Phenotypic plasticity of ecotypes across habitats

Öz Phenotypic plasticity is the ability of a genotype to produce multiple phenotypes depending on the environmental conditions and it can allow persistence of populations in heterogeneous habitats or under climate change. Therefore, phenotypic plasticity can play a major role in the divergence of populations across habitats. Trade-offs in plant performance in various habitats can give rise to the evolution of specialized ecotypes which are locally adapted (specialized) populations of the same species in distinct environments. According to the specialization hypothesis, specialization of ecotypes to either relatively favorable or unfavorable habitats results in increased or decreased phenotypic plasticity, respectively. The presence of phenotypic plasticity differences among ecotypes can be easily detected by examining their performances at home (native) versus foreign (alien) environments in reciprocal field experiments. In this meta-analysis, I compared phenotypic plasticity of ecotypes specialized in favorable and unfavorable habitats to test the specialization hypothesis by extracting data from 47 empirical studies. Log response ratio (LRR) and plasticity index (PIv) were used as effect sizes to detect and quantify significant differences in phenotypic plasticity of ecotypes across habitats. The overall result indicated that it was failed to find an effect of habitat origin on phenotypic plasticity expression of ecotypes. Specialization to either favorable or unfavorable habitats may not alter phenotypic plasticity expression in ecotypes. The interplay between phenotypic plasticity and specialization is quite complex and results of this study may shed light into these two important evolutionary mechanisms in plant ecology which have implications for biodiversity conservation, environmental management, agricultural industry, and ecosystem services. 

