Özkan AGTAŞ

4515

Kant’ın Tıp Fakültesi Eleştirisi

Kant’ın Prusya üniversite sisteminde yönetimin amaçlarıyla uyumlu üst fakülteler (ilahiyat, hukuk ve tıp) ile yalnızca aklın yasalarına tabi olan alt fakülte (felsefe) arasın-daki çatışmaya dair yazdıkları, her zaman güçlü bir akademik ilginin konusu olmuştur. Fakat Kant’ın tıp fakültesi eleştirisinin diğerlerine kıyasla ihmal edilmiş olduğu da açık-tır. Bu makalede, Kant’ın tıbba dair görüşleri ve tıp fakültesine yönelik eleştirisinin temel hatları Aydınlanmanın tıpla olan yakın ilgisi, Alman tıbbını kendi içerisinde bölen geri-limler, yönetimin kamu sağlığı politikaları ile tıp disiplini arasındaki ilişkilerin statüsü ve nihayet felsefe ile tıp arasındaki karmaşık ilişkiler üzerinden gösterilmeye çalışılacak-tır.

Kant’s Critique of the Faculty of Medicine

Kant’s writings on the conflict between the higher faculties (theology, law, and medicine) whose teachings are compatible with the goals of the government itself and the lower faculty (philosophy) which is subject only to laws given by reason in the Prussian university system have always attracted strong academic interest. However, it is also clear that Kant’s critique of the faculty of medicine has been neglected compared to ohers. In this article, the main contours of Kant’s views on medicine and his criticism of the faculty of medicine will be discussed with reference to the Enlightenment’s close in-volvement with medicine, the tensions that divide German medicine within itself, the status of the relations between the government’s public health policies and the medical discipline, and finally, the complex relations between philosophy and medicine.

