Seyyid Şerif ÜNSAL, Tuğrul YILDIRIM, Mehmet ARMANGİL

Comparison of surgical trends in zone 2 flexor tendon repair between Turkish and international surgeons

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate Turkish trends in zone 2 flexor repair with regards to surgical technique, suture materials, anesthesia and post-operative rehabilitation and compare this with international surgeons by modifying Gibson's survey. Methods: A printed and online survey consisting of 19 questions modified from Gibson's survey was sent to 590 Turkish and international surgeons. The surgeon's years in practice, province of practice, residency type, number of zone 2 flexor tendon repairs done in a year, preferred surgical technique, suture material, complications and postoperative protocols were asked to the respondents. Results: A total of 194 surgeons completed the survey (a 25% response rate). Of those who completed the survey, 91 were international (mostly from far eastern countries) and 103 were Turkish surgeons. Years in practice and educational background had influence on the decision-making. There were differences between the Turkish and international surgeons in the core and epitendinous suture thickness preference and flexor tendon sheath repair. There was a statistically significant relationship between the province of practice and the use of WALANT (Wide awake local anesthesia no tourniquet) (p < 0.05). While the majority of respondents who preferred postoperative early passive motion protocol were from Turkey (61.5%), the majority of respondents who preferred early active motion protocol were practicing abroad (73.9%). Conclusion: Despite some variations the surgeons involved in this study follow to a large extent the current literature.

___

1. Verdan CE. Primary repair of flexor tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1960;42: 647e657.

2. Bunnell S. Surgery of the Hand. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1948.

3. Green DP. Green's Operative Hand Surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier/ Churchill Livingstone; 2005.

4. Tang JB, Amadio PC, Boyer MI, et al. Current practice of primary flexor tendon repair: a global view. Hand Clin. 2013;29:179e189.

5. Tang JB. Recent evolutions in flexor tendon repairs and rehabilitation. J Hand Surg Eur. 2018;43:469e473.

6. Gunturk OB, Kayalar M, Kaplan I, Uludag A, Ozaksar K, Kelesoglu B. Results of 4- strand modified Kessler core suture and epitendinous interlocking suture followed by modified Kleinert protocol for flexor tendon repairs in Zone 2. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2018;52:382e386.

7. Gibson PD, Sobol GL, Ahmed IH. Zone II flexor tendon repairs in the United States: trends in current management. J Hand Surg Am. 2017;42:e99ee108.

8. Rudge WBJ, James M. Flexor tendon injuries in the hand: a UK survey of repair techniques and suture materials: are we following the evidence? ISRN Plast Surg. 2014;2014:1e4.

9. Najibi S, Banglmeier R, Matta JM, Tannast M. Material properties of common suture materials in orthopaedic surgery. Iowa Orthop J. 2010;30:84e88.

10. Scherman P, Haddad R, Scougall P, Walsh WR. Cross-sectional area and strength differences of fiberwire, Prolene, and ticron sutures. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35:780e784.

11. Tang JB. Plastic surgery. In: Neligan P, Chang J, eds. Flexor Tendon Repair Volume 6. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2012:178e205.

12. Osei DA, Stepan JG, Calfee RP, et al. The effect of suture caliber and number of core suture strands on zone II flexor tendon repair: a study in human cadavers. J Hand Surg Am. 2014;39:262e268.

13. Yaseen Z, English C, Stanbury SJ, et al. The effect of the epitendinous suture on gliding in a Cadaveric model of zone II flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40:1363e1368.

14. Merrell GA, Wolfe SW, Kacena WJ, et al. The effect of increased peripheral suture purchase on the strength of flexor tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Am. 2003;28:464e468.

15. Elliot D, Giesen T. Primary flexor tendon surgery: the search for a perfect result. Hand Clin. 2013;29:191e206.

16. Tang JB. Indications, methods, postoperative motion and outcome evaluation of primary flexor tendon repairs in Zone 2. J Hand Surg Eur. 2007;32:118e129.

17. Lister G. Indications and techniques for repair of the flexor tendon sheath. Hand Clin. 1985;1:85e95.

18. Miller L, Mass DP. A comparison of four repair techniques for Camper's chiasm flexor digitorum superficialis lacerations: tested in an in vitro model. J Hand Surg Am. 2000;25:1122e1126.

19. Sebastin SJ, Ho A, Karjalainen T, Chung KC. History and evolution of the Kessler repair. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38:552e561.

20. Chauhan A, Palmer BA, Merrell GA. Flexor tendon repairs: techniques eponyms, and evidence. J Hand Surg Am. 2014;39:1846e1853.

21. Lalonde D, Martin A. Epinephrine in local anesthesia in finger and hand surgery: the case for wide-awake anesthesia. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013;21: 443e447.

22. Leblanc MR, Lalonde J, Lalonde DH. A detailed cost and efficiency analysis of performing carpal tunnel surgery in the main operating room versus the ambulatory setting in Canada. Hand (N Y). 2007;2:173e178.

23. Starr HM, Snoddy M, Hammond KE, Seiler III JG. Flexor tendon repair rehabilitation protocols: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38:1712e1717.

24. Trumble TE, Vedder NB, Seiler III JG, et al. Zone-II flexor tendon repair: a randomized prospective trial of active place-and-hold therapy compared with passive motion therapy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1381e1389.