The effects of cryopreserved human amniotic membrane on fracture healing: Animal study

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of human amniotic membrane (HAM) on fracture healing in an animal model. Methods: Standard tibial diaphysial fractures were created in twenty-eight Wistar-Albino rats and treated with intramedullary Kirschner wire (K-wire) and HAM (HAM (þ) group) or K-wire only (HAM (e) group). Fracture healing was evaluated by histological analysis, radiologic X-ray views and callus diameter measurements at 3rd and 6th weeks postoperatively. Results: Fracture healing was histologically better in the HAM (þ) group and the difference was statistically significant at both 3rd and 6th weeks postoperatively (p < 0.05). The highest histologic scores and entire woven bone formation (Huo Stage 8e9) were obtained at 6th weeks postoperatively in the HAM (þ) group. Histological examination also revealed predominant fibrous tissue and partial cartilage formation (Huo Stage 2) at the postoperative 3rd week in the HAM (-) group. Equal amounts of woven bone and cartilage formation (Huo Stage 6e7) were observed at 3rd weeks postoperatively in the HAM (þ) group and at 6th weeks postoperatively in the HAM (-) group. The callus diameters were greater in the HAM (þ) group and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05) at 3rd and 6th weeks postoperatively. Although there was only a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) at the postoperative 3rd week, radiological scores tended to be higher in the HAM (þ) group at both the 3rd and 6th weeks postoperatively. Conclusion: HAM is a cheap and easily accessible alternative biological material. HAM may be used to support surgical treatment of fractures, particularly where bone healing is expected to last longer.

___

1. Atilla HA, Stubbs AJ. Amniyotik membran ve sıvı kaynaklı tedaviler e kok hücre € tedavisi. TOTBID Derg. 2017;16(3):259e265.

2. Ghanmi S, Trigui M, Baya W, et al. The periosteum-like effect of fresh human amniotic membrane on bone regeneration in a rabbit critical-sized defect model. Bone. 2018;110:392e404.

3. Feng Y, Borrelli M, Reichl S, Schrader S, Geerling G. Review of alternative carrier materials for ocular surface reconstruction. Curr Eye Res. 2014;39(6):541e552.

4. DiDomenico LA, Orgill DP, Galiano RD, et al. Aseptically processed placental membrane improves healing of diabetic foot ulcerations. Plast Reconstr Surg e Glob Open. 2016;4(10):e1095.

5. Ozgenel GY. The effects of a combination of hyaluronic and amniotic mem- € brane on the formation of peritendinous adhesions after flexor tendon surgery in chickens. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(2):301e307.

6. Mohan R, Bajaj A, Gundappa M. Human amnion membrane: potential applications in oral and periodontal field. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017;7(1): 15e21.

7. Zhang Z, Zeng L, Yang J, Guo L, Hou Q, Zhu F. Amniotic membrane-derived stem cells help repair osteochondral defect in a weight-bearing area in rabbits. Exp Ther Med. 2017;14(1):187e192.

8. Tang K, Wu J, Xiong Z, Ji Y, Sun T, Guo X. Human acellular amniotic membrane: a potential osteoinductive biomaterial for bone regeneration. J Biomater Appl. 2018;32(6):754e764.

9. Liu PF, Guo L, Zhao DW, et al. Study of human acellular amniotic membrane loading bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in repair of articular cartilage defect in rabbits. Genet Mol Res. 2014;13(3):7992e8001.

10. Karaçal N, Kos¸ ucu P, Çobangl ^u Ü, Kutlu N. Effect of human amniotic fluid on bone healing. J Surg Res. 2005;129(2):283e287.

11. Kerimoǧlu S, Livaoǧlu M, Sonmez B, et al. Effects of human amniotic € fluid on fracture healing in rat tibia. J Surg Res. 2009;152(2):281e287.

12. Oner M, Dulgeroglu TC, Karaman I, Guney A, Kafadar IH, Erdem S. The effects of human amniotic fluid and different bone grafts on vertebral fusion in an experimental rat model. Curr Ther Res e Clin Exp. 2015;77:35e39.

13. Rosenblum BI. A retrospective case series of a dehydrated amniotic membrane allograft for treatment of unresolved diabetic foot ulcers. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2016;106(5):328e337.

14. Lane JM, Sandhu HS. Current approaches to experimental bone grafting. Orthop Clin North Am. 1987;18(2):213e225.

15. Huo MH, Troiano NW, Pelker RR, Gundberg CM, Friedlaender GE. The influence of ibuprofen on fracture repair: biomechanical, biochemical, histologic, and histomorphometric parameters in rats. J Orthop Res. 1991;9(3):383e390.

