Kerim ÖZCAN

11349

Yönetsel kontrol ve örgütsel düzen: Michel Foucault ve Zygmunt Bauman ekseninde bir tartışma

Ana akım örgütsel yaklaşımlar düzen ve denetim olgusunu işlevselci bir bakış açısıyla yönetsel etkinlik ve etkililik kavramı etrafında incelemiş ve yönetsel rasyonellik açısından öneriler geliştirmiştir. Ne var ki, son dönemlerde yaygınlaşan eleştirel bakışaçıları bu iki olguyu iktidar ilişkilerinin cenderesindeki insanın konumuyla birlikte ele almışlardır. Bu çalışma, düzen ve denetim konusunu eleştirel perspektiften incelemeyiamaçlamaktadır. Bu noktada güç, iktidar, düzen konuları üzerinde yaptıkları analizlerle büyük yankı uyandıran Foucault ve Bauman’ın görüşlerine başvurulmuştur. Bir bakımaçalışma, Foucault ve Bauman’ın geliştirdiği tez ve teorilerden hareketle, modern yönet sel kontrol ve düzen konusunu bir yeniden okuma çabasıdır. Bauman’ın özellikle “bahçıvanlık”, Foucault’un ise “panoptikon” ve “pastorallik” metaforu etrafında açıklama ya çalıştıkları disipline etme ve uysallaştırma pratiklerinin örgütsel alandaki izdüşümleri farklı boyut ve yönleriyle gösterilmeye çalışılmıştır.

Managerial Control and Organizational Order: A Discussion Based on the Analyses of Michel Foucault and Zygmunt Bauman

Mainstream organizational approaches have examined order and control from a functionalist point of view focusing on the managerial effectiveness and efficien- cy and have tried to generate suggestions for managerial rationality. However, critical views, which have been rising in recent years, examine these two concepts within the positions of employees where they are under power pressure. This paper aims to study order and control from the critical perspective. With this aim, thoughts of Foucault and Bauman are paid attention whose analyses on power, domination, and control have created a great deal of interest. In one respect, the study is an attempt to reread mana gerial control and order moving from the thesis and theories developed by Foucault and Bauman. The projections of the practices in disciplining and making people submissive that have been explained by Bauman especially with the metaphor of “gardening” and by Foucault with “panopticon” and “pastoralism”, are tried to exhibit in some aspects and dimensions in the work setting.

