Esra KELEŞ, Semra FİŞ ERÜMİT, Abdullah ÖZKALE, Nükef AKSOY

Öğretim tasarımcıları için bir yol haritası: Öğretim tasarım modellerinin karşılaştırılması

Öğretim tasarımı; öğrenme-öğretme sürecindeki çalışmaları, etkili ve verimli sonuçlar elde etmek için sistematik biçimde tasarlamayı sağlamaktadır. Günümüze kadar pek çok öğretim tasarım modeli geliştirilmiş ve bu modellerin farklı şekillerde sınıflandırıldığı görülmüştür. Bu çalışmada öğretim tasarım modelleri; sınıf, ürün ve sistem odaklı olmak üzere üç grupta incelenmiştir. Yapılan çalışmada her gruptan en çok kullanılan öğretim tasarım modelleri ele alınmış ve toplamda 12 model genel özeliklerine, tasarım ve uygulama süreçlerine göre birbiriyle karşılaştırılmıştır. Yapılan bu çalışma, öğretim tasarımcılarının amacına en uygun tasarım modelini seçmelerine yardımcı olacaktır.

A Roadmap for Instructional Designers: A Comparison of Instructional Design Models

Instructional design provides a systematic design in order to get effective and productive results in the teaching-learning process. Until today, many instructional design models have been developed, and it has been seen that these models have been classified in different ways. In this study, instructional design models have been analyzed in three groups. These groups are classroom-oriented models, product-oriented models, and system-oriented models. In this study, commonly used instructional design models have been analyzed in each group, and 12 patterns have been compared totally according to their general features and design-applying process. This study will contribute to instructional designers in choosing the most relevant design model

Keywords:

Instructional design models, classroom-oriented models, product-oriented models, system-oriented models,

