Gebede lomber ultrasonografi eşliğinde subaraknoid blok

Amaç: Subaraknoid blok, elektif sezaryenlerde tercih edilen bir rejyonal anestezi yöntemidir. Günümüzde gebelerde interspinöz aralığı tespit etmek oldukça zordur. Bu çalışma ile gebelerde blok öncesi iğne derinliğini tahmin etmede ve en uygun giriş noktasını belirlemede lomber ultrasonografinin katkısını değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Yöntem: Çalışmaya, hastane etik kurulu ve hastaların onamları alındıktan sonra, ASA I-II, subaraknoid blok ile sezaryen operasyonu geçirecek 68 gebe dâhil edildi. Hastalara oturur pozisyonda, aynı anestezist tarafından L4-L5 interspinöz aralığın tespiti için lomber ultrasonografi yapıldı. Tujfier hattının gebede gerçekte hangi aralığa denk geldiği US ile tespit edilerek kaydedildi. Cilt-Ligamentum Flavum (LF) , cilt-subdural mesafe (US derinliği) arası mesafeler hem paramedian hem de transvers düzlemlerde ölçüldü. Bulgular: işlem sırasında ölçülen iğne derinliği ile US ile ölçülen cilt-subdural mesafe arasında güçlü bir korelasyon tespit edildi (r- 0,71 p< 0,001). US ile ölçülen cilt-subdural mesafe (US derinliği) ortalaması 5,3 cm iken, iğne mesafesi 6,1 cm olarak ölçüldü. Subaraknoid aralık vakaların %92,6'sında başarıyla tespit edildi. Yönlendirme yapmadan ilk denemede başarı oranı ise %83,7 olarak tespit edildi. Sonuç: Ultrason ile ölçülen cilt-subdural mesafe ile iğne derinliği arasında güçlü bir korelasyon tespit ettik. Sonuç olarak; ultrasonografinin gebelerde subaraknoid bölgeye iğne girişinde güvenilir bir rehber olabileceğini düşünmekteyiz.

Ultrasound guidance for subarachnoid block in parturient

Objective: Subarachnoid blocks have become the technique of choice for elective cesarean sections. Current techniques to identfy a safe interspace have limitations. In this study, we assessed prepuncture lumbar ultrasound scanning as a tool for estimating the depth to the subdural space and determining the optimal insertion point in parturients. Method: After approval by the Ethics Committe and written informed consent, ASA I-II, sixty-eight term pregnant women scheduled to receive subarachnoid blockade for Caesarean section were included in the study. With the patients in the sitting position, the same anesthesiologist performed a lumbar spine ultrasound scan to identfy the L4-L5 interspace. The intercristal line (Tujfier's line) were assessed by ultrasound to detect its clinical level. The distances from the skin to the ligamentum flavum and from skin to the subdural space (ultrasound depth, UD) were measured in the paramedian and transverse planes. Results: There was a high correlation between the ultrasound depth and the needle depth (ND) (r= 0.71 p< 0.001). The mean ultrasound depth was 5.3 cm, whereas the needle depth was 6.1 cm. Successful identification of the subarachnoid space was accomplished in 92.6% of the cases. First attempt success rate was 83.7%. Conclusion: We found a good correlation between the ultrasound depth and the needle depth. This suggests that ultrasound can be a reliable guide to facilitate subarachnoid needle placement in parturients

___

  • 1. Tsen LC. Anesthesia for cesarean delivery. ASA Refresher Courses. Anesthesiol 2005;33:235-245.
  • 2. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia.Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: an update report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2007;106(4):843-863.
  • 3. Cook TM, Counsell D, Wildsmith JA. Major complications of central neuraxialblock: report on the Third National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102(2): 179-190.
  • 4. Watson MJ, Evans S, Thorp JM. Could ultrasonography be used by an anaesthetist to identify a specified lumbar interspace before spinal anaesthesia? Br J Anaesth 2003;90(4):509-511.
  • 5. Grau T, Leipold RW, Fatehi S, Martin E, Motsch J. Real-time ultrasonic observation of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004;21(1):25-31.
  • 6. Locks Gde F, Almeida MC, Pereira AA. Use of the ultrasound to determine the level of lumbar puncture in pregnant women. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2010;60(1):13-19.
  • 7. Reynolds F. Logic in the safe practice of spinal anesthesia. Anaesthesia 2000;55(11): 1045-1046.
  • 8. Quinnell RC, Stockdale HR. The use of in vivo lumbar discography to assess the clinical significance of the position of the intercristal line. Spine 1983;8(3):305-307.
  • 9. Snider KT, Kribs JW, Snider EJ, Degenhardt BF, Bukowski A, Johnson JC. Reliability of Tuffier's line as an anatomic landmark. Spine 2008;33(6):E161-165.
  • 10. Broadbent CR, Maxwell WB, Ferrie R, Wilson DJ, Gawne-Cain M, Russell R. Ability of anaesthetists to identify a marked lumbar interspace. Anaesthesia 2000;55(11):1122-1126.
  • 11. Margarido CB, Mikhael R, Arzola C, Balki M, Carvalho JC. The intercristal line determined by palpation is not a reliable anatomical landmark for neuraxial anesthesia. Can J Anaesth 2011;58(3):262-266.
  • 12. Furness G, Reilly MP, Kuchi S. An evaluation of ultrasound imaging for identification of lumbar intervertebral level. Anaesthesia 2002;57(3):277-280.
  • 13. Whitty R, Moore M, Macarthur A. Identification of the lumbar interspinous spaces: palpation versus ultrasound. Anesth Analg 2008;106(2):538-540.
  • 14. Schnabel A, Schuster F, Ermert T, Eberhart LH, Mettelein T, Kranke P. Ultrasound Guidance for Neuraxial Analgesia and Anesthesia in Obstetrics: a Quantitative Systematic Review. Ultraschall Med 2010.
  • 15. Grau T, Leipold RW, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. Efficacy of ultrasound imaging in obstetric epidural anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 2002; 14(3): 169-175.
  • 16. Arzola C, Davies S, Rofaeel A, Carvalho JC. Ultrasound using the transverse approach to the lumbar spine provides reliable landmarks for labor epidurals. Anesth Analg 2007; 104(5): 1188-1192.
  • 17. Balki M, Lee Y, Halpern S, Carvalho JC. Ultrasound imaging of the lumbar spine in the transverse plane: the correlation between estimated and actual depth to the epidural space in obese parturients. Anesth Analg 2009; 108(6): 1876-1881.
  • 18. Tran D, Kamani AA, LessowayVA, Peterson C, Hor KW, Rohling RN. Preinsertion paramedian ultrasound guidance for epidural anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2009; 109(2):661-667.