İşlemsel uzaklık algısı ve uzaktan eğitim uygulamalarına yansımaları

Öz It is necessary to understand the concept of transactional distance perception, which is seen as an obstacle, before carrying out efficient, effective and attractive instructional practices in distance education and which could effect the quality of the interactions between student, teacher, interface and medium elements and to reduce this distance perception. This study aims to discuss the theory of transactional distance which led to the existence of the concept of transactional distance perception as well as the components of this theory which are dialogue, structure and autonomy. Later the study examines the impact of these components on transactional distance perception. Information presented in the study was obtained via field survey. The reflections of the concept of transactional distance perception on curriculum, content and practices in distance education are discussed and various suggestions are made on reducing this distance perception

Transactional Distance Perception and Its Reflections on Distance Education Practices

___

  • Aluko, R. F., Hendrikz, J. ve Fraser, W. J. (2011). Transactional Distance Theory and Total Quality Management in Open and Distance Learning. Africa Education Review, 8(1), 115-132.
  • Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the Mix Right Again: An Updated and Theoretical Rationale for Interaction. International Review of Researchin Open and Distance Learning, 4(2), 1-14.
  • Ateş, S. ve Akyol, H. (2013). Türkçe Dersi Öğrenme-Öğretme Sürecinin Anlama Öğretimi Açısından Değerlendirilmesi. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(3), 268-300.
  • Aydın, C. H. (2005). Açık ve Uzaktan Öğrenmede Kullanılan Basılı Materyallerdeki Anlatım Biçimine İlişkin Öğrenen Tercihleri. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(1), 131- 147.
  • Aydınlı, E. (2007). İlköğretim 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Bilimsel Süreç Becerilerine İlişkin Performanslarının Değerlendirilmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Barrett, D. J. (2002). Change Communication, Use Strategic Employee Communication to Facilitate Major Change. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 7(4), 219-231.
  • Bayır, E. A. (2014). Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Ortamlarında Sohbet ve E-posta Kullanımının Öğrencilerin İşlemsel Uzaklık Algılarına Etkisi. Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Behnke, R. R. ve Miller, P. (1989). Information in Class Syllabus May Build Student Interest. Journalism Educator, 44(3), 45-47.
  • Beise, C. ve Wynekoop, J. (2001). A Hierarchy of Needs for A Virtual Class. In Proceedings of the International Academy for Information Management (IAIM) Annual Conference: International Conference on Informatics Education and Research (ICIER), U.S.A.
  • Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and Researching: Autonomy in Language Learning. Routledge.
  • Berge, Z. L. (2002). Active, Interactive and Reflective eLearning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2), 181-90.
  • Blass, E. ve Davis, A. (2003). Building on Solid Foundations: Establishing Criteria for E-learning Development. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 27(3), 227-245.
  • Braxton, S. N. (2000). Empirical Comparison of Technical and Non-technical Distance Education Courses to Derive a Refined Transactional Distance Theory as The Framework for a Utilization-Focused Evaluation Tool. Doktora Tezi, George Washington University.
  • Bunker, E., Gayol, Y., Nti, N. ve Reidell, P. (1996). A Study of Transactional Distance in an International Audioconferencing Course. In Proceedings of Seventh International Conference of The Society for Information Technlogy and Teacher Education (40-44). Phoenix.
  • Chen, Y. J. (2001). Transactional Distance in World Wide Web Learning Environments. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38(4), 327-338.
  • Chin, S. T. S. ve Williams, J. B. (2006). A Theoretical Framework for Effective Online Course Design. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 12-21.
  • Clouse, S. (2001). The Assessment of Student Performance and Satisfaction Outcomes With Synchronous and Asynchronous Interaction Methods in Student-Centered Distributed Learning Environment. Doktora Tezi, University of Montana.
  • Çağıltay, K., Graham, C. R., Lim, B. R., Craner, J. ve Duffy, T. M. (2001). The Seven Principles of Good Practice: A Practical Approach to Evaluating Online Courses. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20, 40-50.
  • Desharnais, R. A. ve Limson, M. (2007). Designing and Implementing Virtual Courseware to Promote Inquiry-Based Learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(1), 30-39.
  • Dickinson, L. (1993). Talking Shop: Aspects of Autonomous Learning. An Interview with Leslie Dickinson. ELT Journal, 47(4), 330-336.
  • Drennan, J., Kennedy, J. ve Pisarski, A. (2005). Factors Affecting Student Attitudes Toward Flexible Online Learning in Management Education. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(6), 331-338.
