Senem ÜNVER, Merve BANKOĞLU GÜNGÖR, Seçil KARAKOCA NEMLİ

Senem ÜNVER* Merve BANKOĞLU GÜNGÖR* Seçil KARAKOCA NEMLİ

Diş eksikliklerinin tedavisinde klinik başarı oranlarının yüksek olması ve çok sayıda avantajı nedeniyle dental implantların kullanımı her geçen gün artmaktadır. Yaygınlaşan kullanım ve yapılan klinik çalışmalar sonucunda biyolojik, mekanik ve estetik olarak sınıflandırılan çok çeşitli komplikasyonlar da görülmektedir. İmplant tedavilerinde olası sorunların ve nedenlerinin bilinmesi, tedavi planlaması aşamasında gereken önlemlerin alınmasına yardımcı olacaktır. Bu literatür derlemesinin amacı dental implant tedavilerinde görülebilecek protetik komplikasyonlarla ilgili bilgi vermektir

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Dental implantlar, protetik komplikasyonlar

Prosthetic complications of dental implants

The high rate of clinical success in the treatment of tooth loss and due to the numerous advantages, the use of dental implants is increasing. As a result of widespread usage and performed clinical studies, wide range of complications which can be classified as biological, mechanical and aesthetical, are also observed. In implant treatment, knowledge of the potential causes and problems, will assist in the treatment planning for taking necessary precautions. The purpose of this literature review is to provide information about the encountered prosthetic complications during dental implant treatments

Keywords:

