ngilizce Öğretmenlerinin Eğitimde Değişimin Önemli Faktörleri ve Problemleri üzerine Görüşleri

Son gelişmelerle birçok alanda birçok değişiklikler meydana geldi. Türkiye’de eğitim sisteminin de değişmesi kaçınılmaz oldu. Bu bağlamda, bu çalışma İngilizce öğretmenlerinin eğitimde değişimin uygulama aşamasına ilişkin görüşlerini incelemeyi hedeflemektedir. Bu hedefi gerçekleştirmek için, çalışmada nitel araştırma yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Çalışmaya amaçsal örnekleme stratejisi ile seçilen 84 İngilizce öğretmeni katılmıştır. İngilizce öğretmenlerinin eğitimde değişimin uygulanmasında en önemli faktörler ve eğitimde değişimin uygulanması sürecinde karşılaşılan en yaygın sorunlara ilişkin yanıtlarını ortaya çıkarmak için katılımcılara Google Form belgesini kullanarak iki açık uçlu soru yöneltildi. 84 İngilizce öğretmeninden toplanan nitel veriler içerik analizi kullanılarak analiz edilmiş ve her soru için temalar ve kodlar kategorize edilmiştir. Bulgular, öğretmenlere göre başarılı bir değişim için en önemli faktörlerin liderler, öğretmenler, öğrenciler, ebeveynler, eğitim sistemi, imkanlar vb. olduğunu göstermiştir. Katılımcıların çoğu gelişime açık olmanın ve birbirleriyle etkileşime girmenin başarılı eğitimde değişimin anahtarı olduğuna inanmaktadır. Kapasite geliştirmenin yetersizliği; öğretmenler, müdürler, ebeveynler ve toplum arasında işbirliği eksikliği; olumsuz tutumlar, değişime karşı direnç; iş doyumu ve motivasyon eksikliği; okulların fiziksel koşullarının uygunsuzluğu katılan öğretmenler tarafından ensık karşılaşılan sorunlar olarak belirtilmiştir. En çarpıcı öneri olarak, değişim planlamacıları ve politika yapıcıların eğitimdedeğişimleri belirlemeden önce öğretmenlerin ihtiyaç ve beklentilerini de dikkate almaları gerektiği vurgulanabilir. Çalışmanın sonunda ekçıkarımlar veöneriler sunulmuştur.

English Teachers' Views on Important Factors and Pro lems of Educational Change

With recent developments, there have been so many changes in many fields. It is inevitable that educational system has also changed a lot in Turkey. In this respect, this study aims to examinethe English teachers’viewson the implementation stage of the educational changes. To achieve this aim, qualitative research methodologywas followed. Purposeful sampling was used and 84 English teachers participated in the study. To elicit English teachers’ responses about the most important factors for implementing educational change and the most common problems faced during the implementation process of educational change, two open-ended questions were directed to the participants using Google Forms document.Qualitative data collected from 84 English teacherswere analysed using content analysis, and the themes and codes were categorizedfor each question.The findings indicated that according the teachers,the most important factors fora successfulchange areleaders, teachers, students, parents, and other factors such as educational system, and facilities, etc. Most of the participants believed thatbeing open to improvement, and interacting with one anotherare key to successful educational change. As for themost frequently faced problems;the inadequacy of capacity building, the lack of cooperation between teachers, principals, parents and the society; negative attitudes, and resistance to change; lack of job satisfaction and motivation; inconvenience of schools’ physical conditionswere noted by the participant teachers. As the most striking suggestion, change planners and policy makers should take classroom teachers’ needs and expectations into consideration before determining educational changes. Further implications and suggestionswere presented at the end of the study.

___

  • Algoe, S. B., Haidt, J., and Gable, S. L. (2008). Beyond reciprocity: Gratitude and relationships in everyday life. Emotion, 8(2), 425–429.
  • Alliman-Brissett, A., and Turner, S. (2010). Racism, parent support, and math-based career interests, efficacy, and outcome expectations among African American adolescents. The Journal of Black Psychology, 36(2), 197-225.
  • Anderson, A. R., Christenson, S. L., Sinclair, M. F., andLehr,C. A. (2004). Check and connect: The importance of relationships for promoting engagement with school. Journal of School Psychology, 42(2), 95-113.