  • Dron, J., Seidel, C. ve Litten, G. (2004). Transactional Distance in a Blended Learning Environment. Research in Learning Technology, 12(2), 163-174.
  • Evans, T. ve Nation, D. (1989). Dialogue in Practice, Research and Theory in Distance Education. Open Learning, 4(2), 37-42.
  • Flowers, L. O., White, E. N. ve Raynor Jr, J. E. (2012). Examining the Transactional Distance Theory in a Web-Enhanced Biology Course. Journal of Studies in Education, 2(3), 144-154.
  • Force, D. (2004). Relationships Among Transactional Distance Variables in Asynchronous Computer Conferences: A Correlational Study. Doktora Tezi, Athabasca University.
  • Garrison, D. R. ve Shale, D. (Eds.).(1990). Education at a Distance: From Issues to Practice. RE Krieger Publishing Company.
  • Gerson, S. M. (2000). E-class: Creating a Guide to Online Course Development for Distance Learning Faculty. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 3(4). http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter34/gerson34.pdf adresinden 17.01.2015 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
  • Gorsky, P. ve Caspi, A. (2005). Dialogue: A Theoretical Framework for Distance Education Instructional Systems. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 137-144.
  • Grigorovici, D., Nam, S. ve Russill, C. (2003). The Effects of Online Syllabus Interactivity on Students' Perception of The Course and Instructor. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 41-52.
  • Hillman, D. C. A., Willis, D. J. ve Gunawardena, C. N. (1994). Learner-Interface Interaction in Distance Education: An Extension of Contemporary Models and Strategies for Practitioners. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30- 42.
  • Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and Foreign Language Learning: Council of Europe. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • Hopper, D. A. (2000). Learner Characteristics, Life Circumstances, and Transactional Distance in a Distance Education Setting. Doktora Tezi, Wayne State University.
  • Horzum, M. B. (2007). İnternet Tabanlı Eğitimde Transaksiyonel Uzaklığın Öğrenci Başarısı, Doyumu ve Özyeterlilik Algısına Etkisi. Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • Horzum, M.B. (2015). Interaction, Structure, Social Presence, and Satisfaction in Online Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(3), 505-512.
  • Huang, H. M. (2002). Student Perceptions in an Online Mediated Environment. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(4), 405-422.
  • Huang, H. ve Liaw, S. S. (2004). Guiding Distance Educators in Building Web-Based Instructions. International Journal of Instructional Media, 31(2), 125-136.
  • Jin, S. H. (2005). Analyzing Student-Student and Student-Instructor Interaction Through Multiple Communication Tools in Web-Based Learning. International Journal of Instructional Media, 32(1), 16-32.
  • Jung, I. (2000). Enhancing Teaching and Learning Through Research: Focusing on Web-Based Distance Education. In Proceedings of the CRIDALA 2000, The Open University of Hong Kong, 21 - 24 June, 2000.
  • Jung, I. (2001). Building a Theoretical Framework of Web-Based Instruction in The Context of Distance Education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(5), 525-534.
  • Jung, H. Y. (2006). Transactional Distance and Student Motivation: Student Perception of Teacher Immediacy, Solidarity Toward Peer Students and Student Motivation in Distance Education. Doktora Tezi, West Virginia University.
  • Kanuka, H., Collett, D. ve Caswell, C. (2002). University Instructor Perceptions of The Use of Asynchronous Text-Based Discussion in Distance Courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 151-167.
  • Karataş, S. (2008). Interaction in The Internet-Based Distance Learning Researches: Results of a Trend Analysis. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(2), 11-19.
  • Kaymak ve Horzum (2013). Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Öğrencilerinin Çevrimiçi Öğrenmeye Hazır Bulunuşluk Düzeyleri, Algıladıkları Yapı ve Etkileşim Arasındaki İlişki. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 13(3), 1783-1797.
  • Kearsley, G. ve Lynch, W. (1996). Structural Issues in Distance Education. Journal of Education for Business, 71(4),191-195.
  • Kostina, M. V. (2011). Exploration of Student Perceptions of Autonomy, Student- Instructor Dialogue and Satisfaction in a Web-Based Distance Russian Language Classroom: A Mixed Methods Study. Doktora Tezi, University of Iowa.
  • Lally V. ve Barrett, E. (1999). Building a Learning Community On-Line: Towards Socio-Academic Interaction. Research Papers in Education: Policy and Practice, 14(2), 147-163.