PDF

___

Andrews, D. H. & Goodson, L. A. (1980). A comparative analysis of models ofinstructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 3(4), 2-16.
Akkoyunlu, B., Altun, A. ve Soylu, M. Y. (2011). Öğretim tasarımı. Ankara: MayaAkademi.
Akbulut, Y. (2007). Implications of Two well-known models for instructionaldesigners in distance education: Dick-Carey versus Morrison-Ross-Kemp. TheTurkish Online Journal of Distance Education (TOJDE), 8 (2), 62-68.
Baran, B. (2010). Experiences from the process of designing lessons with interactivewhiteboards: ASSURE as a road map. Contemporary Educational Technology,1(4), 367-380.
Baturay, M. H. (2008). Characteristics of basic instructional design models. EkevAkademi Dergisi, 12(34), 471-482.
Bates, T. (2000). Managing technological change: Strategies for college anduniversity leaders. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bello, H. & Aliyu, U. O. (2012). Effect of 'Dick and Carey instructional model' onthe performance of electrical/electronic technology education students in someselected concepts in Technical Colleges of Northern Nigeria. InternationalResearch Journals Educational Research, 3(3), 277-283.
Bergman, R. E. & Moore, T. V. (1990). Managing interactive video-multimediaprojects. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
Brandt, D. (2001). Information technology literacy: Task knowledge and mentalmodels. Library Trends, 50(1), 73.
Branson, R. K. (1978). The interservice procedures for instructional systemsdevelopment. Educational Technology, March, 11-14.
Çakır, H., Çebi, A. ve Özcan, S. (2013). BÖTE nedir? Nasıl tanımlanır? Okulmüzesiyle başlayan serüvenden insan performans teknolojilerine uzananyolculuk. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 2(3), 102-111.
Diamond, R. M. (1998). Designing and assessing courses and curricula. SanFrancisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Dick, W., Carey, L. & Carey, J. (2001). The systematic design of instruction (5th ed.)Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Dick, W. & Carey, L. (1996). The systematic design of instruction. USA: HarperCollins College Publishers.
Edmonds, G. S., Branch, R. C. & Mukherjee, P. (1994). A conceptual framework forcomparing instructional design models. Educational Technology Research andDevelopment, 42(4), 55-72.
Eren, F., Aktürk, A. O., Demirer, V. ve Şahin, İ. (2010). Bilişim teknolojileri dersindeASSURE modeline gore hazırlanmış ders materyalinin akademik başarı, dersekarşı tutum ve bilgisayar yeterliliğine etkisi. Proceedings of 4th InternationalComputer and Instructional Technologies Symposium, 476-481.
Fang, J. & Strobel, J. (2011). How ID models help with game-based learning: Anexamination of the Gentry model in a participatory design project. EducationalMedia International, 48(4), 287-306. Fer, S. (2011). Öğretim tasarımı. Ankara: AnıYayıncılık.
Fowler, D. (1996). Synthesis fundamentals seminar: testing the instructional projectdevelopment and management (IPDM) model. Unpublished master thesis,Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg,Virginia.
Fauser, M., Henry, K. & Norman, D. K. (2006)."Comparison of alternative instructional design models." [Online] Retrieved on June 22, 2015, at URL:https://deekayen.net/comparison-alternative-instructional-design-models
Gentry, C. G. (1994). Introduction to instructional development: Process andtechnique. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Gerlach, V. S. & Ely, D. P. (1980). Teaching and media: A systematic approach (2nded.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall Incorporated.
Grabowski, S. (2003). "Teaching and media: A systematic approach - The Gerlach &Ely Model." [Online] Retrieved on May 27, 2015, at URL: http://sarah.lodick.com/edit/edit6180/gerlach_ely.pdf
Gropper, G. L. (1983). A meta theory of instruction: A framework for analyzing andevaluating instructional theories and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status(pp. 37-52). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gustafson, K. L. & Branch, R. M. (2002). Survey of instructional development models(4th ed.) (Report No. IR021912). Syracuse Univ., Syracuse, NY: ERICClearinghouse on Information and Technology. (ERIC Document ReproductionService No. ED477517)
Gustafson, K. L. & Branch, R. M. (2007). What is instructional design? In R. A. Reiser& J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design andtechnology (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Prentice Hall.
Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D. & Smaldino, S. E. (2002). Instructionalmedia and technologies for learning (7th ed.). USA: Merrill Prentice Hall.
İşman, A. (2005). The implementation results of new instructional design model:İşman model. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4 (4), 47-53.
Kemp, J., Morrison, G. & Ross, S. M. (1996). Designing effective instruction. NewJersey: Prentice Hall.
Knowlton, D.S. & Simms, J. (2009). Generative strategies and computer basedinstruction for teaching adult students. Tech Trends, 53(3), 54-60.
Larson, M. B. & Lockee, B. B. (2014). Streamlined ID: A practical guide to instructional design. NY: Routledge.
Lockee, B. (1996). Development of a hypermedia template using whole languageinstructional methods. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Virginia PolytechnicInstitute and State University for the Preservation of Native AmericanLanguages, USA.
McPheeters, D. (2009). Creating a virtual classroom for NAU's educationaltechnology program, NAU Graduate Schools of Education. [Online] Retrievedon June 22, 2015, at URL:http://tr.scribd.com/doc/29599424/VirtualClassroom-Proposal-Using-Sloodle-to-Connect-Moodle-to-Second-Life
Molenda, M., Pershing, J. A. & Reigeluth, C. M. (1996). Designing instructionalsystems. In R. L. Craig (Ed.), The ASTD training and development handbook(4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Moore, K. J. & Knowlton, D. S. (2006). Students as library detectives and books asclues: An application of ISD in K-12 schools. Tech Trends, 50(3), 59-63.
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M. & Kemp, J. E (2004). Designing effective instruction (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Najjar, L. J. (1996). Multimedia information and learning. Journal of EducationalMultimedia and Hypermedia, 5, 129-150.
Newby, T. J., Stepich, D. A., Lehman, J. D. & Russell, J. D. (2000). Instructionaltechnology for teaching and learning: Designing instruction, integratingcomputers, and using media. (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Özdemir, E. ve Uyangör, S. M. (2011). Matematik eğitimi için bir öğretim tasarımımodeli, e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 6 (2), 1786- 1796.
Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.). (1999). Instructional design theories and models. Volume II.A new paradigm of instructional theory. Mahwah, New Jersey: LawrenceErlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Reiser, R. A. (2001). A history of instructional design and technology: Part II: Ahistory of instructional design, Educational Technology, Researchand Development, 49 (2), 57-67.
Reiser, R. A. (2007). A history of instructional design and technology. In R.A. Reiser,& J.V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and Issues in Instructional Design andTechnology (2nd ed.). Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Schwartz, J. E. & Beichner, R. J. (1999). Essentials of educational technology.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Seels, B. & Glasgow, Z. (1998). Making instructional design decisions (2nd ed.).Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Smaldino, S. E., Russell, J. D., Heinich, R. & Molenda, M. (2005). Instructionaltechnology and media for learning (8th ed.). NJ: Pearson, Merrill Prentice Hall.
Smith, N. L. & Murray, S. L. (1975).The status of research on models of productdevelopment and evaluation. Educational Technology, 15 (3), 13-17.
Smith, P. L. & Ragan, T. J. (2001). Conditions-based models for designing instruction. In D. H. Jonassen, (Ed.), The handbook for educational communications and technology (pp. 623-644). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates, Publishers. Smith, P. L. & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design(3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Swain, C. (2006). Preservice teachers' self-assessment using technology: Determining what is worthwhile and looking for changes in daily teaching andlearning practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 29-59.
Şimşek, A. (2009).Öğretim tasarımı. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
Şakar, Ç. (2008). Otistik öğrencilere yönelik eğitsel yazılım tasarlama, geliştirme vedeğerlendirme sürecinin incelenmesi, Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi,Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
Van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S. & Nieveen, N. (2006). Introducingeducational design research. In J. Van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney& N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research. London: Routledge.
Yılmaz, Y. ve Yılmaz, S. (2008). Öğretim tasarım modellerinin karşılaştırılması:Gagne, Briggs & Wagner modeli, Kemp, Morrison & Ross modeli ve Seels &Glasgow modeli. 8. Uluslararası Eğitim Teknolojileri Bildiri Kitapçığı (IETC2008), 1138-1142.