (2011). Introduction. In N. Shah & F. Jansen (Eds.) Digital alternatives with a cause? book two: To think (pp. 8-9). The Hague: Centre for Internet and Society and Hivos.
Şahin, M. C. (2010). Eğitim Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Yeni Bin Yılın Öğrencileri Ölçütlerine Göre Değerlendirilmesi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.
Weiß, S. ve Bader, H. J. (2010). How to improve media literacy and media skills of secondary school teachers in order to prepare them for the next generation of learners: A new type of in-service training for teachers. In M. Ebner & M. Schiefner (Eds.), Looking toward the future of technology-enhanced education: ubiquitous learning and the digital native (pp. 37-54). Hershey. PA: Information Science Reference.
Weltevrede, E. (2011). Digital methods to study digital natives with a cause. In N. Shah & F. Jansen (Eds.), Digital alternatives with a cause? book one: To be (pp. 10-23). The Hague: Centre for Internet and Society and Hivos.
Windham, C. (2005). The student’s perspective. 2 Ocak 2011 tarihinde http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen adresinden alınmıştır.
Zimmerman, L. ve Milligan, A. T. (2008). Perspectives on communicating with the net generation. Innovate Journal of Online Education, 4(2). 8 Aralık 2010 tarihinde http://innovateonline.info/pdf/vol4_issue2/Perspectives_on_Communicating_with_ the_Net_Generation.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.