___

  • Arendt, H. (2019). Kant’ın Siyaset Felsefesi Üzerine Dersler. (Çev. D. Sezer ve İ. Ilgar). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  • Borges, M. (2016). “High Doses of Hellebore”. Kant’s Shorter Writings: Critical Paths Outside the Critiques. (Ed. R.V.O. Jiménez et al). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 180-188.
  • Broman, T. H. (1989). “University Reform in Medical Thought at the End of the Eighteenth Century”. Osiris, 5, 36-53.
  • Broman, T. H. (1996). The Transformation of German Academic Medicine: 1750-1820. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cassier, E. (2017). Kant’ın Yaşamı ve Öğretisi. (Çev. D. Özlem). İstanbul: Notos Kitap.
  • Clarke, M. (1997). “Kant’s Rhetoric of Enlightenment”. The Review of Politics, 59(1), 53-73.
  • Critchley, S. (2014). Ölü Filozoflar Kitabı. (Çev. T. Kabadayı). Ankara: BilgeSu Yayınları.
  • Çörekçioğlu, H. (2003). “Eleştirel Üniversite: Kant ve Fakülteler Çatışması”. Toplum ve Bilim, 97, 217-233.
  • David-Ménard, M. (2000). “Kant’s ‘An Essay on the Maladies of the Mind’ and Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and the Sublime”. Hypatia, 15(4), 82-98.
  • De Ceglia, F. P. (2007). “Hoffmann and Stahl. Documents and Reflections on the Dispute”. History of Universities, Vol. XXII (1). (Ed. M. Feingold). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 98-140.
  • De Quincey, T. (2011). Immanuel Kant’ın Son Günleri. (Çev. T. Ayteş). İstanbul: Monokl Yayınları.
  • Derrida, J. (2004). “Mochlos, or The Conflict of the Faculties”. Eyes of the University. (Tr. R. Rand and A. Wygant). Stanford: Stanford University Press, 83-112.
  • Evans, D. (2008). “The Conflict of the Faculties and the Knowledge Industry: Kant’s Diagnosis, in His Time and Ours”. Philosophy, 83(4), 483-495.
  • Foucault, M. (2008). Introduction to Kant’s Anthropology. (Tr. R. Nigro and K. Briggs). Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
  • French, R. (1990). “Sickness and the Soul: Stahl, Hoffmann and Sauvages on Pathology”. The Medical Enlightenment of the Eighteenth Century. (Ed. A. Cunninngham and R. French). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 88-110.
  • Frierson, P. (2009a). “Kant on Mental Disorder. Part 1: An Overview”. History of Psychiatry, 20(3), 267-289.
  • Frierson, P. (2009b). “Kant on Mental Disorder. Part 2: Philosophical Implications of Kant’s Account”. History of Psychiatry, 20(3), 290-310.
  • Gay, P. (1977). The Enlightenment: An Interpretation. Volume II: The Science of Freedom. New York and London: W. W. Norton and Company.
  • Geier, M. (2018). Kant’ın Dünyası. (Çev. E. Özbek). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  • Gilgen, P. (2009). “Structures, But in Ruins Only: On Kant’s History of Reason and the University”. The New Centennial Review, 9(2), 165-193.
  • Gözkan, H. B. (2020). “Kant ve Üniversite İdeası”. Kant’ın Şemsiyesi: Kant’ın Teorik Felsefesi Üzerine Yazılar. (H. B. Gözkan). İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 241-256.
  • Gregor, M. J. (1979). “Translator’s Introduction”. The Conflict of the Faculties. I. Kant. New York: Abaris Books, vii-xxxiv.
  • Gulyga, A. (1987). Immanuel Kant: His Life and Thought. (Tr. M. Despalatovic). Boston: Birkhäuser.
  • Habrich, C. (1991). “Characteristic Features of Eighteenth-Century Therapeutics in Germany”. Essays in the History of Therapeutics. (Ed. W. F. Bynum and V. Nutton). Amsterdam: Rapodi, 39-49.
  • Hunter, I. (1995). “The Regimen of Reason: Kant’s Defence of the Philosophy Faculty”. Oxford Literary Review, 17(1/2), 51-85.
  • Kant, I. (1979). The Conflict of the Faculties. (Tr. M. J. Gregor and R. Anchor). New York: Abaris Books.
  • Kant, I. (1996a). “The Conflict of the Faculties”. Religion and Rational Theology. I. Kant. (Ed. A. W. Wood and G. di Giovanni). (Tr. M. J. Gregor and R. Anchor). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 233-327.
  • Kant, I. (1996b). “An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment”. Practical Philosophy. I. Kant. (Ed. M. J. Gregor). (Tr. M. J. Gregor). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 11-22.
  • Kant, I. (1999). Correspondence. (Ed. and Tr. A. Zweig). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kant, I. (2006). Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. (Tr. R. B. Louden). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kant, I. (2007a). “Essay on the Maladies of the Head”. Anthropology, History, and Education. I. Kant. (Ed. G. Zöller and R. B. Louden). (Tr. H. Wilson). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 63-77.
  • Kant, I. (2007b). “Review of Moscati’s Work Of the Corporeal Essential Differences between the Structure of Animals and Humans”. Anthropology, History, and Education. I. Kant. (Ed. G. Zöller and R.B. Louden). (Tr. G. Zöller). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 78-81.
  • Kant, I. (2007c). “A Note to Physicians”. Anthropology, History, and Education. I. Kant. (Ed. G. Zöller and R. B. Louden). (Tr. G. Zöller). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 105-106.
