Which patients are less likely to improve after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair?

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate which specific factors influence the improvement in function and to estimate the time to obtain pain relief following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods: A total of 97 patients (57 men and 40 women; mean age: 55.5 ± 9.3 years) who had arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between 2013 and 2016 were included into the study. Multivariable stepwise analysis included preoperative variables (age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities, occupation and participation in sports, Oxford shoulder score at baseline, preceding injury and duration of preoperative symptoms) and arthroscopic findings (size of rotator cuff tear, pathology of the long head of the biceps and cartilage lesions). The change in the Oxford shoulder score at the last follow-up was modeled as a function of the above predictor variables. The time to regain a visual analogue scale (VAS) under two points following surgery was considered the time to regain substantial pain relief. Results: The mean follow-up time was 33.2 ± 14.4 months. Twenty three patients had partial thickness and seventy four had full thickness supraspinatus tears. In third of the patients the tears were defined as large full thickness. At the last follow-up the mean Oxford shoulder score improved from 13.8 ± 4.8 to 42.1 ± 7.2 points (P < 0.001). The mean VAS improved from a preoperative score of 6.7 ± 1.3 points to 1.5 ± 0.6 points postoperatively (P < 0.001) and 80 (83%) patients declared they were satisfied to have had the operation. The mean time interval for substantial pain relief was 4.9 ± 3.6 months. Patients with higher preoperative Oxford shoulder score and larger tear size were correlated with lesser improvement in Oxford shoulder score (R ¼ 0.5, P ¼ 0.001). Conclusion: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair improved pain and function at an average follow-up of three years. A substantial pain relief was regained within five months from surgery. Larger rotator cuff tear size and more favorable preoperative function were predictors of worse postoperative function. Level of evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic study

___

1. Colvin AC, Egorova N, Harrison AK, Moskowitz A, Flatow EL. National trends in rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(3):227e233.

2. Yamaguchi K, Ditsios K, Middleton WD, Hildebolt CF, Galatz LM, Teefey SA. The demographic and morphological features of rotator cuff disease. A comparison of asymptomatic and symptomatic shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(8): 1699e1704.

3. Yamamoto A, Takagishi K, Osawa T, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of a rotator cuff tear in the general population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(1): 116e120.

4. Mather 3rd RC, Koenig L, Acevedo D, et al. The societal and economic value of rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(22):1993e2000.

5. Cho NS, Rhee YG. The factors affecting the clinical outcome and integrity of arthroscopically repaired rotator cuff tears of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Surg. 2009;1(2):96e104.

6. Chung SW, Kim JY, Kim MH, Kim SH, Oh JH. Arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears: outcome and analysis of factors associated with healing failure or poor postoperative function. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(7): 1674e1683.

7. Fermont AJ, Wolterbeek N, Wessel RN, Baeyens JP, de Bie RA. Prognostic factors for successful recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic literature review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014;44(3):153e163.

8. Gulotta LV, Nho SJ, Dodson CC, Adler RS, Altchek DW, MacGillivray JD, HSS Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Registry. Prospective evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs at 5 years: part II–prognostic factors for clinical and radiographic outcomes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(6):941e946.

9. Lambers Heerspink FO, Dorrestijn O, van Raay JJ, Diercks RL. Specific patientrelated prognostic factors for rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(7):1073e1080.

10. McElvany MD, McGoldrick E, Gee AO, Neradilek MB, Matsen 3rd FA. Rotator cuff repair: published evidence on factors associated with repair integrity and clinical outcome. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(2):491e500.

11. Saccomanno MF, Sircana G, Cazzato G, Donati F, Randelli P, Milano G. Prognostic factors influencing the outcome of rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(12):3809e3819.

12. Dawson J, Harris KK, Doll H, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. A comparison of the Oxford shoulder score and shoulder pain and disability index: factor structure in the context of a large randomized controlled trial. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2016;21(7):195e203.

13. Post M, Silver R, Singh M. Rotator cuff tear. Diagnosis and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;173:78e91.

14. Fermont AJ, Wolterbeek N, Wessel RN, Baeyens JP, de Bie RA. Prognostic factors for recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prognostic study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24(8):1249e1256.

15. Murray Jr TF, Lajtai G, Mileski RM, Snyder SJ. Arthroscopic repair of medium to large full-thickness rotator cuff tears: outcome at 2- to 6-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11(1):19e24.

16. Wilson F, Hinov V, Adams G. Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff: 2- to 14-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2002;18(2):136e144.

17. Wolf EM, Pennington WT, Agrawal V. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: 4- to 10- year results. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(1):5e12.

18. Manaka T, Ito Y, Matsumoto I, Takaoka K, Nakamura H. Functional recovery period after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: is it predictable before surgery? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(6):1660e1666.

19. Charousset C, Grimberg J, Duranthon LD, Bellaïche L, Petrover D, Kalra K. The time for functional recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: correlation with tendon healing controlled by computed tomography arthrography. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(1):25e33.

20. Russell RD, Knight JR, Mulligan E, Khazzam MS. Structural integrity after rotator cuff repair does not correlate with patient function and pain: a metaanalysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(4):265e271.
Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica-Cover
  • ISSN: 1017-995X
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Derneği
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

One step treatment of talus osteochondral lesions with microfracture and cell free hyaluronic acid based scaffold combination

Necip Selçuk YONTAR, Lercan ASLAN, ATA CAN, Tahir ÖĞÜT

Effectiveness of posterior structures in the development of proximal junctional kyphosis following posterior instrumentation: A biomechanical study in a sheep spine model

Murat KORKMAZ, TURGUT AKGÜL, Kerim SARIYILMAZ, Okan OZKUNT, FATİH DİKİCİ, Önder YAZICIOĞLU

The safety and the efficacy of computed tomography guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma

Cennet ŞAHİN, Yunus ÖÇ, Naim EDİZ, Mustafa ALTINAY, Aylin HASANEFENDİOĞLU BAYRAK

Magnetic resonance imaging of patients with lateral epicondylitis: Relationship between pain and severity of imaging features in elbow joints

Yoon Ki CHA, Seon-Jeong KİM, Noh Hyuck PARK, Joon Yub KIM, Joo-Hak KIM, Ji Yeon PARK

Which patients are less likely to improve after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair?

Barak HAVİV, Tal Frenkel RUTENBERG, Lee YAARİ, Muhammad KHATİB, Ehud RATH, Mustafa YASSİN

A new computerized tomography classification to evaluate response to Denosumab in giant cell tumors in the extremities

Laura CAMPANACCİ, Andrea SAMBRİ, Manuel Ricardo MEDELLİN, Pietro CİMATTİ, Costantino ERRANİ, Davide Maria DONATİ

Intereintra observer reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Trunk Control Measurement Scale in children with cerebral palsy

CEMİL ÖZAL, Gonca ARI, MİNTAZE KEREM GÜNEL

Assessing the risk of asymptomatic dysplasia in parents of children with developmental hip dysplasia

Tacettin AYANOĞLU, Muhammet Baybars ATAOGLU, NİL TOKGÖZ, Elif ERSÖZ, HAKAN ATALAR, Sacit TURANLI

Predatory journal preference in the field of Orthopaedics and Traumatology in Turkey

Muhittin ŞENER, Cumhur Deniz DAVULCU, Mesut TAHTA, İzge GÜNAL

Continuous adductor canal block following total knee arthroplasty provides a better analgesia compared to single shot: A prospective randomized controlled trial

UMUT CANBEK, ULAŞ AKGÜN, NEVRES HÜRRİYET AYDOĞAN, CEM YALIN KILINÇ, Ali İhsan UYSAL