Professional development of Japanese science and physics teachers and Japanese approach in professional development: Lesson study

Bu araştırmanın amacı Japonya’da fen ve fizik öğretmenlerine yönelik mesleki gelişim programlarını açıklamaktır. Bu çalışmada, özellikle “ders araştırması” yaklaşımı ele alınmaktadır. “Ders araştırması” öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişiminde kullanılan bir yaklaşımdır. “Ders araştırması” Japonya’da geliştirilmiştir ve pek çok ülkede öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişiminde başarı ile uygulanmaktadır. Tarama modelinde yapılan bu araştırmanın verilerinin toplanmasında nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden biri olan doküman incelemesi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada, doküman analizi yapılırken, birincil kaynaklara ulaşılmaya çalışılmış, dokümanlar çözümlenmiş, veriler analiz edilerek sunulmuştur. Doküman incelemesinde kullanılabilen yollardan biri de uzman bilgisine başvurmaktır. Bu araştırmada da Japonya’dan bir uzmanın bilgisine de başvurularak güncel ve gerçek bilgiler toplanmaya çalışılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonunda, Türkiye’de fen ve fizik öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimi için öneriler geliştirilmiştir.

Japonya’da fen ve fizik öğretmenlerinin mesleki gelişimi ve mesleki gelişimde Japon yaklaşımı: Ders araştırması

This research has been conducted to express the professional development programs for science and physics teachers in Japan. In this study especially “lesson study” was introduced. Lesson study is an approach that has been used in professional development of teachers. This approach was developed in Japan and has been used in many other countries as an effective approach in professional development of teachers. In this descriptive study, document analysis method was used. Moreover expert knowledge also used by contacting one researcher in Japan who has publications, researches and expertise in the subject of this research. By this way more accurate and up-to-date data were collected. At the end of the research, suggestions have been developed for the professional development of science and physics teachers in Turkey.

