Tuna PEHLİVANOĞLU, HALİL İBRAHİM BALCI, Mehmet DEMİREL, Mehmet Fevzi CAKMAK, Önder YAZICIOĞLU, ÖNDER İSMET KILIÇOĞLU
Prevalence of anterior knee pain after patellar retention total knee arthroplasty: Comparison of patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus primary osteoarthritis
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is an increased risk of anterior knee pain (AKP) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without patellar resurfacing in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) versus primary osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: This study was a retrospective review of 388 patients (577 knees) who underwent TKA without patellar resurfacing between 2003 and 2011, with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups: Group OA (273 knees of 206 patients; 83 males, 123 females; mean age: 64.4 (47e87) years) and Group RA (304 knees of 182 patients; 92 males, 90 females; mean age: 50.7 (21e72) years). In the clinical evaluation, the knee range of motion (ROM) and several outcome measures such as The Knee Society Score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were used preoperatively and at the final follow-up visit. The quality of life was measured using Short Form (SF)-36 MCS and PCS scores. The primary outcome was the frequency and severity of patient-reported AKP. The AKP Scale was used to determine the severity of AKP. Results: The IKDC raised from 21.62 (range, 13e29.9) preoperatively to 85.1 (range, 80e88) for group OA and from 21.8 (range, 13e29.9) to 85.2 (range, 81e88) for group RA (p < 0.001). The mean KSS improved from 28.35 (range, 22e38) preoperatively to 90.04 (range, 88e95) for group OA and from 21.9 (range, 18 e35) preoperatively to 89.7 (range, 86e95) for group RA. The mean WOMAC increased from 20.61 (range, 17.4e24.2) preoperatively to 95.7 (range, 90.9e97.7) for group OA (p < 0.001) and from 20.2 (range, 16.7e24.2) preoperatively to 95.8 (range, 90.9e98.5) for group RA (p < 0.001). The mean ROM improved from 80.14 (range, 55e130) preoperatively to 113.17 (range, 95e140) in group OA (P ¼ 0.003) and from 73.4 (range, 10e130) to 112.8 (range 90e140) in group RA (P ¼ 0.003) postoperatively. The frequency of AKP was 8% in Group OA and 7% in Group RA (p ¼ 0.27). For patients with AKP, the mean AKP Scale was 92.74 (range, 84e98) in Group OA and 93.39 (range, 82e98) in Group RA (p ¼ 0.3). Conclusion: After TKA without resurfacing the patella, patients with RA were determined to have a similar risk for AKP as those with OA.
___
1. Meftah M, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. The natural history of anterior knee pain in 2 posterior-stabilized, modular total knee arthroplasty designs. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(8):1145e1148.2. Indelli P, Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Baldini A. The Insall-Burstein II prosthesis: a 5-to 9- year follow-up study in osteoarthritic knees. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(5): 544e549.
3. Li S, Chen Y, Su W, Zhao J, He S, Luo X. Systematic review of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2011;35(3):305e316.
4. Pais-Brito J, Rafols-Urquiza B, Gonzalez-Massieu L, Herrera-Perez M, Aciego-De Mendoza M, De Bergua Domingo J. Reduced patellofemoral and walking pain with mobile-bearing vs. fixed-bearing total knee replacements: a mid-term prospective analytic study. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2015;49(4):375e381.
5. Ranawat C. History of total knee replacement. J South Orthop Assoc. 2001;11(4): 218e226.
6. Helmy N, Anglin C, Greidanus NV, Masri BA. To resurface or not to resurface the patella in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(11): 2775e2783.
7. Breeman S, Campbell M, Dakin H, et al. Patellar resurfacing in total knee replacement: five-year clinical and economic results of a large randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(16):1473e1481.
8. Metsna V, Vorobjov S, Martson A. Prevalence of anterior knee pain among patients following total knee arthroplasty with nonreplaced patella: a retrospective study of 1778 knees. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania). 2014;50(2): 82e86.
9. Holt G, Miller N, Kelly M, Leach W. Retention of the patella in total knee arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis. Jt Bone Spine. 2006;73(5):523e526.
10. Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71(3):262e267.
11. Hanssen AD. Bone-grafting for severe patellar bone loss during revision knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83(2):171.
12. Deehan DJ, Phaltankar PM, Pinder IM. Do we need to replace the patella in knee arthroplasty for rheumatoid disease? Acta Orthop Belg. 2008;74(4): 478e482.
13. Parvizi J, Rapuri VR, Saleh KJ, Kuskowski MA, Sharkey PF, Mont MA. Failure to resurface the patella during total knee arthroplasty may result in more knee pain and secondary surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;438(1): 191e196.
14. Feller JA, Bartlett RJ, Lang DM. Patellar resurfacing versus retention in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78(2):226e228.
