Role of Mathematical Self-Efficacy and Self-Concept in Mathematics Achievement: A Structural-Motivational Model

Matematik öz-yeterliği ve matematik benlik saygısı sosyo-bilişsel kuramın motivasyonel bileşenlerindendir. Bu kuram matematik öz-yeterliği ve matematik benlik saygısının matematik başarısında, duyuşsal-motivasyonel ve arka plan değişkenleri üzerinde iyi bir tahminci ya da aracı olduğunu önermektedir. Bu neden ile bu çalışmanın amacı Ferla, Valcke ve Cai'nin (2009) PISA'da yüksek performanslı bir ülke (Belçika) için akademik öz-yeterlik ve benlik saygısı modeline entegre edip temel alarak PISA'da düşük performanslı (Türkiye) bir ülkenin matematik başarısının yapısal-motivasyonel modelini incelemektir. Modeldeki elde edilen önemli bulgular (a) matematik öz-yeterliğinin matematik benlik saygısı, matematik ilgisi, sınıf seviyesi ya da cinsiyete göre daha iyi bir yordayıcı olduğunu, matematik benlik saygısının ise matematik başarısı üzerindeki duyuşsal-motivasyonel değişkenler için iyi bir aracı olduğunu; (b) öğrencilerin matematik öz-yeterliği güçlü bir şekilde matematik benlik saygısını etkilediğini ve bunun tam tersinin olmadığını; (c) şaşırtıcı bir şekilde, matematik ilgisinin matematik başarısı üzerinde negatif bir etkiye sahip olduğunu; ve (d) önerilen modelin matematik başarısını 34% varyans ile açıkladığını göstermiştir. Bulgular PISA'da düşük ve yüksek performanslı ülkelerin matematik başarısının tahmininde akademik motivasyonun önemini göstermiştir

Matematik Başarısında Matematik Öz-Yeterliği ve Matematik Benlik Saygısının Rolü: Yapısal-Motivasyonel Bir Model

Mathematical self-efficacy and mathematical self-concept are motivational elements of socialcognitive theory. This theory proposes that mathematical self-efficacy and mathematical self-concept are better mediators or predictors of mathematics achievement than affective-motivational and background variables. Therefore, the aim of the research is to investigate a structural-motivational model of mathematics achievement for a low performing country in the PISA (Turkey) based on the integration of Ferla, Valcke and Cai’s (2009) model of mathematical self-efficacy and self-concept for a high performing country in the PISA (Belgium). Important finds from the model indicates: (a) mathematical self-efficacy was more predictive of mathematics achievement than is mathematical self-concept, mathematics anxiety, mathematics interest, grade level, or gender, while mathematical self-concept is a better mediator for affective-motivational variables on mathematics achievement than the other variables; (b) students’ mathematical self-efficacy strongly influenced their mathematical self-concept and not vice versa; (c) surprisingly, mathematics interest has a negative influence on mathematics achievement; and (d) the proposed model explained 34% of the variance in mathematics achievement. These results show the importance of academic motivation in the prediction of mathematics achievement for low performing and high performing countries in the PISA

