Constituting the Common Foreign and Security Policy: The European Union's Pursuit of Being a Coherent and Effective Foreign and Security Policy Actor in Global Politics

Bu makaleninin amacı, AB’nin ODGP’nın tarihsel gelişimi içinde Avrupalı Devletlerin tutarlı ve etkin bir dış ve güvenlik politikası geliştirme çabalarının değerlendirilmesidir. Bu çalışmada, Avrupa Devletlerinin tutarlı ve etkin bir dış ve güvenlik politikası geliştirme çabaları üç uluslararası siyasal çevrede ele alınmıştır. İlk dönem, İkinci Dünya Savaşı sonrası dönemi, ikincisi Soğuk Savaş Sonrası dönemi, üçüncüsü de 11 Eylül sonrası dönemi kapsar. Bu makaleninin temel argümanı, AB’nin küresel siyasette önemli ve etkin bir aktör olabilmesi için, AB Devletlerinin tutarlı bir aktör olarak hareket edip tek sesle konuşmalarının gerekli olduğudur. Eğer AB Devletleri bireysel olarak hareket etmek yerine tutarlı bir aktör olarak hareket ederlerse, önemli uluslararası meseleler üzerindeki etkileri daha fazla olur.

Ortak Dış ve Güvenlik Politikasının Oluşumu: Avrupa Birliği'nin Küresel Siyasette Tutarlı ve Etkin Bir Dış ve Güvenlik Politikası Aktörü Olma Arayışı

The objective of this article is to evaluate European States’ efforts to develop a coherent and effective foreign and security policy in the context of historical evolution of the CFSP. In this article, European states’ efforts to develop a coherent and effective foreign and security policy will be evaluated in three international political contexts. First period is Post World War II Period, second one is Post-Cold War Period and third one is Post September 11 Period. The main argument of this article is that in order to be an important and effective actor in global politics, EU Member States should act coherently and speak with one voice. Their influence on important international issues is greater if they act as a coherent actor rather than acting individually.