___

  • Arani, M., R., S. (2004). Teachers Learning from each Other in Japan through Jugyou Kenkyuu: an Alternative Approach to Teachers’ Professional Development. Journal of Studies in International Relations, 25, 1: 191–210.
  • Arani, M., R., S. ve Matoba, M. (2006). Challenges in Japanese Teachers’ Professional Development: A Focus on an Alternative Perspective. Comparative Education in Teacher Training, Vol. 4, Edited by N. Popov, C. Wolhuter, C., Heler, M., Kysilka, Bulgarian Comparative Education Society and Bureau for Educational Services, pp. 107–115.
  • Arani, S. ve Fukaya, T. (2009). Learning Beyond Boundaries: Japanese Teachers Learning to Reflect and Reflecting to Learn. Web: http://www.chilresearch.net/resource/research/2009/arani.htm adresinden 01.10.2009 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  • Banaz-Sierra, C., Diaz-Correa, L., J., Mellado, V. ve Ruiz, C. (2008). The Effect of Secondary Education Teachers’ Involvement in an Action-Research Program on Their Students’ Alternative Ideas on Energy. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online. Vol. 5 (1), 20 -31.
  • Center for Promotion of Science Education (CPSE, 2009). Japan Science and Technology Agency.
  • Cobb, V., L., Darling-Hammond, L., Murangi, K. (1995). Teacher Preparation and Professional Development in APEC Members: An Overview of Policy and Practice. In L. Darling-Hammond and V. L. Cobb, (Ed.), Teacher Preparation and Professional Development in APEC Members: A Comparative Study (pp. 1–16). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. See ED 383 683.
  • Cobb, V., L. (1999). An International Comparison of Teacher Education. ERIC Digest. Web: http://www.ericdigests.org/2000–3/teaches.htm adresinden 10 Temmuz 2007’de alınmıştır.
  • Education of Primary and Secondary School Teachers (2007). Web: http://www.see-educoop.net/education_in/pdf/bela_knjiga-08-cro-enl- t02.pdf adresinden 02.06.2007’de alınmıştır.
  • ETUCE – European Trade Union Committee for Education. (1995). Teacher Education in Europe. Brussels. Web: http://www.ibe.unesco.org/Regional/SEE/SEEpdf/etucereport 1995.pdf adresinden 02.09.2008’de alınmıştır.
  • Fernandez, C. (2002). Learning from Japanese Approaches to Professional Development: The Case of Lesson Study. Journal of Teacher Education, 53 (5), 393–405.
  • Fujita, H. (2007). The Qualifications of the Teaching Force in Japan. R. M. Ingersoll, et all. (Eds.). A Comparative Study of Teacher Preparation and Qualifications in Six Nations. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.Web:http://www.cpre.org/images/stories/cpre_pdfs/sixnations_final. pdf adresinden 28.07.2009 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  • Ganser, T. (2002). The new teacher mentors: Four trends that are changing the look of mentoring programs for new teachers. American School Board Journal, 189 (12), 25–27.
  • Glatthorn, A. (1995). Teacher Development. Anderson, L. (ed.), International Encyclopaedia of Teaching and Teacher Education (second edition). London: Pergamon Pres.
  • Green, A., Wolf, A., ve Leney, T. (1999). Convergence and divergence in European education and training systems. London: University of London.
  • Gürkan, T. (1987). Ortaöğretim Kurumlarında Öğretime Đlişkin Sorunlar. Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 20 (1–2), 305–322.
  • Honigsfeld, A., Cohan, A. (2006). Lesson Study Meets SIOP: Linking Two Successful Professional Development Models. Paper Presented at the AERA Conference, Chicago: USA.
  • Jalongo, M., R. (2003). Editorial: On Behalf of Children. Early Childhood Education Journal, 31 (2).
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (JSTA) , (2009). Science Teacher Training. Web:http://rikai.jst.go.jp/eng adresinden 17.10.2009’da alınmıştır.
  • Karasar, N. (1998). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi (15. Baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Khakbaz, A., S. (2007). Professional Development for Mathematics Teacher Through Lesson Study. Web:http://math.unipa.it/~grim/21_project/Khakbaz312-316.pdf adresinden 10.10.2009’da alınmıştır.
  • Kısakürek, M., A. (2003). ‘Eleştirel Çağrışımlar ve Öğrenme’, Öğrenmeyi Öğrenme Etkinlikleri, 17–18 Kasım 2003, Türkiye Zekâ Vakfı ve Talim Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı, ODTÜ Kültür ve Kongre Merkezi, Ankara.
  • Lee, J., F., K. (2008). A Hong Kong Case of Lesson Study-Benefits and Concerns. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24 (5), 1115–1124.
  • Lewis, C. ve Tsuchida, I. (1997). Planned Educational Change in Japan: The Case of Elementary Science Instruction. Journal of Educational Policy, 12 (5), 313– 331.
  • Lewis, C. (2000). Lesson Study: The Core of Japanese Professional Development. American Educational Research Association Meetings, New Orleans. April 28, 2000.
  • Ling, L., M. ve Mackenzie, N. (2001). The Professional Development of Teachers in Australia. European Journal of Teacher Education, 24 (2).
  • Matoba, M. ve Arani, M., R., S. (2005). Learning from Japanese Approach to Teachers’ Professional Development: Can Jugyou Kenkyu Work in Other Countries? A Paper Presented at the 3rd International Conference on Comparative Education in Teacher Training, Organized by the Bulgarian Comparative Education Society, Sofia, Bulgaria, 18–22 April 2005.
  • Matoba, M. ve Arani, M., R., S. (2006). Ethnography for Teachers’ Professional Development: Japanese Approach of Investigation on Classroom Activities. Comparative Education in Teacher Training, 4, 116–125. Edited by N. Popov, C. Wolhuter, C. Heler ve M. Kysilka, Bulgarian Comparative Education Society and Bureau for Educational Services.
  • MEXT (The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology) (2001). White Paper: Japanese Government Policies in Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Web:http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/hakusho/html/hpac200101/index.html adresinden 08.09.2009’da alınmıştır.
  • MEXT (The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology) (2007). Reform of Japan’s Science and Technology System. Web:http://www.mext.go.jp/english/news/2007/03/07022214/003/007.htm adresinden 09.10.2008’de alınmıştır.
  • NCES (National Center for Education Statistics) (2006). Teaching Science in Five Countries: Results from the TIMMS 1999 Video Study Statistical Analysis Report. US Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences.
  • OECD (2005). Teachers Matter: Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers. Web:http://www.oecd.org/edu/teacherpoliciy adresinden 04.10.2009’da alınmıştır.
  • Ogawa, M. (2001). Reform Japanese Style: Voyage into an Unknown and Chaotic Future. Science Education, 85 (5), 483 – 614.
  • Ogawa, M. (2002). How are the Novice Getting to be the Expert? : A Preliminary Case Study on Japanese Science Teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22 (5), (Special Issue), 1082–1102.
  • Paddilla, M. ve Riley, J. (2003). Guiding the New Teacher: Induction of the First Year Teachers in Japan. In E. Britton, L. Paine, D. Pimm and S. Raizen (Eds.), Comprehensive Teacher Induction: Systems for Early Career Learning (p. 261–295). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
  • Reimers, V., E. (2003). Teacher Professional Development: an International Review of the Literature. UNESCO, Paris.
  • Rodrigues, S. (ed.). (2005). International Perspectives on Teacher Professional Development: Changes Influenced by Politics, Pedagogy and Innovation. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
  • SPP: Science Partnership Project (2009). Science Camp. Web: http://spp.jst.go.jp/ adresinden 11.11.2009’da alınmıştır.
  • Stoel, C.,F. and Thant,T.,S. (2002). Teachers’ Professional Lives- A View from Nine Industrialized Countries. Washington: Milken Family Foundation.
  • The Consolidation of the New Education System (2009). Teacher Training, In- Service Training for Teachers. Web:http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/hakusho/html/hpbz198103/hpbz198103_ 2_202.html adresinden 02.10.2009’da alınmıştır. The Teaching Profession.
  • Web:http://members.tripod.com/h_javora/jed4.htm adresinden 10.05.2009 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  • Türkoğlu, A. (1984). Türkiye ve Fransa’da Lise Programlarının Karşılaştırmalı Olarak Đncelenmesi. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Yayınları. No: 131
  • UNESCO (1978). The Final Report: International Conference on Environmental Education. Paris: UNESCO.
  • UNESCO-UNEP (1990). Environmentally Educated Teachers: The Priority of Priorities? Conncet, 15(1), 1–3.
  • What is Lesson Study (2009). Web:http://www.misd.net/lessonstudy/lessonstudy.htm adresinden 01.10.2009 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  • White Paper on Science and Technology (2008). Web:http://www.mext.go.jp/component/english/icsFiles/afieldfile/2009/04/23/ 1260307_2.pdf adresinden 10.10.2009’da alınmıştır.
  • Yıldırım, A. Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. 5. Baskı. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.
Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1301-3718
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1968
  • Yayıncı: ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ (EĞİTİM BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Evaluation of attitude items in PISA 2006 student questionnaire in terms of differential item functioning