___

  • Avramov, S., Tucic, B., 2006. Plasticity to an irradiance gradient in foliage attributes of a perennial monocot Iris pumila (L.): Comparison of populations from habitats of contrasting light conditions. Polish Journal of Ecology, 54(3): 403-416.
  • Balaguer, L., Martínez‐Ferri, E., Valladares, F., Pérez‐Corona, M. E., Baquedano, F. J., Castillo, F. J., Manrique, E., 2001. Population divergence in the plasticity of the response of Quercus coccifera to the light environment. Functional Ecology, 15:124-135.
  • Bennington, C. C., McGraw, J. B., 1995. Natural selection and ecotypic differentiation in Impatiens pallida. Ecological Monographs, 65(3): 303-323.
  • Bennington, C. C., Fetcher, N., Vavrek, M. C., Shaver, G. R., Cummings, K. J., McGraw, J. B., 2012. Home site advantage in two long-lived arctic plant species: Results from two 30-year reciprocal transplant studies. Journal of Ecology, 100(4): 841-851.
  • Berg, H., Becker, U., Matthies, D., 2005. Phenotypic plasticity in Carlina vulgaris: effects of geographical origin, population size, and population isolation. Oecologia, 143: 220-231.
  • Chevin, L. M., Hoffmann, A. A., 2017. Evolution of phenotypic plasticity in extreme environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372(1723): 20160138.
  • Conover, D. O., Schultz, E. T., 1995. Phenotypic similarity and the evolutionary significance of countergradient variation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 10: 248-252.
  • de Jong, G., 2005. Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: patterns of plasticity and the emergence of ecotypes. New Phytologist, 166: 101-117.
  • Dewitt, T. J., Sih, A., Wilson, D. S., 1998. Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 13(2): 77-81. Fazlioglu, F., Bonser, S. P., 2016. Phenotypic plasticity and specialization in clonal versus non-clonal plants: A data synthesis. Acta Oecologica, 77: 193-200.
  • Fazlioglu, F., Wan, J. S. H., Bonser, S. P., 2017. Testing specialization hypothesis on a stress gradient. Austral Ecology, 42(1): 40-47.
  • Forsman, A., 2015. Rethinking phenotypic plasticity and its consequences for individuals, populations and species. Heredity, 115: 276-284.
  • Frei, E. R., Ghazoul, J., Pluess, A. R., 2014. Plastic responses to elevated temperature in low and high elevation populations of three grassland species. PLoS ONE, 9: e98677.
  • Futuyma, D. J., Moreno, G., 1998. The evolution of ecological specialization. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 19: 207-233.
  • Gauthier, P., Lumaret, R., Bedecarrats, A., 1998. Ecotype differentiation and coexistence of two parapatric tetraploid subspecies of cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata) in the Alps. New Phytologist, 139: 741-750.
  • Ghalambor, C. K., Mckay, J. K., Carroll, S. P., Reznick, D. N., 2007. Adaptive versus non-adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments. Functional Ecology, 21: 394-407.
  • Godoy, O., Valladares, F., Castro-Díez, P., 2011. Multispecies comparison reveals that invasive and native plants differ in their traits but not in their plasticity. Functional Ecology, 25:1248-1259.
  • Gratani, L., Catoni, R., Pirone, G., Frattaroli, A. R., Varone, L., 2012. Physiological and morphological leaf trait variations in two Apennine plant species in response to different altitudes. Photosynthetica, 50(1): 15-23.
  • Griffith, T., Sultan, S. E., 2005. Shade tolerance plasticity in response to neutral vs green shade cues in Polygonum species of contrasting ecological breadth. New Phytologist, 166(1): 141-147.
  • Griffith, T., Sultan, S. E. 2012. Field-based insights to the evolution of specialization: plasticity and fitness across habitats in a specialist/generalist species pair. Ecology and Evolution, 2(4): 778-791.
  • Hollander, J., Snell-Rood, E., Foster, S. 2015. New frontiers in phenotypic plasticity and evolution. Heredity, 115(4): 273-275.
  • Kawecki, T. J., Ebert, D., 2004. Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecology Letters, 7: 1225-1241.
  • Lambers, H., Poorter, H., 1992. Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: A search for physiological causes and ecological consequences. Advances in Ecological Research, 23: 188-261.
  • Langlet, O., 1971. The hundred years of genecology. Taxon, 20: 656-722. Lazaro‑Nogal, A., Matesanz, S., Hallik, L., Krasnova, A., Traveset, A., Valladares, F., 2016. Population differentiation in a Mediterranean relict shrub: the potential role of local adaptation for coping with climate change. Oecologia, 180: 1075-1090.
  • Lenormand, T., 2002. Gene flow and the limits to natural selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17(4): 183-189.
  • Lortie, C., Aarssen, L. W., 1996. The specialization hypothesis for phenotypic plasticity in plants. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 157(4): 484-487.
  • Magi, M., Semchenko, M., Kalamees, R., Zobel, K., 2011. Limited phenotypic plasticity in range-edge populations: a comparison of co-occurring populations of two Agrimonia species with different geographical distribution. Plant Biology, 13: 177-184.
  • McGraw, J. B., Antonovics, J., 1983. Experimental ecology of Dryas octopetala ecotypes. I. Ecotypic differentiation and life-cycle stages of selection. Journal of Ecology, 71: 879-897.
  • Nicotra, A. B., Atkin, O. K., Bonser, S. P., Davidson, A. M., Finnegan, E. J., Mathesius, U., Poot, P., Purugganan, M. D., Richards, C. L., Valladares, F., van Kleunen, M., 2010. Plant phenotypic plasticity in a changing climate. Trends in Plant Science, 15(12): 684-692.
  • Pfennig, D. W., Wund, M. A., Snell-Rood, E. C., Cruickshank, T., Schlichting, C. D., Moczek, A. P., 2010. Phenotypic plasticity’s impacts on diversification and speciation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25(8): 459-467.
  • Pigliucci, M., 2001. Phenotypic plasticity: beyond nature and nurture, The John Hopkins University Press. Baltimore, USA. 328 pp.
  • Richards, C. L., Bossdorf, O., Muth, N. Z., Gurevitch, J., Pigliucci, M., 2006. Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions. Ecology Letters, 9(8): 981-993.
  • Sultan, S. E., 1995. Phenotypic plasticity and plant adaptation. Acta Botanica Neerlandica, 44(4): 363-383.
  • Sultan, S. E., 2000. Phenotypic plasticity for plant development, function and life history. Trends in Plant Science, 5(12): 537-542.
  • Valladares, F., Wright, S. J., Lasso, E., Kitajima, K., Pearcy, R. W., 2000. Plastic phenotypic response to light of 16 congeneric shrubs from a Panamanian rainforest. Ecology, 81(7): 1925-1936.
  • Valladares, F., Sanchez-Gomez, D., Zavala, M. A., 2006. Quantitative estimation of phenotypic plasticity: Bridging the gap between the evolutionary concept and its ecological applications. Journal of Ecology, 94: 1103-1116.
  • Valladares, F., Gianoli, E., Gomez, J. M., 2007. Ecological limits to plant phenotypic plasticity. The New Phytologist, 176(4): 749-763.
  • van Kleunen, M., Fischer, M., 2005. Constraints on the evolution of adaptive phenotypic plasticity in plants. The New Phytologist, 166(1): 49-60.
  • van Tienderen, P. H., 1991. Evolution of generalists and specialist in spatially heterogeneous environments. Evolution, 45(6): 1317-1331.
  • Via, S., 1993. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: target or by-product of selection in a variable environment? The American Naturalist, 142: 352-365.
  • Weinig, C., Johnston, J., German, Z. M., Demink, L. M., 2006. Local and global costs of adaptive plasticity to density in Arabidopsis thaliana. The American Naturalist, 167: 826-836.
Akademik Ziraat Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-6403
  • Yayın Aralığı: 2
  • Başlangıç: 2012
  • Yayıncı: Ordu Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Nevşehir ili tarımsal peyzaj deseni ve tarımsal turizm potansiyeli