___

  • Aiken L. (1970) “Attitudes towards Mathematics”. Review of Educational Research 40 (1970) 551-596.
  • Aydın A., Sarıer Y. & Uysal Ş. (2012). “The Comparative Assessment of the Results of PISA Mathematical Literacy in Terms of Socio-Economic and Socio-Cultural Variables”. Education and Science 37/164 (2012) 20-30.
  • Bakers S., Gersten R. & Lee D. (2002). “A Synthesis of Empirical Research on Teaching Mathematics to Low-Achieving Students”. The Elementary School Journal 103/1 (2002) 51-73.
  • Bandura A. (1995). Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies. Cambridge 1995.
  • Bong M. & Skaalvik E. M. (2003). “Academic Self-Concept and Self-Efficacy: How Different are They Really?” Educational Psychology Review 15 (2003) 1-40.
  • Carmichael C., Callingham R., Hay I. & Watson J. (2010). “Statistical Literacy in the Middle School: The Relationship Between Interest, Self-Efficacy and Prior Mathematics Achievement”. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology 10 (2010) 83-93.
  • Dillman D. A., Jolene D., Smyth J. D & Christian L. M. (2009). Internet, Mail, And Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York 2009.
  • Elliot S. & Gray A. (2000). Family Structures: A Report for The New Zealand Immigration Service. Immigration Research Programme. Wellington 2000.
  • Ferla, J. Valcke M. & Cai Y. (2009). “Academic Self-Efficacy and Academic Self-Concept: Reconsidering Structural Relationships”. Learning and Individual Differences 19/4 (2009) 499-505.
  • Gresham G. (2007). “A Study of Mathematics Anxiety in Pre-Service Teachers”. Early Childhood Education Journal 35/2 (2007) 181-188.
  • Gündüz-Kalan Ö. (2011). “Media Literacy and Pre-school Children: A Research of Media Literacy Awareness”. İstanbul University Faculty of Communication Journal 39 (2011) 59-73.
  • Güzel Ç. (2006). Cross-Cultural Comparison of Impact of Human and Physical Resource Allocations on Students’ Mathematical Literacy Skills in the Programme For International Student Assessment PISA (2003). Unpublished Dissertation. Middle East Technical University, Ankara 2006.
  • Güzel Ç. & Berberoğlu, G. (2005). “An Analysis of the Programme for International Student Assessment 2000 (PISA 2000) Mathematical Literacy Data for Brazilian, Japanese and Norwegian Students”. Studies in Educational Evaluation 31 (2005) 283–314.
  • Güzeller C. O. & Akın A. (2011). “An Examination of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2003 Turkish Database with the Aim of Exploring the Relationship Between Homework Variables and Mathematics Achievement”. Educational Research and Reviews 6/13 (2011) 793-803.
  • Hembree R. (1990). “The Nature, Effects, And Relief of Mathematics Anxiety”. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 21 (1990) 33-46.
  • Hidi S. (1990). “Interest and Its Contribution as A Mental Resource for Learning”. Review of Educational Research 60 (1990) 49-571.
  • Isiksal M. Curran J. M. Koc Y. & Askun C. S. (2009). “Mathematics Anxiety and Mathematical SelfConcept: Considerations in Preparing Elementary-School Teachers”. Social Behavior and Personality 37/5 (2009) 631-644.
  • Jöreskog K. G. & Sörbom D. (1993). LISREL 8 User’s Reference Guide. Chicago 1993.
  • Klassen R. M. (2004). “Optimism and Realism: A Review of Self-Efficacy from A Cross-cultural Perspective”. International Journal of Psychology 39/3 (2004) 205-230.
  • Kline R. B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York 1998.
  • Lampert J. N. (2007). The Relationship of Self-Efficacy and Self-concept to Academic Performance in A College Sample: Testing Competing Models and Measures. Unpublished MS. Thesis. Pacific University, Oregon 2007.
  • Lent R. W., Brown S. D. & Hackett G. (1994). “Toward A Unified Social Cognitive Theory of Career/Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance”. Journal of Vocational Behavior 45 (1994) 79- 122.
  • Leung F. K. S. (2002). “Behind the High Achievement of East Asian Students”. Educational Research and Evalution 8/1 (2002) 87-108.
  • Marsh H. W., Trautwein U., Lüdtke O., Köller O. & Baumert J. (2005). “Academic Self-concept, Interest, Grades, and Standardized Test Scores: Reciprocal Effects Models of Causal Ordering”. Child Development 76 (2005) 397-416.
  • Müftüler-Bac M. (1999). “Turkish Women’s Predicament”. Women’s Studies International Forum 22/3 (1999) 303-15.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). PISA 2003 Technical Report. Paris 2005.
  • Owusu K. A. Monney K. A., Appiah J. Y. & Wilmot E. M. (2010). “Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction on Performance of Senior High School Biology Students in Ghana”. Computer & Education 55 (2010) 904-910.
  • Pajares F. & Miller M. D. (1994). “Role of Self-Efficacy and Self-Concept Beliefs in Mathematical Problem-Solving: A Path Analysis”. Contemporary Educational Psychology 20 (1994) 426-443.
  • Pearse N. (2011). “Deciding on The Scale Granularity of Response Categories of Likert Type Scales: The Case of a 21-Point Scale”. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 9/2 (2011) 159-171.
  • Reyes L. H. (1984). “Affective Variables and Mathematics Education”. The Elementary School Journal 84/5 (1984) 558-581.
  • Ross S. (2008). Motivation Correlates of Academic Achievement: Exploring How Motivation Influences Academic Achievement in the PISA 2003 Dataset. Unpublished Dissertation. University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada 2008.
  • Schunk H. D. (1991). “Self-efficacy and Academic Motivation”. Educational Psychologist 26 (1991) 207-231.
  • Shavelson R. J., Hubner J. J. & Stanton G. C. (1976). “Self-Concept: Validation of Construct Interpretations”. Review of Educational Research 46 (1976) 407-441.
  • Shin J., Lee H. & Kim Y. (2009). “Student and School Factors Affecting Mathematics Achievement: International Comparisons Between Korea, Japan and the USA”. School of Psychology International 30 (2009) 520-537.
  • Shirvani H. (2010). “The Effects of Using Computer Technology with Lower-Performing Students: Technology and Student Mathematics Achievement”. International Journal of Learning 17/1 (2010) 143-154.
  • Siegel R. G., Galassi J. P. & Ware W. B. (1985). “A Comparison of Two Models for Predicting Mathematics Performance: Social Learning Versus Math Aptitude-Anxiety”. Journal of Counseling Psychology 32 (1985) 531-538.
  • Silvia P. J. (2003). “Self-Efficacy and Interest: Experimental Studies of Optimal Incompetence”. Journal of Vocational Behavior 62/4 (2003) 237-249.
  • Şahinkayası Y. (2008). A Cross-Cultural Comparison Modeling of Information and Communication Technologies Aspects Affecting Mathematical and Problem-Solving Literacy and Perceptions of Policy Makers. Unpublished Dissertation. Orta Doğu Teknik University, Ankara 2008.
  • Uzun S., Bütüner S. Ö. & Yiğit N. (2010). “A Comparison of the Results of TIMSS 1999-2007: The Most Successful Five Countries-Turkey Sample”. Elementary Education Online 9/3 (2010)1174-1188.
  • Waller B. (2006). “Math Interest and Choice Intentions of Non-traditional African-American College Students”. Journal of Vocational Behavior 68 (2006) 538-547.
  • Weng L. J. (2004). “Impact of the Number of Response Categories and Anchor Labels on Coefficient Alpha and Test-retest Reliability”. Educational and Psychological Measurement 64 (2004) 956-972.
  • Yıldırım S. (2011). “Self-Efficacy, Intrinsic Motivation, Anxiety and Mathematics Achievement: Findings from Turkey, Japan And Finland”. Necatibey Fac. of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 5/1 (2011) 277-291.