Yoğunlaşma ve Piyasa Yapısı İlişkisi Çerçevesinde Türk Çimento Sektörünün Yapısal Analizi

Serbest piyasa ekonomilerinde ekonomik etkinlik, üretimde en iyi kaynak bileşimi ve tüketimde en iyi mal ve hizmet bölüşümüyle sağlanabilmektedir. Serbest piyasa ekonomilerinde bunu sağlayacak mekanizma, rekabetçi piyasa yapısıdır. Dünya ekonomisindeki piyasalar incelendiğinde, daha çok tam rekabet piyasası ile monopol (tekel) piyasası arasında oluşan monopolcü rekabet ve oligopol piyasa yapılarının yer aldığı görülmektedir. Piyasa yapıları belirlenirken en çok kullanılan yöntemler M – Firma Yoğunlaşma Oranı ve Herfindahl – Hirschman İndeksi analizidir. Bu yöntemler aracılığıyla hesaplanacak yoğunlaşma derecesi ile yoğunlaşma – piyasa yapısı ilişkisi çerçevesinde piyasa yapısı belirlenebilmektedir. Çalışmada, çimento sektörü firmalarının gelirleri, maliyetleri ve çimento üretim miktarla- rı verileri ile hesaplanan M – Firma Yoğunlaşma Oranı ve Herfindahl – Hirschman İndeksi analizi yöntemi kullanılarak, Türkiye’de çimento sektörünün piyasa yapısı belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır.

Structural Analysis of Turkish Cement Sector Within Context of Concentration and Market Structure Relation

In free market economies, economic efficiency can be provided by best combination of source in production and by best distribution of goods and services in consumption. In such economies, the mechanism which provides the aforementioned efficiency is the competitive market structure. When the markets in the world are examined, it is usually seen that there are monopolistic competition and oligopolistic market structures, which occur between perfect competitive markets and monopolistic markets. The most frequent methods of determining market structures are M – Firm Concentration Ratio and Herfindahl – Hirschman Index. By the help of the mentioned methods, the market structures are determined by the interaction between concentration degree and market structures. In this study, it is aimed to determine the market structure of Turkish cement sector, by the help of the M – Firm Concentration Rate and Herfindahl – Hirschman Index analysis methods which are used to calculate income, cost and amount of cement production of cement sector firms.