___

  • Abrahamson, Eric (1997), “The Emergence And Prevalence Of Employee Management Rhetorics: The Effects Of Long Waves, Labor Unions And Turnover, 1875 to 1992”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40 No. 3, s. 491-533.
  • Aldrich, Howard E. (1999), Organizations Evolving, Sage, London.
  • Alvesson, Mats - Wilmott, Hugh (1992), Critical Management Studies, Sage, London.
  • Alvesson, Mats - Deetz, Stanley (2000), Doing Critical Management Research, Sage, London.
  • Alvesson, Mats - Willmott, Hugh (2001), Making Sense of Management: A Critical Int- roduction, Sage, London.
  • Alvesson, Mats - Willmott, Hugh (2002), “Identity Regulation As Organizational Control: Producing The Appropriate İndividual” Journal of Management Studies, Vol.39, s. 619-644.
  • Alvesson, Mats - Willmott, Hugh (2003), Studying Management Critically, Sage, London.
  • Alvesson, Mats (2004), Knowledge Work And Knowledge-İntensive Firms, Oxford Uni- versity Press, Oxford.
  • Alvesson, Mats - Deetz, Stanley A. (2006), “Critical Theory and Postmodernism Approaches to Organizational Studies”, S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T.B. Lawrence, W.R. Nord (Ed.), The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies, Sage, London, s. 255-283.
  • Anthony, P.D. (2005), “Management Ideology”, Christopher Grey-Hugh Willmott (Ed.), Critical Management Studies: A Reader, Oxford University Press, Oxford, s.21-28.
  • Astley, W. Graham (1985), “Organizational Size and Bureaucratic Structure”, Organization Studies, Vol. 6/3, s.201-228.
  • Baritz, Loren (2005), “The Servants of Power”, Christopher Grey-Hugh Willmott (Ed.), Critical Management Studies: A Reader, Oxford University Press, Oxford, s.29-45.
  • Barker, James R. (2005), “Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self- Managing Teams”, Christopher Grey-Hugh Willmott (Ed.), Critical Management Studies: A Reader, Oxford University Press, Oxford, s.209-243.
  • Barley, Stpehen R. - Kunda, Gideon (1992), “Design and Devotion: Surges Of Rational And Normative İdeologies of Control in Managerial Discourse”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 37, s. 363-99.
  • Bauman, Zygmunt (2000a), Ölümlülük, Ölümsüzlük ve Diğer Hayat Stratejileri, (Çev.Nurgül Demirdöven), Ayrıntı, İstanbul.
  • Bauman, Zygmunt (2000b), Siyaset Arayışı, (Çev. Tuncay Birkan), Ayrıntı, İstanbul.
  • Bauman, Zygmunt (2001), Parçalanmış Hayatlar, (Çev. İsmail Türkmen), Ayrıntı, İstanbul.
  • Bauman, Zygmunt (2003a), Modernlik ve Müphemlik, (Çev. İsmail Türkmen), Ayrıntı, İstanbul.
  • Bauman, Zygmunt (2003b), Yasa Koyucular ile Yorumcular, (Çev. Kemal Atakay), Me- tis, İstanbul.
  • Bauman, Zygmunt (2005), Bireyselleşmiş Toplum, (Çev. Yavuz Alogan), Ayrıntı, İstanbul.
  • Bauman, Zygmunt (2006), Küreselleşme, (Çev. Abdullah Yılmaz), Ayrıntı, İstanbul.
  • Bauman, Zygmunt (2007), Modernite ve Holocaust, (Çev. Süha Sertabiboğlu), Versus, İstanbul.
  • Bauman, Zygmunt (2010), Etiğin Tüketiciler Dünyasında Bir Şansı Var Mı?, (Çev. F. Çoban-İ. Kantarcı) De Ki Yay., Ankara.
  • Best, Steven - Kellner, Douglas (1998), Postmodern Teori: Eleştirel Soruşturmalar, (Çev. Mehmet Küçük), Ayrıntı, İstanbul.
  • Blau, Peter M. - Schoenherr, Richard S. (1971), The Structure Of Organizations, Basic Books, New York.
  • Buğra, Ayşe (2013) Kapitalizm, Yoksulluk ve Türkiye’de Sosyal Politika, İletişim Ya- yınları, İstanbul.
  • Burns, Tom - Stalker, G.M. (1961) The Management of Innovation, Tavistock, London.
  • Burrell, Gibson - Morgan, Gareth (1979) Sociological Paradigms and Organizasational Analysis, Ashgate, London.
  • Burris, Beverly H. (1989), “Technocratic Organization and Control”, Organization Stu- dies, Vol. 10/1, s. 1-22.
  • Casey, Catherine (1995), Work, Self and Society, Routledge, London.
  • Clegg, Stewart (1978), Power, Rule and Domination, Routledge, London.