  • Appleton, J., Christenson, S., and Furlong, M. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369–386.
  • Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., andReschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427 –445.
  • Bono, G., andFroh, J. (2009). Gratitude in school: Benefits to students and schools. In R. Gilman, E. Huebner and M. J. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in schools(pp. 77-88). New York: Routled.
  • Brewster, A. B., and Bowen, G. L. (2004). Teacher support and the school engagement of Latino middle and high school students at risk of school failure. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 21(1), 47-67.
  • Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., and Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and studentlearning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1-32.
  • Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., Appleton, J. J., Berman-Young, S., Spangers, D., and Varro, P. (2008). Best practices in fostering student engagement. In A. Thomas, and J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V(pp. 1099-1120). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
  • Christenson, S. L., and Anderson, A. R. (2002). Commentary: The centrality of the learning context for students’ academic enabler skills. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 378 –393.
  • Cobb, S. (1976). Social support as a moderator of life stress. PsychosomaticMedicine, 38(5), 300-314.
  • Cohen, S., and Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310-357.
  • DeSantis King, A. L., Huebner, S., Suldo, S. M., and Valois, R. F. (2006). An ecological view of school satisfaction in adolescence: Linkages between social support and behavior problems. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1(3-4), 279–295.
  • Dunn, J. R., and Schweitzer, M.E. (2005). Feeling and believing: The influence of emotion on trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 736-748.
  • Eccles, J. S., andMidgley, C. (1989). Stage-environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for young adolescents. In C. Ames and R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Vol. 3. Goals and cognitions(pp. 13–44). New York: Academic Press.
  • Ekşioğlu, S., Sürücü, M. veArastaman, G. (2009). Lise öğrencilerinin okula bağlılıklarınıyor . XVIII. EğitimBilimleri Kurultayı, 1-3 Ekim, İzmir: EgeÜniversitesi. .
  • Emmons, R.A. (2004). Gratitude. In M. E. P. Seligman and C. Peterson (Eds.), The VIA taxonomy of human strengths and virtues(pp. 553–568). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Emmons, R. A., andCrumpler, C. A. (2000). Gratitude as a human strength: Appraising the evidence. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 56–69.
  • Emmons, R. A., McCullough, M. E. and Tsang, J. (2007). The assessment of gratitude. In J.Lopez and C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures (pp.327-341), Washington DC: APA.
  • Emmons, R. A. and McCullough, M. E. (2003). Counting blessings versus burdens: An empirical investigation of gratitude and subjective wellbeing in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 377–389
  • Finn, J. D. and Zimmer,K.S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S.L.Christenson, A. L. Reschly,and C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp.97-133). New York: Springer.
  • Fraenkel, J. R. ;Wallen, N. E. and Hyun, H. H. (2012) How to design and evaluate research in education. Eight Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill
  • Fredericks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C. and Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109
  • Fredericks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., Friedel, J. and Paris, A. (2005). School engagement. In K.A. Moore and L. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish?: Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development(pp.305-321). New York: Kluwer Academic.
  • Froh, J. J., and Bono, G. (2008). The gratitude of youth. In S. J. Lopez (Ed.), Positive psychology: Exploring the best in people Vol. 2(pp. 55–78). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
  • Froh, J. J., Sefick, W. J. and Emmons, R. A. (2008). Counting blessings in early adolescents: An experimental study of gratitude and subjective well-being. Journalof School Psychology, 46(2), 213–233.
  • Froh, J. J., Kashdan, T. B., Ozimkowski, K. M. and Miller, N. (2009). Who benefits the most from a gratitude intervention in children and adolescents? Examining positive affect as a moderator. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(5), 408–422.
  • Froh, J. J., Yurkewicz, C. andKashdan, T. B. (2009). Gratitude and subjective well-being in early adolescence: Examining gender differences. Journal of Adolescence, 32(3), 633-650.
  • Froh, J. J., Bono, G. and Emmons, R. A. (2010). Being grateful is beyond good manners: Gratitude and motivation to contribute to society among early adolescents. Motivation &Emotion, 34(2), 144-157.
  • Froh, J. J., Kashdan, T. B., Yurkewicz, C., Fan, J., Allen, J. and Glowacki, J. (2010). The benefits of passion and absorption in activities: Engaged living in adolescents and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(4), 311–332
  • Froh, J. J., Emmons, R. A., Card, N. A., Bono, G. and Wilson, J. A. (2011). Gratitude and the reduced costs of materialism in adolescents. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(2), 289-302.