___

  • ABELLAN, M.A.M. (2002) The Coherence of the European Foreign Policy: a Real Barrier of an Academic Term, Institut Universitari D’estudis Europeus Working Paper No. 27.
  • AKGÜL, D.A. (2002) The European Union Response to September 11: Relations with the US and the Failure to Maintain a CFSP, The Review of International Affairs, 1(1.4), 1-24.
  • ALLEN, D. (1998) Who Speaks for Europe, in J. Peterson and H. Sjuersen (eds.), A Common Foreign and Security Policy, London, Routledge, 41-58.
  • ANDRÉANI, G. (2000) Why Institutions Matter, Survival, 42(2), 81-95.
  • BAĞCI, H. (2002) Turkey and Europe: Security Issues, in M. S. Radu (ed.), Dangerous Neighborhood, Contemporary Issues in Turkey’s Foreign Relations, New Brunswick, Transatlantic Publishers, 49-76.
  • BILDT, C. (2004) One Year On: Lessons From Iraq, in G. Lindstrom and B. Schmitt (eds.), Cahaillot Papers, 68 Paris, Institute for Strategic Studies, 21-27.
  • BRETHERTON, C. and VOGLER, J. (1999) The European Union as a Global Actor, London, Routledge.
  • CAMERON, F. (1999) The Foreign and Security Policy of theEuropean Union, Past, Present and Future, Sheffield, Sheffield Academic Press.
  • CAMERON, F. (2003a) Repairing the Damage: European Disunity and Global Crisis: The New Challenges To EU External Policy After Iraq,After Iraq- Can there really be a Future for CFSP?, Issue Paper 9. http://www.theepc.net./en/default.asp.
  • CAMERON, F. (2003b) An EU Strategic Concept, EPC Issue Paper 4. http://www.theepc.net.
  • CEBECİ, M. (1999) A Delicate Process of Participation: The Question of Participation of WEU Associate Members in the DecisionMaking for EU-led Petersberg Operations With Special Reference to Turkey,Occasional Papers Brussels: Western European Union.
  • DALGAARD-NIELSEN, A. (2003) Gulf War: The German Resistance, Survival, 45(1), 99-116.
  • DASSU, M. and MISSIROLI, A. (2002) More Europe in Foreign and Security Policy: The Institutional Dimension of CFSP, A Quarterly Journal of Instituto Affari Internazionali, XXXVII(2), 79-88.
  • DUKE, S. (1999) Consistency as an Issue in EU External Relations, Working Paper 6, European Institute of Public Administration.
  • DUKE, S. (2000) The Elusive Quest for European Security, From EDC to CFSP, Great Britain, Macmillan Press.
  • DUKE, S. (2003) The Convention, the Draft Constitution and External Relations: Effects and Implications for the EU and Its International Role”, Working Paper European Institute of Public Administration, (2).
  • EVERTS, S. (2003) Why the EU Needs a Security Strategy, Briefing Note, CER. http://www.cer.org.uk.
  • EVERTS, S. and KEOHANE, D. (2003) The European Convention and EU Foreign Policy: Learning From Failure, Survival, 45(3), 167-186.
  • GAUTTIER, P. (2004) Horizontal Coherence and the External Competences of the European Union, European Law Journal, 10(1), 23-41.
  • GNESOTTO, N. (2002) European Security and Defence Policy: A European View, in European Security and Defence Policy: Taking Stock, CEPS-IISS European Security Forum, Working Paper 8.
  • GOURLAY, C. and KLEYMEYER, J. (2003) The Defence Deal in the IGC, European Security Review 20. http://isis-europe.org/isiseu/ esreview/esreview.html.
  • GRANT, C, (2002) The Eleventh September and Beyond: The Impact on the European Union, Oxford: Political Quarterly Publishing, 135-153.
  • GRANT, C. (2001) A Stronger European Foreign and Defence Policy, in Bannerman et.al. (eds.), Europe After September 11th London: CER, 31-48.
  • HAINE, J. (2004) Idealism and Power: The New EU Security Strategy, Current History, 107-112.
  • HAGMAN, H. (2002) European Crisis Management and Defence: The Search For Capabilities, Adelphi Paper 153 USA, Oxford University Press.
  • HILL, C. (1993) The Capability-Expectations Gap, or Conceptualizing Europe’s International Role, Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(3),305-328.
  • HILL, C. (2002a) EU Foreign Policy since 11 September 2001: Renationalising or Regrouping?, First Annual Guest Lecture, the Europe and the World Center, University of Liverpool, 24 October. http://www.liv.ac.uk/ewc.
  • HILL, C. (2002b) CFSP: Conventions, Constitutions and Consequentiality, A Quarterly Journal of Instituto Affari Internazionali, XXXVII(4), 75-89.
  • HILL, C. and Smith, K.E. (2000) European Foreign Policy Key Documents, Routledge, London.
  • HOWORTH, J. (2000) Britain, France and the European Defence Initiative, Survival, 42(2), 33-55.
  • HOWORTH, J. (2001) European Defence and the Changing Politics of the European Union: Hanging Together or Hanging Separately?, Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(4), 765-789.
  • HOWORTH, J. (2002) CESDP After 11 September: From Short-term Confusion to Long-term Cohesion?, EUSA Review Essay 15(1).
  • HULSMAN, J. C. (2000) The Guns of Brussels: Burden Sharing and Power Sharing with Europe, Policy Review 101, http://www.policyreview.org/jun00/hulsman.html.
  • JUPILLE, J. and CAPORASO, J.A. (1998) States, Agency and Rules: The European Union in Global Environment Politics, in C. Rhodes (ed.), The European Union in the World Community, Boulder-Colorado, Lynne Riener Publishers, 213-230.
  • KINTIS, G.A. (1999) Between Ambition and Paralysis: The European Union’s Common Foreign and Security Policy and the War in the Former Yugoslavia, in C. Cavanagh Hodge (ed.), Redefining European Security, New York, Garland Publishing, 273-298.
  • MENON, A. (2002) Enhancing The Effectiveness of the EU’s Foreign and Defence Policies, CEPS Policy Brief 29. http://www.ceps.be.
  • MISSIROLI, A. (2001) European Security Policy: The Challenge of Coherence, European Foreign Affairs Review 6, 177-196.
  • MISSIROLI, A. and QUILLE, G. (2004) European Security in Flux, in F. Cameron (ed.), The Future of Europe, Integration and Enlargement, London, Routledge, 114-134.
  • NUTTALL, S.J. (2000) European Foreign Policy, United States, Oxford University Press.
  • PAPANDREOU, G. (2003) Greek Views on the EU Common Foreign and Security Policy, The Brown Journal of World Affairs, IX(2), 49-62.
  • POND, E. (1999) Kosovo: Catalyst for Europe, Washington Quarterly, 22(4), 77-92.
  • SAKELLARIOU, J. and KEATING, T. (2003) Safeguarding Multilateralism: The Urgency of European Defence, The Brown Journal of World Affairs, IX(2), 83-93.
  • SANGIOVANNI, M.E. (2003) Why a Common Security and Defence Policy is Bad for Europe, Survival, 45(3), 193-206.
  • SJURSEN, H. (1999) The Common Foreign and Security Policy: an Emerging New Voice in International Politics?, Arena Working Papers 34. http://arena.uio.no.
  • SLOAN, S. (2003) NATO, the European Union and the Atlantic Community, The Transatlantic Bargain Reconsidered, USA, Rowman&Littlefield Publishers.
  • SMITH, M.E. (2001) The Quest for Coherence: Institutional Dilemmas of External Action from Maastricht to Amsterdam, in A. Stone Sweet, W.Sandholtz and N. Flingstein (eds.), The Institutionalization of Europe,Oxford, Oxford University Press, 171-193.
  • SMITH, M.E. (2003) Institutional Moments, Policy Performance, and the Future of EU Security/Defence Policy, EUSA Review 16(1).
  • SMITH, M.E. (2004) Europe’s Foreign and Security Policy: The Istitutionalization of Cooperation, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • TONRA, B. (2003) The European Union’s Global Role, FORNET Working Paper, FORNET Working Group 1: Theories and Approaches to the CFSP London School of Economics.
  • VAN HAM, P. (2004) Europe Gets Real: The New Security Strategy Shows the EU’s Geopolitical Maturity, 9 January. http://www.aicgs.org/ c/vanham.shtml.
  • VOGLER, J. (2002) In the Absence of the Hegemon: EU Actorness and the Global Climate Change Regime, Paper Presented to Conference on the European Union in International Affairs, 3-4 July, National Europe Centre Paper No. 20.
  • YOUNG, R. (2002) The European Security and Defence Policy: What Impact on EU’s Approach to Security Challenges?, European Security,11(2), 101-124.
Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1302-9975
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2001
  • Yayıncı: Akdeniz Üniversitesi