Yumurta tavuğu kümeslerinin dış duvarları için optimum yalıtım kalınlığının belirlenmesi
Bir ülkenin enerji stratejisinin temel hedeflerinden biri de enerji tasarrufudur. Isı yalıtımı enerjinin korunumun da önemli bir yere sahiptir. Bu nedenle, bu çalışma da Türkiye’de en fazla yumurta tavuğu yetiştiren on il için optimum yalıtım kalınlığının belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Derece gün yöntemi kullanılarak yıllık ısıtma ve soğutma yükleri belirlendikten sonra taş yünü (RW) ve cam yünü (GW) yalıtım malzemeleri için optimum yalıtım kalınlığı, enerji tasarrufu, geri ödeme süreleri ve CO2 emisyonları hesaplanmıştır. Sonuç olarak şehir ve yakıt türüne bağlı olarak RW yalıtım malzemesi için optimum yalıtım kalınlığının 0.046 ile 0.165 m arasında, enerji tasarrufunun %35.42 ile %74.56 arasında ve geri ödeme süresinin 0.67 ile 2.00 yıl arasında olduğu, GW yalıtım malzemesi içinse optimum yalıtım kalınlığının 0.045 ile 0.150 m arasında, enerji tasarrufunun %42.17 ile %77.72 arasında ve geri ödeme süresinin 0.61 ile 1.72 yıl arasında değiştiği belirlenmiştir. CO2 emisyonundaki en düşük azalma oranı (%64.79) İzmir ili için doğalgaz ve RW yalıtım malzemesi kullanıldığı zaman, en yüksek azalma oranı ise (%88.76) LPG ve GW yalıtım malzemesi ile Kayseri'de elde edilmiştir.
The determination of optimum thermal insulation thickness for external walls of laying hens building
One of the main objectives of the energy strategy of any country is energy conservation. Thermal insulation is of utmost importance in the context of conservation energy. Therefore, this study aims to optimize insulation layer for the ten cities of Turkey which have the highest number of laying hens. The yearly heating and cooling loads were determined by using degree day method. Then optimum insulation thickness, energy savings, payback periods and CO2 emission were computed for Rock wool (RW) and Glass wool (GW) insulation materials. The study's results indicated that the optimum thickness of insulation for RW insulation material varies between 0.046 and 0.159 m, energy savings range between 35.42% and 74.56%, and payback periods were between 0.67 and 2.00 years, while for GW insulation material optimum insulation thickness varies from 0.450 and 0.150 m, energy savings vary in the range of 42.17% and 77.72%, and payback periods were between 0.61 and 1.72 years depending on the city, and type of fuel. The lowest CO2 emission reductions (64.79%) were obtained for İzmir with natural gas and RW insulation material are used, while the highest value (88.76%) was achieved for Kayseri with LPG and GW insulation material.
___
- Agra, Ö., Özgür Atayilmaz, S., Demir, H., Teke, I.,
2011. Environmental impact of optimum insulation
thickness in buildings, World Renewable Energy
Congress-Sweden, Linköping University Electronic
Press, 8-13 May, Sweden, pp. 1813-1820.
- Aktemur, C., 2018. Determination of optimum
insulation thicknesses, energy savings and
environmental impacts with respect to heating and
cooling degree-days for different climate regions of
Turkey. International Journal of Energy
Applications and Technologies, 5: 29-43.
- Anastaselos, D., Oxizidis, S., Papadopoulos, A.M.,
2017. Suitable thermal insulation solutions for
Mediterranean climatic conditions: a case study for
four Greek cities. Energy Efficiency, 10: 1081-1098.
- Ashouri, M., Astaraei, F.R., Ghasempour, R., Ahmadi,
M.H., Feidt, M., 2016. Optimum insulation
thickness determination of a building wall using
exergetic life cycle assessment. Applied Thermal
Engineering, 106: 307-315.
- Barrau, J., Ibanez, M., Badia, F., 2014. Impact of the
optimization criteria on the determination of the
insulation thickness. Energy and Buildings, 76: 459-
469.
- Blokhuis, H., Veissier, I., Jones, B., Miele, M., 2013.
The welfare quality® vision, Improving farm animal
welfare. Springer, pp. 71-89.
- Bolattürk, A., 2008. Optimum insulation thicknesses for
building walls with respect to cooling and heating
degree-hours in the warmest zone of Turkey.
Building and Environment, 43: 1055-1064.
- Çetintaş, K.F., Yılmaz, Z., 2018. A new approach to
determine insulation material and thickness from a
life-cycle perspective. Proceedings of the Institution
of Civil Engineers-Energy, 171: 171-181.