  • Froh, J. J., Bono G., Fan, J., Emmons, R.A., Henderson, K., Harris, C., et.al. (2014). Nice thinking! An educational intervention that teaches children how to think gratefully.School Psychology Review, 43(2), 132-152.
  • Furlong, M. J., Sharkey, J. D., Quirk, M. and Dowdy, E. (2011). Exploring the protective and promotive effects of school connectedness on the relation between psychological health risk and problem behaviors/experiences. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 1(1), 18-34.
  • Furlong, M., Froh, J. J., Muller, M. and Gonzalez, V. (2014). The role of gratitude in fostering school bonding. In D. Shernoff and J. Bempechat (Eds.), Engaging youth in schools: Empirically-based models to guide future innovations. Volume 113(pp. 58-79). New York: Teachers College Record.
  • Furrer, C. and Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148–162
  • Garcia-Reid, P., Reid, R. and Peterson, N. A. (2005). School engagement among Latino youth in an urban middle school context: Valuing the role of social support. Education and Urban Society, 37(3), 257–275.
  • Henry, K. L and Thornberry, T. P. (2010). Truancy and escalation of substance use during adolescence. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 71(1), 115–124.
  • Hill, P. L andAllemand, M. (2011). Gratitude, forgivingness, and well-being in adulthood: Tests of moderation and incremental prediction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(5), 397-407.
  • Howell, K. (2012). Gratitude in education: A radical view. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Howells, K. (2014). An exploration of the role of gratitude in enhancing teacher-student relationships. Teaching and Teacher Education, 42, 58-67
  • ashdan, T. B., Uswatte, G. and Julian, T. (2009). Gratitude and hedonic and eudaimonic well-being in Vietnam War veterans. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(2), 177-199.
  • Kef, S. (1997). The personal networks and social supports of blind and visually impaired adolescents. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 91(3), 236-244
  • Lewis, A. D., Huebner, E. S., Malone, P. S. and Valois, R. F. (2011). Life satisfaction and student engagement in adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(3), 249-262.
  • Ma, L., Tunney, R .J. and Ferguson, E. (2017). Does gratitude enhance prosociality?: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 601-635.
  • Mahatmya, D., Lohman B. J., Matjasko J. L. and Farb, A. F. (2012). Engagement across developmental periods. InS. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly and C. Wylie (Eds.),Handbook of Research on Student Engagement(pp.45-65). New York:Springer.,
  • McCullough, M. E., Emmons, R. A. and Tsang, J. (2002). The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 112-127.
  • McCullough, M. E., Kilpatrick, S. D., Emmons, R. A. and Larson, D. B. (2001). Is gratitude a moral affect? Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 249-266
  • .Mengi, S. (2011). Ortaöğretim 10. ve 11.sınıf öğrencilerinin sosyal destek ve özyeterli kdüzeylerinin okula bağlılıkları ile ilişkisi. YayınlanmamışYüksekLisansTezi, SakaryaÜniversitesi,EğitimBilimleriEnstitüsü, Sakarya.
  • Newmann, F. (1992). Higher-orderthinking and prospects for classroom thoughtfulness. In F. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools(pp. 11-39). New York: Teachers College Press.,
  • Overwalle, F. V., Mervielde, I. and De Schuyter, J. (1995). Structural modeling of the relationships between attributional dimensions, emotions, and performance of college freshmen. Cognition and Emotion, 9(1), 59–85.
  • Önen, E. (2014). Öğrencinin okula bağlılığı ölçeği: Türk ortaokul veli seöğrencileriiçinuyarlamaçalışması. TürkPsikolojikDanışmaveRehberlikDergisi, 5(42), 221-234.
  • Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M. and Kaplan, A. (2007). Early adolescents’ perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 83–98.
  • Plybon, L. E., Edwards, L., Butler, D., Belgrave, F. Z. and Allison, K. W. (2003). Examining the link between neighborhood cohesion and school outcomes: The role of support coping among African American adolescent girls. Journal of Black Psychology, 29(4), 393-407.,
  • Reschly, A. L., Huebner, E. S., Appleton, J. J. andAntaramian, S. (2008). Engagement as flourishing: The contribution of positive emotions and coping to adolescents’ engagement at school and with learning. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 419–431.
