Sosyal Bilimlerde Disiplinlerarasılığı ve Disipliner Ayrımları Yeniden Düşünmek

Disiplinlerarasılık giderek daha da popüler ve yaygın hale gelen kuramsal ve pedagojik bir yaklaşım ve akademik pratikler bütünüdür. Disiplinlerarasılık belirli kuramsal, pedagojik ve kurumsal faaliyetlerin genel adı olmakla birlikte, aslında disipliner ayrımlara radikal bir etki yapmış ve farklı disiplinlerin kendi epistemolojik ve yöntemsel sınırlarını yeniden tanımlamasına yol açmıştır. Aynı zamanda disiplinlerarasılık, kendi sembolik ve kurumsal sınırlarını yer yer katı hatlarla çizmiş akademik cemaatlerin yapısını da kökten bir biçimde etkilemektedir. Bu çalışmada, giderek daha da popüler ve etkili bir hale gelen disiplinlerarasılık kavramı disipliner ayrımların görece uzun tarihi bağlamında tartışılacak, kavramın farklı tanımları ve farklı bağlamlarda kavram üzerine sorunsallaştırmalar eleştirel bir analize tabi tutulacaktır

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Disiplinlerarasılık, Disipliner Ayrımlar, Postmodernizm, Sosyal Bilimler, Metodoloji

Revisiting The Issue of Inter Disiplinarity and Disiplinary Distinctions in Social Siences

Interdisciplinarity depicts a theoretical and pedagogical approach and a set of academic practices that has been increasingly more popular and widespread. Being more than a general term describing theoretical, pedagogical and institutional activities, interdisciplinarity has radically altered the conception of disciplinary distinctions and caused various disciplines to redefine their symbolic and methodological boundaries. Moreover, academic communities are on the way of changing their symbolic and institutional territories, very solidly defined at times, upon influence of interdisciplinarity. This article focuses on the concept of interdisciplinarity with respect to the relatively long history of disciplinary distinctions and attempts to critically analyze the various definitions of and problematic points regarding the concept

Keywords:

Interdisciplinarity, Disciplinary Distinctions, Postmodernism, Social Sciences, Methodology,

PDF

___

Abbott, Andrew (2001). “Chaos of Disciplines.” Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Aristotle (1952). “On the Parts of Animals.” Great Books of the Western World. Robert Hutchins (der.) içinde. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.
Becher, Tony ve Ludwick Huber (1990). “Editorial.” European Journal of Education. 25(3): 235.
Bradbeer, John (1999). “Barriers to Interdisciplinarity: Disciplinary Discourses and Student Learning.” Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 23 (3): 381-396.
Buanes, Arild ve Svein Jentoft (2009). “Building Bridges: Institutional Perspectives on Interdisciplinarity.” Futures. 41: 446–454.
Cluck, Anne (1980). “Reflections in the Interdisciplinary Apporach to the Humanities.” Liberal Education. 66 (1): 67-77.
Cole, Stephen (1992). “Making Science: Between Nature and Society.” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
DiMaggio, Paul (1997). “Epilogue: Sociology as a Discipline”.
Sociological Visions. Kai Erikson (der.) içinde. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Elzinga, Aant (1987). “Internal and External Regularities in Research and Higher Education Systems”.
Disciplinary Perspectives on Higher Education and Research (Report 37: Papers presented at an International Seminar) içinde. Sweeden. Stockholm University.
Frank, Roberta (1988). “Interdisciplinary: the First Half-Century.” Words: for Robert Burchfield’s Sixty-Fifty Birthday”. in Eric G. Stanley (der.) içinde. Woodbridge: D.S. Brewer.
Geertz, Clifford J. (2005). “Rearticulating Anthropology,”. Unwrapping the Sacred Bundle: Reconfiguring the Discipline of Anthropolog. Daniel Segal ve Sylvia Yanagisako (der.) içinde. Durham: Duke University Press.
Hanisch, Thor Einar ve Wolfgang Vollman (der.) (1983). “Interdisciplinarity in Higher Education.”
Bükreş: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization.
John, Mary (1996). “Discrepant Dislocations: Feminism, Theory, and Postcolonial Histories.” Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Kelley, Donald (1997). “The Problem of Knowledge and the Concept of Discipline.” History and the Disciplines: The Reclassification of Knowledge in Early Modem Europe. Donald R. Kelley (der.) içinde.
Rochester: University of Rochester Press.
Klein, Julie Thompson (2000). “A Conceptual Vocabulary of Interdisciplinary Science.” Practicing Interdisciplinarity.
Peter Weingart ve Nico Stehr (der.) içinde. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Klein, Julie Thompson ve William H. Newell (1998). “Advancing Interdisciplinary Studies.” Interdisciplinarity: Essays from the Literature. William H. Newell (der.) içinde. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
Moran, Joe (2010).” Interdisciplinarity”. Londra: Routledge.
Murphy, John (2000). “Postmodern Sosyal Analiz ve Postmodern Eleştiri.” Çev., Hüsamettin Arslan.
İstanbul: Paradigma Yayınları.
Rosenau, Pauline Marie (1992). “Post-modernism and the Social Sciences.” Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Steinmetz, George (der.) (1999). “State/Culture: State-Formation after the Cultural Turn.” Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Stember, Marilyn (1998). “Advancing the Social Sciences Through the Interdisciplinary Enterprise.” Interdisciplinarity: Essays from the Literature. William H. Newell (der.) içinde. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
Szostak, Rick (2007). “Modernism, Postmodernism and Interdisciplinarity.” Issues in Integrative Studies. 25: 32-83.
Wallerstein, Immanuel (2004). “The Three Meanings of ‘Discipline’.” Reinventing the Social Sciences (OECD Proceedings) içinde. Paris.
Wallerstein, Immanuel (der.) (1996). “Open the Social Sciences: Report of the Gulbenkian Commission on the Restructuring of the Social Sciences.” Stanford: Stanford University Press.