Dental implants, prosthetic complications,

PDF

___

Misch CE. Dental Implant Prosthetics. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier, 2005, 1-15.
Pjetursson BE., Tan K., Lang NP., Bragger U., Eg- ger M., Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures after an obversation period of at least 5 years. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 15: 667-676, 2004.
Cox JF., Zarb GA. The longitudinal clinical ef- ficacy of osseointegrated dental implants: A 3 year report. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2: 91-100, 1987.
Keiner P., Oetterli M., Mericske E., Mericske- Stern R. Effectiveness of maxillary overdentures supported by implants: Maintenance and prost- hetic complications. Int. J. Prosthodont. 14(2): 133-140, 2001.
Schmitt A., Zarb GA. The longitudinal clinical ef- fectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants for single-tooth replacement. Int. J. Prosthodont. 6: 197-202, 1993.
Goodacre CJ., Bernal G., Rungcharassaeng K., Kan JY. Clinical Complications with Implants and Implant Protheses. J. Prosthetic Dent. 90: 121- 132, 2003.
Blanes RJ., Bernard JP., Blanes ZM., Belser UC. A 10 year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. II. Influence of the crown to implant ratio and different prosthetic tre- atment modalities on crestal bone loss. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 18: 707-714, 2007.
Osuna JR., Marques NA., Escoda CG. Prevalence of complications after the oral rehabilitation with implant-supported hybrid prostheses. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal. 1;17:116-121, 2012.
Hsu YT., Fu JH., Al-Hezaimi K., Wang HL. Biomec- hanical implant treatment complications:A syste- matic review of clinical studies of implants with at least 1 year of functional loading. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 27: 894-904, 2012. Göthberg C., Bergendal T., Magnusson T. Comp- lications after treatment with implant-supported fixedprotheses: A retrospective study. Int. J. Prost- hodont. 16: 201-207, 2003.
Knauf M., Gerds T., Muche R., Strub JR. Survival and success rates of 3i implants in partially eden- tulous patients: results of a prospective study with up to 84-months’ follow-up. Quintessence Int. 38: 643-651, 2007.
Walton JN., MacEntee MI. Problems with prost- heses on implants: a retrospective study. J. Prost- het. Dent. 71: 283–288, 1994.
Blanes RJ. To what extent does the crown–implant ratio affect the survival and complications of implant-supported reconstructions? A systematic review. Clin. Oral. Implant Res. 4: 67-72, 2009.
Cakarer S., Can T., Yaltırık M., Keskin C. Comp- lications associated with the ball, bar and Locator attachments for implant-supported overdentures. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal. 1: 953-959, 2011.
Schwartz-Arad D., Laviv A., Levin L. Failure causes, timing, and cluster behavior: an 8-year study of den- tal implants. Implant Dent. 17: 200-207, 2008.
Duncan JP., Nazarova E., Vogiatzi T., Taylor TD. Prosthodontic Complications in a Prospective cli- nical trial of single-stage implants at 36 months. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 18: 561-565, 2003.
Andreiotelli M., Att W., Strub JR. Prosthodontic complications with implant overdentures: A syste- matic literature review. Int. J. Prosthodont. 23: 195-203, 2010.
Weinberg L. The biomechanics of force distribu- tion in implant supported prosthesis. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 8: 19-31, 1993. Hemmings KW., Schmitt A., Zarb GA. Compli- cations and maintenance requirements for fixed prostheses and overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a 5-year report. Int. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 9: 191-196, 1994. Kiener P., Oetterli M., Mericske E., Mericske- Stern R. Effectiveness of maxillary overdentures supported by implants: maintenance and prost- hetic complications. Int. J. Prosthodont. 14: 133- 140, 2001.
Berglundh T., Persson L., Klinge B. A systematic review of the incidence of biological and tech- nical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. J. Clin. Periodontol. 29: 197–212, 2002.
Aglietta M., Siciliano VI., Zwahlen M., Bragger U., Pjetursson BE., Lang NP., Salvi GE. A systema- tic review of the survival and complication rates of implant supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extensions after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 20: 441–451, 2009. Schwarz MS. Mechanical complications of den- tal implants. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 1: 156-158, 2000.
Goodacre CJ., Kan JY., Rungcharassaeng K. Cli- nical complications of osseointegrated implants. J. Prosthet. Dent. 81: 537–552, 1999.
Heasman P., Esmail Z., Barclay C. Peri-implant diseases. Dental Update 37: 511–512, 514- 516, 2010. Lindhe J., Meyle J. Peri-implant diseases: consensus report of the sixth European workshop on periodon- tology. J. Clin. Periodontol. 35: 282–285, 2008.
Renvert S., Roos-Jansåker AM., Claffey N. Non- surgical treatment of peri-implantitis and peri- implantitis: a literature review. J. Clin. Periodon- tol. 35: 305–315, 2008. Heitz-Mayfield LJ. Peri-implant diseases: diagno- sis and risk indicators. J. Clin. Periodontol. 35: 292–304, 2008.
Agar JR., Cameron SM., Hughbanks JC., Parker MH. Cement removal from restorations luted to titanium abutments with simulated subgingival margins. J. Prosthet. Dent. 78: 43–47, 1997.
Pauletto N., Lahiffe BJ., Walton JN. Complications associated with excess cement around crowns on osseointegrated implants: a clinical report. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 14: 865–868, 1999. Okamoto M., Minagi S. Technique for removing a cemented superstructure from an implant abut- ment. J. Prosthet. Dent. 87: 241–242, 2002.
Esposito M., Hirsch JM., Lekholm U., Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated implants (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 106: 527–551, 1998.
Alsaadi G., Quirynen M., Komárek A., van Ste- enberghe D. Impact of local and systemic factors on the incidence of oral implant failures, up to abutment connection. J. Clin. Periodontol. 34: 610–617, 2007.
Davies SJ. Occlusal considerations in implanto- logy: good occlusal practice in implantology. Dental Update. 37: 610–612, 615-616, 619- 620, 2010.
Lobbezoo F., Brouwers JE., Cune MS., Naeije M. Dental implants in patients with bruxing habits. J. Oral Rehabil. 33: 152–159, 2006.
McGlumphy E. Keeping implant screws tight: The solution. J. Dent. Symp. 1: 20-23, 1993.
Jung RE., Pjetursson BE., Glauser R., Zembic A., Zwahlen M., Lang NP. A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant supported single crowns. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 19: 119–130, 2008.
Kinsel RP., Lin D. Retrospective analysis of porce- lain failures of metal seramic crowns and fixed partial dentures supported by 729 implants in 152 patients:Patient specific and implant speci- fic predictors of ceramic failure. J. Prosthet. Dent. 101: 388-394, 2009.
Quirynen M., Naert I., van Steenberghe D. Fixtu- re design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Brånemark system. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 3: 104-111, 1992.
Sahin S., Cehreli MC., Yalçin E. The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant- supported prostheses--a review. J. Dent. 30: 271- 282, 2002.
Zarb GA., Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: The Toronto study. Part III: Problems and compli- cations encountered. J. Prosthet. Dent. 64: 185- 194, 1990. Duyck J., Van Oosterwyck H., Vander Sloten J., De Cooman M., Puers R., Naert I. Magnitude and distribution of occlusal forces on oral implants sup- porting fixed prostheses: an in vivo study. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 11: 465-475, 2000.
Bozini T., Petridis H., Garefis K., Garefis P. A meta-analysis of prosthodontic complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in edentulous patients after an observation period of at least 5 years. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Imp- lants. 26: 304-318, 2011.
Attard NJ., Zarb GA. Long-term treatment out- comes in edentulous patients with implant-fixed prostheses: the Toronto study. Int. J. Prosthodont. 17: 417-424, 2004.
Davis DM., Packer ME., Watson RM. Mainte- nance requirements of implant-supported fixed prostheses opposed by implant-supported fixed prostheses, natural teeth, or complete dentures: a 5-year retrospective study. Int. J. Prosthodont. 16: 521-523, 2003.
Stewart RB., Desjardins RP., Laney WR., Chao EY. Fatigue strength of cantilevered metal frame- works for tissue-integrated prostheses. J. Prosthet. Dent. 68: 83-92, 1992.
Tripodakis AP., Strub JR., Kappert HF., Witkows- ki S. Strength and mode of failure of single imp- lant all-ceramic abutment restorations under static load. Int. J. Prosthodont. 8: 265-272, 1995.
Luterbacher S., Fourmousis I., Lang NP., Brägger U. Fractured prosthetic abutments in osseointegra- ted implants: a technical complication to cope with. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 11: 163-170, 2000.
Sahin S., Cehreli MC. The significance of passive framework fit in implant prosthodontics: current status. Implant Dent. 10: 85-92, 2001.
van Kampen F., Cune M., van der Bilt A., Bos- man F. Retention and postinsertion maintenance of bar-clip, ball and magnet attachments in man- dibular implant overdenture treatment: an in vivo comparison after 3 months of function. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 14: 720-726, 2003.
Cehreli MC., Karasoy D., Kökat AM., Akça K., Eckert S. A systematic review of marginal bone loss around implants retaining or supporting overdentures. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 25: 266-277, 2010.
Payne AG., Solomons YF. The prosthodontic ma- intenance requirements of mandibular mucosa- and implant-supported overdentures: a review of the literature. Int. J. Prosthodont. 13: 238-243, 2000. Jemt T. Failures and complications in 391 con- secutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Branemark implants in edentulous jaws:a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual check up. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 6: 270-276, 1991.
Watson RM., Jemt T., Chai J., Harnett J., Heath MR., Hutton JE., Johns RB., Lithner B., McKenna S., McNamara DC., Naert I., Taylor R. Prostho- dontic treatment, patient response, and the need for maintenance of complete implant-supported overdentures: an appraisal of 5 years of pros- pective study. Int. J. Prosthodont. 10: 345-354, 1997.
Purcell BA., McGlumphy EA., Holloway JA., Beck FM. Prosthetic complications in mandibular metal resin implant fixed complete dental prostheses: a 5 to 9 year analysis. Int. J. Maxillofac. Implants. 23: 847-857, 2008.
Smedberg JI., Nilner K., Frykholm A. A six-year follow-up study of maxillary overdentures on osse- ointegrated implants. Eur. J. Prosthodont. Restor. Dent. 7: 51-56, 1999.
Vere J., Bhakta S., Patel R. Prosthodontic compli- cations associated with implant retained crowns and bridgework: a review of the literature. Br. Dent. J. 212: 267-272, 2012.
Karakoca Nemli S., Boynueğri D. Dişsiz Alt Çe- neye Uygulanan 4 İmplant Destekli Bar Tutuculu Hareketli Protezlerde Komplikasyonların ve Has- ta Memnuniyetinin Değerlendirilmesi. ADO Klin. Bil. Der. 4: 581-589, 2010.
Simon RL. Single implant-supported molar and premolar crowns: a ten-year retrospective clinical report. J. Prosthet. Dent. 90: 517-521, 2003.
Binon PP. Implants and components: entering the new millennium. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 15: 76–94, 2000.
Brunski JB., Puleo DA., Nanci A. Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial imp- lants: current status and future developments. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 15: 15-46, 2000. Rangert B., Krogh PH., Langer B., Van Roekel N. Bending overload and implant fracture: a retros- pective clinical analysis. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 10: 326-334, 1995.
Papaspyridakos P., Chen CJ., Chuang SK., We- ber HP., Gallucci GO. A systematic review of biologic and technical complications with fixed implant rehabilitations for edentulous patients. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 27: 102-110, 2012. Takahashi T., Gunne J. Fit of implant frameworks: an in vitro comparison between two fabricati- on technique. J. Prosthet. Dent. 89: 256-260, 2003.
Taylor D. Prosthodontic problem and limitations associated with osseointegration. J. Prosthet. Dent. 79: 74-78, 1998. Naert I., Quirynen M., Darius P. A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses. Part II: Prosthetic aspect. J. Prosthet. Dent. 68: 949-956, 1992.
Mericske-Stern R., Grütter L., Rösch R., Mericske E. Clinical evaluation and prosthetic complicati- ons of single tooth replacement by non-submerged implants. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 12: 309-318, 2001.
Cranin AN., Dibling JB., Simons A., Klein M., Si- rakian A. Report of the incidence of implant insert fracture and repair of Core-Vent dental implants. J. Oral Implantol. 16: 184-188, 1990. Sailer I., Philipp A., Zembic A., Pjetursson BE., Hämmerle CH., Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the performance of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructi- ons. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 4: 4-31, 2009.
Leutert CR., Stawarczyk B., Truninger TC., Hämmerle CH., Sailer I. Bending moments and types of failure of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal implant-abutment connections: a la- boratory study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 27: 505-512, 2012.
Fract Sánchez-Pérez A., Moya-Villaescusa MJ., Jornet-Garcia A., Gomez S. Etiology, risk factors and management of implant fractures. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal. 15: 504-508, 2010.
Al-Harbi SA., Edgin WA. Preservation of soft tissue contours with immediate screw-retained provisional implant crown. J. Prosthet. Dent. 98: 329–332, 2007. Buser D., Martin W., Belser U. Optimising esthe- tics for implant restorations in the anterior maxil- la: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 19: 43–61, 2004.
Tinsley D., Watson CJ., Preston AJ. Implant comp- lications and failures: the fixed prosthesis. Dent Update. 29: 456-460, 2002.
Palacci P., Ericsson I. Esthetic implant dentistry soft and hard tissue management. Chicago: Qu- intessence Publishing Co Inc. 2001.
Sclar AG. Soft tissue and esthetic considerations in implant therapy. US: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc. 2003.