16. Peister A, Woodruff MA, Prince JJ, Gray DP, Hutmacher DW, Guldberg RE. Cell sourcing for bone tissue engineering: amniotic fluid stem cells have a delayed, robust differentiation compared to mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Res. 2011;7(1):17e27.

17. Aydın H, Saraçoglu M, Kerimo glu G, Kerimo glu S, Topbas ¸ M. _ Insan amniyon sıvısının posterolateral spinal füzyon üzerindeki etkileri: deneysel bir on€ çalıs¸ ma Effects of human amniotic fluid on posterolateral spinal fusion: an experimental preliminary study. Eklem Hast Cerrahisi. 2011;22(3):166e171.

18. Krishnamurithy G, Shilpa PN, Ahmad RE, Sulaiman S, Ng CLL, Kamarul T. Human amniotic membrane as a chondrocyte carrier vehicle/substrate: in vitro study. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2011;99A(3):500e506.

19. Garcia D, Longo UG, Vaquero J, et al. Amniotic membrane transplant for articular cartilage repair: an experimental study in sheep. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;10(1):77e83.

20. Díaz-Prado S, Rendal-V azquez ME, Muinos-L ~ opez E, et al. Potential use of the human amniotic membrane as a scaffold in human articular cartilage repair. Cell Tissue Bank. 2010;11(2):183e195.

21. Namba RS, Meuli M, Sullivan KM, Le AX, Adzick NS. Spontaneous repair of superficial defects in articular cartilage in a fetal lamb model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80(1):4e10.

22. Rennie K, Gruslin A, Hengstschl€ ager M, et al. Applications of amniotic membrane and fluid in stem cell biology and regenerative medicine. Stem Cell Int. 2012;2012:1e13.

23. Hanselman AE, Lalli TA, Santrock RD. Use of fetal tissue in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Spec. 2015;8(4):297e304.

24. Heckmann N, Auran R, Mirzayan R. Application of amniotic tissue in orthopedic surgery. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016;45(7):E421eE425.
Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica-Cover
  • ISSN: 1017-995X
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Derneği
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Locally administrated single-dose teriparatide affects critical-size rabbit calvarial defects: A histological, histomorphometric and micro-CT study

TAHA ÖZER, Özgür BAŞLARLI, ALPER AKTAŞ, EMRE BARIŞ, HAKAN HAMDİ ÇELİK, Mert OCAK

The effects of cryopreserved human amniotic membrane on fracture healing: Animal study

ENES SARI, MEHMET YALÇINOZAN, Barış POLAT, Hanife ÖZKAYALAR

Incidence of shoulder functional morbidity following ipsilateral mastectomy and latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction

Muhammad UMAR, Noman JAHANGİR, Michael HUGHES, Qasim MALİK, Jalal KOKAN, M. WASEEM

Prevalence of anterior knee pain after patellar retention total knee arthroplasty: Comparison of patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus primary osteoarthritis

Tuna PEHLİVANOĞLU, HALİL İBRAHİM BALCI, Mehmet DEMİREL, Mehmet Fevzi CAKMAK, Önder YAZICIOĞLU, ÖNDER İSMET KILIÇOĞLU

Comparison of clavicular hook plate with and without coracoclavicular suture fixation for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation

Hao-Ming CHANG, Chih-Kai HONG, Wei-Ren SU, Tzu-Hao WANG, Chih-Wei CHANG, Ta-Wei TAİ

Meta-analysis of the association of IL1-RN variable number of tandem repeats polymorphism with osteoarthritis risk

Bo XU, Xiao-Qing SHİ, Run-lin XING, Yan-Cheng XİAO, Peng WU, Pei-Min WANG

Isokinetic Evaluation of Shoulder Strength and Endurance after Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Comparative Study

Ali ERŞEN, Fevzi BİRİŞİK, Serkan BAYRAM, Türker ŞAHİNKAYA, Mehmet DEMİREL, Ata Can ATALAR, Mehmet DEMİRHAN

Unusual localization and aggressive progression of large infantile fibrosarcoma

İsmail Burak ATALAY, Güray TOĞRAL

Double ulnar osteomy for the treatment of congenital radial head dislocation

Qiang JİE, Xiaoju LİANG, Xiaowei WANG, Yongtao WU, Ge WU, Bing WANG

Biomechanical comparison of humeral nails with different distal locking mechanisms: Insafelock nails versus conventional locking nails

Tunay ERDEN, Mehmet KAPICIOĞLU, Abdullah DEMİRTAŞ, Kerem BİLSEL, Fuat AKPINAR, Hacer KUDUZ