Küreselleşme Sürecinde Vergi Rekabeti ve Boyutları

1980’lere kadar ülkeler ekonomilerinin gelişimini; ithal ikameci ve korumacı ulusal sanayiye dayandırmışlardır. Bunun gereği olarak yabancı yatırımlar için sıkı kontrol ve gümrük engelleri uygulayan politikalar benimsemişlerdir. 1980’lerin başında bu politikalar değişmiştir. Artan küreselleşme, vergileme alanında ulusal politikaların gücünü sınırlamakta ve vergi rekabetini artırmaktadır. Bu çalışmada vergi rekabeti ve küreselleşme ilişkisi anlatılmaktadır. Önemli bir sorun olan zararlı vergi rekabeti, yarattığı sonuçlar açıklanmakta, uluslararası işbirliğinin bu sorunları azaltıp azaltmayacağı ve daha sonra zararlı vergi rekabetiyle ilgili AB ve OECD tarafından yapılan çalışmalar değerlendirilmektedir.

Tax Competition and Its Dimensionin the Process of Globalization

Until the 1980’s, countries based the development of their national economies on policies of import substitution, protecting their national industrial by imposing high customs barriers and strict control of foreign investment. In the early 1980’s these policies have changed. Increased globalization has limited the power of domestic policies in the area of taxation and increased tax competition. This paper is argued the relationship between globalization and tax competition to be a very important problem. I study whether international tax coordination can alleviate these problems. Than this paper assesses the studies of EU and OECD to related harmful tax competition.