  • Rockhill, C. M., Stoep, A. V., McCauley, E. and Katon, W. J. (2009). Social competence and social support as mediators between comorbid depressive and conduct problems and functional outcomes in middle school children. Journal of Adolescence, 32(3), 535-553.
  • Rosenfeld, L. B., Richman, J. M. and Bowen, G. L. (2000). Social support networks and school outcomes: The centrality of the teacher. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 17(3), 205–226.
  • ueger, S. Y., Malecki, C. K. andDemaray, M.K. (2008). Gender differences in the relationship between perceived social support and student adjustment during early adolescence. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(4), 496–514.
  • Rueger, S. Y., Malecki, C. K. andDemaray, M. K. (2010). Relationship between multiple sources of perceived social support and psychological and academic adjustment in early adolescence: Comparisons across gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(1), 47–61.
  • Sarason, I. G. andSarason, B. R. (1985). Social support-Insights from assessment and experimentation. In I. Sarasonand B. R. Sarason (Eds.), Socialsupport: Theory, research and applications(pp. 39-50). Boston: MartinusNijhoff.
  • Sipahi, B., Yurtkoru, E. S., veÇinko, M. (2006). SosyalbilimlerdeSPSS’leveri analizi. İstanbul: Beta Skues, J. L., Cunningham, E. G. andPokharel, T. (2005). The influence of bullying behaviours on sense of school connectedness, motivation and self-esteem. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 15(1), 17-26.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L.S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Torsheim, T., Aaroe, L. E. andWold, B. (2003). School-related stress, social support, and distress: Prospective analysis of reciprocal and multilevel relationships. Scandinavian Journal ofPsychology, 44(2), 153–159.
  • Walker, C. and Greene, B (2009). The relations between student motivational beliefs and cognitive engagement in high school. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(6), 463-471
  • Wang, M. T. and Eccles, J. S. (2012). Social support matters: Longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school. Child Development, 83(3), 877-895.
  • Watkins, P. C., Woodward, K., Stone, T. and Kolts, R. D. (2003). Gratitude and happiness: The development of a measure of gratitude and its relationship with subjective well-being. Social Behavior and Personality, 31(5), 431–452.
  • Wood, A. M., Joseph, S. and Linley, P. A. (2007). Coping style as a psychological resource of grateful people. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26(9), 1076-1093.
  • Wood, A. M., Maltby, J., Gillett, R., Linley, P. A. and Joseph, S. (2008). The role of gratitude in the development of social support, stress, and depression: Two longitudinal studies. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(4), 854 –871.
  • Woolley, M.E. and Bowen, G.L. (2007). In the context of risk: Supportive adults and the school engagement of middle school students. Family Relations, 56(1), 92-104.
  • Woolley, M., Kol, K. and Bowen, G. (2009). The social contextof school success for Latino middle school students: Direct and indirect influences of teachers, family, and friends. Journal of Early Adolescence, 29(1), 43-70.
  • Yıldırım, İ. (1997).Algılanansosyaldestekölçeğiningeliştirilmesigüvenirliğivegeçerliği. HacettepeÜniversitesiEğitimFakültesiDergisi,13,81-88.
  • Yıldırım, İ. (1998). Akademikbaşarıdüzeylerifarklıolanliseöğrencilerininsosyaldestekdüzeyleri.PsikolojikDanışmaveRehberlikDergisi, 2(9), 33-38.
  • Yıldırım, İ. (2004). Algılanansosyaldestekölçeğininrevizyonu. EğitimAraştırmalarıDergisi, 17, 221-236.
  • Yıldırım, İ. (2006). Akademikbaşarınınyordayıcısıolarakgündeliksıkıntılarvesosyaldestek. HacettepeÜniversitesiEğitimFakültesiDergisi, 30, 258-267.
  • Yıldırım, İ. (2007). Depression, test anxiety and social support among Turkish students preparing for the university entrance examination. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 29, 171-184.
  • Yüksel, A. and Oğuz Duran N. (2012). Turkish adaptation of Gratitude Questionnaire. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 46, 199-21
Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1309-0682
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2008
  • Yayıncı: Tayfun Taşbilek