Kübra KABASAKAL ATALAY, Hülya KELECİOĞLU

The instrument for determining the views of primary school students about historical knowledge

Banu ÖZBAŞ ÇULHA, Erdal ASLAN

Türkiye’de Genel Ortaöğretim Okullarının Büyüklüğüne Göre Fiziksel Koşulların Yeterliği

Kasım KARAKÜTÜK, Binali TUNÇ, Tuncer BÜLBÜL, Güven ÖZDEM, Murat TAŞDAN, Öner ÇELİKKALELİ, Arslan BAYRAM

Professional development of Japanese science and physics teachers and Japanese approach in professional development: Lesson study

Dürdane JACOBS BAYRAM

A study on the viewpoints of preschool teacher candidates on “Community Service” course

Dilek ACER, Müge SEN, Aysegül ERGÜL

Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi’nin Kuruluş Süreci Üzerine Bir Sözlü Tarih Denemesi

Mehmet SAĞLAM

An oral history try on the process of the foundation of Ankara University Faculty of Education

Mehmet SAĞLAM

Prof. Dr. Cevat ALKAN through the eyes of his students

Necmettin TEKER, Salih BARDAKCI, Gülcan NUMANOĞLU, Mehmet KURT

The adequacy of physical conditions of public high schools in Turkey according to their sizes

Öner ÇELİKKALELİ, Murat TAŞDAN, Binali TUNÇ, Arslan BAYRAM, Kasım KARAKÜTÜK, Güven ÖZDEM, Tuncer BÜLBÜl

Study of developing scales for assessment of the levels of readiness and satisfaction of participants in e-learning environments

Yasemin GÜLBAHAR