Murat KORKMAZ, TURGUT AKGÜL, Kerim SARIYILMAZ, Okan OZKUNT, FATİH DİKİCİ, Önder YAZICIOĞLU

Effectiveness of posterior structures in the development of proximal junctional kyphosis following posterior instrumentation: A biomechanical study in a sheep spine model

Introduction: Proximal junctional kyphosis e PJK has been defined by a 10 or greater increase in kyphosis at the proximal junction as measured by the Cobb angle from the caudal endplate of the uppermost instrumented vertebrae (UIV) to the cephalad endplate of the vertebrae 1 segments cranial to the UIV. In this biomechanical study, it is aimed to evaluate effects of interspinosus ligament complex distruption and facet joint degeneration on PJK development. Materials and methods: Posterior instrumentation applied between T2 e T7 vertebrae using pedicle screws to randomly selected 21 sheeps, divided into 3 groups. First group selected as control group (CG), of which posterior soft tissue and facet joints are protected. In second group (spinosus group, SG) interspinosus ligament complex which 1 segment cranial to UIV has been transected, and third group (faset group-FG) was applied facet joint excision. 25 N, 50 N, 100 N, 150 N and 200 N forces applied at frequency of 5 Hertz as 100 cycles axial to the samples. Then, 250 N, 275 N and 300 N forces applied static axially. Interspinosus distance, kyphosis angle and discus heights was measured in radiological evaluation. Abnormal PJK was defined by a proximal junctional angle greater than 100 and at least 100 greater than the corresponding preoperative measurement. Results: In CG group, average interspinosus distance was 6,6 ±1.54 mm and kyphosis angle was 2,2 ± 0.46 before biomechanical testing, and they were measured as 9,4 ± 1.21 mm and 3,3 ±0.44 respectively after forces applied to samples. In SG group, average interspinosus distance was 6,2 ± 1.72 mm and kyphosis angle was 2,7 ± 1.01 before experiment, and they were measured as 20,8 ± 5.66 mm and 15,1 ± 2.34 respectively after forces applied to samples. In FG group, average interspinosus distance was 4,8 ± 1.15 mm and kyphosis angle was 1 ± 4.14 before experiment, and they were measured as 11,1 ± 1:96 mm and 11 ± 2.87 respectively after forces applied to samples. In comparison to group CG, statistically significant junctional kyphosis was seen on both FG and SG group after statistical analysis. (p < 0.05). PJK was seen statistically significant more on SG group than FG group. (p < 0.05). Not any statistically significant difference was seen on measurement of disk distances among three groups. (p > 0.05) Conclusions: Protecting interspinosus ligament complex and facet joint unity during posterior surgical treatment for spine deformation is vital to prevent PJK development. Based on our literature review, this is the first biomechanical study that reveals interspinosus ligament complex are more effective on preventing PJK development than facet joints

___

1. Cotrel Y, Dubousset J, Guillaumat M. New universal instrumentation in spinal surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;(227):10e23.

2. Edmonston SJ, Singer KP, Day RE, Breidahl PD, Price RI. Formalin fixation effects on vertebral bone density and failure mechanics: an study of human and sheep vertebrae. Clin Biomech. 1994 May;9(3):175e179.

3. Eggli S, Schl€ apfer F, Angst M, Witschger P, Aebi M. Biomechanical testing of three newly developed transpedicular multisegmental fixation systems. Eur Spine J. 1992 Sep;1(2):109e116.

4. Hostin R, McCarthy I, OʼBrien M, et al. Incidence, mode, and location of acute proximal junctional failures following surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 May 20;38(12):1008e1015.

5. Yagi M, Akilah KB, Boachie-Adjei O. Incidence, risk factors and classification of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(1):E60eE68.

6. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Glattes CR, Rhim S, Cheh G. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity after segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum five-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(20):2179e2184.

7. Helgeson MD, Shah SA, Newton PO, et al. Evaluation of proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following pedicle screw, hook, or hybrid instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(2):177e181.

8. Sucato DJ, Kassab F, Dempsey M. Analysis of screw placement relative to the aorta and spinal canal following anterior instrumentation for thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29(5):554e559. discussion 559.

9. Glattes RC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, Rinella A, Edwards 2nd C. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity following long instrumented posterior spinal fusion: incidence, outcomes, and risk factor analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(14):1643e1649.

10. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Kim J, Cho SK. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(18):2045e2050.

11. Yang SH, Chen PQ. Proximal kyphosis after short posterior fusion for thoracolumbar scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;411:152e158.

12. Coe JD, Arlet V, Donaldson W, et al. Complications in spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the new millennium. A report of the scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality committee. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(3):345e349.

13. Anderson AL, McIff TE, Asher MA, Burton DC, Glattes RC. The effect of posterior thoracic spine anatomical structures on motion segment flexion stiffness. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(5):441e446.

14. Kretzer RM, Hu N, Umekoji H, et al. The effect of spinal instrumentation on kinematics at the cervicothoracic junction: emphasis on soft-tissue response in an in vitro human cadaveric model. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;13(4): 435e442.

15. Arlet V, Aebi M. Junctional spinal disorders in operated adult spinal deformities: present understanding and future perspectives. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(2):S276eS295.

16. Lee GA, Betz RR, Clements 3rd DH, Huss GK. Proximal kyphosis after posterior spinal fusion in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24(8):795e799.

17. Lowe TG, Kasten MD. An analysis of sagittal curves and balance after CotrelDubousset instrumentation for kyphosis secondary to Scheuermann's disease. A review of 32 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994;19(15):1680e1685.

18. Herkowitz HN, Garfin Steven R, Eismont Frank J, Bell Gordon R, Balderston Richard A. Rothman simeone the Spine: expert consult. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2011.

19. Cammarata M, Wang X, Mac-Thiong JM, Ce A. Biomechanical analysis of proximal junctional kyphosis: preliminary results. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;(176):299e302.

20. Osti OL, Vernon-Roberts B, Fraser RD. 1990 Volvo Award in experimental studies. Anulus tears and intervertebral disc degeneration. An experimental study using an animal model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990;15(8): 762e767.

21. Hans-Joachim Wilke AK, Kettler Annette, Howard Wenger Karl, Eberhardt Claes Lutz. Anatomy of the sheep spine and its comparison to the human spine. Anatomical Rec. 1997 Apr;247(4):542e555.