The attitudes of the students in sofl towards call

Çok yönlü bilgisayar iletişim araçları ve internetin ortaya çıkışıyla birlikte dil öğretimindebilgisayarların rolü dünyanın dört bir yanındaki yabancı dil öğretmenlerinin karşılaştığıönemli bir konu haline gelmiştir. Bilgisayar destekli dil öğrenme etkinlikleri ve internetkaynakları İngilizce öğretmenlerine bilgiye tek başlarına hızlı ve rahat şekildeerişmelerine yardımcı olur. Ayrıca eğitim alanlarında Yabancı Dil Hazırlık Okulu’ndayoğun bir programla İngilizce öğrenen öğrenciler, gelecek yaşamları için çok çeşitli becerive nitelikler kazanırlar. Bu bakımdan teknoloji insanları çok fazla bilgiye ulaşmak içinkendi kendilerine ayırt edebilme özelliğine sahip olmaya zorlamaktadır. Bu çalışmaYabancı Dil Hazırlık Okulunda öğrenim gören öğrencilerin bilgisayar destekli dilöğrenme ile ilgili yeni bakış açılarının farkına varabilmeleri için dile getirdikleriifadelerden ortaya çıkan tutumlarını açıklamaktadır. Selçuk Üniversitesi YDYO’daki 171öğrencinin katıldığı anket, öğrencilerin internetle ilgili bilinçli olduklarını göstermiştir.

YDYO öğrencilerinin bilgisayar destekli dil öğrenimine yönelik tutumları

With the advent of multimedia computing and the Internet, the role of computers inlanguage instruction has now become an important issue confronting large numbers oflanguage teachers throughout the world. Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL)facilities and internet resources help English teachers to search lonely to get informationin a stable and comfortable manner. Besides, at educational areas, students who startlearning English in an intensive program in School of Foreign Languages get variouscapacities and properties for their future life. In that sense, technology makes people tohave self-differentiated features in order to get wide range of knowledge. This studypoints out the attitudes of students, who attend School of Foreign Languages, with regardto CALL by considering their tendencies emerging with described statements to realizenew generation perspectives. The questionnaire applied to 171 students in SOFL at SelçukUniversity examined the consciousness of students towards internet.

PDF

___

Ahmed, K., Corbett, G., Rogers, M., & Sussex, R. (1985). Computers, language learning and language teaching . Cambridge: CUP
Ayres, R. (2002). Learner attitudes towards the use of CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning Journal, 15(3), 241-249.
Bucher, C. A. and Wuest, D. A. (1987). The Foundations of physical education and sport. (10th ed.), St. Louis, Toronto, Santa Clara: Times Mirror/Mosby College Publishing.
Calif, S. C. (2000). “Education by Increasing Access to Internet Resources”. http://www.findarticles.com/cf_0/m3337/n5_v15/21143804/print.jhtml.
Crane, Beverley E. (2000). Teaching With the Internet. Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc. in New York.
Dybek, A. (2002). “How Students Use the Internet for Education”. http://www.newswise.com/articles/2002/8/NETHOM.WK.UIC.html
Forcier, R. C. (1996). The Computer as a Productivity Tool in Education. Prentice Hall Company in United States of America.
Fort, L. (2000). “Internet Starts up Signs Teaming Agreement with IBM. http://www.findarticles.com/cf_0/m4PRN/2000_April_7/61380531/print.jhtml.
Grabe, Mark, et al. (2001). “Integrating Technology For Meaningful Learning” Houghton Mifflin Company in United States of America.
Higgins, J. (1988). Language, leaners and computers. Longman Group UK Limited.
Jones, C. & Fortescue, S. (1988). Using computers in the language classroom. New York: Longman.
Kılınçoğlu, O. & Altun, A. (2002). Ortaögretim okullarindaki ögrencilerin bilgisayar destekli egitime yönelik tutumlari. Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8, 175-187.
Lamy M.-N. & Hapel R. (2007) Online communication in language learning and teaching, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Levy M. (1997) Call: context and conceptualisation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maddux, C., et al. (1997). “Educational Computing”. A Viacom Company in United States of America.
Motsching, R. (2001). “Using Internet With the Student-centered Approach to Teaching Method and Case-study”. http://www.pri.univie.ac.at/~renatan/rogers/StudCentr2001.doc
Petropolus, H. (2001). “Are We There Yet? How To Know When You Have Enough Technology in a School”. Eric no:: EJ 637658
Plomp, T., and et al. (1996). “International Encyclopedia of Educational Technology”. Cambridge University Press in United Kingdom.
Ray, K., and et al. (1998). “Student Attitudes towards Electronic Information Resources”. http://informationr.net/ir/4-2/paper54.html
Schmid Euline Cutrim (2009). Interactive whiteboard technology in the language classroom: exploring new pedagogical opportunities, Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.
Shaver, James P. (1999). “Electronic Technology and The Future of Social Studies”. Eric no: EJ622455.
Shield L. & Kukulska-Hulme A. (eds.) (2008) Special edition of ReCALL (20, 3) on Mobile Assisted Language Learning.
Spears, B. and Swanson, R. (1993). Individual pre-game state anxiety in the United States (2nd ed.) Dubuque, IA: Brown.
Stezo, R. (2000). “Towards A Model Of Internet Learning”. http://www.usdla.org/html/journal/JUNOO Issue/story02.htm
Wright, M. D., and et all. (1998). “They Want to Teach: Factors Influencing Students to Become Technology Education Teachers”. Eric no: EJ 573018.