15. Shoji H, Yoshino S, Kajino A. Patellar replacement in bilateral total knee arthroplasty. A study of patients who had rheumatoid arthritis and no gross deformity of the patella. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71(6):853e856.
16. Kon E, Altadonna G, Filardo G, Matteo BD, Marcacci M. Knee scoring systems. In: Bentley G, ed. European Surgical Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Berlin: Springer; 2014:3371e3388.
17. Wolfe F, Kong SX. Rasch analysis of the Western Ontario MacMaster questionnaire (WOMAC) in 2205 patients with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and fibromyalgia. Ann Rheum Dis. 1999;58(9):563e568.
18. Kujala UM, Jaakkola LH, Koskinen SK, Taimela S, Hurme M, Nelimarkka O. Scoring of patellofemoral disorders. Arthroscopy. 1993;9(2):159e163.
19. Kramers-de Quervain IA, Engel-Bicik I, Miehlke W, Drobny T, Munzinger U. Fat-pad impingement after total knee arthroplasty with the LCS A/P-Glide system. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005;13(3):174e178.
20. Ma HM, Lu YC, Kwok TG, Ho FY, Huang CY, Huang CH. The effect of the design of the femoral component on the conformity of the patellofemoral joint in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(3):408e412.
21. Nizard RS, Biau D, Porcher R, et al. A meta-analysis of patellar replacement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;432(3):196e203.
22. Pakos EE, Ntzani EE, Trikalinos TA. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(7):1438e1445.
23. Pavlou G, Meyer C, Leonidou A, As-Sultany M, West R, Tsiridis E. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: does design matter? A meta-analysis of 7075 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(14):1301e1309.
24. Patel K, Raut V. Patella in total knee arthroplasty: to resurface or not toea cohort study of staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2011;35(3):349e353.
25. He JY, Jiang LS, Dai LY. Is patellar resurfacing superior than nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Knee. 2011;18(3):137e144.
26. Swan JD, Stoney JD, Lim K, Dowsey MM, Choong PF. The need for patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a literature review. ANZ J Surg. 2010;80(4):223e233.
27. Bhan S, Malhotra R, Eachempati KK. Total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;450(9):157e163.
28. Biau D, Mullins MM, Judet T, Piriou P. Mobile versus fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: mid-term comparative clinical results of 216 prostheses. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(10):927e933.
29. Picetti Gd, McGann W, Welch R. The patellofemoral joint after total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(9):1379e1382.
30. Fern E, Winson I, Getty C. Anterior knee pain in rheumatoid patients after total knee replacement. Possible selection criteria for patellar resurfacing. Bone Joint J. 1992;74(5):745e748.
31. Bourne RB. To resurface the patella or not? Better assessments needed to address the benefits for total knee replacement: commentary on an article by George Pavlou, BSc, MRCS, et al.: “Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: does design matter? A meta-analysis of 7075 cases”. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(14):e82.
32. Levitsky KA, Harris WJ, Mcmanus J, Scott RD. Total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing: clinical outcomes and long-term follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:116e121.
33. Peng CW, Tay BK, Lee BP. Prospective trial of resurfaced patellaversus nonresurfaced patella in simultaneous bilateral total knee replacement. Singapore Med J. 2003;44(7):347e351.
- ISSN: 1017-995X
- Başlangıç: 2015
- Yayıncı: Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Derneği
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler
ABDULLAH MERTER, Mustafa Onur KARACAC, Tarık YAZAR
Tunay ERDEN, Mehmet KAPICIOĞLU, Abdullah DEMİRTAŞ, Kerem BİLSEL, Fuat AKPINAR, Hacer KUDUZ
The thickness of heel fat-pad in patients with plantar fasciitis
Oktay BELHAN, Mehmet KAYA, MURAT GÜRGER
Bo XU, Xiao-Qing SHİ, Run-lin XING, Yan-Cheng XİAO, Peng WU, Pei-Min WANG
Muhammad UMAR, Noman JAHANGİR, Michael HUGHES, Qasim MALİK, Jalal KOKAN, M. WASEEM
Association between calcium-phosphorus balance and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A meta-analysis
Qingling ZHU, Junwei CHEN, Changxian CHEN, Hanlong WANG, Shengping YANG
The effects of cryopreserved human amniotic membrane on fracture healing: Animal study
ENES SARI, MEHMET YALÇINOZAN, Barış POLAT, Hanife ÖZKAYALAR
Seyyid Şerif ÜNSAL, Tuğrul YILDIRIM, Mehmet ARMANGİL
Whoan Jeang KİM, Jong-Beom PARK, Heui-Jeon PARK, Kyung-Jin SONG, Woo-Kie MİN
Double ulnar osteomy for the treatment of congenital radial head dislocation
Qiang JİE, Xiaoju LİANG, Xiaowei WANG, Yongtao WU, Ge WU, Bing WANG