Postoperatif ağrı tedavisinde tramadol ile intravenöz ve epidural hasta kontrollü analjezinin karşılaştırılması
Bu çalışmada postoperatif ağrı tedavisinde hasta kontrollü analjezide (HKA) tramadolün intravenöz ve epidural uygulamalarının etkinlik ve yan etki profili yönünden karşılaştırılması amaçlandı. 18-65 yaşları arasında majör ürolojik cerrahi girişim geçirecek 30 olgu (ASA I-II) çalışmaya alındı. Tüm olgulara standart genel anestezi uygulandı. Postoperatif analjezi uygulamasına göre olgular iki gruba ayrıldı. HKA cihazı ile I. Gruba (n=15) iv tramadol (50 mg yükleme dozu, 5 mg sa-1 bazal infüzyon hızı, 20 mg bolus, kilitli kalma süresi 30 dakika), II. Gruba epidural tramadol (20 mg yükleme dozu, 8 mg sa-1 bazal infüzyon hızı, 5 mg bolus, kilitli kalma süresi 30 dakika) uygulandı. Ağrı şiddeti [Vizüel analog skala (VAS)], sedasyon düzeyi (5 noktalı sedasyon skalası), ortalama arter basıncı, kalp atım hızı, solunum sayısı ve yan etkiler O, 6, 12, 24, 48. saatlerde kaydedildi. Her iki grupta ihtiyaç duyulan toplam tramadol miktarı hesaplandı. Vital parametreler çalışma süresince normal sınırlarda seyretti. Her iki grupta VAS skorlarında başlangıca göre tüm ölçüm zamanlarında anlamlı düşme gözlendi (p
Comparison of intravenous versus epidural patient controlled analgesia with tramadol for postoperative pain relief
We compared the effectiveness and side effects of epidural versus intravenous patient controlled analgesia (PCA) with tramadol for postoperative analgesia in this study. Thirty ASA I-II patients (18-65 years) undergoing major urologic operations were included. A standard general anesthetic technique was used for all patients. Patients were randomly divided into two groups with respect to postoperative analgesia technique. Group I (n=I5) received iv PCA with tramadol (50 mg loading dose, 5 mg h<sup>-1</sup> basal infusion rate, 20 mg bolus, 30 minutes lock-out time). Group II (n=15) received epidural PCA with tramadol (20 mg loading dose, 8 mg h<sup>-1</sup> basal infusion rate, 5 mg bolus, 30 minutes lock-out time). Pain score via Visual analog scale (VAS), sedation score, blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, side effects at 0, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours as well as total tramadol consumption were recorded. Vital parameters were within normal limits throughout the study. There were obvious reductions in VAS scores in both groups (p<0.01). There were no major side effects in Group II. The most common side effect in Group I was nausea-vomiting and the difference was significant between the groups (p<0.05). Total tramadol consumption was found to be similar in both groups (380±55 mg in Group I, 399(84 mg in Group II). In conclusion, tramadol is an effective analgesic via iv or epidural PCA for postoperative pain control. Epidural PCA with tramadol is better tolerated than iv PCA with tramadol because the latter one has a high incidence of nausea-vomiting.
___
- 1. Hennies HH, Friedrichs E, Schneider J. Receptor binding, analgesic and antitussive potency of tramadol and other selected opioids. Arzneimittelforschung 1988; 38: 877-80.
- 2. Raffa RB, Friderichs E, Reimann W, et al. Complimentary and synergistic antinociceptive interaction between the enantiomers of tramadol. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1993; 267: 331-40.
- 3. Raffa RB, Friderichs E, Reimann W, et al. Opioid and nonopioid components independently contribute to the mechanism of action of tramadol, an 'atypical' opioid analgesic. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1992; 260: 275-85.
- 4. Lehmann KA, Kratzenberg U, Schroder-Bark B, Horrichs-Haermeyer G. Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia with tramadol: analgesic efficacy and minimum effective concentrations. Clin J Pain 1990; 6: 212-20, 5. Vickers MD, O'Flaheity D, Szekely SM, Read M, Yoshizumi J. Pain relief by an opioid without depression of respiration. Anaesthesia 1992:47:291-6.
- 6. Alon E, Atanassoff PC, Biro P. Postoperative analgesia with nalbuphine and tramadol. Continuous infusion combined with patient-controlled application. Anaesthesist 1992; 41: 83-7.
- 7. Chrubasik J, Buzina M, Shulte-Mönting J, Atanasoff P, Alon E. Intravenous tramadol for postoperative pain» comparison of intermittent dose regimens with and without maintenance infusion. EurJ Anaesthesiol 1992; 9: 23-8.
- 8. Stamer UM, Maiifr C, Grond S, Veh-Schmidt B, Klaschik E, Lehnmann KA. Tramadol in the management of postoperative pain: A double-blind, placebo- and active drug-controlled study. EurJ Anaesthesiol 1997; 14: 646-54.
- 9. Chrubasik J, Warth L, Wüst H. Untersuchungen zur analgetischen wirksamkeit epidural applizierten Tramadols bei der Behadlung von Schmerzen nach abdominal chirurgischen Eingriffen. Eur J Pain 1988; 9:12-8.
- 10. Delilkan AE, Vijayan R. Epidural tramadol for postoperative pain relief. Anaesthesia 1993; 48: 328-31.
- 11. Baraka A, Jabbour S, Ghabash M, Nader Akhoury G, Sibai A. A comparison of epidural tramadol and epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia. Can J Anaesth 1993;40::308-13.
- 12. Chrubasik J, Chrubasik S, Martin E. Klinik uygulamada epidural opioidlerin karşılaştırılması. Ağrı Dergisi 1994; 6:11.
- 13. Bamigbade TA, Langford RM. The clinical use of tramadol hydrochloride. Pain Reviews 1998; 5: 155.
- 14. Lehman KA, Brand-Stavroulaki A, Dworzak H. The influence of demand- and loading dose on the efficacy of postoperative patient-controlled analgesia with tramadol: A randomized double-blind study. Schmerz Pain Dolor 1986; 7: 146-52.
- 15. 14.Vickers MD, Paravicini D. Comparison of tramadol with morphine for post-operative pain following abdominal surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1995; 12: 265-71.
- 16. 15.Yücel A, Erdine S, Özyalçın S. Postoperatif ağrı kontrolünde epidural morfin, fentanil, tramadol hidroklorid ve tramadol hidroklorid + droperidol kullanımı. Ağrı Dergisi 1992; 4: 35-40.