Predatory journal preference in the field of Orthopaedics and Traumatology in Turkey

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of predatory journals in Orthopedics and Traumatology and to investigate the relationship of these publications with the regulations of scientific fields made in recent years in Turkey. Methods: The journals and publishers between the years 2000e2018 were screened and websites visited one by one on the basis of the orthopedic journals and publishers list determined as predators or possible predators. Orthopedic publications originated from Turkey was detected in these predatory journals. Article admissions, article processing charges, editorial and referee average response times were reviewed from the websites of journals. In addition, the effect of changing associate professorship application requirements and academic incentive regulation on the preference of predatory journals was examined. Results: Between 2000 and 2018 years 1626 issues which can be reached in 282 journals were examined. 4795 articles were screened in 29 journals which have articles originated from Turkey. One hundred and six (2.21%) articles which originated from Turkey was reached in these publications. Average article processing charge was $865 ($ 0e1819). Fifty-nine of 106 (55%) articles originated from Turkey were found in only 4 journal. Journals which have articles originated from Turkey were not on the Web of Science list. The response time to the articles was between 2 and 6 weeks in these journals. After the change criteria in associate professorship in 2016, 3.32 fold increase in annual average number of publications originated from Turkey have been identified in predatory journals. After the change criteria in academic incentive regulation in 2015, 4.76 fold increase in annual average number of publications originated from Turkey have been identified in predatory journals. Conclusion: The number of articles in predatory journals is increasing all over the world. This situation also valid in the field of Orthopaedics and Traumatology in Turkey. Authors should pay attention regarding predatory journals not only article processing charges but also very short evaluation period.

___

1. Rupp M, Anastasopoulou L, Wintermeyer E, Malhaan D, El Khassawna T, Heiss C. Predatory journals: a major threat in orthopaedic research. Int Orthop. 2019;43:509e517. https://doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4179-1.

2. Triggle CR, Triggle DJ. From gutenberg to open science: an unfulfilled odyssey. Drug Dev Res. 2017;78:3e23. https://doi: 10.1002/ddr.21369.

3. Piwowar H, Priem J, Lariviere V, et al. The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ. 2018;13:e4375. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375.

4. Laakso M, Welling P, Bukvova H, Nyman L, Bjork BC, Hedlund T. The devel- € opment of open access publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS One. 2011;6: e20961. https://doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020961.

5. Directory of Open Access Journals. https://doaj.org/Accessed 24 April 2019.

6. Beall J. Beall's list of predatory journals and publishers. http://beallslist.weebly. com/Accessed 27 February 2019.

7. Witham MD, Runcie H. Turning predator into prey-the problem of predatory journals. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2017;47:3e4. https://doi: 10.4997/JrcPe. 2017.101.

8. Priyadarshini S. India targets universities in predatory-journal crackdown. Nature. 2018;560:537e538. https://doi:10.1038/d41586-018-06048-2.

9. Akça S, Akbulut M. Türkiye’deki yagmac ı dergiler: Beall listesi üzerine bir aras¸ tırma. Bilgi Dünyası. 2018;19:255e274. https://doi: 10.15612/BD.2018.695.

10. Yan JR, Baldawi H, Lex JR, et al. Predatory publishing in orthopaedic research. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100:e138. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.01569.

11. The Terms and Conditions of Associate Professorship. http://www.uak.gov.tr/ temelalan/TA_Tablo10_2016A_030316.pdf Accessed 01 March 2019.

12. Academic Incentive Allowance Regulation. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/ eskiler/2015/12/20151218-4.pdf Accessed 20 February 2019.

13. Cress P. Guest Post: When Authors Get Caught in the Predatory (Illegitimate Publishing) Net. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/12/11/guest-postauthors-get-caught-predatory-illegitimate-publishing-net/?informz¼1 Accessed 10 December 2018.

14. The Terms and Conditions of Associate Professorship. http://www.uak.gov.tr/ temelalan/TA_Tablo10_2018N_181217.pdf Accessed 02 March 2019.

15. Academic Incentive Allowance Regulation. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/ eskiler/2018/06/20180627-6.pdf Accessed 22 February 2019.

16. Shen C, Bjork BC. ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Med. 2015;13:230. https://doi:10.1186/ s12916-015-0469-2.

17. Christopher MM, Young KM. Awareness of “predatory” open-access journals among prospective veterinary and medical authors attending scientific writing workshops. Front Vet Sci. 2015;2:22. https://doi: 10.3389/fvets.2015.00022.
Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica-Cover
  • ISSN: 1017-995X
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Derneği
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Intereintra observer reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Trunk Control Measurement Scale in children with cerebral palsy

CEMİL ÖZAL, Gonca ARI, MİNTAZE KEREM GÜNEL

Postoperative mechanical alignment analysis of total knee replacement patients operated with 3D printed patient specific instruments: A Prospective Cohort Study

HALİL CAN GEMALMAZ, Kerim SARIYILMAZ, Okan OZKUNT, Mustafa SUNGUR, İbrahim KAYA, FATİH DİKİCİ

Effectiveness of posterior structures in the development of proximal junctional kyphosis following posterior instrumentation: A biomechanical study in a sheep spine model

Murat KORKMAZ, TURGUT AKGÜL, Kerim SARIYILMAZ, Okan OZKUNT, FATİH DİKİCİ, Önder YAZICIOĞLU

Predatory journal preference in the field of Orthopaedics and Traumatology in Turkey

Muhittin ŞENER, Cumhur Deniz DAVULCU, Mesut TAHTA, İzge GÜNAL

One step treatment of talus osteochondral lesions with microfracture and cell free hyaluronic acid based scaffold combination

Necip Selçuk YONTAR, Lercan ASLAN, ATA CAN, Tahir ÖĞÜT

Assessing the risk of asymptomatic dysplasia in parents of children with developmental hip dysplasia

Tacettin AYANOĞLU, Muhammet Baybars ATAOGLU, NİL TOKGÖZ, Elif ERSÖZ, HAKAN ATALAR, Sacit TURANLI

A new computerized tomography classification to evaluate response to Denosumab in giant cell tumors in the extremities

Laura CAMPANACCİ, Andrea SAMBRİ, Manuel Ricardo MEDELLİN, Pietro CİMATTİ, Costantino ERRANİ, Davide Maria DONATİ

Continuous adductor canal block following total knee arthroplasty provides a better analgesia compared to single shot: A prospective randomized controlled trial

UMUT CANBEK, ULAŞ AKGÜN, NEVRES HÜRRİYET AYDOĞAN, CEM YALIN KILINÇ, Ali İhsan UYSAL

Which patients are less likely to improve after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair?

Barak HAVİV, Tal Frenkel RUTENBERG, Lee YAARİ, Muhammad KHATİB, Ehud RATH, Mustafa YASSİN

The safety and the efficacy of computed tomography guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma

Cennet ŞAHİN, Yunus ÖÇ, Naim EDİZ, Mustafa ALTINAY, Aylin HASANEFENDİOĞLU BAYRAK