  • Clegg, Stewart R.- Dunkerley, David (1980), Organization, Class and Control, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Clegg, Stewart R. (1981), “Organization and Control”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 26, No.4, s. 545-562.
  • Clegg, Stewart R. (1989), “Radical Revisions: Power, Discipline and Organizations”, Organization Studies, Vol.10/1: 97-115.
  • Clegg, Stewart (1998), “Foucault, Power and Organizations”, Alan McKinlay ve Ken Starkey (Ed.), Foucault, Management and Organizaiton Theory: From Panopticon to Technologies of Self, Sage, London, s.27-48.
  • Clegg, Stewart R. - Courpasson, David - Phillips, Nelson (2006), Power and Organizations, London, Sage.
  • Clegg Stewart R.- Hardy, Cythia (2006) “Representation and Reflexivity”, Stewart R.
  • Clegg-Cythia Hard-Thomas B. Lawrence-Walter R. Nord (Ed.), The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies, Sage, London, s.425-444.
  • Clegg, Stewart R.-Hard, Cythia-Lawrence, Thomas B.- Nord, Walter R. (2006.), The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies, Sage, London.
  • Cobb, Anthony T. – Stephens, Carroll - Watson, George (2001), “Beyond structure: The role of social accounts in implementing ideal control”, Human Relations, Vol. 54/9, s. 1123-1153.
  • Coombs, Rod – Knights, David – Willmott, Hugh C. (1992), “Culture, Control and Ceompetititon: Towards a Conceptual Framework fort he Study of Information Technology in Organizations”, Organization Studies, Vol. 13/1, s. 51-72.
  • Cravens, Dawid W. - Lassk, Felicia G. - Low, George S. - Marshall, Greg W. - Moncrief, William C. (2004), “Formal and İnformal Management Combinations İn Sales Organizations: The İmpact On Salesperson Concequences”, Journal of Busi- ness Research, Vol. 57, s. 241-248.
  • Croizer, Michel (1964), The Bureaucratic Phenomenon, Tavistock, London.
  • Cyert, Richard M.- March, James G. (1963), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Wiley- Blackwell.
  • Daft, Richard (2000), Management, Dryden Press, Orlando.
  • Daft, Richard L. (1998), Organization Theory and Design, South-Western, Ohio.
  • Dahl, Robert A. (1972), Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition, Yale University Press.
  • Deetz, Stanley (1992), “Disciplinary Power in the Modern Corporation”, Mats Alvesson-Hugh Willmott (Ed.), Critical Management Studies, Sage, London, s.21-45.
  • Dickson, David (1974), “Technology and the Construction of Social Reality”, Radical Science Journal, Vol.1, 29-50.
  • Edwards, Richard (1979), Contested terrain: The transformation of the workplace in the twentieth century, Basic Books, New York.
  • Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. (1985), “Control: Organizational and Economic Approaches” Management Science, Vol. 31, No. 2, s. 134-149
  • Findlay, Patricia - Newton, Tim (1998), “Re-framing Foucault: The Case of Performance Appraisal”, Alan McKinlay ve Ken Starkey (Ed.), Foucault, Management and Organizaiton Theory: From Panopticon to Technologies of Self, Sage, London, s.211-229.
  • Flamholtz, Eric G. - T. K. Das - Tsui, Anne S. (1985), "Toward an Integrative Framework of Organizational Control," Accounting Organizations and Society, Vol.10/1, s. 35-50.
  • Foucault, Michel (1992), Hapishanenin Doğuşu, (Çev. Mehmet Ali Kılıçbay), İmge, Ankara.
  • Foucault, Michel (1999), Bilginin Arkeolojisi, (Çev. Veli Urhan), Birey, İstanbul.
  • Foucault, Michel (2000), Deliliğin Tarihi, (Çev. Mehmet Ali Kılıçbay), İmge, Ankara.
  • Foucault, Michel (2003a), İktidarın Gözü, (Çev. Işık Ergüden), Ayrıntı, İstanbul.
  • Foucault, Michel (2003b), Toplumu Savunmak Gerekir, (Çev. Şehsuvar Aktaş), YKY, İstanbul.
  • Foucault, Michel (2005a), Büyük Kapatılma, (Çev.Ferda Keskin-Işık Ergüden), Ayrıntı, İstanbul.
  • Foucault, Michel (2005b), Özne ve İktidar, (Çev.Ferda Keskin-Işık Ergüden), Ayrıntı, İstanbul.
  • Foucault, Michel (2006), Kelimler ve Şeyler, (Çev. Mehmet Ali Kılıçbay), İmge, Ankara.