Esra ÖZHANCI, Meliha AKLIBAŞINDA, Aslıhan TIRNAKÇI

Phenotypic plasticity of ecotypes across habitats

Fatih FAZLIOĞLU

Harran Ovası sulamasında tekrar kullanılan drenaj sularının kullanımı ve kalitesi

Ali Rıza ÖZTÜRKMEN, İlknur SÜPÜRKECİ YARMAÇ

Etlik piliçlerde embriyonun erken ve geç gelişim dönemlerinde yapılan yüksek isıl uygulamanın tibia ve femur kemiğinin büyümesine etkileri

Özgür Barış BİRGÜL, Sezai ALKAN

Piraziz elmasının soğukta muhafaza ve raf ömrü üzerine avg ve aloevera uygulamalarının etkisi

Burhan ÖZTÜRK, Medeni KARAKAYA, Orhan KARAKAYA, Sefa GÜN

Kavun bitkisinde (Cucumis melo L.) bulunan Aphis gossypii Glover, 1877 (Hemiptera: Aphididae)’nin popülasyon yoğunluğunun belirlenmesi

İsmail ALASERHAT, Adnan CANBAY, Özkan BOZBEK, İşıl ÖZDEMİR

Kiraz (Prunus avium) meyvelerinin kalite özellikleri üzerine yaprak gübresi uygulamalarının rolü

Onur SARAÇOĞLU, Erdal AĞLAR

Farklı ekmeklik buğday (Triticum aestivum L.) çeşitlerinde tuz stresinin çimlenme ve fide gelişimine etkileri

Fatih ÖNER, Ayşegül KIRLI

Beyaz ve kahverengi ticari yumurtacı tavuklarda, tavuk yaşı ve kafes katının yumurta dış kalite parametreleri üzerine etkileri

Bayram AKKUŞ, İskender YILDIRIM

Hıyarlarda salisilik asit uygulaması ile depolama süresinin uzatılması ve kalite kayıplarının azaltılması

Ebrar ALTIKARDEŞ, Mehmet Ali KOYUNCU, Derya ERBAŞ