  • Kant, I. (2007d). “On the Philosophers’ Medicine of the Body”. Anthropology, History, and Education. I. Kant. (Ed. G. Zöller and R. B. Louden). (Tr. M. J. Gregor). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 182-191.
  • Kant, I. (2007e). “From Soemmering’s On the Organ of the Soul”. Anthropology, History, and Education. I. Kant. (Ed. G. Zöller and R. B. Louden). (Tr. A. Zweig). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 219-226.
  • Kant, I. (2012). “A Draft of Kant’s Reply to Hufeland: Autograph, Transcription (by Wolfgand G. Bayerer) and English Translation (by Yvonne Unna)”. Kant-Studien, 103, 5-24.
  • Kant, I. (2015). “Fakültelerin Birbirleriyle İlişkisi Üzerine”. (Çev. Ezgi Demir Oralgül). ViraVerita, 2, 89-104.
  • King, L. S. (1964). “Stahl and Hoffmann: A Study in Eighteenth Century Animism”. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 19(2), 118-130.
  • Kuehn, M. (2011). Kant. (Çev. B. O. Doğan). İstanbul: İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
  • Laursen, J. C. (1986). “The Subversive Kant: The Vocabulary of ‘Public’ and ‘Publicity’”. Political Theory, 14(4), 584-603.
  • Lehman, R. S. (2016). “Letters for the Blind”. SubStance, 45(1), 81-97.
  • Louden, R. B. (2007). “General Introduction”. Anthropology, History, and Education. I. Kant. (Ed. G. Zöller and R. B. Louden). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-17.
  • Madrid, N. S. (2018). “Controlling Mental Disorder: Kant’s Account of Mental Illness in the Anthropology Writings”. Knowledge, Morals and Practice in Kant’s Anthropology. (Ed. G. Lorini and R. B. Louden). London: Palgrave Macmillan, 147-162.
  • Marino, L. (1994). “Soemmerring, Kant and the Organ of the Soul”. Romanticism in Science: Science in Europe, 1790-1840. (Ed. S. Poggi and M. Bossi). Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media, 127-142.
  • Ökten, K. H. (2016). “Kant ve Prusya’da Dini Sansür”. İstanbul Kemerburgaz Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1(1), 87-101.
  • Pecere, P. (2016). “Kant’s Über das Organ der Seele and the Limits of Physiology: Arguments and Legacy”. Kant’s Shorter Writings: Critical Paths Outside the Critiques. (Ed. R. V. O. Jiménez et al). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 214-230.
  • Poggi, D. (2016). “Kant and Soemmerring: A ‘Two Letters Correspondence’ between Transcendental Philosophy and Medicine”. Kant’s Shorter Writings: Critical Paths Outside the Critiques. (Ed. R. V .O. Jiménez et al). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 200-213.
  • Pozzo, R. (2001). “Kant’s Streit der Fakultäten and Conditions in Königsbeg”. History of Universities, Vol. XVI (2). (Ed. M. Feingold). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 96-128.
  • Risse, G. B. (1972). “Kant, Schelling, and the Early Search for a Philosophical ‘Science’ of Medicine in Germany”. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 27(2), 145-158.
  • Risse, G. B. (1976). “‘Philosophical’ Medicine in Nineteenth-Century Germany: An Episode in the Relations between Philosophy and Medicine”. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1(1), 72-92.
  • Schapira, M. (2019). “Kant versus the Managers: Historical Reconstruction and the Modern University”. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 53(1), 111-126.
  • Shell, S. M. (1996). The Embodiment of Reason: Kant on Spirit, Generation, and Community. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Stuckenberg, J. H. W. (1882). The Life of Immanuel Kant. London: Macmillan.
  • Tsouyopoulos, N. (1988). “The Influence of John Brown’s Ideas in Germany”. Medical History, 32(S8), 63-74.
  • Unna, Y. (2012). “A Draft of Kant’s Reply to Hufeland: Key Questions of Kant’s Dietetics and the Problem of Its Systematic Place in His Philosophy”. Kant-Studien, 103, 271-291.
  • Wellmon, C. (2010). Becoming Human: Romantic Anthropology and the Embodiment of Freedom. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Wiesing, U. (2008). “Immanuel Kant, His Philosophy and Medicine”. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 11(2), 221-236.
  • Zammito, J. H. (2018). “Kant and the Medical Faculty: One ‘Conflict of the Faculties’”. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy. 22(2), 429-451.
Amme İdaresi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-1795
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1968
  • Yayıncı: -
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Kant’ın Tıp Fakültesi Eleştirisi

Özkan AGTAŞ

John Locke’un Siyaset Felsefesi Ekseninde Doğal Hukukun Politikleştirilmesi

ŞEFİK TAYLAN AKMAN

Büyükşehir Yönetimlerinde Bütünleşmeci Düzenlemelerin Kırsal Mahallelere Çok Boyutlu Etkisi

Feriştah YILMAZ

II. Abdülhamid Dönemi Velâdet-i Hümâyûn Törenlerinin Diplomatik ve Toplumsal Fonksiyonları

Yunus ÖZGER

Tanzimat’tan Sonra Modern Bütçe Anlayışı ve Osmanlı Bütçelerinin Güvenilirliği Meselesi: Bütçe Etiği Açısından Bir Değerlendirme

Tekin AKDEMİR, Şahin YEŞİLYURT