  • Foucault, Michel (2011) Bu Bir Pipo Değildir, (Çev. Selahattin Hilav ), Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Fournier, Valerie - Grey, Chris (2000), “At the Critical Moment: Conditions and Prospects for Critical Management Studies”, Human Relations, Vol. 53 No. 1, s. 7-32.
  • Garrety, Karin Helen (2008), “Organizational Control and the Self: Critiques and Normative Expectations”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.82, s. 93-106.
  • Giddens, Anthony (1998), Modernliğin Sonuçları, (Çev. Ersin Kuşdil), Ayrıntı, İstanbul.
  • Goffman, Erving (1959), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Penguin Books, Middlesex.
  • Gramsci, Antonio (1971), From the Prison Notebooks, Lawrence and Wishart, London.
  • Harre ́, Rom (1998), The Singular Self: An Introduction to the Psychology of Personhood, Sage, London.
  • Harvey, David (2003), Postmodernliğin Durumu, (Çev. Sungur Savran), Metis, İstanbul.
  • Henderson, John C. - Lee, Soonchul (1992) “Managing I/S Design Teams: A Control Theories Perspective”, Management Science, Vol. 38, No. 6, s. 757-777.
  • Ilcan, Suzan (2006), “Global Governing Organizations : Order-Building and Waste Management”, Current Sociology, Vol. 54, s. 851-872.
  • Jackson, Norman - Carter, Pippa (1998), “Labour as Dressage”, Alan McKinlay ve Ken Starkey (Ed.), Foucault, Management and Organizaiton Theory: From Panopticon to Technologies of Self, Sage, London, s. 49-64.
  • Jermier, John M. (1998), “Introduction: Critical Perspectives on Organizational Control” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 43, s. 235-256.
  • Kelemen, Mihaela - Rumens, Nick (2008), An Introduction to Critical Management Research, Sage, London.
  • Keskin, Ferda (2005a), “Büyük Kapatılma: Önsöz”, İçinde M. Foucault (2005) Büyük Kapatılma, (Çev. I. Ergüden ve F. Keskin), Ayrıntı, İstanbul.
  • Keskin, Ferda (2005b), “Özne ve İktidar: Önsöz” İçinde M. Foucault (2005) Özne ve İktidar, (Çev. I. Ergüden-O.Akınhay), Ayrıntı, İstanbul. Leflaive, Xavier (1996), “Organizations as Structures of Domination”, Organization Studies, Vol.17/1, s. 23-47.
  • Marglin, S.A. (1974), “What Do Bosses Do?- The Origins and Functions of Hierarchy in Capitalist Production”, Review of Radical Political Economics, Vol.6, s. 60-112.
  • Mead, George Herbert (1934), Mind, Self and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviourist, Chicago University Press.
  • Milham, Spencer - Bullock, Roger - Cherret, Paul Francis (1972), “Social Control in Organizations”, The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 23, No. 4, s. 406-421
  • Mills, C. Wright (2005), “Power Elite”, Christopher Grey-Hugh Willmott (Ed.), Critical Management Studies: A Reader, Oxford University Press, Oxford, s.50-59.
  • Munro, Rolland (1999), “The Cultural Performance of Control”, Organization Studies Vol.20, s. 619-640.
  • Ogbor, John O. (2001), “Critical theory and the hegemony of corporate culture,” Journal of Organizational Change Management; Vol. 14, No.6, s. 590-608.
  • Ouchi, William G. (1977), “The Relationship between Organizational Structure and Organizational Control,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 22/1, s. 95-113.
  • Ouchi, William G. (1979), “A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms”, Management Science, Vol. 25, s. 833-848.
  • Parker, Martin (2002), Against Management: Organizaiton in the Age of Manageria- lism, Blackwell, London.
  • Perrow, Charles (1967), “A Framework for the Comperative Analysis of Organizati- ons”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 32, s. 194-208.
  • Perrow, Charles (1970), Organizational Analysis, Belmont, California.
  • Poloma, Margeret M. (2007), Çağdaş Sosyoloji Kuramları, (Çev. H. Erbaş), EOS, Ankara.
  • Raelin, Joseph A. (2010), “The End of Managerial Control?”, Group and Organization Management, Vol. 36, s. 135-160.
  • Reed, Michael I. (1992), The Sociology of Organizations, Harvester, London. Ritzer, George (1997), Postmodern Social Theory, McGraw-Hill.