- Daouas, N., 2011. A study on optimum insulation
thickness in walls and energy savings in Tunisian
buildings based on analytical calculation of cooling
and heating transmission loads. Applied Energy, 88:
156-164.
- Evin, D., Ucar, A., 2019. Energy impact and ecoefficiency of the envelope insulation in residential
buildings in Turkey. Applied Thermal Engineering,
154: 573-584.
- Gelegenis, J., Axaopoulos, P., 2017. A Multi-Parametric
Mathematical Approach on the Selection of
Optimum Insulation Thicknesses in Buildings.
Buildings, 7 (15): 1-26.
- Gürel, A.E., Daşdemir, A., 2011. Economical and
enviromental effects of thermal insulation thicness
in four different climatic regions of Turkey.
International Journal of Renewable Energy
Research, 1: 1-10.
- Hasan, A., 1999. Optimizing insulation thickness for
buildings using life cycle cost. Applied energy, 63:
115-124.
- Holik, V., 2009. Management of laying hens to
minimize heat stress. LohmannInformation, 44: 16-
29.
- Indraganti, M., Boussaa, D., 2017. A method to estimate
the heating and cooling degree-days for different
climatic zones of Saudi Arabia. Building Services
Engineering Research and Technology, 38: 327-350.
- Kurekci, N.A., 2016. Determination of optimum
insulation thickness for building walls by using
heating and cooling degree-day values of all
Turkey’s provincial centers. Energy and Buildings,
118: 197-213.
- Legrand, A., Von Keyserlingk, M., Weary, D., 2009.
Preference and usage of pasture versus free-stall
housing by lactating dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy
Science, 92: 3651-3658.
- Liu, X., Chen, Y., Ge, H., Fazio, P., Chen, G., Guo, X.,
2015. Determination of optimum insulation
thickness for building walls with moisture transfer in
hot summer and cold winter zone of China. Energy
and Buildings, 109: 361-368.
- Lucas, S., Ferreira, V., 2010. Selecting insulating
building materials trough an assessment tool.
Portugal SB10 sustainable building affordable to all,
745-752, 17-19 March 2010, Algavre.
- Mahlia, T., Iqbal, A., 2010. Cost benefits analysis and
emission reductions of optimum thickness and air
gaps for selected insulation materials for building
walls in Maldives. Energy, 35: 2242-2250.
- Mahlia, T., Taufiq, B., Masjuki, H., 2007. Correlation
between thermal conductivity and the thickness of
selected insulation materials for building wall.
Energy and Buildings, 39: 182-187.
- Ozel, M., 2011. Effect of wall orientation on the
optimum insulation thickness by using a dynamic
method. Applied Energy, 88: 2429-2435.
- Petrecca, G., 2014. Energy Conversion and
Management. Springer.
- Ramin, H., Hanafizadeh, P., Akhavan-Behabadi, M.A.,
2016. Determination of optimum insulation
thickness in different wall orientations and locations
in Iran. Advances in Building Energy Research, 10:
149-171.
- Roshan, G.R., Ghanghermeh, A., Attia, S., 2017.
Determining new threshold temperatures for cooling
and heating degree day index of different climatic
zones of Iran. Renewable Energy, 101: 156-167.
- USDA, F., 2016. Livestock and Poultry: World Markets
and Trade. United States Department of Agriculture.
Foreign Agriculture Service.
- Vincelas, F.F.C., Ghislain, T., 2017. The determination
of the most economical combination between
external wall and the optimum insulation material in
Cameroonian's buildings. Journal of Building
Engineering, 9: 155-163.
- Yildiz, A., Gurlek, G., Erkek, M., Ozbalta, N., 2008.
Economical and environmental analyses of thermal
insulation thickness in buildings. Journal of Thermal
Science and Technology, 28: 25-34.
- Yu, J., Yang, C., Tian, L., Liao, D., 2009. A study on
optimum insulation thicknesses of external walls in
hot summer and cold winter zone of China. Applied
Energy, 86: 2520-2529.
- Yuan, J., Farnham, C., Emura, K., Alam, M.A., 2016.
Proposal for optimum combination of reflectivity
and insulation thickness of building exterior walls
for annual thermal load in Japan. Building and
Environment, 103: 228-237.
- Zhu, P., Huckemann, V., Fisch, M.N., 2011. The
optimum thickness and energy saving potential of
external wall insulation in different climate zones of
China. Procedia Engineering, 21: 608-616.