___

  • AKTAN, C.C. (2004) Müdahaleci Devlet ve Uluslararası Rekabet Gücü,www.can.aktan.org
  • ASHER, M. G. and RAJAN, R. S. (October, 1999) Globalization and Tax Systems: Implications for Developing Countries with Particular Reference to Southeast Asia, Discussion Paper, No: 99/23, Adelaide: Adelaide University. 1-37.
  • BHAGWATI, J. (1991) Political Economy and International Economics, (Ed: D.A. Irwin), Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.
  • BJORVATN, K. and SCHJELDERUP, G. (March, 2002) Tax Competition and International Public Goods, International Tax and Public Finance, 9(2), 111-120.
  • BRETSCHGER, L. and HETTICH, F. (2002) Globalization Capital Mobility and Tax Competition: Theory and Evidence for OECD Countries, European Journal of Political Economy, 18, 695-716.
  • Canadian Tax Letter (July, 2000) OECD Issues Hit List of Tax Havens and Harmful Tax Regimes.
  • COADY, D. and DRÉZE, J. (2000) Commodity Taxation and Social Welfare: The Generalized Ramsey Rule, International Tax and Public Finance, 9, 295. 316.
  • CULLIS, J. and JONES, P. (1998) Public Finance and Public Choice: Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • ÇALICIOĞLU, E. E. (2003) Küreselleşme ve Vergilendirmede Yeni Eğilimler, İstanbul: Kazancı Kitap Ticaret A.Ş.
  • DEHEJIA, V. H. and GENSCHEL, P. (February, 1998) Tax Competition in the European Union, Discussion Paper, 1-40.
  • DEVEREUX, M.P., GRIFFITH, R. and KLEMM, A. (2002) Corporate Income Tax Reform and International Tax Competition, London:
  • EDWARDS, C. and RUGGY, V. D. (April, 2002) International Tax Competition A 21 st- Century Restraint on Government, Policy Analysis.
  • EGGERT, W. (2001) Capital Tax Competition with Socially Wasteful Government Consumption, European Journal of Political Economy, 17, 517-529.
  • EIJFFINGER, S. C. W. and WAGNER, W. (2001) Taxation If Capital is not percetly Mobile: Tax Competition Versus Tax Exportation, Discussion Papers.
  • EYÜPGİLLER, S. (Şubat, 2000) Vergi Cennetleri ve Tercihli Vergi Sistemleri: Uygun Olmayan Vergi Rekabetinin 1998 OECD Vergi Komitesi Raporu Işığı Altında Değerlendirilmesi, Vergi Dünyası, 222.
  • Free Trade Zones and Free Trade Agreements (2000) http://www.local.attac.org/ 13/documents/2F_enPDF.
  • GAFFNEY, M. (2002) The Worldwide Benefits of International Tax Competition, The Progress Report, http://www.progress.org/archive/gaffne.10htm.
  • GENSCHEL, P. (2001) Globalization, Tax Competition, and the Fiscal Viability of the Welfare State, MPIfG Working Paper.
  • GİRAY, F. (Nisan, 2004) Vergi rekabeti ve Serbest Bölgeler, Vergi Dünyası, 23 (272), 175-185.
  • GOODE, R. (1980) Vergilemenin Sınırları, Çağdaş Vergilemede Son Gelişmeler, Ord. Prof. Dr. Nihad Sayar’a Armağan, (Çev: Ö. Faruk Batırel), İstanbul: İstanbul İ.T.İ.A. Kamu Maliyesi Enstitüsü Yayını No: 2.
  • GOODSPEED, T.J. (September, 1998) Tax Competition, Benefit Taxes,and Fiscal Federalism, National Tax Journal, LI (3), 579-586.
  • GOODSPEED, T.J. (2002) Tax Competition and Tax Structure in Open Federal Economies: Evidence from OECD Countries with Implications for the European Union, European Economic Review, 46, 357-374.
  • HAUFLER, A. (1993) Commodity Tax Harmonization in the European Community: A General Equilibrium Analysis of Tax Policy Options in the Internet Market, Heidelberg: Physica- Verlag.
  • HAUFLER, A. and WOOTON, L. (1997) Tax Competition for Foreign Direct Investment, London: Discussion Paper No. 1583.
  • HEIJ, G. (1999) Taxation in a Globalised World: the Facts and Fantasies, http://www.arc.murdoch.edu.au/a.siaview/sep99/heij.html.
  • JAMES, S. (1998) A Dictionary of Taxation, Cheltenham: Edward Elger Publishing.
  • JANEBA, E. (1997) International Tax Competition, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
  • JANEBA, E. and PETERS, W. (Jaunary, 1999) Tax Evasion, Tax Competition and the Gains from Nondiscrimination: The Case of Interest Taxation in Europe, The Economic Journal, 109, 93-101.
  • KARACA, Y. (Haziran, 2001) Zararlı Vergi Rekabeti ve Vergi Cennetleri: OECD Bünyesindeki Çalışmalar Ne Aşamada?, Vergi Dünyası, 238, 90-99.
  • KEEN, M. (December, 2001) Preferential Regimes can Make Tax Competition Less Harmful, National Tax Journal, LIV (4), 757-762.
  • KONRAD, K.A. and SCHJELDERUP, G. (1999) Fortress Building in Global Tax Competition, Journal of Urban Economics, 46, 156- 167.
  • MENDOZA, E. G. and TESAR, L.L. (2003) A Quanlitative Analysis of Tax Competition, Tax Coordination under Perpect Capital Mobility.www.cepr.org/meets/wken/1/1527/papers/tesar.pdf.
  • MERİÇ, M. ve AY, H. (2004) Küreselleşme Olgusu Bağlamında Vergi Kayıp ve Kaçakları, 19. Maliye Sempozyumu Antalya, 1-26.
  • MEUSSEN, G. (2003) The EU-Fight Against Harmful Tax Competition;Developments in Light of the Enlargement of the EU with 10 Candidate Member States. http://www.eurofaculty.lu/taxconference/files/tp_A2/Meussen.pdf.
  • NOCERİNO, O., REALE, G. (2000) Fiscal Advantage and Economic Impact of “Tax Free Zones” on SME’s. http://www.sbaer.uca.edu/Research /2000/ICSB/P+2/070REALE.PDF.
  • IMF (2001) Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook, Washington:
  • OATES, W. (September, 2001) Fiscal Competition or Harmonization? Some Reflections, National Tax Journal, LIV (3), 507-512.
  • OECD (1998) Harmful Tax Competition: An Emerging Global Issue, Paris:
  • OECD, (2000) Towards Global Tax Co-operation (Report to the 2000 Ministerial Council Meeting and Recommendations by the Committee on Fiscal Affairs): Progress in Identifying and Eliminating Harmful Tax Practices, http:www:oecd.org/daf/fa/harm_tax/Refprt_En.pdf.
  • OECD (2001) The OECD’s Project on Harmful Tax Practise: The 2001 Progress Report, Paris:
  • OECD (2004) The OECD’s Project on Harmful Tax Practices: The 2004 Progress Repor, Paris:
  • OECD, (March-April 2001) Tax Rates are Falling, Washington.
  • OLSEN, T. E. and OSMUNDSEN, P. (2001) Strategic Tax Competition; Implications of National Ownership, Journal of Public Economics, 81, 253-277.
  • PINTO, C. (2002) (Harmful) Tax Competition within the European Union: Concept and Overview of Certain Tax Regimes in Selected Member States http://www.lof.nl/artikel/harm_tax.html.
  • RAMSEY, F.P. (March, 1927) A Contribution to the Theory of Taxation, Economic Journal, 37, 47-61.
  • SCHON, W. (2000) Tax Competition In Europe-the Legal Perspective, EC Tax Review, 2, 90-105.
  • SMITH, A. (1970) The Wealth of Nation Middlesex, Peguin Books.
  • STEWART, K.G. and WEBB, M.C. (2003) Capital Taxation, Globalization, and International Tax Competition, Working Paper, EWp0301, Canada:University of Victoria.
  • STIGLITZ, J.E. (1994) Kamu Kesimi Ekonomisi, (Çev: Ömer Faruk Batırel), İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Yayın No: 396.
  • TEATHER, R. (December, 2002) Harmful Tax Competition?, Economic Affairs, 58-61.
  • TIEBOUT, C.M. (1956) A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures, Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416-424.
  • TOBB, (2001) TOBB: Vergilemede Global Eğilimler AB ve Türk Vergi Sistemi, Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu, Ankara: TOBB No: 359-BÖM-59.
  • The Economist (May, 1997) Disappearing Taxes, 17-19.
  • United Nations, (2003), World Investment Report 2003 FDI Policies for Development: National and International Perspectives,, New York and Ceneva:
  • VANISTENDAEL, F. (2003) Fiscal Support Measures and Harmful Tax Competition, EC Tax Review, 3, 152-161.
  • WILSON, J.D. (June, 1999) Theories of Tax Competition, National Tax Journal, LII(2), 269-304.
Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1302-9975
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2001
  • Yayıncı: Akdeniz Üniversitesi