Married women’s perception of family systems
Bu çalışmanın amacı evli kadınların aile sistemlerini nasıl algıladıklarını incelemektir. Araştırma verileri 21 evli kadından görüşme yöntemi ile elde edilmiştir. Elde edilen nitel verilerin betimsel içerik analizi 4 temada (görevler, işbirliği ve destekleme; aile içi etkileşim; denge, kurallar ve roller; kök aile ve üst sistem) yapılmıştır. Genel olarak evli kadınların geleneksel Türk aile yapısının değerlerini benimsedikleri belirlenmiştir.
Evli kadınların aile sistemlerini algılayışları
The purpose of this study is to examine how married women perceive their family systems. Research data was obtained from 21 married women by interview technique. Qualitative content analysis of the obtained data has been conducted in 4 themes (duties, co-operation and supporting; intra-familial interaction; balance, rules and roles; family root and upper system). In general, it is determined that married women internalize traditional Turkish family structure.
___
- Agate, J.R., Zabriskie, R.B., Agate, S.T. ve Poff, R. (2009). Family leisure satisfaction and satisfaction with family life. Jornal of Leisure Research, 41,2,205-223.
- Başbağ, A. (1995). Metropolitan aile ilişkilerinde değişen cinsel roller. Aile Kurultayı. Ankara: Aile Araştırma Kurumu Yayınları.
- Brennan, J. L. ve Wambolt, F.S. (1990). From the outside ın examining how ındividuals define their experinced family, Communication Research. August, vol.17
- Cumsille, P., Darling, N., Flaherty, B. ve Martinez, M.L. (2009). Heterogeneity and change in the patterning of adolescents’ perceptions of the legitimacy of parental authority: A latent transition model. Child Development, March/April, 2,418-432.
- Ewalt, P.L. (1997). The revitalization of improverished communities, Social Work. Sep vol.42, 5.
- Farber, N.K. (2006). Conducting qualitative research: A practical guide for school counselors. Professional School Counseling, www.findarticles.com
- Fenell, D. ve Weinhold, B. (1989). Counseling Families. Colorado: Love Pub. Com.
- Fincham, F.D. ve Beach, S.R. (2002). Forgiveness in marriage: Implications for psychological aggression and constructive communication. Personal Relationship, 9,239-251.
- Fitzpatrik, M.A. ve Wombolt, F.S. (1990). Where is all said done? Toward an integration of intrapersonal and interpersonal models of marital and family communication, Communication Research. August, vol.20.
- Frude, N. (1991). Understanding Family Problems. Chishester: John Wiley and Sons.
- Gladding, S.T. (1998). Family Therapy. History, Theory and Practice. Second Edition, Merrill Prentice Hall.
- Glaser, S. ve Glaser, R. (1995). Pathway to understanding, Nation’s Business. Nov, vol.83.
- Goldenberg, I. ve Goldenberg, H. (1996). Family Therapy. Fourth Edition, Brooks/cole Pub. Com.
- Gordon, K.C. ve Baucom, D.H. (2003). Forgiveness and marriage: Preliminary support for a measure based on a model of recovery from a marital betrayal. The American Jornal of Family Therapy, 31, 179-199.
- Gülerce, A. (2007). Dönüşümsel aile modeli ve Türkiye’de Ailelerin Psikolojik Örüntüleri. İstanbul: Boğaziçi Yayınları.
- Hill, C.E., Thompson, B.J., ve Williams, E.N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. Counseling Psychologist, 25, 517-572. İmamoğlu, O. (1991a). Değişen Dünya’da aile içi roller. Değişen Dünyada Birey Aile Toplum Semineri. İstanbul.
- İmamoğlu, O. (1991b). Aile içinde kadın erkek rolleri. Türk Aile Ansiklopedisi 3. Ankara: Aile Araştırma Kurumu Yayınları.
- İmamoğlu, O. (1995). Değişim sürecinde aile. Aile Kurultayı. Ankara: Aile Araştırma Kurumu Yayınları.
- Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2000). Kültürel Psikoloji ve Kültürel Bağlamda İnsan ve Aile. 2. Baskı, İstanbul: Evrim Yayınları.
- Ludlow, L. H. ve Howard, E. (1990). The family map: A graphical representation of family systems theory, Educational and Psychological Measurement. Summer, vol.50.
- McGrath, E.P. ve Repetti, R. (2000). Mothers’ and fathers’ attitudes toward their children’s academic competence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 6,713- 725.
- Miles, B.M., ve Huberman, A.M. (1994). An Expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis. Second Edition, London, U.K.: Sage Publications.
- Minuchin, S. (1981). Constructing a therapeutic reality. Editör G. Brenson & H. White, Annual Review of Family Therapy. New York. Human Sciences Press.
- Nazlı, S. (1997). Aile Fonksiyonlarının Bazı Değişkenlere Göre İncelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bil. Ens., Ankara.
- Nazlı, S. (2012). Aile Danışmanlığı.9. Baskı, Ankara: Anı Yayınevi.
- Nichols, M., ve Schwartz, R. (1998). Family Therapy. 4. Baskı, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
- Riley, S. (1990). A strategic family systems approach to art therapy with individuals, The American Journal of Art Therapy. Feb, vol.28.
- Sabatalli, R. ve Bartle, S. (1995). Survey approaches to the assessment of family functioning: Conceptual, operational and analytical issues, Journal of Marriage and Family. Vol.57.
- Sheridan, M., Peterson, B.D. ve Rosen, K.H. (2010). The experiences of parents adolescents in family therapy: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. April, 36,2.
- Stiles, W.B. (1997). Quality control in qualitative research. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 593-618.
- Spring, B., Rosen, K. ve Matheson, J. (2002). How parents experience a transition to adolescence: A qualitative study. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 11, 411- 425.
- Süleymanov, A. (2009). Çağdaş Türk toplumlarında aile ve evlilik ilişkileri. Aile ve Toplum.Nisan-Mayıs-Haziran, 7-17.
- Taysi, E. (2010). Evlilikte bağışlama: Evlilik uyumu ve yüklemelerin rolü. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi,25,65,40-52.
- Tinsley, H.E.A. (1997). Synergistic analysis of structured essays: A large sample, discoveryoriented, qualitative research approach. The Counseling Psychologist, 25, 573-585.
- Tsang, J.A. ve Stanford, M.S. (2007). Forgiveness for intimate partner violence: The influence of victim and offender variables. Personality and Individual Differences. 42, 653-664.
- Walters, L.S. (1998). Good talk enlives family mealtime, Christian Science Monitor. February, vol.90.
- Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (1999). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi.