Dentin Hassasiyeti Tedavisinde Diş Hekimi Tarafından Uygulanan Desensitize Edici Ajanlar

Dentin hassasiyeti genellikle doğal sklerotik mekanizmalarla dentin tübüllerinin tıkandığı geçici bir durum olmakla birlikte hastalarda keskin ağrıya neden olan rahatsız edici bir sorundur. Hekimler bu duruma neden olan etiyolojik faktörleri ve tedavi seçeneklerini ayrntılı olarak bilmelidir. Bu derlemenin amacı dentin hassiyetinin çok faktörlü etiyolojisini ve hekim tarafından uygulanan hassasiyet giderici ajanları değerlendirmektir

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Dentin hassasiyeti, hassasiyet giderici ajanlar, vernik, flor

Desensitizing Agents Applied by the Dentist in the Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity

Dentin hypersensitivity is a transient condition that often resolves with natural sclerotic obturation of dentin tubules. It is a common clinical finding that can cause considerable concern for the patient. Clinicians must understand the various etiological factors and numerous treatment options available. This review aims to evaluate the multi-factorial etiology of dentin hypersensitivity and in-office desensitizing agents applied by the dentist

Keywords:

Dentin hypersensitivity, desensitizing agents, varnish, fluor,

PDF

___

Trushkowsky RD., Oquendo A. Treatment of dentin hypersensitivity. Dent. Clin. North Am. 55:599- 608, 2011.
Byers MR., Neuhaus SJ., Gehrig JD. Dental sen- sory receptor structure in human teeth. Pain13:221- 235, 1982.
De Bruyn H., Van Rijn LJ., Purdell-Lewis DJ., Arends J. Influence of various fluoride varnishes on mineral loss under plaque. Caries Res. 22:76-83, 1988.
Arends J., Duschner H., Ruben JL. Penetration of var- nishes into demineralized root dentine in vitro. Caries Res. 31:201-205, 1997.
Cunha-Cruz J., Stout JR., Heaton LJ., Wataha JC. Den- tin hypersensitivity and oxalates: a systematic review. J. Dent. Res. 90:304-310, 2011.
Collaert B., Fischer C. Dentine hypersensitivity: a re- view. Endod. Dent. Traumatol. 7:145-152, 1991.
Pashley DH., Galloway SE. The effects of oxalate treatment on the smear layer of ground surfaces of hu- man dentine. Arch. Oral Biol. 30:731-737, 1985.
Muzzin KB., Johnson R. Effects of potassium oxa- late on dentin hypersensitivity in vivo. J. Periodontol. 60:151-158, 1989.
Trowbridge HO., Silver DR. A review of current ap- proaches to in-office management of tooth hypersensi- tivity. Dent. Clin. North Am. 34:561-581, 1990.
Shinkai K., Suzuki S., Katoh Y. Effect of air-blowing variables on bond strength of all-in-one adhesives to bovine dentin. Dent. Mater. J. 25:664-668., 2006.
Brannstrom M., Johnson G. Effects of various condi- tioners and cleaning agents on prepared dentin sur- faces: a scanning electron microscopic investigation. J. Prosthet. Dent. 31:422-430, 1974.
Duran I., Sengun A. The long-term effectiveness of five current desensitizing products on cervical dentine sen- sitivity. J. Oral Rehabil. 31:351-356, 2004.
Prati C., Cervellati F., Sanasi V., Montebugnoli L. Treatment of cervical dentin hypersensitivity with resin adhesives: 4-week evaluation. Am. J. Dent. 14:378- 382, 2001.
Baysan A., Lynch E. Treatment of cervical sensitivity with a root sealant. Am. J. Dent. 16:135-138, 2003.
Addy M., Dowell P. Dentine hypersensitivity--a review. Clinical and in vitro evaluation of treatment agents. J. Clin. Periodontol. 10:351-363, 1983.
Dondi dall’Orologio G., Lone A., Finger WJ. Clinical evaluation of the role of glutardialdehyde in a one- bottle adhesive. Am. J. Dent. 15:330-334, 2002.
Dondi dall’Orologio G., Malferrari S. Desensitizing effects of Gluma and Gluma 2000 on hypersensitive dentin. Am. J. Dent. 6:283-286, 1993.
Derise NL., Ritchey SJ., Furr AK. Mineral composition of normal human enamel and dentin and the relation of composition to dental caries. I. Macrominerals and comparison of methods of analyses. J. Dent. Res. 53:847-852, 1974.
Nakajima M., Kitasako Y., Okuda M., Foxton RM., Tagami J. Elemental distributions and microtensile bond strength of the adhesive interface to normal and caries-affected dentin. J. Biomed Mater. Re.s B Appl. Biomater 72:268-275, 2005.
Nanci A. Ten Cate’s Oral Histology: Development, Structure, and Function: Mosby; 2007.
Cross KJ., Huq NL., Palamara JE., Perich JW., Reyn- olds EC. Physicochemical characterization of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate nanocomplexes. J. Biol. Chem. 280:15362-15369, 2005.
Geiger S., Matalon S., Blasbalg J., Tung M., Eichmill- er FC. The clinical effect of amorphous calcium phos- phate (ACP) on root surface hypersensitivity. Oper. Dent. 28:496-500, 2003.
Dolci G., Mongiorgi .R, Prati C., Valdre G. Calcium phosphates produced by physical methods in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity. Minerva Stomatol 48:463-476, 1999.
Tung MS., Bowen HJ., Derkson GD., Pashley DH. Effects of calcium phosphate solutions on dentin per- meability. J. Endod. 19:383-387, 1993.
Tung MS., Eichmiller FC. Dental applications of amor- phous calcium phosphates. J. Clin. Dent. 10:1-6, 1999.
Schiff T., Delgado E., Zhang YP., Cummins D., DeVizio W., Mateo LR. Clinical evaluation of the ef- ficacy of an in-office desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate in providing in- stant and lasting relief of dentin hypersensitivity. Am. J. Dent. 22 Spec No A:8A-15A, 2009.
Hamlin D., Williams KP., Delgado E., Zhang YP., DeVizio W., Mateo LR. Clinical evaluation of the ef- ficacy of a desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate for the in-office relief of dentin hypersensitivity associated with dental prophylaxis. Am. J. Dent. 22 Spec No A:16A-20A, 2009.
Benco Dental. In-Office Management of Dentin Hyper- sensitivity. Available at: http://d3e9u3gw8odyw8. cloudfront.net/inoffice_mgmnt_dentin.pdf. 2012.
Yu X., Liang B., Jin X., Fu .B., Hannig M. Compara- tive in vivo study on the desensitizing efficacy of den- tin desensitizers and one-bottle self-etching adhesives. Oper. Dent. 35:279-286, 2010.
Sethna GD., Prabhuji ML., Karthikeyan BV. Comparison of two different forms of varnishes in the treatment of den- tine hypersensitivity: a subject-blind randomised clinical study. Oral Health Prev. Dent. 9:143-150, 2011.
Aranha AC., Pimenta LA., Marchi GM. Clinical eval- uation of desensitizing treatments for cervical dentin hypersensitivity. Braz. Oral Res. 23:333-339, 2009.
Ozen T., Orhan K., Avsever H., Tunca YM., Ulker AE., Akyol M. Dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized clinical comparison of three different agents in a short-term treat- ment period. Oper. Dent. 34:392-398, 2009.
de Assis Cde A., Antoniazzi RP., Zanatta FB., Rosing CK. Efficacy of Gluma Desensitizer on dentin hyper- sensitivity in periodontally treated patients. Braz. Oral Res. 20:252-256, 2006.
Tantbirojn D., Poolthong S., Leevailoj C., Srisawasdi S., Hodges JS., Randall RC. Clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass-ionomer liner for cervical dentin hy- persensitivity treatment. Am. J. Dent. 19:56-60, 2006.
Polderman RN., Frencken JE. Comparison between effectiveness of a low-viscosity glass ionomer and a resin-based glutaraldehyde containing primer in treat- ing dentine hypersensitivity--a 25.2-month evaluation. J. Dent. 35:144-149, 2007.
Kakaboura A., Rahiotis C., Thomaidis S., Doukouda- kis S. Clinical effectiveness of two agents on the treat- ment of tooth cervical hypersensitivity. Am. J. Dent. 18:291-295, 2005.
Kara C., Orbak R. Comparative evaluation of Nd:YAG laser and fluoride varnish for the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. J. Endod. 35:971-974, 2009.
Corona SA., Nascimento TN., Catirse A.B, Lizarelli RF., Dinelli W., Palma-Dibb RG. Clinical evaluation of low-level laser therapy and fluoride varnish for treat- ing cervical dentinal hypersensitivity. J. Oral. Rehabil. 30:1183-1189, 2003.
Ipci SD., Cakar G., Kuru B., Yilmaz S. Clinical evalu- ation of lasers and sodium fluoride gel in the treat- ment of dentine hypersensitivity. Photomed Laser Surg. 27:85-91, 2009.
Schwarz F., Arweiler N., Georg T., Reich E. Desen- sitizing effects of an Er:YAG laser on hypersensitive dentine. J. Clin. Periodontol. 29:211-215, 2002.
Pamir T., Dalgar H., Onal B. Clinical evaluation of three desensitizing agents in relieving dentin hypersen- sitivity. Oper. Dent. 32:544-548, 2007.
Erdemir U., Yildiz E., Kilic I., Yucel T., Ozel S. The effi- cacy of three desensitizing agents used to treat dentin hypersensitivity. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 141:285-296, 2010.
Jalali Y., Lindh L. A randomized prospective clini- cal evaluation of two desensitizing agents on cervi- cal dentine sensitivity. A pilot study. Swed. Dent. J. 34:79-86, 2010.
Olusile AO., Bamise CT., Oginni AO., Dosumu OO. Short-term clinical evaluation of four desensitizing agents. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 9:22-29, 2008.
Merika K., HeftitArthur F., Preshaw PM. Comparison of two topical treatments for dentine sensitivity. Eur. J. Prosthodont. Restor. Dent. 14:38-41, 2006.
Singal P., Gupta R., Pandit N. 2% sodium fluoride- iontophoresis compared to a commercially available desensitizing agent. J. Periodontol. 76:351-357, 2005.
Orhan K., Aksoy U., Can-Karabulut DC., Kalender A. Low-level laser therapy of dentin hypersensitivity: a short-term clinical trial. Lasers Med. Sci. 26:591-598, 2011.
Elgalaid T. Ozone treatment had no effect on tooth hypersensitivity. Evid. Based Dent. 11:70, 2010.
Pillon FL., Romani IG., Schmidt ER. Effect of a 3% po- tassium oxalate topical application on dentinal hyper- sensitivity after subgingival scaling and root planing. J. Periodontol. 75:1461-1464, 2004