  • Lemak, D. J., Montgomery, J. C. ve Reed, R. (2003). Instructor Effectiveness in Distance Education: The Case of Technology and Transactional Distance. In Proceedings of The 2003 Academy of Management Conference. Seattle, Washington.
  • Lemak, D., Shin, S., Reed, R. ve Montgomery, J. (2005). Technology, Transactional Distance, and Instructor Effectiveness: An Empirical Investigation. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(2), 150-159.
  • Mclaren, A. C. (2010). The Effects of Instructor-Learner Interactions on Learner Satisfaction in Online Masters Courses. Doktora Tezi, Wayne State University.
  • Moore, M. G. (1972). Learner Autonomy: The Second Dimension of Independent Learning. Convergence, 5(2), 76-88.
  • Moore, M. (1983). On a Theory of Independent Study. In Distance Education: International Perspectives, D. Stewart, D. Keegan ve B. Holmberg (Ed.). London: Croom Helm.
  • Moore, M. G. (1989). Three Types of Interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-7.
  • Moore, M. G. (1991). Editorial: Distance Education Theory. The American Journal of Distance Education, 5(3), 1-6.
  • Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of Transactional Distance. Keegan, D. (Ed.), Theoretical Principle of Distance Education. Routledge.
  • Moore, M. G. (2007). Web 2.0: Does It Really Matter? American Journal of Distance Education, 21(4), 177-183.
  • Moore, M. G. ve Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance Education: A Systems View of Online Learning. Cengage Learning.
  • Munro, J. P. (1991). Presence at a Distance: The Educator-Learner Relationship in Distance Education and Dropout. Doktora Tezi, University of British Columbia.
  • Pascarella, E. T. ve Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research. 2nd K. A. Feldman (Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Peters, O. (1998). Learning and Teaching in Distance Education. London: Kogan Page.
  • Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to Learn. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
  • Rumble, G. (1986). The Planning and Management of Distance Education. London: Croom Helm.
  • Sankur, B. (2005). Bilişim Sözlüğü. Pusula Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  • Shearer, R. L. (2009). Transactional Distance and Dialogue: An Exploratory Study to Refine The Theoretical Construct of Dialogue in Online Learning. Doktora Tezi, The Pennsylvania State University.
  • Steinman, D. (2007). Educational Experiences and The Online Student. TechTrends, 51(5), 46-52.
  • Stow, R. C. (2005). Minimizing The Distance in Distance Learning. Athletic Therapy Today, 10(2), 57-59.
  • Swain, C. (1996). Improving Traditional Teaching Using Findings from Distance Education. Journal of Effective Teaching, 1(1). http://www.uncw.edu/cte/et/articles/Swain/ adresinden 12.12.2014 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
  • Tokgöz, D. (2002). Geliştirilmiş Bağlantı Yapısı ile Bileşen Yönelimli Modelleri XML Betimleme. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Vandergrift, K. E. (2002). The Anatomy of a Distance Education Course: A Case Study Analysis. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 76-90.
  • Vealé, B. L. (2009). Transactional Distance and Course Structure: A Qualitative Study. Doktora Tezi, University of Nebraska.
  • Vonderwell, S. ve Zachariah, S. (2005). Factors That Influence Participation in Online Learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(2), 213-2.
  • Vrasidas, C. ve McIsaac, M. S. (1999). Factors Influencing Interaction in an Online Course. The American Journal of Distance Education, 13(3), 22-36.
  • Wagner, E. D. (1994). In Support of a Functional Definition of Interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 6-29.
  • Wheeler, S. ve Reid, F. (2005). A Matter of Perception? Transactional Distance and Student Support in Distance Education. In EDEN 2005 Annual Conference.
  • Yatchou, R., Nkambou, R. ve Tangha, C. (2004). Intelligent Learning Environment for Software Engineering Processes. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems (898-900). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  • Yılmaz, R. ve Kılıç-Çakmak, E. (2012). Educational Interface Agents as Social Models to Influence Learner Achievement, Attitude and Retention of Learning. Computers & Education, 59(2), 828-838.
  • Yılmaz, R. ve Keser, H. (2015). İşlemsel Uzaklık Ölçeğinin Uyarlama Çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(4), 91-105.
  • Zhang, A. (2003). Transactional Distance in Web-Based College Learning Environments: Toward Measurement and Theory Construction. Doktora Tezi, Virginia Commonwealth University.