___

  • Blees Jasper, Kemp Ron, Maas Jeroen, Mosselman Marco (May 2003), Barriers to Entry:Differences in barriers to entry for SMEs and large enterprises, Research Report H20030,published by SCALES: Zoetermeer.
  • Boyes William, Melvin Michael (1991), Economics, Houghton Mifflin Company: Boston.
  • Çağlayan Ali İhsan (2003), Rekabet Hukukunda Pazar Gücünün Önemi ve Ölçülmesi, Rekabet Kurumu Uzmanlık Tezi, Rekabet Kurumu Yayınları Yayın No: 0112: Ankara.
  • DİE (2001), Dış Ticarette Yoğunlaşma - Concentration In Foreign Trade, T.C. Başbakanlık Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü: Ankara, s. III, VI - VIII
  • DİE (1997), Türkiye İmalat Sanayiinde Yoğunlaşma 1992 - 1996 (Concentration In The Turkish Manufacturing Industry), T.C. Başbakanlık Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü: Ankara, s. III, VII - X
  • De Vany Arthur, Kim Cassey Lee Hong (July 2003), Stochastic Market Structure: Concentration Measures And Motion Picture Antitrust, Centre On Regulation And Competition Working Paper Series Paper No. 52, Centre On Regulation And Competition, Institute For Development Policy And Management, University of Manchester: Manchester.
  • DPT (2006), Sekizinci Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı (2001 - 2005) 2005 Yılı Programı Destek Çalışmaları,Ekonomik ve Sosyal Sektörlerdeki Gelişmeler: Ankara.
  • George K. D. (1968), “Concentration, Barriers to Entry And Rates of Return”, MIT Press, Revive of Economics And Statistics, Vol.: 50, No: 2 : 273 - 275
  • Ghemawat Pankaj, Thomas Catherine (2005), Multinational Agglomeration in the Cement Industry:Patterns, Drivers, and Performance Implications, http://www.rotman.utoronto.ca/~baum/workshop/Ghemawat_workshop.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 09.03.2007)
  • Gwartney James D., Stroup Richard L. (1992), Microeconomics - Private and Public Choice, Sixth Edition, The Dryden Pres: Orlando
  • Hirschey, Mark, Pappas, James L. (1996), Managerial Economics, Eighth Edition, The Dryden Press:Florida
  • Hyman David N. (1986), Modern Microeconomics Analysis And Applications, Times Mirror’Mosby College Publiching: Missouri
  • Jelili Riadh Ben (July 2005), Competition, Efficiency and Competition Policy in Tunisia,Competition, Efficiency And Competition Policy in The MENA Region, Femise Research Program 2004 - 2005, Country Report: Bruxell.
  • Keat Paul G., Young Philip K.Y. (2003), Managerial Economics - Economic Tools For Today’s Decision Makers, Fourth Edition, Pearson Education Inc.:New Jersey
  • Kulaksızoğlu Tamer (2004), Measuring the Effectiveness of Competition Policy: Evidence from the Turkish Cement Industry, Munich Personal RePEc Archive: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/357/01/MPRA_paper_357.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 09.03.2007)
  • Kuzle I., Klaric M., Tesnjak S. (2004), “Reactive Power Evaluation and Market Power in Liberalized Ancillary Services Market”, IEEE MELECON 2004, May 12-15: 1075 - 1078
  • Lipsey Richard G. (1992), Harbury Colin, First Principles of Economics, Second Edition, Oxford University Pres: New York
  • Matthes Felix Chr., Grashof Katherine, Gores Sabine (February 2007), “Power Generation Market Concentration in Europe1996 - 2005 : An Empirical Analysis”, Öko Institut e.V.: Berlin http://www.greensefa.org/cms/default/dokbin/168/168183.oko_institut_energy_market_liberalis atio@en.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 05.03.2007)
  • McConnell Campbell R., Brue Stanley L. (1999), Economics: Principles, Problems and Policies,Fourteenth Edition, Irwin McGraw-Hill C. : Boston
  • Nissan Edward, Caveny Jennifer (March 2005), “Aggregate Concentration In Corporate America:The Case Of The Fortune 500”, International Journal Of Applied Economics published by Southeastern Louisiana University, 2 (1):132 - 152
  • Norman George, Thisse Jacqes - François (2000), Market Structure and Competition Policy (Game - Theoretic Approaches), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge
  • Parkin Michael (2003), Economics, Sixth Edition, Pearson Education, Addison Wesley World Student Series: New York
  • Pindyck Robert S., Rubinfeld Daniel L. (1992), Microeconomics, Second Edition, Macmillian Publishing Company: New York
  • Salvatore Dominick (1992), Theory And Problems Of Microeconomic Theory, Thirth Edition,Schaum’s Outline Series: Singapore
  • Schiller Bradley R. (2003), The Economy Today, Ninth Edition, Mc Graw - Hill Inc.: New York
  • Stiglitz Joseph E., Walsh Carl E. (2002), Economics, Third Edition, W.W. Norton & Company Inc.:New York
  • Twomey Paul, Gren Richard, Neuhoff Karsten, Newbery David (2005), A Review of the Monitoring of Market Power, Cambridge Working Papers in Economics CWPE 0504, Faculty of Economics (formerly DAE), University of Cambridge: Cambridge
  • WADE (World Alliance For Decentralized Energy), 2007, Concrete Energy Savings: Onsite Power in The Cement Sector: Scotland
  • Watson Clinton, Newman John, Upton Rt Hon Simon, Hackmann Petra (2005), Round Table on Sustainable Development: CAN TRANSNATIONAL SECTORAL AGREEMENTS HELP REDUCE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS?, General Secretariat, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD): Paris, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/14/11/35030013.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi:13.03.2007)
  • Yıldırım Kemal, Eşkinat Rana, Kabasakal Ali (2005), Endüstriyel Ekonomi, 3. Baskı, Ekin Kitabevi: Bursa
  • http://www.census.gov/prod/ec97/m31s-cr.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 01.03.2007)
  • http://www.die.gov.tr/disTicaret03.htm, ( Erişim Tarihi: 05.03.2007)
  • http://www.die.gov.tr/TURKISH/SONIST/IMALATYOG/290598.htm, (Erişim:20.02.2007)
  • http://www.ftc.gov/reports/ethanol/Ethanol_Report_2006.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 05.03.2007)