  • Robertson, Maxine - Swan, Jacky (2003), “‘Control-What Control?’ Culture and Ambiguity within a Knowledge İntensive Firm”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 40, s. 831-858.
  • Rosenau, Pauline Marie (2004), Post-modernizm ve Toplum Bilimleri, (Çev. Tuncay Birkan), Bilim ve Sanat, Ankara.
  • Sarup, Madan (2004), Post-yapısalcılık ve Postmodernizm, (Çev. Abdülbaki Güçlü), Bilim ve Sanat, Ankara.
  • Savage, Mike (1998), “Discipline, Surveillance and ‘Career’: Employment on the Great Western Rilaway 1833-1914”, Alan McKinlay ve Ken Starkey (Ed.), Foucault, Management and Organizaiton Theory: From Panopticon to Technologies of Self, Sa- ge, London, s. 61-92.
  • Schiel, Tilman (2005), “Modernity, Ambivalance and the Gardening State”, Thesis Eleven, Vol.83, s.78-89.
  • Schwartz, H. S. (1987), “On the Psychodynamics of Organizational Totalitarianism”, Journal of Management, Vol. 13/1, s. 41–54.
  • Sewell, Graham - Wilkinson, Barry (1992), “ ‘Someone to Watch Over Me’: Surveil- lance, Dsicipline and the Just-in-Time Labor Process”, Sociology, Vol.26/2, s. 271-289.
  • Smelser, Neil J. (1998), “The Rational and the Ambivalent in the Social Sciences: 1997 Presidential Adress”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 63, No.1, s.1-16.
  • Steffy, Brian D. – Grimes, Andrew J. (1992) “Personel/Organizational Psychology: A Critique of the Discipline”, Mats Alvesson-Hugh Willmott (Ed.), Critical Manage- ment Studies, Sage, London, s.181-201.
  • Sthyre, Alexander (2008), “Management Control in Bureaucratic and Post-bureaucratic Organizations: A Lacanian Perspective”, Group and Organization Management, Vol.33, s. 635-656.
  • Şaylan, Gencay (2006), Postmodernizm, İmge, Ankara.
  • Tekelioğlu, Orhan (2003), Foucault Sosyolojisi, Alfa, Bursa.
  • Thompson, James (1967), Organizations in Action, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • Thompson, Lyke - Sarbaugh-McCall, Marjorie - Norris, Donald F. (1989), “The Social Impacts of Computing: Control in Organizations”, Social Science Computer Review Vol. 7, s. 407-417.
  • Touraine, Alan (2002), Modernliğin Eleştirisi, (Çev. Hülya Tufan), Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Townley, Barbara (1993), “Foucault, Power/Knowledge, and Its Relevance for Human Resource Management”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 18, No. 3, s. 518-545.
  • Townley, Barbara (2005), “Performans Appraisal and the Emergence of Management”, Christopher Grey-Hugh Willmott (Ed.), Critical Management Studies: A Reader, Oxford University Press, Oxford, s.304-323.
  • Urhan, Veli (2010), Foucault, Say Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Urry, John (1999), Mekanları Tüketmek, (Çev. Rahmi G. Öğdül), Ayrıntı, İstanbul. Weber, Max (1995), Toplumsal ve Ekonomik Örgütlenme Kuramı, (Çev. Ö. Ozankaya), İmge, Ankara.
  • Willmott, Hugh (1993), “Strength is ignorance; slavery is freedom: Managing culture in modern organizations”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol.30, s. 515–552. Woodward, Joan (1965), Industrial Organizations: Theory and Practice, Oxford University Press, London.
Amme İdaresi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-1795
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1968
  • Yayıncı: -
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Türkiye'de işgücü piyasası ve genç işsizlik- büyüme ilişkisi üzerine bir inceleme

FUNDA ÇONDUR, MEHMET BÖLÜKBAŞ

Kamu ve özel hastanelerde hizmet kalitesi, hasta tatmini ve tercihi arasındaki ilişki: Karşılaştırmalı bir analiz

OMÜR DEMIRER, HASAN BÜLBÜL

GaziÜniversitesi'nde örgütse iİklim

AYHAN URAL

İstihdamsız büyüme (İstihdamsız iyileşme) sorununa karşı kamusal politikalar ve önemi: Türkiye açısından bir değerlendirme

EREN ÇAŞKURLU

Üniversitelerde stratejik planlama süreci: Devlet ve Vakıf üniversitelerinde karşılaştırmalı bir araştırma

VEYSEL EREN, Ufuk Orhan, Demet DÖNMEZ

Yönetsel kontrol ve örgütsel düzen: Michel Foucault ve Zygmunt Bauman ekseninde bir tartışma

Kerim ÖZCAN